January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
West Brom released Snodgrass before the window closed.
We should be all over that
We should be all over that
-
- Posts: 5456
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 3668 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
"Have the new paper clips arrived yet Enid"?
This user liked this post: longsidepies
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Do you honestly believe we will finish above Newcastle or Leeds, Brentford and Everton, because that's what we need to do to stay up, not a chance we are going to win four or five more games than those teams by the end of the season.
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Whilst it's a big challenge from here, I can't understand why anyone would conclude that we have no chance of survival with 20 games to go. I also can't understand why we'd need to win four or five more games than all those you refer to.
-
- Posts: 5639
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1292 times
- Has Liked: 691 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
We move on 3 points on Saturday please .
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Wonder if Pace is going to hide away or come out an address his failures this window.
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:19 pm
- Been Liked: 124 times
- Has Liked: 173 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
My analogy is to a formula one car coming in for a tyre change half way through a race . (old and not performing as good as the other cars on the track) We have changed one tyre for a different brand and left the other 3 on the car.
-
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:41 am
- Been Liked: 465 times
- Has Liked: 234 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
However, we still have Pope, Tarkowski, Mee and McNeil. All of whom were reported as being wanted by other clubs
-
- Posts: 10577
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Fair enough if the tyre you changed was because the old one was punctured….
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Why don't you meet him at the ground......ohNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:07 amWonder if Pace is going to hide away or come out an address his failures this window.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:34 pm
- Been Liked: 59 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
This. Although I’ve already seen the obligatory it’s done support the lads posts along with the stay away from the Turf if you dare to have an opposing (apparently negative) view. You’ll be waiting a long time for any realism from them.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
3.4 million views for the Weghorst video now
More than fairly impressive
(Course, I'd prefer more signing videos with actual signings, but it is what it is, and there is no reason we can't survive from here as long as we play like we can)
More than fairly impressive
(Course, I'd prefer more signing videos with actual signings, but it is what it is, and there is no reason we can't survive from here as long as we play like we can)
This user liked this post: Anonymous
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I’m there Saturday Lancaster so maybe I will. Pace will most likely be hiding in case we lose though
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 23 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Wout apart -
Didn’t strengthen the team for this team for this season.
Didn’t sign any players in anticipation of next season.
Didn’t manage to get any loan signings in.
I guess Pace over estimated his and our own appeal & pull.
Remained (overly) confident we could get the higher profile targets in.
And was unwilling to set deadlines on deals which would have then given us a fighting chance of moving to and executing Plan B, C, D etc
With so many players out of contract in the summer we are going to have to wise up and take a very different approach.
Didn’t strengthen the team for this team for this season.
Didn’t sign any players in anticipation of next season.
Didn’t manage to get any loan signings in.
I guess Pace over estimated his and our own appeal & pull.
Remained (overly) confident we could get the higher profile targets in.
And was unwilling to set deadlines on deals which would have then given us a fighting chance of moving to and executing Plan B, C, D etc
With so many players out of contract in the summer we are going to have to wise up and take a very different approach.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
If we'd signed nobody at all, then you and other ones with clearly zero idea of financial reality would have been back to manufacturing bizarre scenarios in which Pace both simultaneously lost all his money and walked away with loads of money
But we lost a striker, and replaced him with another one (on paper, a better one) for less money
Am I happy about it?
Not at all, but I understand enough about the realities of premier league football and finances to know how hard it is to get players and I'd rather we failed to get Ramsey and Orica than continue our policy of buying more Stephens and Lennons (who are no more than ok at this level anymore)
I think we've probably got enough to survive, but we are going to struggle, and that is because we've not been our usual solid selves
I'm hopeful now the window has closed that we can back to that and I'm looking forward to Saturday
Up to you like, but I suggest you do the same
This user liked this post: longsidepies
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I think surviving from here basically depends on the fitness of Cornet and whether Weghorst hits the ground running, which I feel he will. If Maxwel stays fit for all our remaining games we’ve got a good chance.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:32 am3.4 million views for the Weghorst video now
More than fairly impressive
(Course, I'd prefer more signing videos with actual signings, but it is what it is, and there is no reason we can't survive from here as long as we play like we can)
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Good, we need every fan we can get supporting us, and I'm sure Pace will front up at some stageNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:37 amI’m there Saturday Lancaster so maybe I will. Pace will most likely be hiding in case we lose though
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I think we are realisticBLH_Claret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:32 amThis. Although I’ve already seen the obligatory it’s done support the lads posts along with the stay away from the Turf if you dare to have an opposing (apparently negative) view. You’ll be waiting a long time for any realism from them.
I don't think you and Mov are, certainly not about the reality of the premier league and billionaires v millionaires
-
- Posts: 6501
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2706 times
- Has Liked: 1592 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
3.4 million views of the video.
Will be pleasing to Pace to have this world coverage. Hope the necessary permissions were obtained from Universal prior to using the footage. Can be a difficult Company to deal with in this area.
Will be pleasing to Pace to have this world coverage. Hope the necessary permissions were obtained from Universal prior to using the footage. Can be a difficult Company to deal with in this area.
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 722 times
- Has Liked: 2352 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I agree with you here but given Cornet has already had two spells of being sidelined to injury I'm not expecting him to last out the season without picking up another strain (especially given our fixture congestion). Hope I'm wrong though
-
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1925 times
- Has Liked: 1021 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Everton were forced to make the Deli Ali deal permanent because their loan quota is full after adding Manchester United's Donny van de Beek to the recent signing of Anwar El Ghazi from Aston Villa
…how close are we to fulfilling our loan-quota!
…how close are we to fulfilling our loan-quota!

Last edited by claretblue on Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I’m as disappointed as everyone but I’m pretty sure Pace and Co will have been working all hours to try and bring more players in. Let’s see if we can do something in the loan window, I’m sure he’ll be looking at trying to help SD as much as he can. We all know the problem has been building for a few seasons, unfortunately Pace inherited the problems and regrettably doesn’t have a magic wand. For now let’s get behind the players we have, they need our support.
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2230 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
I hope they do the right thing on Saturday and put up a counter on the big screens to show the views.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:32 am3.4 million views for the Weghorst video now
More than fairly impressive
(Course, I'd prefer more signing videos with actual signings, but it is what it is, and there is no reason we can't survive from here as long as we play like we can)
I’d certainly get on early to see it.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret
-
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1925 times
- Has Liked: 1021 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Did we sign anyone ?
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Got immense respect for you Lancaster and we've agreed down the years more often than not, but we diverge a bit here.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:40 amIf we'd signed nobody at all, then you and other ones with clearly zero idea of financial reality would have been back to manufacturing bizarre scenarios in which Pace both simultaneously lost all his money and walked away with loads of money
But we lost a striker, and replaced him with another one (on paper, a better one) for less money
Am I happy about it?
Not at all, but I understand enough about the realities of premier league football and finances to know how hard it is to get players and I'd rather we failed to get Ramsey and Orica than continue our policy of buying more Stephens and Lennons (who are no more than ok at this level anymore)
I think we've probably got enough to survive, but we are going to struggle, and that is because we've not been our usual solid selves
I'm hopeful now the window has closed that we can back to that and I'm looking forward to Saturday
Up to you like, but I suggest you do the same
At it's simplest, if you buy a Premier League football club on a financial model that threatens its sustainability in the event of relegation and no swift return, then the least you can do is ensure the recruitment to give your gamble a chance of working.
We've had 3 windows of ALK now, and they've delivered 4 players of any note across those, and essentially those have been funded by the sales of Gibson and Wood. We ended the summer with a squad that was at least one quality player short (a midfielder, or a winger to allow McNeil to move inside) on the promise that we'd be able to fix it in the winter window. Well, that window has been and gone, and we haven't. We haven't even brought in any "ones for the future" who might be a replacement for McNeil, or Westwood, or Cork or Mee or Pope in 6, 12 or 18 months time.
It may not be entirely due to ALK's lack of capital. It may be that Dyche remains too fixated on a particular type of player, and isn't willing to look at players who he doesn't feel will deliver in the immediacy. But even if that's true, it's ultimately for ALK to set a direction and for the manager to deliver it. It may be true that they were terribly unlucky with Orsic - but that was one signing, the bare minimum beyond replacing Wood that was required, and they essentially got burned for aiming for the bare minimum at the last minute. At some point, the "hard luck" stories have to be met with a dose of reality.
This team is not good enough to get 40 points, and I disagree with your assessment that it has enough to survive. It lacks technical ability and pace, and you can probably get away without one, but not both. it has corroded over the last 3-4 years and will go down barring an astonishing underperformance from Newcastle or a capitulation of grand proportions by someone like Brentford (who managed to be creative in the market themselves).
The last regime ultimately allowed investment to stagnate for 2-3 years, and the new owners knew that when they came in. But they haven't diffused the ticking time bomb yet - they've just allowed it to tick louder. And given their repeated failures to explain their business model properly, I think we've now reached the point where questions need to be asked quite loudly. Where exactly are we headed, and what is the strategy?
These 11 users liked this post: BLH_Claret Jakubclaret Enola Gay RVclaret BurnleyFC jedi_master Lancasterclaret yosserhughes JohnDearyMe Boss Hogg Dark Cloud
-
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:52 am
- Been Liked: 190 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
- Location: Todmorden
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Can we play 3.4 million views in midfield?
This user liked this post: jrgbfc
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
What really p1sses me off more then anything is the optimism gained after the Arsenal draw when Burnley defensively were back to our best and the consensus was get some pace in, get a creative midfielder we had weeks to do it, we were either naïve or the owners think we are naïve and would fall for the owe we tried our best bullshit.
No plan B on the field, no plan B off it.
No plan B on the field, no plan B off it.
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Another excellent post spice.claretspice wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:04 amGot immense respect for you Lancaster and we've agreed down the years more often than not, but we diverge a bit here.
At it's simplest, if you buy a Premier League football club on a financial model that threatens its sustainability in the event of relegation and no swift return, then the least you can do is ensure the recruitment to give your gamble a chance of working.
We've had 3 windows of ALK now, and they've delivered 4 players of any note across those, and essentially those have been funded by the sales of Gibson and Wood. We ended the summer with a squad that was at least one quality player short (a midfielder, or a winger to allow McNeil to move inside) on the promise that we'd be able to fix it in the winter window. Well, that window has been and gone, and we haven't. We haven't even brought in any "ones for the future" who might be a replacement for McNeil, or Westwood, or Cork or Mee or Pope in 6, 12 or 18 months time.
It may not be entirely due to ALK's lack of capital. It may be that Dyche remains too fixated on a particular type of player, and isn't willing to look at players who he doesn't feel will deliver in the immediacy. But even if that's true, it's ultimately for ALK to set a direction and for the manager to deliver it. It may be true that they were terribly unlucky with Orsic - but that was one signing, the bare minimum beyond replacing Wood that was required, and they essentially got burned for aiming for the bare minimum at the last minute. At some point, the "hard luck" stories have to be met with a dose of reality.
This team is not good enough to get 40 points, and I disagree with your assessment that it has enough to survive. It lacks technical ability and pace, and you can probably get away without one, but not both. it has corroded over the last 3-4 years and will go down barring an astonishing underperformance from Newcastle or a capitulation of grand proportions by someone like Brentford (who managed to be creative in the market themselves).
The last regime ultimately allowed investment to stagnate for 2-3 years, and the new owners knew that when they came in. But they haven't diffused the ticking time bomb yet - they've just allowed it to tick louder. And given their repeated failures to explain their business model properly, I think we've now reached the point where questions need to be asked quite loudly. Where exactly are we headed, and what is the strategy?
-
- Posts: 9811
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3226 times
- Has Liked: 10705 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:37 amI’m there Saturday Lancaster so maybe I will. Pace will most likely be hiding in case we lose though
I hope you do go on Saturday and any others who share your views.
I can't see why Pace would hide, win or lose. I think he'll probably be as disappointed and as frustrated as we are that most of our targets took the better options offered to them, more prospects, more money.
Anyway, enjoy it - if you go - and support the lads.
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:54 amI hope they do the right thing on Saturday and put up a counter on the big screens to show the views.
I’d certainly get on early to see it.

Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Athletic article this morning suggesting a player changed his mind late on last night (from not wanting to come to wanting to come) but it was too late in the day to complete a deal/medical.
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
ALK No Capital would me more apt.
-
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Won’t quote it all because that is a long one, but that’s a fair and well articulated post in and amongst the overreactions.
I agree that both the former and current ownership have neglected the squad. Four signings in three windows for ALK is just not enough, given how things were left. I think Alan has done a decent job so far but he needs to look very inwardly on that front. What part Dyche has to play in that I’ve no idea, but as you say the strategic direction needs setting.
Like you, my main frustration about yesterday was the lack of forward planning. Had we gone for Vaughan, Knight, Neil, etc types after losing out on Orsic, even loaning them back, I’d have felt better about the situation.
I do disagree on the sustainability piece though. Garlick said several times that he’d sought the right custodians for the club and we know they get shares back in the event of relegation, etc. For now, I’m trusting that whatever deal MG/JB did, they would not have allowed a situation where we are in deep trouble in the event of relegation.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret
-
- Posts: 8240
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4125 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
As long as a deal sheet is in the medical etc can happen afterwards can't it (Alli, for example)?
-
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Absolutely disgusting window, again.
Sometimes being a Burnley fan feels like an abusive relationship, they keep promising they won't do it again, but they do, over and over...
Sometimes being a Burnley fan feels like an abusive relationship, they keep promising they won't do it again, but they do, over and over...
-
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Find that an odd one - think the actual paperwork required to beat the deadline is quite lightweight.
If true, presumably Barkley. Not sure I want a player who only decides he wants to be here after all other options have dissipated at the 11th hour though.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
No, you are quite right to take the p**s, we'd all prefer more actual signingsBordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:54 amI hope they do the right thing on Saturday and put up a counter on the big screens to show the views.
I’d certainly get on early to see it.
But I just think its a brilliant and funny video and I'm pleased its getting the attention it deserves
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Share all those concerns Spiceclaretspice wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:04 amGot immense respect for you Lancaster and we've agreed down the years more often than not, but we diverge a bit here.
At it's simplest, if you buy a Premier League football club on a financial model that threatens its sustainability in the event of relegation and no swift return, then the least you can do is ensure the recruitment to give your gamble a chance of working.
We've had 3 windows of ALK now, and they've delivered 4 players of any note across those, and essentially those have been funded by the sales of Gibson and Wood. We ended the summer with a squad that was at least one quality player short (a midfielder, or a winger to allow McNeil to move inside) on the promise that we'd be able to fix it in the winter window. Well, that window has been and gone, and we haven't. We haven't even brought in any "ones for the future" who might be a replacement for McNeil, or Westwood, or Cork or Mee or Pope in 6, 12 or 18 months time.
It may not be entirely due to ALK's lack of capital. It may be that Dyche remains too fixated on a particular type of player, and isn't willing to look at players who he doesn't feel will deliver in the immediacy. But even if that's true, it's ultimately for ALK to set a direction and for the manager to deliver it. It may be true that they were terribly unlucky with Orsic - but that was one signing, the bare minimum beyond replacing Wood that was required, and they essentially got burned for aiming for the bare minimum at the last minute. At some point, the "hard luck" stories have to be met with a dose of reality.
This team is not good enough to get 40 points, and I disagree with your assessment that it has enough to survive. It lacks technical ability and pace, and you can probably get away without one, but not both. it has corroded over the last 3-4 years and will go down barring an astonishing underperformance from Newcastle or a capitulation of grand proportions by someone like Brentford (who managed to be creative in the market themselves).
The last regime ultimately allowed investment to stagnate for 2-3 years, and the new owners knew that when they came in. But they haven't diffused the ticking time bomb yet - they've just allowed it to tick louder. And given their repeated failures to explain their business model properly, I think we've now reached the point where questions need to be asked quite loudly. Where exactly are we headed, and what is the strategy?
But I think the first 11 isn't a bad side, and if we play like we can, we can get enough
But I'm also realistic enough to know that it might not be enough
And I'm also realistic enough to know that without premier league money, a club like ours can't compete for very long, even at the level below
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
This, but I'd be a lot happier if we were shown how the club would be funded in the event of relegationNewClaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:40 amWon’t quote it all because that is a long one, but that’s a fair and well articulated post in and amongst the overreactions.
I agree that both the former and current ownership have neglected the squad. Four signings in three windows for ALK is just not enough, given how things were left. I think Alan has done a decent job so far but he needs to look very inwardly on that front. What part Dyche has to play in that I’ve no idea, but as you say the strategic direction needs setting.
Like you, my main frustration about yesterday was the lack of forward planning. Had we gone for Vaughan, Knight, Neil, etc types after losing out on Orsic, even loaning them back, I’d have felt better about the situation.
I do disagree on the sustainability piece though. Garlick said several times that he’d sought the right custodians for the club and we know they get shares back in the event of relegation, etc. For now, I’m trusting that whatever deal MG/JB did, they would not have allowed a situation where we are in deep trouble in the event of relegation.
-
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:41 am
- Been Liked: 465 times
- Has Liked: 234 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
If we were not bottom of the table I’m sure we would have got more signings in. I don’t think Newcastle have brought in anything like they could have so that’s good news. Watford - nothing special. Norwich nothing much. Everton - maybe but will Lamoard get them to work ?
I’m not stupid. I know we have to start winning but we’re not down yet!
I’m not stupid. I know we have to start winning but we’re not down yet!
-
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2262 times
- Has Liked: 1242 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
This window was a sign of intent by ALK. Firstly they took the decision to sell Wood , when maybe SD was not happy, and would have first preferred a replacement in place. Secondly they knew late Friday that Orsic was not going to happen.They had 3 full days to work with SD and follow up plan B options. ITs my personal belief minimum effort took place to get anyone else signed up. I believe we were not close to signing anyone else
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
https://twitter.com/henrywinter/status/ ... 9398764545
2nd highest January transfer transactions ever
But the really interesting bit, only £1 million spent by the PL on EFL players
Everyone is looking abroad now
2nd highest January transfer transactions ever
But the really interesting bit, only £1 million spent by the PL on EFL players
Everyone is looking abroad now
-
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2262 times
- Has Liked: 1242 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Lets see if we have enough back up when we start playing 3 games in 7 days for several weeksBabylonClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:09 pmRight. We need to be looking for the positives here. As CT says, we have been close to securing far more points than we have now. We have games in hand - a lot. We have a lot more home games. We have been creating decent chances.
So all in all there's quite a bit to build on there.
We've shipped out a misfiring striker (although I don't think k that was our choice) and brought in a replacement (who I expect we might have been looking at anyway given Vydra's hernia and the need to freshen up the forward line).
Don't get me wrong, this has been the worst window for a long time - worse perhaps than the Summer of 2020 simply because we have seen that gutsy performances from Lennon won't really be enough and JGB and Cork have dropped off alarmingly this season. We really should have had some 2nd base backups (plenty been mentioned) for midfield.
But. We have enough cover and bodies. Cornet is back and we have a new player to freshen up the forward line. We looked more like it against Arsenal and (like against Chelsea) could even have nicked all 3.
Let's get behind the team, get the three points against Watford and start climbing the table again. All in our hands. We are almost there.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Interestingly that 1m spent looks to be an absolute bargain. Looks a real talent PlangeLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:15 amhttps://twitter.com/henrywinter/status/ ... 9398764545
2nd highest January transfer transactions ever
But the really interesting bit, only £1 million spent by the PL on EFL players
Everyone is looking abroad now
-
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Priced out. There’s some ridiculous fees quoted by Championship clubs.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: January 2022 Burnley Transfer Window Rumours - Links - Discussion
Yup, but loaned back I thinkNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:20 amInterestingly that 1m spent looks to be an absolute bargain. Looks a real talent Plange
Something we could have done, but I don't think that is how we are going to do transfers
I've said it before on this thread, but our needs are both long term (ie bringing players in to develop here) and short term (premier league survival) and we are struggling to get the balance right in a very competitive market