This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Leisure
- Posts: 21685
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
- Been Liked: 4566 times
- Has Liked: 15065 times
Post
by Leisure » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:57 pm
clansman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:00 pm
My Kashashy checked me out on linked in on Sunday.!
Fame at last Nick!

-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Post
by NewClaret » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:59 pm
Sadly, can’t see Trippier re-signing while he’s top of La Liga, playing in one of the best stadia in the world.
Would love to see him back though.
-
gandhisflipflop
- Posts: 6501
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2706 times
- Has Liked: 1592 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Post
by gandhisflipflop » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:59 pm
Will this thread reach 100 pages before the takeover is completed? Are we going for a sweepstake on what page the thread will be at when it's confirmed? I'm going for 105.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Post
by NewClaret » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:00 pm
clansman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:00 pm
My Kashashy checked me out on linked in on Sunday.!
Is that because you’ve been stalking him for three months?

This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:04 pm
gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:59 pm
Will this thread reach 100 pages before the takeover is completed? Are we going for a sweepstake on what page the thread will be at when it's confirmed? I'm going for 105.
I might go for page 78. Then I’d lock the thread and reopen when the deal goes through.

These 7 users liked this post: randomclaret2 Zlatan NewClaret gandhisflipflop Burnleyareback2 bfcmik mybloodisclaret
-
Jakubs Tash
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Post
by Jakubs Tash » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:16 pm
BenWickes dropping a few suggestive grenades then going missing....
Seems to happen with a few people on this thread.
-
Nonayforever
- Posts: 3669
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 788 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Post
by Nonayforever » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:24 pm
BenWickes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:13 pm
I think everyone will be pleased come the end of January and beyond with events. The wheels have been in motion for a long time and you'll see some interesting and pleasing developments come mid January. Some of which will put a big smile on Clarets faces. Possibly even surprise a lot of you.
I think what Ben means is that Alan Pace had used his football formula and unbelievably found that Vydra is a better option than Barnes when trying to keep the ball on the deck.
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Post
by NewClaret » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:24 pm
Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:16 pm
BenWickes dropping a few suggestive grenades then going missing....
Seems to happen with a few people on this thread.
I’ve never trusted him since he said there’d be a signing on transfer deadline day...

-
Paul Waine
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2411 times
- Has Liked: 3315 times
Post
by Paul Waine » Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:18 pm
Referencing back to the Telegraph report - it says that ALK are in the running to buy Mike Garlick's and John B's shares. Is that the first time that we've seen those details rather than "buy the club" or similar? Earlier this month (or was it last month?) there was debate about divisions amongst the directors and suggestions that some directors were backing "the other offer (I think if recalled that accurately, happy to be corrected if I've got this wrong). Is it possible that discussions with ALK over the past few weeks have been evolving the proposed deal such that the latest version of the deal is ALK buying MG's and JB's shares, while all the other directors/shareholders retain their existing shares? If the existence of divisions were accurate how will it be resolved if ALK are 75%+ shareholders alongside others who didn't want them there?
UTC
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:33 pm
Paul Waine wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:18 pm
Referencing back to the Telegraph report - it says that ALK are in the running to buy Mike Garlick's and John B's shares. Is that the first time that we've seen those details rather than "buy the club" or similar? Earlier this month (or was it last month?) there was debate about divisions amongst the directors and suggestions that some directors were backing "the other offer (I think if recalled that accurately, happy to be corrected if I've got this wrong). Is it possible that discussions with ALK over the past few weeks have been evolving the proposed deal such that the latest version of the deal is ALK buying MG's and JB's shares, while all the other directors/shareholders retain their existing shares? If the existence of divisions were accurate how will it be resolved if ALK are 75%+ shareholders alongside others who didn't want them there?
UTC
I think you are over thinking things. I don’t believe anything has changed.
This user liked this post: KateR
-
Paul Waine
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2411 times
- Has Liked: 3315 times
Post
by Paul Waine » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:11 pm
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:33 pm
I think you are over thinking things. I don’t believe anything has changed.
OK. So, buying all the shares or just MG's and JB's shares?
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:20 pm
Paul Waine wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:11 pm
OK. So, buying all the shares or just MG's and JB's shares?
I’ve no idea but I would assume they would buy from the two major shareholders.
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 34427
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Post
by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:31 pm
when I read the name Alan Pa..........my brain goes to Pardew and I have a mild panic attack !
-
Paul Waine
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2411 times
- Has Liked: 3315 times
Post
by Paul Waine » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:37 pm
Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:31 pm
when I read the name Alan Pa..........my brain goes to Pardew and I have a mild panic attack !
Pardew's got a new technical director job somewhere - in today's news.
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:39 pm
Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:31 pm
when I read the name Alan Pa..........my brain goes to Pardew and I have a mild panic attack !
Joined CSKA Sofia
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 34427
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Post
by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:40 pm
yeah I saw that, thank god !
-
dsr
- Posts: 16197
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 4855 times
- Has Liked: 2580 times
Post
by dsr » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:45 pm
Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:31 pm
when I read the name Alan Pa..........my brain goes to Pardew and I have a mild panic attack !
He'd be better than Alan Pa ...... rtridge.
Oh, I don't know, though.

-
bfcwest
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 pm
- Been Liked: 72 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Post
by bfcwest » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:25 am
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:20 pm
I’ve no idea but I would assume they would buy from the two major shareholders.
I’d expect the ‘drag and tag’ rules to be in play which means minority shareholders have to do what the majority shareholder agree, i.e. all shares will be sold. That doesn’t prevent a new type of share being established in the new business that some of the old shareholders get a few of as part of the agreed deal.
-
Hipper
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Post
by Hipper » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:32 am
gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:59 pm
Will this thread reach 100 pages before the takeover is completed? Are we going for a sweepstake on what page the thread will be at when it's confirmed? I'm going for 105.
It could be likened to Proust's 'In Search of Lost Time'. I tried to read this once. The book is six volumes.
At one point, a whole chapter is spent on describing the anticipation of meeting a girl, all the possible happenings and outcomes. What the reader then wants is a description of what happened. We don't get it. In effect we get just 'I met the girl'!
-
claretonthecoast1882
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Post
by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:34 am
BenWickes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:13 pm
Think the northern powerhouse ideal was over egged. Yes. ALK have an interest in contributing to the local and wider economy but not some mind blowing, seismic shift as DJW was suggesting. Although I get the point he was trying to make.
I think everyone will be pleased come the end of January and beyond with events. The wheels have been in motion for a long time and you'll see some interesting and pleasing developments come mid January. Some of which will put a big smile on Clarets faces. Possibly even surprise a lot of you.
Over egged is being polite

More a case of someone putting 2 + 2 together and getting 7854236614214
Bluffed his way through some replies but then got very defensive and narked when challenged and exposed
-
arise_sir_charge
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Post
by arise_sir_charge » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:44 am
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:34 am
Over egged is being polite

More a case of someone putting 2 + 2 together and getting 7854236614214
Bluffed his way through some replies but then got very defensive and narked when challenged and exposed
How do you know that Northern Powerhouse isn't a factor?
-
MRG
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:13 am
- Been Liked: 361 times
- Has Liked: 154 times
Post
by MRG » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:11 am
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:34 am
Over egged is being polite

More a case of someone putting 2 + 2 together and getting 7854236614214
Bluffed his way through some replies but then got very defensive and narked when challenged and exposed
Absolutely rubbish. He 100% had more info on what was happening than anybody else on here and people didn’t like that.
I feel he knew more about the American deal than the Egyptian deal. People were very unfair to him
-
Burnley1989
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2662 times
- Has Liked: 2357 times
Post
by Burnley1989 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:14 am
MRG wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:11 am
Absolutely rubbish. He 100% had more info on what was happening than anybody else on here and people didn’t like that.
I feel he knew more about the American deal than the Egyptian deal. People were very unfair to him
Everybody comes on here or transfer threads for rumours then jumps on just about anybody that puts anything forward like argumentative teenagers, hence why you get folk trolling

This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo
-
claretonthecoast1882
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Post
by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:15 am
MRG wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:11 am
Absolutely rubbish. He 100% had more info on what was happening than anybody else on here and people didn’t like that.
I feel he knew more about the American deal than the Egyptian deal. People were very unfair to him
Not believing every word he said is hardly being unfair on him
-
gandhisflipflop
- Posts: 6501
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2706 times
- Has Liked: 1592 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Post
by gandhisflipflop » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:20 am
DJW'S posts were very interesting i thought. What did become frustrating is the lack of direct information and a lot of posts were left to the imagination but to be fair to him it wasn't just him that was doing it and it did appear that he did know about the deal a long time before it broke. I do think people were unfair to him however i do understand the frustrations of posters.
-
arise_sir_charge
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Post
by arise_sir_charge » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:21 am
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:15 am
Not believing every word he said is hardly being unfair on him
No but calling him a bluffer and saying he is wrong, with no evidence at all to support that being the case is.
-
BurnleyPaul
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Post
by BurnleyPaul » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:34 am
gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:20 am
DJW'S posts were very interesting i thought. What did become frustrating is the lack of direct information and a lot of posts were left to the imagination but to be fair to him it wasn't just him that was doing it and it did appear that he did know about the deal a long time before it broke. I do think people were unfair to him however i do understand the frustrations of posters.
I’d imagine that the lack of direct information was as a result of not wanting to be so specific that he made his source identifiable and thereby get them in major trouble...and also lose his access to little snippets in future.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo
-
Goobs
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by Goobs » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:38 am
Have we any proof that anything he said was true. Did he actually reveal anything that wasn't already known or being rumoured?
Honestly can't remember.
-
TsarBomba
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
- Been Liked: 1452 times
- Has Liked: 412 times
Post
by TsarBomba » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:39 am
gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:20 am
DJW'S posts were very interesting i thought. What did become frustrating is the lack of direct information and a lot of posts were left to the imagination but to be fair to him it wasn't just him that was doing it and it did appear that he did know about the deal a long time before it broke. I do think people were unfair to him however i do understand the frustrations of posters.
DJW obviously had a bit of inside information, but it did get a bit silly towards the end.
He liked the attention and he ended up a little out of his depth, but I think the best intention was there.
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop
-
gandhisflipflop
- Posts: 6501
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2706 times
- Has Liked: 1592 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Post
by gandhisflipflop » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:51 am
BurnleyPaul wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:34 am
I’d imagine that the lack of direct information was as a result of not wanting to be so specific that he made his source identifiable and thereby get them in major trouble...and also lose his access to little snippets in future.
I completely understand that which is why i thought the critism was a bit unfair. I do understand how some posts could leave posters very confused and frustrated though but i suspect any criticism was an aggressive attempt to prize more info out of him ut could be wrong.
-
gandhisflipflop
- Posts: 6501
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2706 times
- Has Liked: 1592 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Post
by gandhisflipflop » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:53 am
Goobs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:38 am
Have we any proof that anything he said was true. Did he actually reveal anything that wasn't already known or being rumoured?
Honestly can't remember.
He did mention an Egyptian bid before that came out in the press. When it was ALK that was revealed he may have been accused of getting his info wrong. Stated there was two bids also.
-
Quickenthetempo
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Post
by Quickenthetempo » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:55 am
Goobs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:38 am
Have we any proof that anything he said was true. Did he actually reveal anything that wasn't already known or being rumoured?
Honestly can't remember.
He was certainly the first to break the news it was happening and was denied by a lot of posters on here, who thought they would know if anything was.
Then the thread got deleted.
-
superdimitri
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Post
by superdimitri » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:30 pm
BenWickes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:13 pm
The wheels have been in motion for a long time and you'll see some interesting and pleasing developments come mid January. Some of which will put a big smile on Clarets faces. Possibly even surprise a lot of you.
This sounds like a horoscope!
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat longsidepies Leisure Duffer_
-
KRBFC
- Posts: 19078
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 3973 times
- Has Liked: 1078 times
Post
by KRBFC » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:34 pm
claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:34 am
Over egged is being polite

More a case of someone putting 2 + 2 together and getting 7854236614214
Bluffed his way through some replies but then got very defensive and narked when challenged and exposed
Is this all you contribute to this forum? Needlessly point scoring and attempting to mock other posters? you offer nothing of substance, negative moaning old man angry at the world.
-
Jakubs Tash
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Post
by Jakubs Tash » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:36 pm
I wonder if the pleasing and interesting development might be return of a very popular figure to front the new regime as Chairman.....
-
claretonthecoast1882
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Post
by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:37 pm
KRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:34 pm
Is this all you contribute to this forum? Needlessly point scoring and attempting to mock other posters? you offer nothing of substance, negative moaning old man angry at the world.

-
jedi_master
- Posts: 8240
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4125 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Post
by jedi_master » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:39 pm
Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:36 pm
I wonder if the pleasing and interesting development might be return of a very popular figure to front the new regime as Chairman.....
John Deary?
-
JohnDearyMe
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 722 times
- Has Liked: 2352 times
Post
by JohnDearyMe » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:42 pm
These 2 users liked this post: jedi_master Steve-Harpers-perm
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:43 pm
Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:36 pm
I wonder if the pleasing and interesting development might be return of a very popular figure to front the new regime as Chairman.....
He's busy managing a club in India.
These 3 users liked this post: randomclaret2 jtv mkmel
-
superdimitri
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Post
by superdimitri » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:45 pm
KRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:34 pm
Is this all you contribute to this forum? Needlessly point scoring and attempting to mock other posters? you offer nothing of substance, negative moaning old man angry at the world.
Idd. Some people seem very bitter for some reason.
-
Targetman
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
- Been Liked: 554 times
- Has Liked: 58 times
Post
by Targetman » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:49 pm
TsarBomba wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:39 am
DJW obviously had a bit of inside information, but it did get a bit silly towards the end.
He liked the attention and he ended up a little out of his depth, but I think the best intention was there.
He certainly did like the attention it brought him on the takeover thread and was never forthcoming when people wanted "a bit more meat on the bone".
He liked to tease and regularly answered questions with other questions.
When pressed he said he wouldn't comment on here again but couldn't resist and was soon back with a few more teasers which he was questioned about. Again he said he wouldn't post on the takeover again.
Did he expect to post "confidential information" on this message board without getting a grilling?
His transfer info proved to be less than accurate which didn't do his case any good at all.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
-
BleedingClaret
- Posts: 3882
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1137 times
- Has Liked: 1867 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Post
by BleedingClaret » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:21 pm
At least the transfer window has a deadline day
-
Quickenthetempo
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Post
by Quickenthetempo » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:12 pm
Targetman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:49 pm
He certainly did like the attention it brought him on the takeover thread and was never forthcoming when people wanted "a bit more meat on the bone".
He liked to tease and regularly answered questions with other questions.
When pressed he said he wouldn't comment on here again but couldn't resist and was soon back with a few more teasers which he was questioned about. Again he said he wouldn't post on the takeover again.
Did he expect to post "confidential information" on this message board without getting a grilling?
His transfer info proved to be less than accurate which didn't do his case any good at all.
The thing with transfer info is it can change. The thing you post at that particular time could well be correct.
For instance, the year before Jay Rod signed for us. He was signing then. Every one I bumped into had a reason why or different source that he was coming. He became a member of Townely golf club. People who were sponsors of the club had been told from club insiders. Put he didn't come in the end.
If you break news early before it's sealed then there's a good chance it could go wrong.
If you don't like this it's probably best to wait for club announcements.
-
Goobs
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by Goobs » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:37 pm
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:12 pm
The thing with transfer info is it can change. The thing you post at that particular time could well be correct.
For instance, the year before Jay Rod signed for us. He was signing then. Every one I bumped into had a reason why or different source that he was coming. He became a member of Townely golf club. People who were sponsors of the club had been told from club insiders. Put he didn't come in the end.
If you break news early before it's sealed then there's a good chance it could go wrong.
If you don't like this it's probably best to wait for club announcements.
Or maybe people shouldn't quote things as facts or done deals when they aren't and then they wouldn't be called out for stating something as a fact when it isn't / wasn't?
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:50 pm
Goobs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:37 pm
Or maybe people shouldn't quote things as facts or done deals when they aren't and then they wouldn't be called out for stating something as a fact when it isn't / wasn't?
Exactly
-
Woodleyclaret
- Posts: 8508
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1844 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Post
by Woodleyclaret » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:54 pm
As long as we clear this in time for our January spending spree for Sean
-
MRG
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:13 am
- Been Liked: 361 times
- Has Liked: 154 times
Post
by MRG » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:09 pm
Come on Tony, who was the player where it was rumoured they had signed, you said you had been waiting for the news to break, then it turned out to be rubbish
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:18 pm
MRG wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:09 pm
Come on Tony, who was the player where it was rumoured they had signed, you said you had been waiting for the news to break, then it turned out to be rubbish
I can't remember exactly what it was but there was something I knew, or thought I knew, and had been expecting it to be announced. I don't know whether it was a signing or a new contract or what it was but it wasn't rubbish, it did actually happen and when it did I just posted that I had been expecting the news to break. That's all it was. It's years ago now but occasionally I see some pathetic, childish comment on it.
In terms of this situation, I could have posted some things months and months ago but without anything to back up my claims I chose not to.
-
fidelcastro
- Posts: 9266
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2748 times
- Has Liked: 2740 times
Post
by fidelcastro » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:29 pm
Dwight gone!

-
Steddyman
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
- Been Liked: 792 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Post
by Steddyman » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:32 pm
Seriously, are we back on this again. Grow up.
These 2 users liked this post: Turfytop mill hill claret