Pope a Steal
Pope a Steal
Something we all knew, at £10m for the best keeper in the prem.
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/footbal ... Eddie-Howe
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/footbal ... Eddie-Howe
-
- Posts: 17680
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3979 times
- Has Liked: 4931 times
Re: Pope a Steal
I’d just rather forget this transfer ever happened. Why we sold him for that much I’ll never ever know.
-
- Posts: 5080
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1108 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2493 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: Pope a Steal
There wasn't a bidding war he wanted to go.....just what is so difficult to get ???
-
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1872 times
- Has Liked: 3260 times
Re: Pope a Steal
I get this but surely you wouldn't have sold him for £100 would you ? So the question is what is the minimum acceptable price ? , and many would think it's above £10M
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Pope a Steal
Way above £10m
A literal giveaway.
A literal giveaway.
These 2 users liked this post: Buxtonclaret Stayingup
Re: Pope a Steal
It’s been done to death but I’m amazed that any Burnley fan who watches the team regularly can think anything other than he was sold too cheaply.
The problem was, our own circumstances appear to have necessitated the need for a quick sale. Newcastle took advantage and have earned themselves an absolute bargain in the process.
The problem was, our own circumstances appear to have necessitated the need for a quick sale. Newcastle took advantage and have earned themselves an absolute bargain in the process.
Re: Pope a Steal
Wonder how he would have been accommodated by VK who likes to follow Guardiola's method of passing out from the back come what may.
Re: Pope a Steal
I agree, it was daylight robbery, however if the 10 million is the release clause and no one else was interested what could the club do ? Forme he is by far and away the best English keeper and in the top 3 of Premier league keepers. United.must be kicking themselves but the bull that he couldn't pass put a lot of teams off.Stalbansclaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 10:28 pmI get this but surely you wouldn't have sold him for £100 would you ? So the question is what is the minimum acceptable price ? , and many would think it's above £10M
Re: Pope a Steal
Was there such a release clause?bfcjg wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 10:40 pmI agree, it was daylight robbery, however if the 10 million is the release clause and no one else was interested what could the club do ? Forme he is by far and away the best English keeper and in the top 3 of Premier league keepers. United.must be kicking themselves but the bull that he couldn't pass put a lot of teams off.
Re: Pope a Steal
Absolutely a steal. Unbelievable really. BUT maybe it balances out the robbery for Wood!!!
These 2 users liked this post: JohnDearyMe Gnulty
Re: Pope a Steal
Release clause has never been mentioned. Red herring.
Re: Pope a Steal
I'm just surmising as to why the 10 million was accepted, I suppose only the clubs and Pope know, also it did appear at time that no one else was interested.
-
- Posts: 5118
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Age was the reason. If he was younger, he would have gone for a lot more.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 750 times
- Has Liked: 1965 times
Re: Pope a Steal
And we KNOW that this oft quoted £10 million figure is accurate/true/the full and final amount, because...?
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 290 times
- Has Liked: 502 times
Re: Pope a Steal
He was under contract and if he breaks into the England team for the World Cup and enjoys a great tournament - he'll be valued at least triple what Newcastle just paid for him.
-
- Posts: 19784
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4199 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Biggest downgrade in our clubs history.
6m and Muric for Pope.
Oh well.
6m and Muric for Pope.
Oh well.
-
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 659 times
- Has Liked: 339 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Did he not have just twelve months left on his contract? If so the 10 million on offer was the last chance we’d get any money for him!
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
- Been Liked: 202 times
- Has Liked: 49 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Precisely - the fee has never actually been revealed or confirmed. True to form, there are endless conversations regarding something none of us have any knowledge of!AfloatinClaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 10:56 pmAnd we KNOW that this oft quoted £10 million figure is accurate/true/the full and final amount, because...?
-
- Posts: 14747
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5685 times
- Has Liked: 5918 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Pope a Steal
Not true. We let Peter Swan go on a free and spaffed £150,000 on Steven Blatherwick and £200,000 on Lee Howey.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 11:11 pmBiggest downgrade in our clubs history.
6m and Muric for Pope.
Oh well.
So we spent a significant amount of our transfer budget on two immobile potatoes and let a talented professional footballer leave for nothing.
Re: Pope a Steal
And by the same logic, if we can get promotion we will be able next summer to offer Everton £10m for Pickford, who will be of similar age and with a year left on his contract, and Everton will be only too glad to sell! Or perhaps not.Winstonswhite wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 11:24 pmDid he not have just twelve months left on his contract? If so the 10 million on offer was the last chance we’d get any money for him!
This user liked this post: forzagranata
Re: Pope a Steal
Didn't the terms of the loan drawdown from Macquarie confirm that it was £10m?jackmiggins wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 11:32 pmPrecisely - the fee has never actually been revealed or confirmed. True to form, there are endless conversations regarding something none of us have any knowledge of!
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
- Been Liked: 202 times
- Has Liked: 49 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Have you seen the terms?
Re: Pope a Steal
If I had seen the terms I wouldn't be asking what the terms were, would I.
But I believe other people have seen the terms and I hope they can confirm them.
-
- Posts: 20223
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3307 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Pope a Steal
In short No
They specified a total of £7m in payments over the next three summers for the outstanding element of the Pope transaction - No need for them to know what, if anything, was paid up front
Those Payments which will now go directly from the FA (the transfer clearing House) to Macquarie are of £2.34m, £2.33m and £2.33m
Andy Jones in The Athletic is adamant that the Pope fee was almost £11m by the way
Re: Pope a Steal
Thanks. So I suppose the £10m came from the supposition that the first payment was similar value to the others.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 12:41 amIn short No
They specified a total of £7m in payments over the next three summers for the outstanding element of the Pope transaction - No need for them to know what, if anything, was paid up front
Those Payments which will now go directly from the FA (the transfer clearing House) to Macquarie are of £2.34m, £2.33m and £2.33m
Andy Jones in The Athletic is adamant that the Pope fee was almost £11m by the way
-
- Posts: 34885
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12708 times
- Has Liked: 6319 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Pope a Steal
we paid 1 million for him, yes, it was a steal for usIanMcL wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 8:48 pmSomething we all knew, at £10m for the best keeper in the prem.
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/footbal ... Eddie-Howe
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3056 times
- Has Liked: 343 times
Re: Pope a Steal
He was a raw ingredient at the time..... he was undersold as the finished article.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Pope a Steal
I’m 100% certain the fee would have been higher if there had been a bidding war. Unfortunately for us there was only Newcastle who formalised their interest with an offer.
That left all the cards in their hands. We needed a sale to fund our early (much needed) rebuild, Pope was desperate to remain in the PL and we probably didn’t want to get in his way. Then there’s the question of whether Pope is a good fit for our new possession based system anyway…
So, all things considered, 11m with the possibility to rise to 13-15m with add ons is nowhere near as bad a deal as made out by some. If you read comments without knowing the fee, you’d probably guess the sale was 5-7m.
23 year old international keeper in for 2.5m, who is a key cog in the new managers system, all in all it’s good business.
That left all the cards in their hands. We needed a sale to fund our early (much needed) rebuild, Pope was desperate to remain in the PL and we probably didn’t want to get in his way. Then there’s the question of whether Pope is a good fit for our new possession based system anyway…
So, all things considered, 11m with the possibility to rise to 13-15m with add ons is nowhere near as bad a deal as made out by some. If you read comments without knowing the fee, you’d probably guess the sale was 5-7m.
23 year old international keeper in for 2.5m, who is a key cog in the new managers system, all in all it’s good business.
-
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3056 times
- Has Liked: 343 times
Re: Pope a Steal
You can spin it as much as you want, but it just isn’t. The club probably realised, after Charlton cut and debt factoring about £5-6m in value. Or Muric and £3m….. which is probably why €5m strikers are out of the clubs price range.
Re: Pope a Steal
You have zero clue if €5m strikers are out of the clubs price range.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 7:46 amYou can spin it as much as you want, but it just isn’t. The club probably realised, after Charlton cut and debt factoring about £5-6m in value. Or Muric and £3m….. which is probably why €5m strikers are out of the clubs price range.
This user liked this post: jen1066
Re: Pope a Steal
Would he be playing if he'd stayed?
Like Ben Mee, It's obvious certain players wouldn't work under the system VK wants to adopt.
Like Ben Mee, It's obvious certain players wouldn't work under the system VK wants to adopt.
Re: Pope a Steal
When considering the fee paid, including the net benefit or lack of to our club, Pope's ability and that he's an England international, it will I believe be considered by many to be one of the signings, if not the best signing, of the summer. A fantastic or good deal for Newcastle; not for our club.
Re: Pope a Steal
Pope said in his recent interview with the Athletic how he had heard of Newcastle’s interest weeks before the deal and was keen for it to progress. He also said Southgate told him playing in the Championship would affect his chances of making the World Cup squad.
As for not standing in his way, an Athletic article by Andy Jones suggested there had been conversations with Pope and we would not stand it his way, should fair offers be received.
Hope that clears it up a bit.
-
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4800 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Pope a Steal
I do wish those who claimed we should have sold him for far more would tell us which bid we should have accepted.
We had quite a few posters claiming he wouldn't get a look in at a Premier League club due to his kicking but then we should have held out for a bidding war. If you run a 1 horse race 100 times how many different outcomes would you get.
We had quite a few posters claiming he wouldn't get a look in at a Premier League club due to his kicking but then we should have held out for a bidding war. If you run a 1 horse race 100 times how many different outcomes would you get.
Re: Pope a Steal
He was always bound to get a decent PL club, just never one who plays out from the back.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:00 amI do wish those who claimed we should have sold him for far more would tell us which bid we should have accepted.
We had quite a few posters claiming he wouldn't get a look in at a Premier League club due to his kicking but then we should have held out for a bidding war. If you run a 1 horse race 100 times how many different outcomes would you get.
-
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4800 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
-
- Posts: 3773
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 365 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Fee will rise to £13m if he wins Ballon D’Or - twice and has to be consecutively. The way he has started for Newcastle not totally out of the question !
With the payment to Charlton and less our invoice factoring fees we will end up with closer to £5m than £10m.
I’m sure every football fan, pundit, current or ex player who watched the performances of our old and new keepers over the weekend that £2m or £3m net in our “debt servicing” account to end up with what we now have in our goals represented transfer market dealings only Man United would be proud of.
With the payment to Charlton and less our invoice factoring fees we will end up with closer to £5m than £10m.
I’m sure every football fan, pundit, current or ex player who watched the performances of our old and new keepers over the weekend that £2m or £3m net in our “debt servicing” account to end up with what we now have in our goals represented transfer market dealings only Man United would be proud of.
Last edited by Big Vinny K on Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3056 times
- Has Liked: 343 times
Re: Pope a Steal
You’re mixing wide groups of people. He’s one of the top 5 keepers in the country. If newcastles bid was the only one on the table at deadline day, then by all means accept it then. Surely when negotiating you use all the leverage you can…. Time should have been on our side, and we just casually tossed that leverage away.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:00 amI do wish those who claimed we should have sold him for far more would tell us which bid we should have accepted.
We had quite a few posters claiming he wouldn't get a look in at a Premier League club due to his kicking but then we should have held out for a bidding war. If you run a 1 horse race 100 times how many different outcomes would you get.
Re: Pope a Steal
Newcastle?claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:04 amHow many decent PL clubs are there then who don't play out from the back
Re: Pope a Steal
We could have held out for a higher fee and/or other interest rather facilitating such a quick deal.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:00 amI do wish those who claimed we should have sold him for far more would tell us which bid we should have accepted.
We had quite a few posters claiming he wouldn't get a look in at a Premier League club due to his kicking but then we should have held out for a bidding war. If you run a 1 horse race 100 times how many different outcomes would you get.
-
- Posts: 3773
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 365 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Exactly….and I do not buy at all the timing issue that we needed this to fund incomings given that firstly we have ended up with only around £5m and secondly we must have been very confident that Cornet would be sold and we knew that fee was guaranteed.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:06 amYou’re mixing wide groups of people. He’s one of the top 5 keepers in the country. If newcastles bid was the only one on the table at deadline day, then by all means accept it then. Surely when negotiating you use all the leverage you can…. Time should have been on our side, and we just casually tossed that leverage away.
-
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4800 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Pope a Steal
So we wait til deadline day, hoping Newcastle will sit there and wait, and if Newcastle move on and nobody else comes in ?dandeclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:06 amYou’re mixing wide groups of people. He’s one of the top 5 keepers in the country. If newcastles bid was the only one on the table at deadline day, then by all means accept it then. Surely when negotiating you use all the leverage you can…. Time should have been on our side, and we just casually tossed that leverage away.
The club already knew if relegated he wanted to move on, considering again that at the fee being quoted still nobody else came in and at least matched Newcastle's bid ? There is 1 week to go in the window which Prem clubs are currently still looking for a new number 1 goalkeeper.
Everybody accepts we would have liked more money but whinging over and over about what we got when the proof is there were no other offers is just dull.
-
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4800 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Pope a Steal
Again I will ask, why did no other club match Newcastle's bid ?
Which Prem clubs are still looking for a new number 1 and which have signed a new number 1 this summer ?
Re: Pope a Steal
The thread title makes it crystal clear what this thread is about without having to even open it. Those who dont want to see people's views could have easily stayed away from this particular thread.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:12 amSo we wait til deadline day, hoping Newcastle will sit there and wait, and if Newcastle move on and nobody else comes in ?
The club already knew if relegated he wanted to move on, considering again that at the fee being quoted still nobody else came in and at least matched Newcastle's bid ? There is 1 week to go in the window which Prem clubs are currently still looking for a new number 1 goalkeeper.
Everybody accepts we would have liked more money but whinging over and over about what we got when the proof is there were no other offers is just dull.