Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Milltown1882
Posts: 3537
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1258 times
Has Liked: 908 times

Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Milltown1882 » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:28 pm

Not sure if this will have any chance at all but Southampton are pushing to have all signings that are made this month to be made unavailable for the rearranged games from last month.

Totally unfair on us as it wasn’t our fault but definitely useful against teams that manipulated it.

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Zlatan » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:31 pm

I agree with them and I would go as far as to say that any players who were actually injured (not just the topical sniffle) at the time of the original game should also be ineligible but that wont wash either
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho bf2k

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Billy Balfour » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:32 pm

I do so hope this comes to fruition, then I can lol at Newcastle Arabia.

nyclaret
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:57 am
Been Liked: 351 times
Has Liked: 165 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by nyclaret » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:34 pm

It will never happen.

Mattster
Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 498 times
Has Liked: 187 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Mattster » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:34 pm

Should be the case. And also include anyone they declared injured in order to get the game called off. Only players ruled out by covid should be eligible. The PL will know who was "injured" and who was a covid case so would be easy to implement.
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho bf2k Vegas Claret

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by SalisburyClaret » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:49 pm

We should be right behind this and making as much noise as possible
These 5 users liked this post: randomclaret2 bobinho frankinwales longsidepies bfcjg

WazzaClaret
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:38 pm
Been Liked: 146 times
Has Liked: 94 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by WazzaClaret » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:52 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:31 pm
I agree with them and I would go as far as to say that any players who were actually injured (not just the topical sniffle) at the time of the original game should also be ineligible but that wont wash either
That'd be great but what happens if they have an injured player that was available for the game originally but can't play on the rescheduled date. It's not going to happen.

Petersa
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:33 am
Been Liked: 221 times
Has Liked: 152 times
Location: South Africa

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Petersa » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:56 pm

Can't happen..if a club has sold a player will he then be called back to play for his old club?

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4944
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1226 times
Has Liked: 1903 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by tarkys_ears » Fri Jan 07, 2022 1:05 pm

This needs to be the case.

Should have been decided the first day they started cancelling games


..but it wont

yorkyclaret
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 246 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by yorkyclaret » Fri Jan 07, 2022 1:10 pm

It really should happen, but not a chance, it would mean being fair to all the clubs, not just the favored ones.

Gordaleman
Posts: 4029
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Gordaleman » Fri Jan 07, 2022 1:55 pm

To me, this just means that Southampton aren't buying anyone.

Paddy1882
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Paddy1882 » Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:31 pm

Don’t think it’s an unreasonable request at all to be honest, a bit like being cup tied for a cup competition, if you weren’t available for the original fixture you should not be available for selection…. However knowing the premier league who have failed to investigate suspicious goings on in terms of games being called off in the first place, there’s no chance they’ll get this passed.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34735
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12664 times
Has Liked: 6308 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:34 pm

Ralph Hasenhüttl and Saints keep going up in my estimation
These 2 users liked this post: elwaclaret tiger76

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by bfcjg » Fri Jan 07, 2022 5:43 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:34 pm
Ralph Hasenhüttl and Saints keep going up in my estimation
Let's hope it is the opposite though in the league 😁
This user liked this post: elwaclaret

boatshed bill
Posts: 17329
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3557 times
Has Liked: 7808 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 07, 2022 5:54 pm

Far too sensible for the PL panto.
These 4 users liked this post: Norman elwaclaret bfcjg tiger76

karatekid
Posts: 3625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1223 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by karatekid » Fri Jan 07, 2022 6:10 pm

Be just our luck that this will happen........after we sign 5 top players in this window :lol:

JohnMac
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2580 times
Has Liked: 4167 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by JohnMac » Fri Jan 07, 2022 6:43 pm

He is quite right to be upset as Newcastle could have 5 or more new players available for their rearranged fixtures. These postponements for limp reasons have completely distorted everything. The Premier League should have either cancelled all fixtures or insisted on Clubs fielding a side.
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho tiger76

chekhov
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 878 times
Has Liked: 1676 times
Location: France

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by chekhov » Fri Jan 07, 2022 7:28 pm

I'm going to hold out on voicing my opinion until it's confirmed that we won't be making any signings.

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by bfcjg » Fri Jan 07, 2022 7:58 pm

Hypothetically do you think if the Premier league gets more shambolic this season could be declared null and void by a majority vote ? Unlikely but the teams near the bottom including Newcastle could vote for it as next season they will want European football, those near the top could vote for it as apart from City they would feel given a more normal season they could be champions,in the champions league or in Europe, a cosy group in the middle would want to play on. Who knows it might be good practice for when they want a closed shop anyway.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by tiger76 » Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:32 pm

bfcjg wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 7:58 pm
Hypothetically do you think if the Premier league gets more shambolic this season could be declared null and void by a majority vote ? Unlikely but the teams near the bottom including Newcastle could vote for it as next season they will want European football, those near the top could vote for it as apart from City they would feel given a more normal season they could be champions,in the champions league or in Europe, a cosy group in the middle would want to play on. Who knows it might be good practice for when they want a closed shop anyway.
Could that scenario actually even come to pass?, what precisely would the grounds be for nulling and voiding the season?

I can certainly see the attraction for several PL clubs, Burnley included to get the season scrubbed, but as it wasn't annulled in the initial phase of the pandemic I honestly can't see it happening this time.

It would be hilarious to see just to witness the melt down for our near neighbours as their dreams of a PL return are thwarted, but for the integrity of the game if at all possible the season should be played to a conclusion.

And although we might be one of the ones to benefit, the thought of a closed shop PL would be the death knell for the game as far as I'm concerned.

OK It's not ideal being in the bottom 3, but at least we have something to play for, whereas in a league with no relegation we and many others would simply be playing to complete our fixture list, as there's no realistic prospect of us challenging for Europe, never mind winning the title.
This user liked this post: bfcjg

boatshed bill
Posts: 17329
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3557 times
Has Liked: 7808 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 pm

The problem with this is obvious, in that it would set a precedent:
What if a load of December games in a future season were called off due to snow?
What if we weren't allowed to plat Spurs with new players for instance?

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by bfcjg » Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:47 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 pm
The problem with this is obvious, in that it would set a precedent:
What if a load of December games in a future season were called off due to snow?
What if we weren't allowed to plat Spurs with new players for instance?
It would only serve precedent if there was another pandemic which most scientists reckon come around every 100 years.
We'd benefit but it is unprecedented times.

Foulthrow
Posts: 2324
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 713 times
Has Liked: 1535 times

Re: Southampton pushing for Jan signings to be unavailable for rearranged games

Post by Foulthrow » Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:28 am

bfcjg wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 7:58 pm
Hypothetically do you think if the Premier league gets more shambolic this season could be declared null and void by a majority vote ? Unlikely but the teams near the bottom including Newcastle could vote for it as next season they will want European football, those near the top could vote for it as apart from City they would feel given a more normal season they could be champions,in the champions league or in Europe, a cosy group in the middle would want to play on. Who knows it might be good practice for when they want a closed shop anyway.
If the season was null and void everyone would have to pay back all the tv money. Can’t see many clubs being able to afford that.

Post Reply