We replaced a £30 million defender with an £8? Million one and that worked out pretty well tbh.NewClaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:10 pmMy point was more that we give whatever we would otherwise need to pay for a replacement to Tarks as a signing on fee. It does create a nasty precedent of players running down their contracts to get the same, I suppose, but I think most would understand taht Tarks is in an exceptional situation.
If we replace a £40-£50m defender with a £10-£15m one directly, I fear for us next season. We are just hovering over the brink with him in the team, and may of course still go down, so to me whether you're a fan or a bean counter, the option of Tarks staying his final year still feels the best one for all parties.
Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3523 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2125 times
- Has Liked: 1061 times
Re: Tarkowski
You mean Tarky replacing Keane?
Tarkowski cost about £3m if I remember rightly, although his fee may end up being about £8m with sell on clauses.
Tarkowski cost about £3m if I remember rightly, although his fee may end up being about £8m with sell on clauses.
-
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3523 times
- Has Liked: 6423 times
Re: Tarkowski
Yeah that's who I was referring too.
I couldn't remember the initial figure though, so just went with the higher one.
I couldn't remember the initial figure though, so just went with the higher one.
-
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2125 times
- Has Liked: 1061 times
Re: Tarkowski
And what an absolute steal he was.
I’m sure there’s still some unearthed gems out there for not too stupid amounts of money.
I’m sure there’s still some unearthed gems out there for not too stupid amounts of money.