Weghorst

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
CoolClaret
Posts: 10131
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3208 times
Has Liked: 3196 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by CoolClaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:07 am

milkcrate_mosh wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:41 am
I think one of the issues with people saying they only use the "eye test" is they will often follow this with what sound like objective claims. Thought I'd look up the stats on forward passes, through balls, progressive carries based on the above. Stats all taken from here definitions for all the stats are all clearly explained in this link.


Jack Cork completes on average 1.4 "progressive passes" a game, by contrast Westwood completes the most in the entire team with 4.15. He also completes passes into the penalty area and the opponents third at a much higher rate. Jack Cork hasn't completed a single through ball all season, Westwood has 3.

Westwood's pass accuracy for short (5-15 yards) and medium (15-30 yards) is also significantly higher than Corks (>10%). His Long passes however are significantly worse and he plays a lot more of them a game, his long passes are also a lot likely to be high balls as well.

Westwood carries the ball towards the goal by more yards in 90 minutes than Cork does and is dispossessed less often. Cork however attempts more dribbles and is more successful at them when he does attempt them.

Westwood plays a lot more passes and a lot more passes that are higher risk of interception or losing possession. He tends to be much more involved in the buildup to our chances too which is often measured as "shot creating actions". He's involved in 4x as many shot creating actions as Cork, Cork has been recorded as being involved in a single "goal creating action".



I think that when we're playing badly Westwood is always going to look poor because it's likely to mean his higher risk way of playing hasn't worked out. But I think looking at the numbers helps to see why he continues to play. If you're a low scoring team dropping the CM that is most likely to create chances and be involved in goals(by some distance) is always a difficult decision.
These stats aren’t the tell tail that you think they are tbh.

It sounds exactly as Westwood is. Plays safe short/sideways passes (short and medium pass accuracy) then punts it into the box ‘progressive passes’ - a forward pass that attempts (key word attempts) to advance a team towards the opponents goal.

Westwood also take set pieces and took more when Cornet has been out of the side (a significant part of our game but not a necessity of a starting cm now that Cornet is starting).

It’s not about individual stats per say anyway it’s about the team, Cork allows the team to play more and pull others into the game to do their job - which is what a cm in a 2 normally does.

So it comes down to this - shall we play with Westwood and out everything through him with speculative long balls or a guy that keeps the cogs turning better and pulls others in and allows the team to play better overall… I know the one that I’m having.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin Taffy on the wing

andyh
Posts: 1466
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:27 am
Been Liked: 519 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by andyh » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:08 am

milkcrate_mosh wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:41 am
I think one of the issues with people saying they only use the "eye test" is they will often follow this with what sound like objective claims. Thought I'd look up the stats on forward passes, through balls, progressive carries based on the above. Stats all taken from here definitions for all the stats are all clearly explained in this link.
I think this all shows how complex it is and why no figures work really well in football. The things the stats don’t show is that Brownhill has a different role when playing alongside Westwood than he does alongside Cork. So all though it looks like a straight Cork Westwood comparison it is not really. Whether it was sustainable or not I can’t say but the few games it was Cork and Brownhill got the best out of Josh.

I trust SD. He has all the stats and his team must analyse them endlessly. Yet just trusting my eyesight we seemed better balanced with Cork Brownhill.

Another factor is aerial prowess. We score and concede a lot from set plays and one reason I think SD likes a big front man is to give us aerial superiority. Cork adds to that, he is very good in the air. Westwood is not. So for me Cork would get the nod…. But I’m not paid millions unlike SD so I go back to saying I trust his judgement.
Last edited by andyh on Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

RVclaret
Posts: 16504
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by RVclaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:08 am

milkcrate_mosh wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:04 am
Even if you exclude his shot creating actions from dead balls it's still over twice that of Jack Cork so don't think that fully explains the discrepancy.
So it’s quite a big cut down from 4 times. And anyway, no one is saying Cork is a direct chance creating machine, in fact, almost the exact opposite. As CoolClaret said, Cork is the most composed in possession, tends to retain it better which in turns help us play football on the floor - it’s no coincidence Weghorst’s (back to the thread) best few games came with him in the team. Brownhill took on the more advanced role of the two and led to him scoring more goals in one game (1) than Westwood has all season (0) - how’s that for a stat?

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by arise_sir_charge » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:10 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:33 am
I can actually forward evidence on this, because I was thinking it exactly when it happened. 2 or 3 times quite quickly in the 60-70 minute zone, Westwood returned short throws or passes back to a player, which is an absolutely basic core skill we were taught as lads, and he returned them slightly behind the player so they had no alternative but to turn back and play defensively. So In the 70th minute (if you have it recorded or can FF to that point on digital) we had it on the left but it was screaming for a cross field ball to a man out free in acres by the Bob Lord. We saw that, we worked it well inside to Westwood so he could make that pass, he then played a floaty ball out there that TECHNICALLY FULFILLED HIS STATS but, again, stopped our player in his tracks because he had to wait ages for it AND, again, was played half a yard behind him. All momentum was lost. Look it up, minute 70.

This ridiculous stats thing that Newcastle has. It’s like he just plays FootyMan and can’t understand a real game.
This is a great point, a pass that may cause the crowd to groan and the manager to shake his head can still be logged as a completed successful pass.

The word context has been mentioned a few times and it’s spot on. Stats have a place but not at the expense of everything else.

My eyes tell me Westwood has been a problem all season, our best period of the season came when he was forced out of the team and Cork partnered Brownhill and we got the best out of our forward players.

ClaretMat
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 29 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by ClaretMat » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:22 am

Westwood has been an excellent player for us, those balls in behind the defence really helped get us up the pitch when the Barnes and Wood partnership was so fruitful and they were both a little more mobile.
However we need to adapt, it's clear that Weghorst strengths lie in receiving the ball into feet and helping build the play and gaining more controlled possession higher up the pitch. Jay I'd another who would benefit from this as we all know he's a very intelligent player with good technical ability.
So I'm another in support of bringing Cork in, he isn't perfect and he's not as athletic as he once was but I think he compliments the style we need to play more than Westwood does currently. His composure should also help us manage games more effectively and also get the best out of Brownhill
This is all based on us playing a Jay and Weghorst partnership which has so far looked effective and got us some good results . However if we are going to revert to hitting the channels then Vydra and Westwood would both need to play.

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by SalisburyClaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:27 am

The problem with playing Cork is that he produces very little going forward - no assists for many seasons in the Premier League. He’s tidy in possession but is never going to create much, which means others have to take the load. This is why Brownhill may appear better playing with Cork. Even so he’s not the most creative player either. So that pretty much means Westwood has to play or we play all 3 or we put Dwight in an usual role etc

In any case Cork struggles with games coming in quick succession so best used as a sub or in a 3 in games where we need to be more defensive

milkcrate_mosh
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 5:23 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by milkcrate_mosh » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:30 am

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:08 am
So it’s quite a big cut down from 4 times. And anyway, no one is saying Cork is a direct chance creating machine, in fact, almost the exact opposite. As CoolClaret said, Cork is the most composed in possession, tends to retain it better which in turns help us play football on the floor - it’s no coincidence Weghorst’s (back to the thread) best few games came with him in the team. Brownhill took on the more advanced role of the two and led to him scoring more goals in one game (1) than Westwood has all season (0) - how’s that for a stat?
Weirdly aggressive considering all we're doing is having a conversation about the football team we both support and both using stats to have a constructive conversation about our midfield?

Would people really prefer we all agree that Westwood's a useless clogger and Corks a Rolls Royce without interrogating the differences between the two players.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3477 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Weghorst

Post by Colburn_Claret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:42 am

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:47 am
I'd expect Lowton will be the only change. But there is an argument for freshening a few other spots up, seen as though Norwich did not play midweek. Could be McNeil for Lennon (who looked spent) and Cork for Westwood for midfield freshness. But those changes aren't 'Dyche' and it'll just be Lowton.
If you're going to drop Lennon for a rest, surely Roberts is a better replacement. Its what he does so well for Wales. Dwights one footedness also makes him a lot weaker on the right, all you need to do is show him the outside and he's scuppered.

superdimitri
Posts: 5119
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 739 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by superdimitri » Fri Apr 08, 2022 2:59 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:56 am
There was a video on you tube, discussing WW strengths and abilities.
It showed that he likes to hang around beyond the far post, that way the defender infront of him can't see him, even if he knows he's there. It gives Wout an advantage as the defender doesn't know when he's going to make his run, or which side of him he's going to go. Of course this requires crosses coming in from out wide, or pulled back from the byline. We did this twice on Wednesday and scored twice. How many times do we lump it to him with his back to goal, and then nobody running past him for a lay off.
As Everton showed, Brighton, Villa last season, when we work the ball wide, and get bodies in the box we score goals. There is always a correct time to hoof it, but we have to play the ball through the lines, down the wings and use Wouts preference for that position beyond the far post, and he will score. We will win, and we will have a chance of survival.
I think he's used to playing with more creative players around him. Wolfsburg usually played with two defensive midfielders and 3 attacking midfielders.

Our midfield spend too much time chasing the game. We're just so poor creatively and at keeping possession.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Weghorst

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Fri Apr 08, 2022 6:20 pm

karatekid wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:56 pm
My wife is dutch so i can second that. ;)
:D :D Grappig

BleedingClaret
Posts: 4024
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1187 times
Has Liked: 1925 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Weghorst

Post by BleedingClaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 6:38 pm

He’s generally excellent
Wednesday night just wasn’t his night
But
He was part of the 3 big man preplanned movement from the corner for Collins to score
He made the first run to the near post showing for Taylor that opened up the space for Jay Rods goal
He set Maxwell up for a shot that he should have buried
For one of their breaks from our corner he made it back to our box as extra cover running past Brownhill on the way
Showed for Collins who should have passed to him for a sitter
Played about 5 clever balls that just didn’t quite come off
That was a bad night by his standards
We’re lucky to have him IMO
These 3 users liked this post: SalisburyClaret basil6345789 Woonderbah

Middle-agedClaret
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 1353 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Middle-agedClaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:32 pm

I’ve got to be honest - all these sterile arguments over stats leave me cold. Can’t help but remember that old adage “ Lies, damned lies, and statistics”
Puts me in mind of those earnest Victorians arguing earnestly over how many angels you could fit on the tip of a needle.


UTC. ( no actual statistics were harmed in the writing of this post.)

summitclaret
Posts: 4566
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1021 times
Has Liked: 1612 times
Location: burnley

Re: Weghorst

Post by summitclaret » Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:41 pm

Westy plays those balls down the right into the channel BECAUSE HE IS TOLD TO BY DYCHE AS IT IS A DELIBERATE TACTIC. Anyone that thinks otherwise is deluded. Westy is the only cm player we have that can consistantly play long attacking balls with reasonable accuracy. He plays every week for me.
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Weghorst

Post by Rileybobs » Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:50 pm

Just caught up on this thread and I feel like I’ve spent 15 minutes reading posts by 12 year olds on a FIFA2022 forum. I think if it were allowed there would be an abundance of Mbappe and Haaland avatars.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:54 pm

According to Twitter McNeil has removed Weghorst from his fantasy football team this weekend.

Potentially dropped for Norwich?

joey13
Posts: 7507
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by joey13 » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:32 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:54 pm
According to Twitter McNeil has removed Weghorst from his fantasy football team this weekend.

Potentially dropped for Norwich?
Jay and Vydra

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by IanMcL » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:35 pm

I wouldn't rely on McNeil, for the team line up!

ecc
Posts: 6334
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 1775 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by ecc » Sun Apr 10, 2022 10:33 am

Probably be wrong but just got the feeling WW will get back scoring today.

Pearcey
Posts: 4362
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1495 times
Has Liked: 1876 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Pearcey » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:04 am

ecc wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 10:33 am
Probably be wrong but just got the feeling WW will get back scoring today.
I’ve got that feeling too. Fingers crossed!
This user liked this post: ecc

Quicknick
Posts: 6787
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 9634 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Weghorst

Post by Quicknick » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:40 am

I think he'll get two.

burnleymik
Posts: 5743
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1300 times
Has Liked: 3162 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by burnleymik » Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:14 pm

Twitter rumours (yes I know! Haha) claiming WW is not in the starting 11 today.

ecc
Posts: 6334
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 1775 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by ecc » Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:32 pm

I honestly think if he can get one he'll go on to score more.

It must have been said earlier but for our second goal if Charlie hadn't chosen to pass to Jay, Wout was well placed although not as well placed as Jay. Okay, it's academic as Jay fortunately buried it but I think it only fair to point this out.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by claretandy » Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:33 pm

burnleymik wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:14 pm
Twitter rumours (yes I know! Haha) claiming WW is not in the starting 11 today.
I would be quite happy with this, Jay and Vyds to start, as long as SD doesn't go 451 for the draw :shock:

Conroy92
Posts: 1994
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 730 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Conroy92 » Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:39 pm

Think it'll be Jay and Vydra. Vydra should have had something against these in the other fixture when Krul punched through his head, think he'll bag today. Also hoping Lowton starts.

Milltown1882
Posts: 3573
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1266 times
Has Liked: 911 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Milltown1882 » Sun Apr 10, 2022 3:17 pm

1 in 12. Missing Wood yet?

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Apr 10, 2022 3:19 pm

Poor again and not being helped by the tactics employed by his manager.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3942
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 1205 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Boss Hogg » Sun Apr 10, 2022 3:22 pm

Don’t play to his strengths but he’s not what we needed. There’s something about him that reminds me of the Juke.

Goalposts
Posts: 3093
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 155 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: Weghorst

Post by Goalposts » Sun Apr 10, 2022 3:23 pm

I reckon Westwood plays 90% of his balls blind into channels

Boydesque
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 8:35 am
Been Liked: 28 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Boydesque » Sun Apr 10, 2022 10:42 pm

Just got back Yet again he was shocking
Runs around like bambi on ice
A little skip if he makes a simple pass which was very rare
Offers nothing in fact I think the midfield think he s that poor they look for other options
A absolute total waste of money never seen a footballer

dandeclaret
Posts: 4256
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3056 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:46 am

He may be technically better than Wood, but he’s nowhere near as effective as a premier league striker. People say play into his feet, but he doesn’t look to have the strength to be trusted with a defender in tight. He also doesn’t have the necessary physical attributes to find space to have the ball played into him. His first half performances are regularly very poor.

Granted it takes players time to settle, but the signs right now are not very good.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:49 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:46 am
He may be technically better than Wood, but he’s nowhere near as effective as a premier league striker. People say play into his feet, but he doesn’t look to have the strength to be trusted with a defender in tight. He also doesn’t have the necessary physical attributes to find space to have the ball played into him. His first half performances are regularly very poor.

Granted it takes players time to settle, but the signs right now are not very good.
I 100% agree, he doesn’t look to be making any space for himself at all. I personally think it’s due to his lack of pace but it could also be his lack of physicality.

All in all I think he’s a player we are going to struggle to shift on now. High wages and has proven he’s not really a fit for this league.

CoolClaret
Posts: 10131
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3208 times
Has Liked: 3196 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:02 am

Watch him against United and Brighton and you’ll see his strengths.

The fact is we need to play 3 in the middle (one sitting) and play off Weghorst into his feet.

With our current tactics we may as well play Jay and Barnes together

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 660 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Swizzlestick » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:23 am

While I certainly subscribe to the view that out aimless punts up are not playing to his strengths, his lack of physicality and heading ability for a big man really is quite something. Main thing I would say is, what have the scouting team communicated back to Dyche in terms of how he fits into our style? Because from what I can see, none of his attributes suit us. Don’t agree that he isn’t good enough - he more than showed he was good enough when we played Spurs and Brighton and Dyche wad forced to play Cork. Question now is, do you sack the player off or the style? And I know which I’d be choosing.

burnleymik
Posts: 5743
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1300 times
Has Liked: 3162 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by burnleymik » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:24 am

Despite what people say on here, I don't believe the Jay and WW partnership work well. They are both the types who work hard and come deep for the ball that allows the defense to push onto them and stop them getting time on the ball. You need a striker to hold the line which may allow WW more time to pick up the ball and bring in the players around him. That said you also need midfielders prepared to pass and move rather than keep trying to ay over the top balls.

The odd thing is we did it really well against Brighton and then never again since.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4256
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3056 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:11 am

This view on scouting is probably a bit harsh. I suspect that there was no expectation Wood was moving on in the January window, and therefor the club had to react quickly. I suspect that they weren’t able to get their first choice targets and had to rush to find people available. Suspect that Wout fitted that latter point.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by arise_sir_charge » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:28 am

Think he will be nigh on unplayable next season in the Championship, if we can get players to pass it to his feet and not his neck.

He’s being hung out to dry by our tactics. Put him in a team that can use the ball and he’d be hugely effective.

Spijed
Posts: 18056
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3053 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Spijed » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:42 am

Even if Wood had stayed it looked like he was starting to struggle in the Prem, and that form has carried on at Newcastle. So even if Weghorst hasn't been an instant success we are no worse off than previously.

Conroy92
Posts: 1994
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 730 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Conroy92 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:52 am

I feel sorry for Weggy, playing Champions League qualifiers to pretty much championship in about 6 months.
The lad clearly has talent with the ball at his feet but I can't imagine him ever fitting in a Dyche side for this reason.
Starting to look a poor signing. All this talk of vetting players, getting the right players in and this is where we are, signing someone to lump the ball at who's worst attributes are in the air.
He'll be back in the bundesliga next year.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:55 am

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:28 am
Think he will be nigh on unplayable next season in the Championship, if we can get players to pass it to his feet and not his neck.

He’s being hung out to dry by our tactics. Put him in a team that can use the ball and he’d be hugely effective.
I have genuinely yet to see anything to suggest he could hack the championship.

He’s not got the physical attributes, he makes Vydra look tough.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4840
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 660 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Swizzlestick » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:59 am

Spijed wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:42 am
Even if Wood had stayed it looked like he was starting to struggle in the Prem, and that form has carried on at Newcastle. So even if Weghorst hasn't been an instant success we are no worse off than previously.
Despite not being prolific, Wood has clearly been highly effective for Newcastle considering they were went on a very good run of form while he's been striker.

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by spt_claret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:01 am

superdimitri wrote:
Fri Apr 08, 2022 2:59 pm
I think he's used to playing with more creative players around him. Wolfsburg usually played with two defensive midfielders and 3 attacking midfielders.

Our midfield spend too much time chasing the game. We're just so poor creatively and at keeping possession.
I've been saying we should switch to 4-2-3-1 for a while but don't know if we have the quality capable of it. If we'd signed Orsic and a CM I think we would have made the switch, maybe even just with Orsic.
Problem is as it is you're either pushing the wide men very forward exposing whoever of Cork/Brownhill/Westwood you pick, sitting them deeper and effectively just playing 4-4-1-1 negating the purpose, or having to bench an attacking option and put one of the 3 CMs in the hole instead of McNeil/Corner/Jay/Vydra, again negating the purpose.
We are genuinely 1-2 players short of being able to do it without completely exposing our central midfield even more and being overrun in the channels between them and any advanced wingers.
This user liked this post: superdimitri

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:06 am

Swizzlestick wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:59 am
Despite not being prolific, Wood has clearly been highly effective for Newcastle considering they were went on a very good run of form while he's been striker.
I think Wood has got a bad rep on here due to the nature of him leaving. My father in law is a newcastle fan and he speaks highly of him, saying that he has played a massive part in at least 3 of there victories no more so than the wolves win

Conroy92
Posts: 1994
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 730 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Conroy92 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:13 am

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:11 am
This view on scouting is probably a bit harsh. I suspect that there was no expectation Wood was moving on in the January window, and therefor the club had to react quickly. I suspect that they weren’t able to get their first choice targets and had to rush to find people available. Suspect that Wout fitted that latter point.
Can't accept recruitment not taking a bash here. In football anything can happen and I hazard a guess most clubs have a list of identified players in all areas of the pitch, so that if someone leaves or comes available at short notice the pieces are already to be put together. Considering we also have Vydra leaving on a free, Barnes looking like his legs have gone and Rodriguez pushing 33 it would be hard to imagine the club would not have been scouting in these areas for the new season.
We should have identified someone who fits in with the way we play. We haven't.
I don't like this excuse of "couldn't get our first choice targets" part of good recruitment is equally being realistic with your options, there shouldn't be that many players on our scouted list that don't want to come, what's the point scouting them.

Petersa
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:33 am
Been Liked: 221 times
Has Liked: 154 times
Location: South Africa

Re: Weghorst

Post by Petersa » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:15 am

On his last few outings he has looked more like Carthorst than Weghorst

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by spt_claret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:25 am

burnleymik wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:24 am
Despite what people say on here, I don't believe the Jay and WW partnership work well. They are both the types who work hard and come deep for the ball that allows the defense to push onto them and stop them getting time on the ball. You need a striker to hold the line which may allow WW more time to pick up the ball and bring in the players around him. That said you also need midfielders prepared to pass and move rather than keep trying to ay over the top balls.

The odd thing is we did it really well against Brighton and then never again since.
Few factors different with Brighton and Spurs:
- Pieters in. Taylor is the better player but they play differently, Pieters sits back and tucks in more which provides more support in the grey areas of the pitch between the wing, centre midfield and defence, the winger ahead of him has more of the crossing duty compared to Taylor who is much more likely to overlap and cross himself from further forward, Pieters usually crosses deeper.
-Cork was in and looked more like his old self than in years. Less direct than Westwood, moves us forward slower but more patiently, his movement, reading and technique make him better at retaining possession and covering allowing Brownhill to roam more and be more adventurous,hence why he played better. I'd have him back in personally but there's understandable questions as to how long his legs can last now- questions everyone on here asked right up until he came back in, many wanted Stephens over him.
-Mee over Collins. Collins is probably better on the ball (except nervier and less composed or experienced at this level which for the time being washes it out) but Mees defensive nous and solidity is usually unparalleled, he organises the backline far better giving everyone in it more capacity or at least confidence to take chances or take more time. He does so much unglamorous and overlooked defensive work.
I said when we signed Weghorst he's budget Zlatan not a target man and stand by it - Zlatan has evolved into more of a goal hanging target man now he's 40 but in his prime he was far more a technical player. Thing is because of our midfield issues we need a target man who can hold the ball up the pitch, retain it and move it on. Weghorst is actually weaker with his head than Wood or Jay at this but far better at chest control and with his feet, he can provide that target but in a different way and was doing very well at the time because our shape was different. Trouble is it also forces him to come much deeper than I'd like and is generally still a playing style he didnt do previously, so he's still adapting. Jay is perhaps a bit better in the air but probably not as good at linking and wants to stay further up precisely because in the air hes more likely to score from a cross. Barnes is past it. Vydra isn't a target man.
Ideally we have Weghorst up top, Vydra behind him, but we need a better midfield for that and probably also a defensive framework covering that in-between better. Lowton coming in might help, he sits deeper too, but that means flipping Cornet and benching Lennon, or benching Cornet for McNeil, as Cornets attributes are probably better suited to a deeper fullback behind him given his defensive issues and how he generally is better crossing from in behind than further back.
This is a lot of waffle to say "our tactics are forced by the players available which affects how well certain players do" but that's my read as a fan.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret

ClaretTony
Posts: 77740
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38038 times
Has Liked: 5774 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Weghorst

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:31 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:55 pm
Always supported my theories with stats.
Stats? I've always used my eyes.

CoolClaret
Posts: 10131
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3208 times
Has Liked: 3196 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:34 am

spt_claret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:25 am
Agree with absolutely all of that - great post and I share your view.

I believe a 4-2-3-1 with a front 6 of

——Cork—Brownhill
Cornet—-Vydra—-McNeil
—————-Wout

Would certainly get the most out of our current squad

Pommieclaret
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:13 pm
Been Liked: 58 times
Has Liked: 47 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by Pommieclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:42 am

Petersa wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:15 am
On his last few outings he has looked more like Carthorst than Weghorst
He's not a target man in the sense of the word. We can all see that play it to his feet and he can bring people into the game. The midfield needs to be closer and stop sitting deep. No point playing a Westwood esk type ball blindly into the channel expecting him to chase it. Play to feet fullbacks overlap into the channels, it's not rocket science!!!

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by spt_claret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:54 am

CoolClaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:34 am
Agree with absolutely all of that - great post and I share your view.

I believe a 4-2-3-1 with a front 6 of

——Cork—Brownhill
Cornet—-Vydra—-McNeil
—————-Wout

Would certainly get the most out of our current squad
It's what I would love to see but realistically only if our back 4 was Lowton, Tarkowski, Mee, Pieters (tough call as I prefer Taylor but see above re. Shape and playstyles). Unfortunately 2/4 are still out.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4256
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3056 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Weghorst

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:56 am

Pommieclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:42 am
He's not a target man in the sense of the word. We can all see that play it to his feet and he can bring people into the game. The midfield needs to be closer and stop sitting deep. No point playing a Westwood esk type ball blindly into the channel expecting him to chase it. Play to feet fullbacks overlap into the channels, it's not rocket science!!!
And in that simplicity, how do you provide the relevant defensive shape? That style is all well and good if you've got better players than the opposition. It's why the team scored so many goals when winning the championship and going 23 unbeaten. When you don't have better players, you surely have to be more pragmatic.

If he played up top, on his own, he would be so isolated it's untrue, and we'd have zero territory. There's not masses of evidence of him holding the ball up when played into feet for the necessary time for others to get around and support him.

Post Reply