This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
JohnMac
- Posts: 7683
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2565 times
- Has Liked: 4136 times
- Location: Padiham
Post
by JohnMac » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:06 am
My own experience with Unions was meeting the Area Rep and our Shop Stewards to discuss what was being offered in the way of a pay rise. This was the very first meeting for the next year's negotiations.
Before I had exchanged pleasantries or opened the meeting, one of the Shop Stewards said 'We wish to record A Failure to Agree'.
Even the Area Rep was smirking at that one.
It isn't helpful when you have Shop Stewards who are militant, aggressive and think 'Carry on at Your Convenience' is a training film for Union Reps.

-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:10 am
If union leaders had to go without pay, like their striking members, there would be fewer strikes
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:21 am
SammyBoy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 10:56 am
This is so true, I worked at a supermarket part-time whilst I finished Uni and it's like being back at school.
People get promoted from shelf stacker to the guy who supervises the shelf stackers and act like they've made it, I think the difference at the time equated to an extra £1 an hour. Not sure why but these low paid jobs seem to create pretty toxic environments from my experience.
Spot on mate.
I’ve seen the exact thing happen in multiple companies - it’s even worse when one tries to discipline someone ‘under’ them for doing something that they routinely do/did.
Just rank hypocrisy.
I think it’s some weird sort of psychological trait that gets activated in their reptilian brains upon a slight ‘promotion’ - as that they’re ‘better’ than those ‘beneath’ them and are there purely on merit by some sort of divine right.
It’s a tale as old as time, if they can just save their self then some other poor bugger will take the heat - Malcolm X spoke about this extensively with regards to slavery and ‘Uncle Toms’ - it’s the same psychology in these instances
-
Tribesmen
- Posts: 5639
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1292 times
- Has Liked: 691 times
- Location: Tibet
Post
by Tribesmen » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:27 am
So ballpark how much would a guy get take home for a 40 hour week in Boohoo ?
-
Devils_Advocate
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Post
by Devils_Advocate » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:32 am
Nori1958 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:10 am
If union leaders had to go without pay, like their striking members, there would be fewer strikes
If MPs had to use the NHS, send their kids to state schools, rely 100% on public transport and follow working conditions that these workers at Boohoo are expected to follow then Im sure we would have far better public services and much stricter laws on working conditions so when that happens I'll maybe start to worry about the pay these elected union leaders get for doing the job they are paid to do.
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:35 am
Tribesmen wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:27 am
So ballpark how much would a guy get take home for a 40 hour week in Boohoo ?
At £10/hour, that equates to a yearly salary of £20,800
After deductions for Tax/NI etc that’s a take home wage of £18,166.40 (changed in November - prior would be £18,063.52) which equates to £349.36 a week
-
ClaretDiver
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:00 am
- Been Liked: 588 times
- Has Liked: 144 times
Post
by ClaretDiver » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:36 am
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:35 am
At £10/hour, that equates to a yearly salary of £20,800
After deductions for Tax/NI etc that’s a take home wage of £18,166.40 (changed in November - prior would be £18,063.52) which equates to £349.36 a week
That’s as much as I get driving an ambulance!!!
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:45 am
ClaretDiver wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:36 am
That’s as much as I get driving an ambulance!!!
If so then that’s appalling for that line of work - sorry.
The point is here isn’t to hate on poor sods at Boohoo because of your poor payment, it’s more that you should use that anger (collectively as a union) to demand a salary to rise in line with inflation - because in real terms over the past sort of decade and a half, you’ve had a massive real terms pay cut
These 2 users liked this post: MancunianClaret tiger76
-
ClaretDiver
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:00 am
- Been Liked: 588 times
- Has Liked: 144 times
Post
by ClaretDiver » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:47 am
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:45 am
If so then that’s appalling for that line of work - sorry.
The point is here isn’t to hate on poor sods at Boohoo because of your poor payment, it’s more that you should use that anger (collectively as a union) to demand a salary to rise in line with inflation - because in real terms over the past sort of decade and a half, you’ve had a massive real terms pay cut
I am in no way hating them for this….if they had better employment conditions then that would be a decent wage…
Unfortunately our Union have just balloted us for strike action

-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:56 am
ClaretDiver wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:47 am
I am in no way hating them for this….if they had better employment conditions then that would be a decent wage…
Unfortunately our Union have just balloted us for strike action
It wouldn’t be a decent wage at all mate, it’s terrible.
A one bed flat to lease in Burnley is minimum £450 a month.
Add in costs for food/transport and trying to have some modicum of a social life or whatever plus any other unexpected expenses and you’re never gonna be getting a step up to save and become a home earner etc
https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/minimum-i ... rd-uk-2022#
-
Ptgclaret
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 38 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Post
by Ptgclaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:06 pm
Not strictly true, a quick search in Rightmove shows 22, 1 bed flats available to rent right now, and 40% of them are under £450 - they start at £350pm.
But that's besides the point, Boohoo is a terrible company, with terrible values, it's bad for the environment with their fast throwaway fashion, still has the Leicester sweatshops hanging over their heads, and is horrible to their employees.
-
RMutt
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 pm
- Been Liked: 398 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Post
by RMutt » Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:09 pm
Taffy on the wing wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 1:53 am
An "i'm alright Jack" post if i've ever seen one.
Sadly that seems to be the way on here for a vocal minority. I think we know who they are. Very little care, empathy or understanding for other people’s situations.
These 2 users liked this post: Greenmile tiger76
-
Tribesmen
- Posts: 5639
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1292 times
- Has Liked: 691 times
- Location: Tibet
Post
by Tribesmen » Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:12 pm
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:35 am
At £10/hour, that equates to a yearly salary of £20,800
After deductions for Tax/NI etc that’s a take home wage of £18,166.40 (changed in November - prior would be £18,063.52) which equates to £349.36 a week
Hummmm McDonalds pay €11.60 an hour in Galway , and if you can find a one bedroom flat for less than €850 a month you would have done well .
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:20 pm
Ptgclaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:06 pm
Not strictly true, a quick search in Rightmove shows 22, 1 bed flats available to rent right now, and 40% of them are under £450 - they start at £350pm.
But that's besides the point, Boohoo is a terrible company, with terrible values, it's bad for the environment with their fast throwaway fashion, still has the Leicester sweatshops hanging over their heads, and is horrible to their employees.
There’s 7 and they’re all house shares.
Absolutely miserable
-
Chester Perry
- Posts: 20133
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3296 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Post
by Chester Perry » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:20 pm
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:20 pm
There’s 7 and they’re all house shares.
Absolutely miserable
There has been a huge move to Houses of Multiple Occupation in the town from landlords and developers buying properties fitting them out and then selling them as ongoing business's - the town centre is full of them and the council (who have also long championed the BooHoo presence in the town) have been very significant contributors to this all occurring.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
Ptgclaret
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 38 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Post
by Ptgclaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:23 pm
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:20 pm
There’s 7 and they’re all house shares.
Absolutely miserable
Again, completely untrue and besides the point of Boohoo, but for clarity:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127559798 ( 1 bed flat, Victoria apartments, fully furnished, 350pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129375269 (terrace converted to flats, 1 bed, Briercliffe 380pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127622492 (bathesda house, flats, 1 bed, town Centre, 400pm)
Https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/128988893 (same flats, 415pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/117680915 (Ormerod road, studio flat, 1 bed, 415pm and this includes all gas, electric, water and council tax bills)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017627 (bridge street, town Centre, 1 bed apartment, 425pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017432 (same building)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129379637 (Ashworth house, town Centre, CO vetted flats, 1 bed, 425pm)
Important not to use false facts when making a point. These are all flats or houses/buildings converted to flats. Not to my taste, but they're there.
-
Zlatan
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2230 times
- Has Liked: 5739 times
Post
by Zlatan » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:37 pm
Ptgclaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:23 pm
Again, completely untrue and besides the point of Boohoo, but for clarity:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127559798 ( 1 bed flat, Victoria apartments, fully furnished, 350pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129375269 (terrace converted to flats, 1 bed, Briercliffe 380pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127622492 (bathesda house, flats, 1 bed, town Centre, 400pm)
Https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/128988893 (same flats, 415pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/117680915 (Ormerod road, studio flat, 1 bed, 415pm and this includes all gas, electric, water and council tax bills)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017627 (bridge street, town Centre, 1 bed apartment, 425pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017432 (same building)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129379637 (Ashworth house, town Centre, CO vetted flats, 1 bed, 425pm)
Important not to use false facts when making a point. These are all flats or houses/buildings converted to flats. Not to my taste, but they're there.
thats shockingly high rent for those "rooms" no wonder the country is on it's ar5e when the wealthy can suck up property assets and fleece people (usually under priveleged) like this.
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:44 pm
Ptgclaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:23 pm
Again, completely untrue and besides the point of Boohoo, but for clarity:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127559798 ( 1 bed flat, Victoria apartments, fully furnished, 350pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129375269 (terrace converted to flats, 1 bed, Briercliffe 380pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/127622492 (bathesda house, flats, 1 bed, town Centre, 400pm)
Https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/128988893 (same flats, 415pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/117680915 (Ormerod road, studio flat, 1 bed, 415pm and this includes all gas, electric, water and council tax bills)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017627 (bridge street, town Centre, 1 bed apartment, 425pm)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129017432 (same building)
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/129379637 (Ashworth house, town Centre, CO vetted flats, 1 bed, 425pm)
Important not to use false facts when making a point. These are all flats or houses/buildings converted to flats. Not to my taste, but they're there.
The point is you are basically getting a dive for anywhere nice for under sort of 550-650 (before bills) unless you’re prepared to live with other individuals in a cramped environment or in an cramped environment.
I initially misread what you wrote and thought it stated just £350
For properties at £350 there are 7 listings, 6 of which is a house share, one being an apartment in a mill that you posted.
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to ... xPrice=350
Ultimately, this is just semantics. The point is that living costs relative to wages have increased and people being diehard deniers of it or treating minimum wage workers with contempt scoffing that they should sort of ‘put up with it’ whilst their quality of life is diminishing with each passing day is just a bit disgusting.
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:49 pm
Zlatan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:37 pm
thats shockingly high rent for those "rooms" no wonder the country is on it's ar5e when the wealthy can suck up property assets and fleece people (usually under priveleged) like this.
A lot of folk either don’t understand at all, or worse do and just think they ultimately have what they deserve.
It shows a real lack empathy thinking people should just be happy to exist whilst in effect being used for cheap labour without any real prospects of betterment or getting out of their predicament unless they dedicate to virtually no quality of life for a good number of years.
Which we all know if everyone saved every single penny meticulously the economy would be on its frigging arse.
These 2 users liked this post: Zlatan tiger76
-
Billy Balfour
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Post
by Billy Balfour » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:02 pm
RMutt wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:09 pm
Sadly that seems to be the way on here for a vocal minority. I think we know who they are. Very little care, empathy or understanding for other people’s situations.
It's shows how bad things have got when a Murdoch owned newspaper is covering this. However, the lack of empathy for these workers on here is yet another new low for this place. It must make grim reading for some of the mods who run UTC. After all, some of them help to organise and run foodbank collections, and then they also have to read through this kind of stuff, day in, day out. I couldn't do it - it would make me depressed.
These 3 users liked this post: Bosscat MancunianClaret tiger76
-
Bosscat
- Posts: 28786
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 9632 times
- Has Liked: 20693 times
Post
by Bosscat » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:06 pm
Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:02 pm
It's shows how bad things have got when a Murdoch owned newspaper is covering this.
However, the lack of empathy for these workers on here is yet another new low for this place. It must make grim reading for some of the mods who run UTC. After all, some of them help to organise and run foodbank collections, and then they also have to read through this kind of stuff, day in, day out. I couldn't do it - it would make me depressed.
Summed up Billy by this post ... from a so called Practising Solicitor ...
pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 7:22 am
Why can’t people stop whinging. Get on with your job. If you don’t like it move on. It's all to do with their outlook on life and their personal experiences. You will find that the people complaining are usually failures, jealous, they have had bitter experiences at work, are unhappy and have a poor social life.
You could not make it up
-
Burnley Ace
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 724 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Post
by Burnley Ace » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:13 pm
fidelcastro wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 10:21 am
Can anyone else smell something?
They are describing an average night for a Criminal Duty Solicitor or Police Station Representative. What is worse is that having been out at the police station during the night they are the. Expected to do the next day in Court.
-
Ptgclaret
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:31 am
- Been Liked: 38 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Post
by Ptgclaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:13 pm
Absolutely not pretending these are nice places that I'd chose to live, or denying the price of living is far too high, just that it dilutes a point if it's made using incorrect info.
Also, not pretending anything will come of this latest close look at Boohoo. They don't care, and won't care while people keep buying their crap.
Unfortunately they also own these brands too:
PrettyLittleThing
Nasty Gal
MissPap
Karen Millen
Coast
Oasis
Warehouse
Debenhams
Dorothy Perkins
Wallis
Burton
People buying their nice dresses from Coast, their new suits from Debenhams or some t shirts from Burton have no idea in general their fueling the Boohoo monster.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
NottsClaret
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2900 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Post
by NottsClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:19 pm
Nothing more depressing than people from a working class town decrying the trade union movement. We'd still be slaving 14 hours a day from childhood until we drop with no holidays or sick pay if it wasn't for unions. You need to listen to Mick Lynch or read some history and get off the billionaire's newspaper websites.
These 3 users liked this post: CoolClaret MancunianClaret tiger76
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:22 pm
NottsClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:19 pm
Nothing more depressing than people from a working class town decrying the trade union movement. We'd still be slaving 14 hours a day from childhood until we drop with no holidays or sick pay if it wasn't for unions. You need to listen to Mick Lynch or read some history and get off the billionaire's newspaper websites.
Mick Lynch. Where does he think the money is coming from? Higher taxes, higher fares - so less people will use the railways. Driverless trains the answer to him.
-
NottsClaret
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2900 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Post
by NottsClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:24 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:22 pm
Mick Lynch. Where does he think the money is coming from?
Shareholder dividends.
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:25 pm
Ptgclaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:13 pm
Absolutely not pretending these are nice places that I'd chose to live, or denying the price of living is far too high, just that it dilutes a point if it's made using incorrect info.
Also, not pretending anything will come of this latest close look at Boohoo. They don't care, and won't care while people keep buying their crap.
Unfortunately they also own these brands too:
PrettyLittleThing
Nasty Gal
MissPap
Karen Millen
Coast
Oasis
Warehouse
Debenhams
Dorothy Perkins
Wallis
Burton
People buying their nice dresses from Coast, their new suits from Debenhams or some t shirts from Burton have no idea in general their fueling the Boohoo monster.
Are you sure they own these companies / brands? Debenhams doesn't exist does it?
Where would you recommend people buy their clothes from then?
-
Hapag Lloyd
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 317 times
- Has Liked: 467 times
Post
by Hapag Lloyd » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:29 pm
Debenhams is now an online business
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:29 pm
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:49 pm
A lot of folk either don’t understand at all, or worse do and just think they ultimately have what they deserve.
It shows a real lack empathy thinking people should just be happy to exist whilst in effect being used for cheap labour without any real prospects of betterment or getting out of their predicament unless they dedicate to virtually no quality of life for a good number of years.
Which we all know if everyone saved every single penny meticulously the economy would be on its frigging arse.
That pretty wellsums up life in a communist country and if you dont belive me visit one. No aspiration and basically institutionalised.
-
Lancasterclaret
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Post
by Lancasterclaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:31 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:22 pm
Mick Lynch. Where does he think the money is coming from? Higher taxes, higher fares - so less people will use the railways. Driverless trains the answer to him.
I'm not sure of the timescale for this, but you are talking about a full replacement of not only the engines, but (I think) the infrastructure as well
I doubt I'll be alive when it finished even if it started now
-
atlantalad
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:57 pm
- Been Liked: 143 times
- Has Liked: 120 times
Post
by atlantalad » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:36 pm
NottsClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:24 pm
Shareholder dividends.
I see, your pension pot?
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:45 pm
Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:31 pm
I'm not sure of the timescale for this, but you are talking about a full replacement of not only the engines, but (I think) the infrastructure as well
I doubt I'll be alive when it finished even if it started now
Its interesting though because, as you probabaly know, there are driverless trains operating in and around airports and have been for some time. Atlanta was the first one I encountered some years back but Dubai and Singapore have them as well and there will be others oarticularly in Asia. It will likely be Asia that drives (oops) this.
-
Lancasterclaret
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Post
by Lancasterclaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:45 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:45 pm
Its interesting though because, as you probabaly know, there are driverless trains operating in and around airports and have been for some time. Atlanta was the first one I encountered some years back but Dubai and Singapore have them as well and there will be others oarticularly in Asia. It will likely be Asia that drives (oops) this.
Yes, I'm sure its possible SU, but not in a timescale that affects any decisions made now
-
CoolClaret
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Post
by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:05 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:22 pm
Mick Lynch. Where does he think the money is coming from? Higher taxes, higher fares - so less people will use the railways. Driverless trains the answer to him.
Doesn’t necessarily work that logic does it - just have a look at France/Germany/Scandinavian countries and realise we’re getting the absolute **** taken out of us on rail fairs.
When you can get a return ticket to fly to most of sort of Western Europe’s capital cities for cheaper than you can get a train ticket from Manchester to London (without a railcard) you know that there’s something seriously wrong with the railways
These 2 users liked this post: fatboy47 tiger76
-
jrgbfc
- Posts: 9711
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
- Been Liked: 2349 times
- Has Liked: 351 times
Post
by jrgbfc » Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:05 pm
When a company can sell clothes so cheap there's obviously people getting screwed somewhere along the way.
Unfortunately most people don't care, as a society we're addicted to buying cheap, throwaway crap.
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:17 pm
jrgbfc wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:05 pm
When a company can sell clothes so cheap there's obviously people getting screwed somewhere along the way.
Unfortunately most people don't care, as a society we're addicted to buying cheap, throwaway crap.
If you believe all you read, its all a lot of people can afford
-
sanderson370
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:55 pm
- Been Liked: 8 times
- Has Liked: 132 times
Post
by sanderson370 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:32 pm
houseboy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 10:24 am
Just a thought but for all those who think unions are bad it should be pointed out that any rights workers have now were won by unions. They were not given freely by employers. They never would have been. Criticising unions is hypocrisy in the extreme because the people doing the criticising most probably will have a job that is decent with decent pay and conditions. These conditions and reasonable rates of pay exist because of unions. Employers will give very little freely and yet without the very people they treat badly they themselves would have nothing. Employment is a two way street but in the past employers failed to realise or just chose to ignore it.
i totally agrree some narrow minded people on here forget that unions over many years fought for the rights you have in your workplaces now and still in 2022 are fighting for your rights.This is why boohoo wont recognise a union this is why they are getting away treating there workers like slaves.i rest my case.
This user liked this post: houseboy
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:03 pm
Hardly a surprise. Boohoo are an exploitative employer who were found to be in breach of minimum wage legislation and more just a couple of years ago...
The apologists and sycophants on here make me feel ill. Instead of condemning bad employers and supporting efforts to unionise, they prefer to point the finger at the "feckless" employee. Tells you a lot about a person.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... n-failings
Levitt’s review – commissioned after investigations by the Guardian and Sunday Times found evidence that factories in Leicester were putting workers’ health at risk during lockdown and failing to pay them the minimum wage – said that the company had failed to provide all of the evidence asked for. It also found that:
* Founder Mahmud Kamani in 2018 told staff to “trade faster harder and quicker” to push prices in Leicester down, and had for “too long” been “allowed to dictate company policy”, Levitt said.
* 93% of suppliers analysed had at least one instance of non-compliance with the company’s audits in recent years on issues including minimum wage and unauthorised subcontracting. Factories were found to have locked fire doors, filthy toilets, buildings in “deplorable” condition, and “no wholesome drinking water”.
* Boohoo executives had exhibited an “occasional lack of frankness”, including joint CEO John Lyttle who failed to mention a trip to “appalling” factories which he “could not possibly have forgotten”.
* For long periods Boohoo’s on-the-ground audit team for hundreds of suppliers and subcontractors in Leicester consisted of a single person who told Levitt: “I admit I’m not a very good admin keeper … I don’t have comprehensive records.”
* Profits were “prioritised to the extent that the company lost sight of other issues” and “a series of warning and red flags” were ignored.
* Internal emails warning of social distancing breaches in factories were sent when the pandemic began in March, with one saying: “This is escalating … my instinct is this could blow up in our faces”.
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret tiger76
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:10 pm
MancunianClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:03 pm
Hardly a surprise. Boohoo are an exploitative employer who were found to be in breach of minimum wage legislation and more just a couple of years ago...
The apologists and sycophants on here make me feel ill. Instead of condemning bad employers and supporting efforts to unionise, they prefer to point the finger at the "feckless" employee. Tells you a lot about a person.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... n-failings
But of an over reaction
how many have actually pointed a finger at a feckless employee?
Did reading a messageboard actually make you feel ill?
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:18 pm
Nori1958 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:10 pm
But of an over reaction
how many have actually pointed a finger at a feckless employee?
Did reading a messageboard actually make you feel ill?
Do you have anything meaningful to add to the discussion or do you just want to resort to ad-hominems?
In a good faith attempt at discussion with you (not holding my breath) - I'll at least attempt to address your question. Two terms used already in this thread to describe employees unhappy with their working conditions;
"thugs and vandals"
"[people complaining are usually] failures"
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
MancunianClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:18 pm
Do you have anything meaningful to add to the discussion or do you just want to resort to ad-hominems?
In a good faith attempt at discussion with you (not holding my breath) - I'll at least attempt to address your question. Two terms used already in this thread to describe employees unhappy with their working conditions;
"thugs and vandals"
"[people complaining are usually] failures"
A very small minority then?
The vast majority of posters are anti Boohoo, and that is the main thrust of the conversation, to suggest otherwise, in my opinion was misleading.
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:27 pm
Nori1958 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
A very small minority then?
The vast majority of posters are anti Boohoo, and that is the main thrust of the conversation, to suggest otherwise, in my opinion was misleading.
I don't recall I said it was a majority OR minority of posters taking a certain position. I invite you to back up your claim that I "suggested otherwise".
This user liked this post: Greenmile
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:53 pm
MancunianClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:27 pm
I don't recall I said it was a majority OR minority of posters taking a certain position. I invite you to back up your claim that I "suggested otherwise".
You didn't
It was me who mentioned minority and majority
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:56 pm
Nori1958 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:53 pm
You didn't
It was me who mentioned minority and majority
I'm lost as to what point you're trying to make or argue in that case - because right now it appears you've claimed I represented a position, argued against it, and then admitted I never held that position in the first place.
I'll ask again - I invite you to back up your claim that I "suggested otherwise".
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:05 pm
In my opinion, your post made it sound like there were plenty of posters supporting Boohoo and criticising the employees... So many in fact it made you ill
When in fact not many had that view.
-
ceborame
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:06 am
- Been Liked: 107 times
- Has Liked: 46 times
- Location: Colne
Post
by ceborame » Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:17 pm
Oh the irony of union bashing on this thread, which is about a company that treats it's employee's like sh!t, and won't recognise unions. Incredible
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:32 pm
Nori1958 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:05 pm
In my opinion, your post made it sound like there were plenty of posters supporting Boohoo and criticising the employees... So many in fact it made you ill
When in fact not many had that view.
You've made your own (incorrect) interpretation of my position, got it. To clear it up for you - I don't believe a majority of posters were criticising the unfairly treated employees.
It's beside the point really - my actual intention was to provide additional evidence that Boohoo are indeed an exploitative employer that don't respect workers rights. To see any number of posters (yes, even a minority) suggest those employees being exploited are "failures" makes me angry, yes. Is there something in that position you take objection to?
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:42 pm
MancunianClaret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:32 pm
You've made your own (incorrect) interpretation of my position, got it. To clear it up for you - I don't believe a majority of posters were criticising the unfairly treated employees.
It's beside the point really - my actual intention was to provide additional evidence that Boohoo are indeed an exploitative employer that don't respect workers rights. To see any number of posters (yes, even a minority) suggest those employees being exploited are "failures" makes me angry, yes. Is there something in that position you take objection to?
None at all, and had you said it made you angry, instead of ill I would probably not have commented. Can we leave it now, or have you more questions
This user liked this post: MancunianClaret
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:55 pm
It's an emotive subject, so I make no apology for my feelings on the matter - but yes, let's get back to the discussion.