Tarkowski

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3523 times
Has Liked: 6423 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:36 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:10 pm
My point was more that we give whatever we would otherwise need to pay for a replacement to Tarks as a signing on fee. It does create a nasty precedent of players running down their contracts to get the same, I suppose, but I think most would understand taht Tarks is in an exceptional situation.

If we replace a £40-£50m defender with a £10-£15m one directly, I fear for us next season. We are just hovering over the brink with him in the team, and may of course still go down, so to me whether you're a fan or a bean counter, the option of Tarks staying his final year still feels the best one for all parties.
We replaced a £30 million defender with an £8? Million one and that worked out pretty well tbh.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6825
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by BurnleyFC » Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:04 pm

You mean Tarky replacing Keane?

Tarkowski cost about £3m if I remember rightly, although his fee may end up being about £8m with sell on clauses.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3523 times
Has Liked: 6423 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:08 pm

Yeah that's who I was referring too.

I couldn't remember the initial figure though, so just went with the higher one.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6825
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Tarkowski

Post by BurnleyFC » Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:13 pm

And what an absolute steal he was.

I’m sure there’s still some unearthed gems out there for not too stupid amounts of money.

Post Reply