Jack Wiltshire (again)
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Jack Wiltshire (again)
At present our midfield is lacking in any creativity which is isolating our forwards . Wiltshire is without a club , training with Arsenal and desperate to get back to playing . He's only 29 and with his injury history couldn't we try and get him on a pay as you play contact ? His presence (imo) , would work well in a 3-5-2 formation or a 4-2-3-1 system .
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:44 am
- Been Liked: 136 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
We're going down without a fight so why not give him a chance
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
- Been Liked: 265 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
How about Jack Wilshere lads, how do you think he’d fare?
These 2 users liked this post: Vegas Claret ClaretTony
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I think Wiltshire is a bit to big ... perhaps Fred Rutland would be better
This user liked this post: Bigvince
-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I'm not against it seen as we're happy to spaff money on the likes of Lennon anyway.expoultryboy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 11:03 amAt present our midfield is lacking in any creativity which is isolating our forwards . Wiltshire is without a club , training with Arsenal and desperate to get back to playing . He's only 29 and with his injury history couldn't we try and get him on a pay as you play contact ? His presence (imo) , would work well in a 3-5-2 formation or a 4-2-3-1 system .
That said, there must be some reason that Wilshere is either not entertaining offers from elsewhere or just not getting offers. Seems strange that he prefers the dole queue to drawing a wage in MLS, league 1 / 2.
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Wilshere is better than anything we currently have at the club
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I’m not sure if he is. He’s got good vision, or he had but with his lack of pace I really don’t think he’s any better than what we have. We need someone in the mould of Barkley. I think our lack of pace and mobility generally is currently our downfall.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:30 pmWilshere is better than anything we currently have at the club
These 2 users liked this post: JimmyRobbo bf2k
-
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 2038 times
- Has Liked: 2068 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Why not? Desperate times call for desperate measures: he is better than what we have.
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I’d also be concerned about his injury situation and whether he could do 90 minutes on a regular basis. I’d rather look for some younger legs with an engine.Vino blanco wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:49 pmWhy not? Desperate times call for desperate measures: he is better than what we have.
-
- Posts: 3501
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 684 times
- Has Liked: 1256 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
NO.
Under no circumstances.
Our recruitment this summer shows the way forward. We need something in midfield but he is absolutely NOT the answer. We need an influx of youth and energy. We look tired and sluggish. His body, whether you rate his football or not, cannot deal with what is required.
Arsenal are in a desperate state. They are seeing him on a daily basis and are still not interested. They're plum average and still don't want him. There's your answer.
Under no circumstances.
Our recruitment this summer shows the way forward. We need something in midfield but he is absolutely NOT the answer. We need an influx of youth and energy. We look tired and sluggish. His body, whether you rate his football or not, cannot deal with what is required.
Arsenal are in a desperate state. They are seeing him on a daily basis and are still not interested. They're plum average and still don't want him. There's your answer.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Are you seriously comparing our midfield to arsenals?JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:16 pmNO.
Under no circumstances.
Our recruitment this summer shows the way forward. We need something in midfield but he is absolutely NOT the answer. We need an influx of youth and energy. We look tired and sluggish. His body, whether you rate his football or not, cannot deal with what is required.
Arsenal are in a desperate state. They are seeing him on a daily basis and are still not interested. They're plum average and still don't want him. There's your answer.
Our midfield is bottom end championship standard. The point is we can’t get anyone else until January. Wilshere could sign today and play at the weekend.
In that case he is a definite improvement so even if it’s just a 9 month contract we should take him on
This user liked this post: Vino blanco
-
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6027 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Put you down as a "maybe"?JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:16 pmNO.
Under no circumstances.
Our recruitment this summer shows the way forward. We need something in midfield but he is absolutely NOT the answer. We need an influx of youth and energy. We look tired and sluggish. His body, whether you rate his football or not, cannot deal with what is required.
Arsenal are in a desperate state. They are seeing him on a daily basis and are still not interested. They're plum average and still don't want him. There's your answer.
This user liked this post: Damo
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I wish we were as desperate as Arsenal !!
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Beddie : that's why i put pay as you play contact .
-
- Posts: 14918
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He'd probably be injured before the weekend, and that's not even a joke.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:19 pmAre you seriously comparing our midfield to arsenals?
Our midfield is bottom end championship standard. The point is we can’t get anyone else until January. Wilshere could sign today and play at the weekend.
In that case he is a definite improvement so even if it’s just a 9 month contract we should take him on
-
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Pity we did not move for Will Hughes before he went to Palace. Big improvement on Cork, still got the legs and loads of experience. He wasnt expensive either
-
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2585 times
- Has Liked: 4176 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
There is probably a valid reason he is currently without a Club.
At any level for those who maybe hadn't realised.
At any level for those who maybe hadn't realised.
-
- Posts: 14918
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
I'd forgotten he went to Palace.warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:40 pmPity we did not move for Will Hughes before he went to Palace. Big improvement on Cork, still got the legs and loads of experience. He wasnt expensive either
Yet to make an appearance for them, I'd be tempted to try and loan him in January
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 459 times
- Has Liked: 191 times
- Location: Manchester
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He was on Talksport the other day saying that he was wedded to Arsenal until January. does that mean he has some sort of contract there?Darthlaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:20 pmI'm not against it seen as we're happy to spaff money on the likes of Lennon anyway.
That said, there must be some reason that Wilshere is either not entertaining offers from elsewhere or just not getting offers. Seems strange that he prefers the dole queue to drawing a wage in MLS, league 1 / 2.
If so he is probably getting paid more than he can get elsewhere for now
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Wilshire is just a slower, more injury prone Jack Cork
This user liked this post: Steve1956
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Apologies expoultryboy I’d missed that from your post.
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Cruel....but quite funny!SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:51 pmWilshire is just a slower, more injury prone Jack Cork
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He hasn’t had an injury since January 2020.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:34 pmHe'd probably be injured before the weekend, and that's not even a joke.
-
- Posts: 14918
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He hasn't played much since then either, 1000 mins in total.
He only played 35 mins for West Ham in 2020 and left them in the summer of 2020
The rest at Bournemouth after joining them in Jan 21, predominantly as a sub.
-
- Posts: 77803
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38067 times
- Has Liked: 5778 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Jack Wilshire (again)
If he is such a good bet for us as a Premier League club, can anyone explain why he doesn't have a club?
As for pay as you play - does anyone think players are on such contracts?
As for pay as you play - does anyone think players are on such contracts?
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo
-
- Posts: 9558
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2823 times
- Has Liked: 2813 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Jack wheelchair?
No, ta.
No, ta.
-
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1213 times
- Has Liked: 3777 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Was!Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:30 pmWilshere is better than anything we currently have at the club
-
- Posts: 34913
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12715 times
- Has Liked: 6322 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
he would walk into our midfield. We need someone who can pass and create, surely worth getting him in to train with us with a view to signing. Nothing lost in having a look at him, better than at least 2 of our midfield options
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wilshire (again)
Only premier league clubs and top championship teams can afford him.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:40 pmIf he is such a good bet for us as a Premier League club, can anyone explain why he doesn't have a club?
As for pay as you play - does anyone think players are on such contracts?
None of them need a CM as desperately as we do
-
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 212 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Wilshere made nine starts for Bournemouth in the Championship last season and finished only one game.
Bournemouth did not want to sign him again and they had a look at him all last season, they seem to be doing quite well this year without Wilshere.
Bournemouth did not want to sign him again and they had a look at him all last season, they seem to be doing quite well this year without Wilshere.
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Bournemouth have better CMs than we doClaretLoup wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 6:20 pmWilshere made nine starts for Bournemouth in the Championship last season and finished only one game.
Bournemouth did not want to sign him again and they had a look at him all last season, they seem to be doing quite well this year without Wilshere.
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He’s doing his badge, that’ll take him to January 2022. Then he can play again without trying to balance the two.Down_Rover wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:50 pmHe was on Talksport the other day saying that he was wedded to Arsenal until January. does that mean he has some sort of contract there?
If so he is probably getting paid more than he can get elsewhere for now
Re: Jack Wilshire (again)
Players are on a minimal base wage, that’s heavily weighted with playing time, contributions (coaching and playing), and the usual playing incentives.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:40 pmIf he is such a good bet for us as a Premier League club, can anyone explain why he doesn't have a club?
As for pay as you play - does anyone think players are on such contracts?
I think he would be a great player to have in and around the squad, both for knowledge and morale. I don’t think he’d start games. He’s not able to work as Dyche would want a midfield two to do. BUT, I’d have him for the last fifteen minutes in every game. He’s a magician that needs premier league players to work with.
-
- Posts: 3646
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
- Been Liked: 1236 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: The Moon, Outer Space.
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Jack Wilshire, undoubtedly was a talented youngster. Injuries have sadly have taken their toll. Not been at any level of performance for years, would probably burn his hand carrying Westys brew. If he wants to carry on playing football at any level, he needs to get Ravel Morrison’s agent.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Forget JW-if we signed him he would not be considered by SD until he was "acclimatised" for at least 3 months
Instead we should be working 24 hours a day to target a CM and a striker for the January window. We then need to look at the top clubs like Man Utd, Man City and Liverpool to see what CM and striker we could loan as well. With players like Sancho unable to get a start, there will be a whole regiment of very promising youngsters desperate to play in the PL.You only have to look at James and Gallagher of Chelsea, and how brilliant they played on loan. Tomori and Mount art Derby were outstanding. Also Harvey Elliott of Liverpool was on loan at Blackburn-surely anything they can do we should be able to better.Get two on loan, and buy two so you have some competition , then ease out some of the deadwood thats drawing a wage from the club. They will soon get the message about renewing contracts
Instead we should be working 24 hours a day to target a CM and a striker for the January window. We then need to look at the top clubs like Man Utd, Man City and Liverpool to see what CM and striker we could loan as well. With players like Sancho unable to get a start, there will be a whole regiment of very promising youngsters desperate to play in the PL.You only have to look at James and Gallagher of Chelsea, and how brilliant they played on loan. Tomori and Mount art Derby were outstanding. Also Harvey Elliott of Liverpool was on loan at Blackburn-surely anything they can do we should be able to better.Get two on loan, and buy two so you have some competition , then ease out some of the deadwood thats drawing a wage from the club. They will soon get the message about renewing contracts
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Anything approaching a jog and he’s injured, a no from me
-
- Posts: 14918
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Yeah they look great now they're a league below us
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Come on DJ even you can’t be saying our lot are better than Billing, Lerma, Pearson and Lewis Cook. All of them midfielders walk into our starting eleven.
-
- Posts: 14918
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Dunno, they're a league below for a reason and no one seems to have rushed to buy them from what I saw.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 7:21 pmCome on DJ even you can’t be saying our lot are better than Billing, Lerma, Pearson and Lewis Cook. All of them midfielders walk into our starting eleven.
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 185 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Is he is old, slow & injury prone ?
If so, he's a perfect signing for Dyche.
If so, he's a perfect signing for Dyche.
-
- Posts: 9558
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2823 times
- Has Liked: 2813 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
What a stupid stupid question followed by a stupid statement.Nonayforever wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:48 pmIs he is old, slow & injury prone ?
If so, he's a perfect signing for Dyche.
Are Collins, Cornet and Roberts old, slow and injury prone?
Deary me

-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
He would probably argue Crouch, Stephens and Lennon are though. (Although Lennon is not slow, he’s just crap)
Balance and all that
Balance and all that

-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
- Been Liked: 510 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Philip Billing mentioned above feels like the one that got away. We were strongly linked when Huddersfield got relegated but according to some reports he didn't pass the 'fit and proper' test
Shame if true from a purely footballing perspective appears to tick all of our required boxes
Shame if true from a purely footballing perspective appears to tick all of our required boxes
-
- Posts: 4622
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2566 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
What are you basing that on? Wilshere’s performances 5 years ago?Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:30 pmWilshere is better than anything we currently have at the club
I’d say Wilshere is exactly the kind of has-been we should avoid signing given the issues that we already have.
Don’t take my word for it though. The opinions that really matter are the managers who have chosen not to sign him since Championship Bournemouth decided he wasn’t worth another contract.
Let’s not forgot he was also completely ignored in the summer of 2020 too.
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Be careful, I got a telling off for being sarcastic the other day.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Basing it on his performances at Bournemouth. I started a thread on Wilshere last year after watching him play really well for them.agreenwood wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 10:15 pmWhat are you basing that on? Wilshere’s performances 5 years ago?
I’d say Wilshere is exactly the kind of has-been we should avoid signing given the issues that we already have.
Don’t take my word for it though. The opinions that really matter are the managers who have chosen not to sign him since Championship Bournemouth decided he wasn’t worth another contract.
Let’s not forgot he was also completely ignored in the summer of 2020 too.
Bournemouth have fantastic CMs they don’t need any other ones
-
- Posts: 4622
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2566 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
Let’s not pretend Wilshere’s wage demands are likely to be a hurdle for anyone either. He’s been getting £0 a week for much of the last two seasons of his career.
If anyone who has scouted/analyses his performances really believed he was worth a contract in the top two tiers of English football, he’d have a club by now.
If anyone who has scouted/analyses his performances really believed he was worth a contract in the top two tiers of English football, he’d have a club by now.
-
- Posts: 4622
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2566 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
So he played really well for them and they released him? And then loads of football clubs with scouts and analysts coming out of their ears ignored these high level performances and allowed him to sit on the scrap heap for another 6 months?Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 28, 2021 10:20 pmBasing it on his performances at Bournemouth. I started a thread on Wilshere last year after watching him play really well for them.
Bournemouth have fantastic CMs they don’t need any other ones
Aye.
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo
-
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 212 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Jack Wiltshire (again)
What about all the other Championship clubs that haven't signed him?