Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:16 pm
Hes soooo crap
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
Weghorst
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=72397
Page 1 of 1
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:18 pm
Missed a pen n all
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:19 pm
He’ll be like a new signing when he comes back…
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:29 pm
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 9:21 pm
Subbed 62 mins
Hes been shocking
Hes been shocking
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:08 pm
I don’t think that he will come back. When his loan spell is up, he will only have a few months left on his contract. I think?!?!?
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:16 pm
Burnley's worst ever pound for pound buy ? ( and we've had some bad ones )
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:19 pm
He's out on a Season long loan, and will have another 12 months under contract with us when it ends.dermotdermot wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:08 pmI don’t think that he will come back. When his loan spell is up, he will only have a few months left on his contract. I think?!?!?
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:20 pm
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:51 pm
Probably another loan next season and then he walks for nothing.randomclaret2 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:19 pmHe's out on a Season long loan, and will have another 12 months under contract with us when it ends.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:41 am
nonentity as a claret. just linked with us unfortunately.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:38 am
No, he signed in the January transfer window. His time here will finish at the end of 2024.randomclaret2 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:19 pmHe's out on a Season long loan, and will have another 12 months under contract with us when it ends.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:49 am
We've possibly made back the majority of our transfer spend on him from loan fees too, so probably not our as bad an investment as originally assessed regarding a "pound for pound" signing, although alot of money for us to spend.
I'd say that honour (not including those who have only just signed this season) would have previously been held by someone like Jelle Vossen, Leon Cort or Lukas Jutkiewicz before Wout Weghorst became the undisputed champion.
I'd say that honour (not including those who have only just signed this season) would have previously been held by someone like Jelle Vossen, Leon Cort or Lukas Jutkiewicz before Wout Weghorst became the undisputed champion.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 11:28 am
Signed him in January 2022 on a 3.5yr contract so take it to 2025dermotdermot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:38 amNo, he signed in the January transfer window. His time here will finish at the end of 2024.
https://www.uptheclarets.com/players/squad-list
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 11:32 am
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:07 pm
Good shout.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:13 pm
Was Vossen not the one that ended up going quite quickly for marginal profit. Seen to remember something about him moving to the rivals of the club we bought him from and people talking about us being a middle man in the deal.Foshiznik wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:49 amWe've possibly made back the majority of our transfer spend on him from loan fees too, so probably not our as bad an investment as originally assessed regarding a "pound for pound" signing, although alot of money for us to spend.
I'd say that honour (not including those who have only just signed this season) would have previously been held by someone like Jelle Vossen, Leon Cort or Lukas Jutkiewicz before Wout Weghorst became the undisputed champion.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:45 pm
0 goal's in his last 22 league games
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:48 pm
Was he a Dyche signing or was he selected by others ?
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:54 pm
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:59 pm
Not sure how much we lost on Gibson, and we will never know.
However, it is reported that he went to Norwich for a decent fee, (Probably around £8 million), and we didn't pay anything like the full fee (reportedly £15 million) to Boro as I recall.
So although no loss is good, I don't think it was as huge a loss as some think.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:00 pm
"He'll probably thrive in a VK system" - quote from me, about 6 months ago. This is why I work with computers and not football clubs.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:24 pm
It would be nice to have him play one last game in a Burnley shirt before he leaves, so the crowd can give him a proper send off (booing every time he touches the ball)
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:29 pm
Yeah, ket's boo our own player.
Why do we get called dingles ?
Why do we get called dingles ?
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:32 pm
Certainly playing like he's been on ket.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:07 pm
He might have been, don't be so harsh on yourself.ClaretOfMancunia wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 1:00 pm"He'll probably thrive in a VK system" - quote from me, about 6 months ago. This is why I work with computers and not football clubs.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 4:58 pm
Leon Cort!.......thank you, i was trying to think of his name.Foshiznik wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:49 amWe've possibly made back the majority of our transfer spend on him from loan fees too, so probably not our as bad an investment as originally assessed regarding a "pound for pound" signing, although alot of money for us to spend.
I'd say that honour (not including those who have only just signed this season) would have previously been held by someone like Jelle Vossen, Leon Cort or Lukas Jutkiewicz before Wout Weghorst became the undisputed champion.
Turned like an aircraft carrier, Brian Laws bought him i think.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:33 pm
Leon Cort is the worst signing we've ever made for me. Needed experience and grit at the back for a relegation battle, wasted 1.5 million on an utter donkey who, if memory serves me correctly had never been booked before
He was absolutely crap and managed to get himself sent off for us when we got hammered at home off reading the next season.
He was absolutely crap and managed to get himself sent off for us when we got hammered at home off reading the next season.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:50 pm
He’d been booked before, just not for us.
Possibly because he never managed to get close enough to anyone.
Possibly because he never managed to get close enough to anyone.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:08 pm
He did well in the Bundesliga which is dog and duck compared to the Premierleague. The standard isn’t even close.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:43 pm
I think he might have done well for us this season....
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:48 pm
Contracts end at the end of June - Weghorst's in June 2024dermotdermot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 10:38 amNo, he signed in the January transfer window. His time here will finish at the end of 2024.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:52 pm
He'd picked up a few bookings and one red card early in his career playing for Southend. What happens I suppose when the manager is not choosing the players although I never thought he was that bad. If you think he was the worst, there was a far worse defender at the club at the same time in David Edgar.Claret86 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:33 pmLeon Cort is the worst signing we've ever made for me. Needed experience and grit at the back for a relegation battle, wasted 1.5 million on an utter donkey who, if memory serves me correctly had never been booked before
He was absolutely crap and managed to get himself sent off for us when we got hammered at home off reading the next season.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:59 pm
From 5 appearances for Hoffenheim, Weghorst has an average Kicker mark of 3.40.
The best mark is 1 and the worst is 6 (as on German school reports)
There are obviously better average marks but his mark is not the worst (there are 8 squad players with worst average marks)
The best mark is 1 and the worst is 6 (as on German school reports)
There are obviously better average marks but his mark is not the worst (there are 8 squad players with worst average marks)
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:25 pm
Wasn’t wasted money. Bizarrely we made a v good profit on selling him.Claret86 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:33 pmLeon Cort is the worst signing we've ever made for me. Needed experience and grit at the back for a relegation battle, wasted 1.5 million on an utter donkey who, if memory serves me correctly had never been booked before
He was absolutely crap and managed to get himself sent off for us when we got hammered at home off reading the next season.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:34 pm
Think you're thinking of Wayne Thomas. Cort left on a free.Holtyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:25 pmWasn’t wasted money. Bizarrely we made a v good profit on selling him.
On Weghorst, funny looking back now at the people who wanted him in the team at Foster's expense.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:43 pm
Yes you’re right, stand corrected.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:34 pmThink you're thinking of Wayne Thomas. Cort left on a free.
On Weghorst, funny looking back now at the people who wanted him in the team at Foster's expense.
I’d love Weghorst in our squad but that ain’t happening.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 6:36 pm
Holtyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 5:43 pmYes you’re right, stand corrected.
I’d love Weghorst in our squad but that ain’t happening.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 7:13 pm
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2023 3:56 pm
I stand corrected with his disciplinary record. I've obviously seen worse players play for burnley but a combination of the money spent on him, the expectation I had (that he's a solid premier league defender) and the situation we were in (relegation battle, need to tighten up at the back) meant he was absolutely crapClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:52 pmHe'd picked up a few bookings and one red card early in his career playing for Southend. What happens I suppose when the manager is not choosing the players although I never thought he was that bad. If you think he was the worst, there was a far worse defender at the club at the same time in David Edgar.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:26 am
Surely the worst signing must be Remco van der Schaaf?
We may not have paid anything for him except his wages but he contributed nothing.
We may not have paid anything for him except his wages but he contributed nothing.
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:50 am
Says 2025 on hereClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:48 pmContracts end at the end of June - Weghorst's in June 2024
https://www.uptheclarets.com/players/squad-list
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 2:12 pm
I never checked the year, I was just replying to someone who suggested his contract would end in a January. He is under contract until the end of the 2024/25 season.wilks_bfc wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:50 amSays 2025 on here
https://www.uptheclarets.com/players/squad-list
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 2:13 pm
He was but Barnes was good in the dressing room to add to that and not a disruptive influenceHoltyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 7:13 pmWasn’t Barnes exceptional for the team despite not scoring many 2nd half of last season?
Re: Weghorst
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 3:13 pm
Barnes physical presence was good in a team with a number of smaller, lightweight players.
He's comparatively slow but offered some protection.
We no longer have that. It was a puzzle to me how Barnes contract wasn't renewed but Rodriguez got another twelve months of what is predominantly bench warming.
He's comparatively slow but offered some protection.
We no longer have that. It was a puzzle to me how Barnes contract wasn't renewed but Rodriguez got another twelve months of what is predominantly bench warming.