This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
agreenwood
- Posts: 4466
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Post
by agreenwood » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:10 am
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 8:39 am
It’s really not rocket science.
If under 25 they might spend a lot as it’s likely they can make a profit. If 25 and over the likely won’t spend a lot as less chance of making profit.
Hope that clarifies it.
Neither is the fact that no club in the world sticks religiously to its primary policy. If we did that now, we’d barely have any experience in the team.
IF the future ability to sell on for profit was the overriding factor in all our business, I doubt there’d be too much nervousness about a 25/26 year old at the figures we’re paying. It’s hardly as if you couldn’t make a decent profit on someone who cost £7/8m if they were to have a good season in the Prem next year.
-
Newcastleclaret93
- Posts: 13063
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1922 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Post
by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:19 am
agreenwood wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:10 am
Neither is the fact that no club in the world sticks religiously to its primary policy. If we did that now, we’d barely have any experience in the team.
IF the future ability to sell on for profit was the overriding factor in all our business, I doubt there’d be too much nervousness about a 25/26 year old at the figures we’re paying. It’s hardly as if you couldn’t make a decent profit on someone who cost £7/8m if they were to have a good season in the Prem next year.
I’m not sure if this is just not coming across in the right way.
I am not saying we won’t spend that kind of money. I’m saying the club will be purchasing players that they deem to financially worth the risk.
What I mean when I say that is the club would rather sign someone like Foster (younger, lower fee and wages) but who the club deem to have a similar ceiling (peak value) as Gykores. That is because the financial risk is less.
They will sign 26-32 year old players as long as they meet the financial risk profile.
-
jedi_master
- Posts: 8243
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4127 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Post
by jedi_master » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:26 am
The thing is NC93, you throw out figures for players to suit your argument when you’ve no idea if the player this debate stemmed from would cost what you suggested. He’ll have 12 months on his deal left in the summer, nobody was suggesting spending £20m on him as he’s not worth that and we wouldn’t pay it. He’d be available around £10-15m, and at 24 would very much grow in value. That’s all people are saying.
Everyone agrees with the overall strategy of buying low and selling high - it’s served us great and we will undoubtedly continue it. Every now and then though, a Josh Cullen etc is the right move for the squad. Hadziamehtovic looks class based on the little we could see and would be another exciting addition regardless of reaching 25!
On a similar line, this might wind some up but just a discussion I was having yesterday - do we need to bring a ‘little’ experience in for the Premier League? The likes of Cork, Jay, Barnes, Taylor have been a huge plus for the younger lads this season to learn from, I’m sure of that. With a few of those possibly leaving this summer, is there not space for one or two older lads to lead our prospects to a higher level of football both on and off the pitch? We spitballed a few ex-Kompany alumni who are out of contract this summer - James Milner, Ilkay Gundogan, Edin Dzeko! Yes, all undoubtedly massive salaries and might not fancy it, but would one of those on a free transfer might be of benefit? Hope you see my point NC93, nobody disagrees with our transfer strategy - it’s brilliant - just that the odd move outside the boundaries of that strategy does sometimes serve a purpose too.
-
Ric_C
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
- Been Liked: 1013 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Post
by Ric_C » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:27 am
When did he like the tweet though? The original tweet was from Dec 2022
-
Newcastleclaret93
- Posts: 13063
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1922 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Post
by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:34 am
jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:26 am
The thing is NC93, you throw out figures for players to suit your argument when you’ve no idea if the player this debate stemmed from would cost what you suggested. He’ll have 12 months on his deal left in the summer, nobody was suggesting spending £20m on him as he’s not worth that and we wouldn’t pay it. He’d be available around £10-15m, and at 24 would very much grow in value. That’s all people are saying.
Everyone agrees with the overall strategy of buying low and selling high - it’s served us great and we will undoubtedly continue it. Every now and then though, a Josh Cullen etc is the right move for the squad. Hadziamehtovic looks class based on the little we could see and would be another exciting addition regardless of reaching 25!
On a similar line, this might wind some up but just a discussion I was having yesterday - do we need to bring a ‘little’ experience in for the Premier League? The likes of Cork, Jay, Barnes, Taylor have been a huge plus for the younger lads this season to learn from, I’m sure of that. With a few of those possibly leaving this summer, is there not space for one or two older lads to lead our prospects to a higher level of football both on and off the pitch? We spitballed a few ex-Kompany alumni who are out of contract this summer - James Milner, Ilkay Gundogan, Edin Dzeko! Yes, all undoubtedly massive salaries and might not fancy it, but would one of those on a free transfer might be of benefit? Hope you see my point NC93, nobody disagrees with our transfer strategy - it’s brilliant - just that the odd move outside the boundaries of that strategy does sometimes serve a purpose too.
The number 20m has come from there papers saying that’s what they want. Also he’s 25 at the end of this season.
But I’m not arguing that either? I have said if we could get him for 10m that would be an alright deal. I’m saying at 20m for a 25 year old striker it doesn’t make financial sense as there is low percentage chance we make profit on him.
-
Carport
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:24 am
- Been Liked: 182 times
- Has Liked: 47 times
Post
by Carport » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:38 am
Excited to see these additions to squad. Just hope VK is skilled in keeping them all happy so we don’t end up with a fractured team spirit; the spirit we saw at the end of the WBA game that VK and the group has worked so hard on to achieve. Well I’m guessing they’ve worked hard on that. I guess it helps bringing in younger lads who may be less disenchanted about not getting game time than the older crew. And I suppose if the older players don’t like it they move on!
-
Socrates
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
- Been Liked: 1017 times
- Has Liked: 5 times
Post
by Socrates » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:40 am
Why are you debating with him?
Do you honestly think he’s going to turn round and say “you know what lads, you’re right. I’ve got this one wrong”?
Make a coffee. Go outside. Lots going on you know.
These 3 users liked this post: Chuckypad Lancasterclaret whiffa
-
Firthy
- Posts: 5396
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 1720 times
- Has Liked: 299 times
Post
by Firthy » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:41 am
Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 7:28 am
He's 27
Past his best and would be worthless in a couple of years
Am I doing this right?
Can't believe anyone is taking this post as genuine, love the sarcasm Lancaster. Made me laugh

Last edited by
Firthy on Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jakubclaret
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Post
by Jakubclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:41 am
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:19 am
I’m not sure if this is just not coming across in the right way.
I am not saying we won’t spend that kind of money. I’m saying the club will be purchasing players that they deem to financially worth the risk.
What I mean when I say that is the club would rather sign someone like Foster (younger, lower fee and wages) but who the club deem to have a similar ceiling (peak value) as Gykores. That is because the financial risk is less.
They will sign 26-32 year old players as long as they meet the financial risk profile.
It's obvious from the outset regarding recruitment that players of a certain criteria will only be targeted with the new regime in place, money won't be spunked on the likes of Dale Stephens anymore because it just doesn't represent any financial profitability or even service. The club isn't as financially secure anymore as it once was so things have to be done differently.
-
Dodobdobodobo
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:57 pm
- Been Liked: 125 times
- Has Liked: 324 times
Post
by Dodobdobodobo » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:43 am
NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:02 am
Amir Hadziametovic
From what we can all tell, a really exciting defensive midfielder.
Get you Bosnian that plays in Turkey

-
dsr
- Posts: 16205
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 4857 times
- Has Liked: 2581 times
Post
by dsr » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:46 am
Socrates wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:40 am
Why are you debating with him?
Do you honestly think he’s going to turn round and say “you know what lads, you’re right. I’ve got this one wrong”?
Make a coffee. Go outside. Lots going on you know.
Reading the whole thing, for (it seems) days on end, there seems to be two different arguments - newcastle is arguing the Gyokeres is overpriced and too old and not good enough for what we need, and the massed ranks of opponents are assuming that newcastle is therefore making the same argument about every single player aged 24-25 at whatever price. If we all just stick to the point it would lead to a lot less pointless bickering and attempts to belittle other posters.
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17470
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3939 times
- Has Liked: 4900 times
Post
by NewClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:18 am
dsr wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:46 am
Reading the whole thing, for (it seems) days on end, there seems to be two different arguments - newcastle is arguing the Gyokeres is overpriced and too old and not good enough for what we need, and the massed ranks of opponents are assuming that newcastle is therefore making the same argument about every single player aged 24-25 at whatever price. If we all just stick to the point it would lead to a lot less pointless bickering and attempts to belittle other posters.
Glad to see this post and the one by Socrates.
It was quite bizarre to witness how a poster can be rounded upon on this board for expressing an opinion, which everyone’s entitled to and was actually supported by others as it happens - so he wasn’t alone in holding it.
Would just like to add that nobody knows what’s going on in peoples lives outside this board, or how they’re feeling. I’m all for debate but it costs nothing to be civil.
These 11 users liked this post: MeeActon1 frankinwales tom210 COBBLE mdd2 randomclaret2 sox8595 Paul Waine Exsus Vegas Claret whiffa
-
123EasyasBFC
- Posts: 6546
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 296 times
Post
by 123EasyasBFC » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:29 am
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:19 am
I’m not sure if this is just not coming across in the right way.
I am not saying we won’t spend that kind of money. I’m saying the club will be purchasing players that they deem to financially worth the risk.
What I mean when I say that is the club would rather sign someone like Foster (younger, lower fee and wages) but who the club deem to have a similar ceiling (peak value) as Gykores. That is because the financial risk is less.
They will sign 26-32 year old players as long as they meet the financial risk profile.
So with Gyokeres being 25 at the end of the season and not falling into your 26-32 category would be worth the money then?
-
It Is What It Is
- Posts: 1061
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 251 times
- Has Liked: 472 times
Post
by It Is What It Is » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:30 am
With Lyle Foster hopefully joining us, the Obafemi saga may be over. Swansea messing about has stopped them from getting a very unhappy player off their books. I am still of the opinion that Obafemi would rock the boat in the dressing room...a bit Weghorst like.
Fingers crossed for Foster

-
Oldparkwood
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:14 pm
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Post
by Oldparkwood » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:30 am
Absolutely NewClaret....... As my dad always says....." its nice to be nice and it costs you nothing"
These 4 users liked this post: NewClaret tiger76 mdd2 whiffa
-
HiThere
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:59 pm
- Been Liked: 274 times
- Has Liked: 505 times
Post
by HiThere » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:32 am
According to The Athletic, we're in the final stages of talks with Foster. I thought personal terms had already been agreed.
-
Hapag Lloyd
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 317 times
- Has Liked: 469 times
Post
by Hapag Lloyd » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:32 am
123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:29 am
So with Gyokeres being 25 at the end of the season and not falling into your 26-32 category would be worth the money then?
Think it’s been done to death already.
This user liked this post: Stockbrokerbelt
-
Lancasterclaret
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Post
by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:36 am
Firthy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:41 am
Can't believe anyone is taking this post as genuine, love the sarcasm Lancaster. Made me laugh
We defo need sarcasm emojis on this board
This user liked this post: mkmel
-
COBBLE
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:04 am
- Been Liked: 360 times
- Has Liked: 502 times
Post
by COBBLE » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:43 am
NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:18 am
Glad to see this post and the one by Socrates.
It was quite bizarre to witness how a poster can be rounded upon on this board for expressing an opinion, which everyone’s entitled to and was actually supported by others as it happens - so he wasn’t alone in holding it.
I always ask anyone I meet who is a BFC fan if they read this board and contribute. The usual answer is they read the board (maybe just for information) but say they would not contribute because of the manner in which people can be criticised.
This user liked this post: Exsus
-
mdd2
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1828 times
- Has Liked: 751 times
Post
by mdd2 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:51 am
The problem with this kind of information and comment is that there is just the written word-nothing else-no intonation of speech, no facial expression and no eye contact . This means it is all too easy to misconstrue what is being written which is why the spoken word will always be the preferred way of communication.
Who on this board has not sent a txt or email and the receiver has totally misunderstood the message and at times has been upset by what the txter or emailer felt was nothing like the way it has been received?
Having written all that there are some shocking posts which belittle and insult other posters.
All this for me to agree with NewClaret-if you cant speak well of someone-keep quiet.
These 4 users liked this post: NewClaret tom210 Paul Waine Quicknick
-
martin_p
- Posts: 11091
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
- Been Liked: 4063 times
- Has Liked: 745 times
Post
by martin_p » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:57 am
mdd2 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:51 am
The problem with this kind of information and comment is that there is just the written word-nothing else-no intonation of speech, no facial expression and no eye contact . This means it is all too easy to misconstrue what is being written which is why the spoken word will always be the preferred way of communication.
Who on this board has not sent a txt or email and the receiver has totally misunderstood the message and at times has been upset by what the txter or emailer felt was nothing like the way it has been received?
Having written all that there are some shocking posts which belittle and insult other posters.
All this for me to agree with NewClaret-if you cant speak well of someone-keep quiet.
How dare you!!!! Bet you wouldn’t say that to my face!
This user liked this post: mdd2
-
claretonthecoast1882
- Posts: 11593
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4727 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Post
by claretonthecoast1882 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:11 am
mdd2 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:51 am
The problem with this kind of information and comment is that there is just the written word-nothing else-no intonation of speech, no facial expression and no eye contact . This means it is all too easy to misconstrue what is being written which is why the spoken word will always be the preferred way of communication.
Who on this board has not sent a txt or email and the receiver has totally misunderstood the message and at times has been upset by what the txter or emailer felt was nothing like the way it has been received?
Having written all that there are some shocking posts which belittle and insult other posters.
All this for me to agree with NewClaret-if you cant speak well of someone-keep quiet.
Full agree with this, I text the Mrs on Friday to say we were having a beer after the match but won't be late home.
Apparently it wasn't clear by text that we would have to get a cab to Lytham and it would be 3am when we got back

-
LDNBFC87
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 4:35 pm
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 562 times
Post
by LDNBFC87 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:15 am
Glad we've got this all cleared up - has anyone got any transfer rumours to share?

This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:16 am
Tenuous link, but VK's official Instagram account "liked" a highlights reel of the Bosnian lad last night...
This user liked this post: LDNBFC87
-
HiThere
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:59 pm
- Been Liked: 274 times
- Has Liked: 505 times
Post
by HiThere » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:18 am
LDNBFC87 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:15 am
Glad we've got this all cleared up - has anyone got any transfer rumours to share?
According to The Athletic, we're in the final stages of talks with Foster.
This user liked this post: LDNBFC87
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76695
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37364 times
- Has Liked: 5707 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:37 am
HiThere wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:18 am
According to The Athletic, we're in the final stages of talks with Foster.
Beyond that stage
These 6 users liked this post: LDNBFC87 ClaretAL Steddyman mybloodisclaret S0S-1971 whiffa
-
RVclaret
- Posts: 16231
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
- Been Liked: 4473 times
- Has Liked: 3011 times
Post
by RVclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:38 am
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:37 am
Beyond that stage
Medical today, announced this evening/tomorrow, is my guess.
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76695
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37364 times
- Has Liked: 5707 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:39 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:38 am
Medical today, announced this evening/tomorrow, is my guess.
I'm not expecting anything imminently and in any case a dental appointment has to take priority

These 3 users liked this post: RVclaret Dawlishclaret FeedTheArf
-
burnley007
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 959 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Post
by burnley007 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:41 am
Could we start a transfer rumours thread?
This user liked this post: LDNBFC87
-
HistoricalClaret
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:16 pm
- Been Liked: 58 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
Post
by HistoricalClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:43 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:38 am
Medical today, announced this evening/tomorrow, is my guess.
His medical is not today
-
PremierLeagueClass
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Post
by PremierLeagueClass » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:43 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:38 am
Medical today, announced this evening/tomorrow, is my guess.
Ipswich should have a good feel to it if we can get all 3 of the new lads plus Twine involved.
-
martin_p
- Posts: 11091
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
- Been Liked: 4063 times
- Has Liked: 745 times
Post
by martin_p » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:43 am
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:39 am
I'm not expecting anything imminently and in any case a dental appointment has to take priority
So an announcement at tooth hurty? I’ll get my coat.
This user liked this post: FeedTheArf
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76695
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37364 times
- Has Liked: 5707 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:45 am
martin_p wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:43 am
So an announcement at tooth hurty? I’ll get my coat.
Ha ha
-
Goody1975
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1152 times
- Has Liked: 279 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by Goody1975 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:48 am
burnley007 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:41 am
Could we start a transfer rumours thread?
Yes, please can we stick to the subject, things sometimes go off at a tangent but let's try not have pages and pages of stuff not related to it.

This user liked this post: LDNBFC87
-
RVclaret
- Posts: 16231
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
- Been Liked: 4473 times
- Has Liked: 3011 times
Post
by RVclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:48 am
Go on then, when is/was it?
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17470
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3939 times
- Has Liked: 4900 times
Post
by NewClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:49 am
ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:39 am
I'm not expecting anything imminently and in any case a dental appointment has to take priority
Best he gets his teeth sorted before before his medical

This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
burnley007
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 959 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Post
by burnley007 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:50 am
Is this the end of us wanting Obafemi? Surely there is still a space for him in the squad? We need pace up front.
-
HistoricalClaret
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:16 pm
- Been Liked: 58 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
Post
by HistoricalClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:55 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:48 am
Go on then, when is/was it?
He'll be in before Ipswich as long as he passes but its not today
-
MancunianClaret
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:46 pm
- Been Liked: 175 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Post
by MancunianClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:56 am
burnley007 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:50 am
Is this the end of us wanting Obafemi? Surely there is still a space for him in the squad? We need pace up front.
Shame as he seems a steal at £3M. Not much to lose at that price.
-
AshevilleNCClaret
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
- Been Liked: 231 times
- Has Liked: 11 times
Post
by AshevilleNCClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:00 pm
NRC wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 8:45 pm
If “Bafana Foster” signs that’ll be our last two signings honed through the USA college system….. referring to a post I made a couple of weeks ago, we really should be tapping the system
Did he go to college in the us or did he just play here?
-
HistoricalClaret
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:16 pm
- Been Liked: 58 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
Post
by HistoricalClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:02 pm
AshevilleNCClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:00 pm
Did he go to college in the us or did he just play here?
He didnt go to college in the US dunno where he got that from at all tbh didnt play or go to school there.
-
Stan Tastic
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 471 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Post
by Stan Tastic » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:06 pm
jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:26 am
The thing is NC93, you throw out figures for players to suit your argument when you’ve no idea if the player this debate stemmed from would cost what you suggested. He’ll have 12 months on his deal left in the summer, nobody was suggesting spending £20m on him as he’s not worth that and we wouldn’t pay it. He’d be available around £10-15m, and at 24 would very much grow in value. That’s all people are saying.
Everyone agrees with the overall strategy of buying low and selling high - it’s served us great and we will undoubtedly continue it. Every now and then though, a Josh Cullen etc is the right move for the squad. Hadziamehtovic looks class based on the little we could see and would be another exciting addition regardless of reaching 25!
On a similar line, this might wind some up but just a discussion I was having yesterday - do we need to bring a ‘little’ experience in for the Premier League? The likes of Cork, Jay, Barnes, Taylor have been a huge plus for the younger lads this season to learn from, I’m sure of that. With a few of those possibly leaving this summer, is there not space for one or two older lads to lead our prospects to a higher level of football both on and off the pitch? We spitballed a few ex-Kompany alumni who are out of contract this summer - James Milner, Ilkay Gundogan, Edin Dzeko! Yes, all undoubtedly massive salaries and might not fancy it, but would one of those on a free transfer might be of benefit? Hope you see my point NC93, nobody disagrees with our transfer strategy - it’s brilliant - just that the odd move outside the boundaries of that strategy does sometimes serve a purpose too.
Dzeko is almost 37 and Milner is 37. We've got a manager with plenty of PL experience if you think that really matters. I don't think paying a high wage on players way past their best is a good idea.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
LDNBFC87
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 4:35 pm
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 562 times
Post
by LDNBFC87 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:19 pm
Foster almost done and the Bosnian lad a maybe - we expecting that to be our business done for the window? If so, I'd say it's a cracking window for one Big Al said we wouldn't be active in

-
Claretnick
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:41 am
- Been Liked: 284 times
- Has Liked: 237 times
Post
by Claretnick » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:20 pm
HistoricalClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:02 pm
He didnt go to college in the US dunno where he got that from at all tbh didnt play or go to school there.
Hjalmar Ekdal had a year in the US studying and played for a college whilst there according to Wikipedia. A few posters seeto be getting confused

-
jedi_master
- Posts: 8243
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4127 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Post
by jedi_master » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:21 pm
Stan Tastic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:06 pm
Dzeko is almost 37 and Milner is 37. We've got a manager with plenty of PL experience if you think that really matters. I don't think paying a high wage on players way past their best is a good idea.
Absolutely agree generally speaking, I mean more as a one off if we ended up getting rid of Barnes, Taylor, Rodriguez etc. Experience has helped us this season. Dzeko still lethal despite his age, 11 this season for Inter…
-
NRC
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Post
by NRC » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
HistoricalClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:02 pm
He didnt go to college in the US dunno where he got that from at all tbh didnt play or go to school there.
Duh….. I saw “Orlando Pirates” and put two and two together assuming UCF. Who’dathunk “Orlando” was in Johannesburg

-
claptrappers_union
- Posts: 5996
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1799 times
- Has Liked: 369 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Post
by claptrappers_union » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:34 pm
I think having older players in the squad is great for leadership and experience, even if they don't feature for 90 mins on the field.
Mitchell Thomas, Graham Alexander, Michael Duff, Kevin Ball, Andy Cole and Ian Wright... even Peter Crouch to some extent. As long as they know their role within the group.
Sean Dyche wanted to keep Crouch because he was 'good for the group' and could still do a job on the pitch. However, Crouch didn't want to be a 'head on a stick' and decided to retire and pursue a media career... which is fine, but I think an older player can bring value to the team behind the scenes.
Shame someone like Ronaldo couldn't see that at Manchester United.
-
FeedTheArf
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 178 times
Post
by FeedTheArf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:34 pm
jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:21 pm
Absolutely agree generally speaking, I mean more as a one off if we ended up getting rid of Barnes, Taylor, Rodriguez etc. Experience has helped us this season. Dzeko still lethal despite his age, 11 this season for Inter…
Completely agree with this. Our manager and assistant have more than enough experience of the league but some experienced heads on the pitch that are still able to contribute are invaluable. The trouble is, our experience of this in the past has been players like Steven Reid who contributed the square root of f all. We don't need 'good lads in the changing room', we need 'good lads on the pitch' and the difficulty is finding that balance.
-
tiger76
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Post
by tiger76 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:38 pm
burnley007 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:50 am
Is this the end of us wanting Obafemi? Surely there is still a space for him in the squad? We need pace up front.
Might depend whether Saints recall Tella, if they do then I can see us snapping up Obafemi especially if the £3m fee is accurate.