This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
bf2k
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 337 times
- Has Liked: 1519 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by bf2k » Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:44 pm
MDWat wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:53 pm
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 3
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 3
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Jesus. When I can't view a game there are a few people's scores I look to get a reflection on how the game went. I'm glad I kept the 15 quid in my bank

-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 77628
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37987 times
- Has Liked: 5768 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:29 pm
Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:32 pm
I think 5L or talksport covered it if you are opposed to the PPV or don’t stream.
Because I couldn't see it, and I certainly wasn't going to listen to the club commentary, I just switched off altogether although did keep up with the score.
-
Im_not_Robbie_Blake
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 409 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
- Location: Skipton
Post
by Im_not_Robbie_Blake » Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:30 pm
Pope 6
Lowton 6
Long 6
Tarkowski 6
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 6
Stephens 4
McNeil 6
Wood 6
Barnes 5
Rodriguez 6
Brady 6
-
Hbclaret007
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:42 pm
- Been Liked: 195 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Post
by Hbclaret007 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:01 pm
Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:41 pm
No ratings from me, I watched the game but cant be bothered giving any scores. This post is just to let you know I wont be posting any ratings like any of you give a sh*t
I'll miss them!
-
ashtonlongsider
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 512 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Post
by ashtonlongsider » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:01 pm
Unable to give a marking as I didn’t watch, as I refuse to PPV on principal. I think the sooner we get this opening period out of our systems the better.
-
RalphCoatesComb
- Posts: 8264
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2483 times
- Has Liked: 2223 times
Post
by RalphCoatesComb » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:09 pm
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 6
Brownhill 6
Westwood 4
Stephens 4
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 5
-
Top Claret
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Post
by Top Claret » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:12 pm
Sproggy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:35 pm
Pope 5
Lowton 5
Long 5
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 6
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 3
Wood 4
Barnes 3
Rodriguez 4
Miserable. Barnes and Wood isn't working. Brownhill wide doesn't work. Jay on the left and Dwight on the right doesn't work. Tarkowski on the left of 2 doesn't work.?
Do you work?
-
Cirrus_Minor
- Posts: 4903
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 1485 times
Post
by Cirrus_Minor » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:17 pm
I did not see it but instead listened to BBC 5 Live commentary. So no marks from me...
Thankfully
-
Belial
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Post
by Belial » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:22 pm
Pope 5 poor on 1st and kicking
Lowton 4 lazy
Long 6
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 5
Brownhill 5
Westwood 5
Stephens 3 atrocious
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4 trying to do nothing but win fouls all game is tedious
Rodriguez 5
-
DycheAlmighty
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 11 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Post
by DycheAlmighty » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:10 pm
Pope 5 Kicking all over the place
Lowton 4 Can distribute the ball but that's it
Long 5
Tarkowski 5
Taylor 4
Brownhill 6 Tried
Westwood 5 Minus one for 3rd but tried
Stephens N/A Cant rate that. Very slow, got pushed higher up??? Looked a bit fitter than before but surely a direct swap out, JBG for Brady was better
McNeil 4 Huge fan, but needs a game off
Wood 4 If he's not scoring goals, would consider dropping
Barnes 5 Had our two best moments, doesn't say much however
Rodriguez 5 Would have been better in the hole, just got shoved out wide
Brady 4 Didn't even try to effect it. I would like to see him start over McNeil next, give him something to work with
We learnt nothing from our two games with Chelsea from last season. Mount ran things in front of the back four again and we had to get taught a footballing lesson to implement changes. I'd be tempted to go with Vydra, Jay Rod and Brady for the next game for Wood, Barnes and McNeil, at the very least to take a shot at different options and more of a passing style of play.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
MACCA
- Posts: 15627
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
- Been Liked: 4376 times
Post
by MACCA » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:19 pm
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:07 pm
MACCA - despite the fact that we clearly haven't played very well, although everyone on TV is waxing lyrical about Chelsea, I don't feel lucky but I've made the decision not to watch PPV games but donate to the foodbank so I'll be missing quite a few more.
I know, I was jesting.
Hopefully the 1 good thing to come out of the PPV situation is that a lot of foodbanks from the premier league towns and cities are getting a big boost.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
bfcjg
- Posts: 14834
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
- Been Liked: 5696 times
- Has Liked: 8365 times
Post
by bfcjg » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:22 pm
The takeover groups must be lowering their offers after that abject performance, cannot be bothered marking individual players 4 for them all, Stephens 3.
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 77628
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37987 times
- Has Liked: 5768 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:26 pm
MACCA wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:19 pm
I know, I was jesting.
Hopefully the 1 good thing to come out of the PPV situation is that a lot of foodbanks from the premier league towns and cities are getting a big boost.
Absolutely. The one big positive.
-
Steve-Harpers-perm
- Posts: 6519
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2112 times
- Has Liked: 986 times
Post
by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:33 pm
Pope 5 - not sure what he was doing for first goal.
Lowton 5 gets in good positions going forward but his crossing gets progressively worse each season.
Taylor 6 good few last ditch tackles but as above
Tarkowski 6 did ok
Long 6 as above but need Mee back.
Westwood 5 continually picked the wrong option missing Cork.
Stephens 4 woeful again
Brownhill 5 ineffective pointless when pushed out wide
Barnes 4 should be 4th choice now don’t understand why we are starting with him.
Wood 4 offered nothing today.
McNeil 4 poor yet again.
-
JohnMcGreal
- Posts: 2494
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1473 times
- Has Liked: 469 times
Post
by JohnMcGreal » Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:52 am
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Long 3
Tarkowski 4
Taylor 4
Brownhill 4
Westwood 3
Stephens 3
McNeil 4
Wood 4
Barnes 4
Rodriguez 4
Horrible performance. We could still be playing now and we still wouldn't have mustered a shot on target. We look completely bereft of creativity, quality, confidence.
That said, Chelsea were very good. Two massive games against Brighton and Palace now. We have to find a win in at least one of those.
-
BOYSIE31
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
- Been Liked: 265 times
- Has Liked: 1115 times
Post
by BOYSIE31 » Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:47 pm
Will have to post mine again as obviously been deleted
Pope 4
Lowton 4
Taylor 5
Long 6
Tarks 6
Westwood 3
Brownhill 3
Mc Neil 3
Stephens 3
Barnes 3
Wood 3
Jay 3
Awful no fight nothing - a Chelsea fan messaged me to say have we gone soft as they expect a battle and a hard game.
Hopeless
-
Papabendi
- Posts: 1894
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:29 pm
- Been Liked: 438 times
- Has Liked: 71 times
Post
by Papabendi » Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:18 pm
Not going to rate either. Turgid performance with few positives. McNeill needs a rest. Polite way of saying he needs dropping.
-
FCBurnley
- Posts: 11598
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2283 times
- Has Liked: 1377 times
Post
by FCBurnley » Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:50 pm
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:26 pm
Absolutely. The one big positive.
Have you considered PPV and making a donation ? Or is it that you are just opposed to PPV
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 77628
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37987 times
- Has Liked: 5768 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:52 pm
FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:50 pm
Have you considered PPV and making a donation ? Or is it that you are just opposed to PPV
Have you considered reading my comments on this and what I’ve done in the last week?
-
FCBurnley
- Posts: 11598
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2283 times
- Has Liked: 1377 times
Post
by FCBurnley » Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:08 pm
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:52 pm
Have you considered reading my comments on this and what I’ve done in the last week?
I have read all your comments on this post
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 77628
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37987 times
- Has Liked: 5768 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:21 pm
Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:47 pm
actually, I gave them both 2 for effort, remind me next week to ask you first what numbers I'm allowed to give
No - you look at the top of the thread, that explains how you rate. And you don't abuse other posters either, that's why you were given a warning.
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 34816
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12695 times
- Has Liked: 6314 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Post
by Vegas Claret » Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:26 pm
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 3:21 pm
No - you look at the top of the thread, that explains how you rate. And you don't abuse other posters either, that's why you were given a warning.
say what Tony ?