

There would be even more concern about a state owning us, I’m sure!!
Those notes aren’t at 10%, and were issued in October.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:01 pmsomething to consider about that MSD Holdings loan to ALK vehicles Calder Vale Holdings and Kettering Capital - I stress that this may/may not be connected
https://twitter.com/redfern_i_j/status/ ... 0769436675
You’d imagine, given the 48 hour timeline they set!
Probably overmorrow.
No, not just you joey !
Hallelujah, at last. Yankee doodle dandy. UTC.icu81b4 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 10:50 pmJust announced on the ALK website
https://alkcapital.com/news-media/
UTC
a strange oversight - but then again a strange way of breaking the news - not using the club website/twitter account
Just to add.......exciting times. UTC.
suggests that most directors have sold portions of their shareholdings if not all their shareholding
They’ve just realised deals at Burnley can only be announced on a Thursday and we’re not quite there yetclaptrappers_union wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:16 pmMaybe it was published prematurely by accident. Looks like it’s done though
Am I the only one who can't see anything about it on the website? The only press release is about AI Scouticu81b4 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 10:50 pmJust announced on the ALK website
https://alkcapital.com/news-media/
UTC
Which begs the question why would you sell something that you are being told is going to appreciate in value when you don't need to.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:11 pmsuggests that most directors have sold portions of their shareholdings if not all their shareholding
Because most of them are knocking on and fancy being able to spend it before the next chance to sell!Nonayforever wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:21 pmWhich begs the question why would you sell something that you are being told is going to appreciate in value when you don't need to.
Suspect there will be a holding company structure which borrows the money and then invests this into the operating company (the football club) as equity. So the debt will sit in the holdco and the opco will essentially appear to be debt free. So you will need to follow the paper trail in the ownership structure to fully understand the financing.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:19 pmGreat news.
I’m looking forward to seeing what AiScout and PlayerLENS can do for us - it isn’t Moneyball, but seems to be what Pace sees as the future, and I would expect player purchase and development, and then profit from future player sales to be a key part of the strategy. I’m sceptical that we do what wealthier clubs cannot, but we will see.
I’m worried about the balance sheet post purchase but will keep an open mind. The directors will come out of this very nicely so where does the “debit” sit for their “credit”? Or more pertinently, regardless of where it sits in an accounting sense, if our income stays the same and the directors are paid off, will we see funds for any improvement?
Mike Garlick staying on is good news as long as Sean can work with him around.
Decent media release. “Start of a journey” is a bit condescending given the journey we have had in the last decade, but they are trying to win over the fans, no harm in that.
A real shame for ALK that no fans are allowed on to see this journey begin.
Which is why I was suggesting probably all current directors have sold some/all their sharesClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:25 pmThat was always going to happen. I think you will find he’s retaining some of his shares to enable him to do so.
He doesn’t need to own shares to enable him to be a director but it is sensible for him to retain some for all parties as it makes sure their interests are aligned as shareholdersClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:25 pmThat was always going to happen. I think you will find he’s retaining some of his shares to enable him to do so.
Back in the old Teasdale days the articles of association insisted that you had a minimum of 100 shares to be a director. I don't think that's been removed, in fact I think it's been increased by a significant number.
Hi dp, neat example. A little correction: if you are owed money by someone they are your debtor - and if you owe someone money then they are your creditor. It can be confusing, because we are all used to being "in credit" or having a "debit against us." It's all because the language has developed from the banker's or lender's point of view. Your bank statement shows you being "in credit" when the bank is holding your money - and owes your money to you.dpinsussex wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:14 pmProfit is a paper figure accounting for things like depreciation which are non cash based.
You will see the profits in the accounts but not necessarily in the bank account.
Example
You buy something for 1m and sell it for 2m you make a 1m profit
However you agreed to buy the player in 2 installments of 500k. You only make the 1st payment before you sell. The person buying the thing will only pay you in 4 installments of 500k you receive the first payment which settles the debt to the original seller.
You therefore have no additional cash in the bank.
The balance sheet will show a creditor of 1.5m
The second payment comes in so you have 500k in the bank
The creditors decrease by that amount but cash in the bank increases by same amount.
Interesting, didn’t know that. It’s unusual for companies to have that requirement. But it makes sense for directors to hold shares for the reason I outlined above.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:37 pmBack in the old Teasdale days the articles of association insisted that you had a minimum of 100 shares to be a director. I don't think that's been removed, in fact I think it's been increased by a significant number.