I think that's more to do with his agent demanding a 'living wage for London' than backing the Manager

As Nigel Pearson might say, are you an ostrich? Have you got your hand in the sand?Spijed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:49 amOne thing is certain, Palace won't be able to offer SD a stepping stone onto bigger and better things.
With Zaha likely to leave after today, what can their football achieve that we can't? Certainly not much more.
If he moves to Palace he's basically saying he'll never get a better job in football and he's happy to go on the managerial merry-go-round.
“For certain” ? Really ?Spijed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:49 amOne thing is certain, Palace won't be able to offer SD a stepping stone onto bigger and better things.
With Zaha likely to leave after today, what can their football achieve that we can't? Certainly not much more.
If he moves to Palace he's basically saying he'll never get a better job in football and he's happy to go on the managerial merry-go-round.
They've got a billionaire investor, just haven't spent that money so it's either there waiting for the right manager or he just helps keep the club ticking over without dipping that deep into his pockets.
They've been overpaying in wages and fees for players to get them to sign for the unglamorous club that is Palace though.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:02 am“For certain” ? Really ?
He would have chance to rebuild a team that to be honest pre lockdown were every bit as good as us but more importantly are much stronger than Burnley financially. Palace are 100% a step up in terms of the players they can attract and the salaries they are prepared to pay.
They currently have a rebuilding job to undertake - but from a strong financial position and a few of the highly paid players moving on gives any new manager a strong hand in the transfer market.
That move ticks a hell of a lot of boxes for Dyche IMHO
You honestly think a manager wants a rebuilding job? Yes course they do!TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:02 am“For certain” ? Really ?
He would have chance to rebuild a team that to be honest pre lockdown were every bit as good as us but more importantly are much stronger than Burnley financially. Palace are 100% a step up in terms of the players they can attract and the salaries they are prepared to pay.
They currently have a rebuilding job to undertake - but from a strong financial position and a few of the highly paid players moving on gives any new manager a strong hand in the transfer market.
That move ticks a hell of a lot of boxes for Dyche IMHO
Tbf.... I recall you weren't bothering anymore due to Sean's style of Football anyway?Longsidebogs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:35 amThere will be a lot of season tickets cancelled if it is Sean’s last game.
Sean doesn't do Cup Competitions though??Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:13 amWe rightly think Dyche is performing miricles just to keep us in this division season after season. In that period Palace have been placed between 10th-15th and nobody thinks this is anything special and about par for the course for the money they spend and the players they are able to attract
We might be competing with them but for us its as good as it gets whist for them its just ok and that is why Palace is not a sideways move. If Dyche was to exceed expectations at Palace in the same way he has at Burnley then it would mean he has Palace in the top half every season qualifying for Europe regularly, winning a cup and possibly a freak season where he challenges the top four
Perfect for a new manager with faith in his own ability then. It’s only “overpaying” if the signings don’t work out like they haven’t for Palace with Meyer, Benteke etc.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:04 amThey've been overpaying in wages and fees for players to get them to sign for the unglamorous club that is Palace though.
They've had a poor return on a number of those players too.
I fail to see how Palace can maintain that wage bill on their revenue. They can hardly be making more than us in income, and with a much larger expenditure, it's only a matter of time before the shot hits the fan. I don’t know who is bankrolling Palace, but is he prepared to do the spending job required to rejuvenate that squad. Although Zaha will fetch a good fee, it won't be anywhere near what they could have got 2 years ago. Also will he give SD the time it is going to take to create his own team.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:54 amThose thinking Palace would be a “sideways” move for Dyche might want to have a longer look at their wage bill / budgets. It’s not far off 50% higher than ours.
Zaha is on a reported £140k a week and there’s a few others reportedly on more than £100k - Benteke, Meyer and Sakho with Gary Cahill on a reported £90k a week too.
So yes whilst they may well lose Zaha and they do also have an ageing squad with some very highly paid players underperforming massively what that does give any new manager is a significant amount of scope if they can ship some of these out. Get rid of a couple of these and get in £50m or so for Zaha and you have a fair amount to play with in refreshing up the team....especially compared to what we have available.
If Dyche does decide to go there - and personally I think that there is a very big possibility he will - then I don’t think for a minute he would go if he had not discussed and agreed the budgets he wants to rebuild the team.
So he's going to move clubs and work the same magic, but pay more for the next Tarks, Pope, Barnes etc?TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:24 amPerfect for a new manager with faith in his own ability then. It’s only “overpaying” if the signings don’t work out like they haven’t for Palace with Meyer, Benteke etc.
Any new manager will not be going there with an expectation to improve Palace with the existing team. Bring in new players and ship out ones you don’t want but within their existing £120m wage bill and we have a very different opportunity.
Wouldn’t be the same people this time if it was necessary. John B was joint chairman back then and Lee Hoos played a major part in the appointment.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:32 amIf he goes - he goes. It's the board that recognised him as the right man for the job. There's no reason why they can't do the same again.
There is the possibility that it's the board that we should be wanting to keep hold of the most.
Hmm, I still think it's a case of he wants to go, just let him go. I wouldn't want a manager here who didn't want to be here, so it wouldn't be worth being upset over.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:37 amWouldn’t be the same people this time if it was necessary. John B was joint chairman back then and Lee Hoos played a major part in the appointment.
Owned by a billionaire.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:29 amI fail to see how Palace can maintain that wage bill on their revenue. They can hardly be making more than us in income, and with a much larger expenditure, it's only a matter of time before the shot hits the fan. I don’t know who is bankrolling Palace, but is he prepared to do the spending job required to rejuvenate that squad. Although Zaha will fetch a good fee, it won't be anywhere near what they could have got 2 years ago. Also will he give SD the time it is going to take to create his own team.
I wish SD nothing but good luck, hopefully with us, but if with another so be it. I feel sorry if he feels he doesn't get the budget he wants, but I'm on the boards side. I'm sure Garlick and the board bend over backwards to give Sean as much as they can, if that isn't enough then there is a bigger picture to take into consideration.
Stan left the club in a healthy position for Cotterill, league wise.
Cotterill got the players in on the cheap for Coyle to get the best out of.
Eddie brought in the attacking players the club needed.
Sean got them organised on and off the pitch.
Whoever he passes it on to, whenever it happens, will be walking into a fantastic club, in a fantastic position, so long as the new manager understands the realities of BFC.
Yes - that’s pretty much it.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:36 amSo he's going to move clubs and work the same magic, but pay more for the next Tarks, Pope, Barnes etc?
Whilst also trying to get rid of someone like Benteke, or find a system that suits his style because he's only scored 23 goals in 115 appearances whilst at Palace...not bad for a reputed £120k a week although that ends next summer I've read.
How often have you seen it in football generally that what managers get promised and what they are given differ somewhat?TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:45 amOwned by a billionaire.
I agree on Zaha fee - hence guessing £50m as didn’t they want £70m plus last summer ?
I don’t think Dyche would leave Burnley for Palace without certain assurances over budgets, transfer spend etc. Their team needs rebuilding - it’s ageing like ours and then there’s the likes of Benteke and Sakho who you would just want rid of given their wages and their lack of games, goals etc.
Any manager going there thinking they can just improve the existing team and get more out of them would be in could cuckoo land (or just going there for the money). I don’t think Dyche is like that - just like when he arrived at Burnley he would have a plan of what he wants to do and what he thinks the club needs. He’s not going to leave Burnley and move to a club with no ambition or not prepared to back a new manager.
Our best chance of Dyche not going to Palace is if they decide they don’t want to bank roll the club anymore or are looking to sell (which was a rumour last year I think). If that’s the case the best thing for Palace is to keep Hodgson and see if he can avoid relegation.
Sheff United have found a good number of players in the mould of Tarkowski & Pope, so there are still many lower league bargains to be had.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:53 amYes - that’s pretty much it.
And on top of that earn more money himself and be a lot closer to his family.
And let’s not forget his recent quote of saying the days of buying the likes of Tarks, Pope etc for a couple of million are long gone. So the possibility of moving to a club who have regularly shown they are prepared to pay more than £100k a week to players would be an attractive proposition to any new manager....and in particular to Dyche who is effectively saying that he cannot perform these kind of miracles any longer in the current market (which is different to saying he cannot perform the other miracles we know he can !!)
Yep that happens I agree - but would not stop him going if he believed that was what he was going to get. Plus how many times have you seen new managers get huge transfer budgets to try and rebuild the team ?Spijed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:54 amHow often have you seen it in football generally that what managers get promised and what they are given differ somewhat?
Add into the mix, the uncertainty of Brexit and the on-going situation of Covid 19 then Palace, like every other club may have to cut their cloth accordingly.
There is about 40mins difference in drive time from Northampton, which is where I think Dyche lives, to Palace and Burnley, so not much to shout about and there's the M25.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:53 amYes - that’s pretty much it.
And on top of that earn more money himself and be a lot closer to his family.
And let’s not forget his recent quote of saying the days of buying the likes of Tarks, Pope etc for a couple of million are long gone. So the possibility of moving to a club who have regularly shown they are prepared to pay more than £100k a week to players would be an attractive proposition to any new manager....and in particular to Dyche who is effectively saying that he cannot perform these kind of miracles any longer in the current market (which is different to saying he cannot perform the other miracles we know he can !!)
If Sean wants to give the Palace job a whirl so be it, i'll wish him all the best, apart from when they play us obviously, but if he's going just go ASAP, and let us move on with a new appointment, whoever that might be, hopefully the board have their eyes on the ball and we have a genuine shortlist of replacements lined up.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:39 amHmm, I still think it's a case of he wants to go, just let him go. I wouldn't want a manager here who didn't want to be here, so it wouldn't be worth being upset over.
Our 'pulling power' would surely be much higher than what it was when we appointed SD, with more managers with Premier League experience interested.
They do - but they have been in the Premier League for one season...and yes they did brilliantly.
There is a direct train between Bedford (less than 15 miles from where he lives) and Croydon too - he can afford to have a car at either endGodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 12:00 pmThere is about 40mins difference in drive time from Northampton, which is where I think Dyche lives, to Palace and Burnley, so not much to shout about and there's the M25.
Especially when a number of them are bang averagejackmiggins wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 12:17 pmCould very well be, following these past few months, that SD and his family want to continue with a ‘more normal’ family balance. Could also be that there are frustrations with the board. However, it’s important to note that managing high earning players is a whole different ball game.
Not sure there would be a huge risk. If he moves on he'll be signing a longer contract for a larger sum of money.EarbyClaret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 12:18 pmIf there's any truth in this I would say massive risk for SD in the current climate/uncertainty
Since the restart we look every bit a PL club (on the pitch) - Palace look like relegation material without a major overhaul - will there be time to do that - they don't seem to be a club over-blessed with Dyche-type players
Is there actually any more to this than speculation following Palace's poor recent form?
I can't remember when I posted that as this thread is 3 years old. Do you not think it's fair to say that the situation may have changed in that time? If Dyche has a poor relationship with his employers then he may see this as a good opportunity. I doubt it is the dream move that Dyche may be looking for in the long term, but if he takes a job at an established PL side who offer him more money and a longer contract then he's not taking a big risk. He may find himself out of a job but I don't think he would be for long.
I know, my point is that if he signs a 4 year contract on the same salary as he's currently on then he will be paid for the duration of that contract. So in that sense it wouldn't particularly be a risk. Changing any job comes with some risk.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 12:25 pmHe may not get much difference in length of contract.
It's also rare that a manager sees out the duration of that contract.
Scored on the 7th July this yearHibsclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:40 amWe have 3 great strikers earning almost what they are paying Benteke who hasn’t scored for about 5 years....
This is essentially the problem we have. Lots of dead money at that club that can be easily replaced by someone who knows what they are doing. If he can get Burnley to finish above Arsenal with top earners up to 50k what can he achieve with top earners over 100k.
The size of the clubs are similar actually but it’s the size of investment into and by the clubs that are different.