Norwich charged by FA

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ClaretTony
Posts: 77545
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37944 times
Has Liked: 5763 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Norwich charged by FA

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:44 pm

They’ve been charged with failing to ensure their players conducted themselves in an orderly fashion.

It was the incident when they harangued the referee after not being given a penalty. The referee took no action at the time.

Leisure
Posts: 22134
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 15274 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Leisure » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:47 pm

I didn't notice anything untoward that would warrant a charge??

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9817
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3230 times
Has Liked: 10712 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by evensteadiereddie » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:49 pm

Mobbing the ref after the so-called Ash Barnes penalty incident.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9817
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3230 times
Has Liked: 10712 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by evensteadiereddie » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:50 pm

Sorry, it was the "penalty" that was so-called, not Ash Barnes.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5709
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 2037 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Vino blanco » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:52 pm

It’s about time the powers that be started doing something about this.

HiThere
Posts: 1493
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:59 pm
Been Liked: 274 times
Has Liked: 505 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by HiThere » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:59 pm

And after all that it was the correct decision not to award it.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3454 times
Has Liked: 5698 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Colburn_Claret » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:06 pm

It was definitely the right decision, but you can understand why they were appealing.
Seems a bit strange as if anything untoward was said, the ref would have dealt with it at the time.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4536 times
Has Liked: 2044 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by ElectroClaret » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:09 pm

Leisure wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:47 pm
I didn't notice anything untoward that would warrant a charge??
Me neither.
Alright, yes they mobbed the ref, but i don't think it was worse than anything we've seen lots of times in games, unless i missed something.
If this is now to be applied across the board then fair enough.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12670 times
Has Liked: 6311 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:17 pm

don't they get done for having 5 players booked too ?

Claretitus
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
Been Liked: 452 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Claretitus » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:36 pm

It was very much an over the top reaction from Norwich players. It was never a pen, and they were also 0-3 down, it wasn’t 0–0 or 0-1.
BPF would have saved it anyway :lol: :lol: :lol:
This user liked this post: k90bfc

fidelcastro
Posts: 9521
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2816 times
Has Liked: 2792 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by fidelcastro » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:41 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:17 pm
don't they get done for having 5 players booked too ?
I always thought it was when a team got six bookings in one game, as that's more than half the team.

timshorts
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 469 times
Has Liked: 355 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by timshorts » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:02 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:41 pm
I always thought it was when a team got six bookings in one game, as that's more than half the team.
It's just an extra fine. You don't have to make an appearance and answer for it.

Those hearings are really annoying. The worst I had to go to involved a ref that was under 18. He was old enough to ref a game at step 5, and to tell the hearing what he thought of player x but we were not allowed to ask him a question at the hearing as he was a minor.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12670 times
Has Liked: 6311 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:36 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:41 pm
I always thought it was when a team got six bookings in one game, as that's more than half the team.
maybe it is :) Always though it's a daft thing anyway because most refs book players for nothing nowadays

Burnley1989
Posts: 8564
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2680 times
Has Liked: 2369 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:42 pm

Literally happens in the premier league with the top clubs on a weekly basis

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12965
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Devils_Advocate » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:51 pm

The FA threshold around controlling your players is either 6 booking or 4 bookings and a mob the ref. I think if you mob the ref three times in one game you automatically get a charge regardless of bookings

Billyblah
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:33 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 53 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Billyblah » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:59 pm

I've been pretty shocked with Jurgen Klopp and his behaviour toward match officials on the touch line mid-game.
I have a relative who is a qualified referee who up until recently has acted as referee in kids footbal. He quit due to the intolerable behaviour of parents.
When you see the behaviour of Klopp it's hardly a surprise that parents begin to think that it is acceptable.

joey13
Posts: 7507
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by joey13 » Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:02 pm

Got to raise money somehow

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 510 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by EarbyClaret » Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:14 pm

I was there and I didn't think it looked that bad

I think the referee called it right on the penalty

As others have said if any Norwich players crossed the line you'd assume the referee would have taken action against them - he produced 8(?) yellows during the game

Maybe it was because it was on Sky that it has been highlighted

IanMcL
Posts: 34711
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6932 times
Has Liked: 10339 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by IanMcL » Fri Feb 10, 2023 12:25 am

It was their most positive act in the match!

dsr
Posts: 16244
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4868 times
Has Liked: 2588 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by dsr » Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:03 am

I don't think there needs to be a problem with what any of the Norwich players individually said or did. The problem is that they surrounded the ref en masse and that's what they're trying to stop.

jojomk1
Posts: 5622
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 972 times
Has Liked: 648 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by jojomk1 » Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:39 am

£20,000 fine probably

Where are they going to find such a large amount of money !!

Culmclaret
Posts: 1827
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Culmclaret » Fri Feb 10, 2023 9:01 am

We had a good view of it from the away section. I just thought it was funny. Under no circumstances would it have changed his mind. Surely an over-reaction from the FA?

ClaretTony
Posts: 77545
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37944 times
Has Liked: 5763 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:25 pm

Fined £10,000 after admitting the charge

pureclaret
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 216 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by pureclaret » Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:45 pm

HiThere wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:59 pm
And after all that it was the correct decision not to award it.
Norwich claim that the EFL confirmed he should have given the penalty

Elizabeth
Posts: 5284
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1513 times
Has Liked: 1495 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:58 pm

This mobbing of the referees is unacceptable and it will soon stop with all these charges.
The amount of the fine is not the talking point. Some might think this amount of money is minimal but there is more to it than that. I don’t expect the Norwich players to repeat their action.
Some managers make it clear to their players that it’s not what they want, at the moment too many managers don’t.
This is for those managers !

ClaretTony
Posts: 77545
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37944 times
Has Liked: 5763 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:01 pm

pureclaret wrote:
Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:45 pm
Norwich claim that the EFL confirmed he should have given the penalty
Surely not something a league would or could confirm

Lip
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 2:35 pm
Been Liked: 313 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Lip » Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:02 pm

Yes,definitely need charging,I'm absolutely sure if the rolls were reversed we wouldn't have done that.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10676
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3119 times
Has Liked: 2496 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Tricky Trevor » Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:20 pm

I’ve noticed, the last fortnight the refs have been booking the third player to approach them. Reportedly one of Howard Webbs ideas. Not a bad one but the only player to speak to the ref should be the nearest or the captain.

Targetman
Posts: 1985
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
Been Liked: 561 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Targetman » Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:24 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:20 pm
I’ve noticed, the last fortnight the refs have been booking the third player to approach them. Reportedly one of Howard Webbs ideas. Not a bad one but the only player to speak to the ref should be the nearest or the captain.
Wasn't one of the Wolves players sent off for exactly that last week at Southampton. He was already on a yellow and was the 3rd player to approach the Aussie ref who we had recently.

dsr
Posts: 16244
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4868 times
Has Liked: 2588 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by dsr » Fri Feb 17, 2023 11:21 pm

pureclaret wrote:
Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:45 pm
Norwich claim that the EFL confirmed he should have given the penalty
Even if there is any truth at all in what they claim, it wouldn't amount to more than an informal viewpoint from someone who said "I would have given it". If you asked every league referee with all the TV coverage to go at, if they thought it was a penalty, you wouldn't get a definitive consensus.

Besides which, they would still have lost.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12670 times
Has Liked: 6311 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 18, 2023 12:29 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:25 pm
Fined £10,000 after admitting the charge
the only way it stops is if the players have to pay the 10K between them, if the club pays it it's irrelevant

Commy
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by Commy » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:43 am

Wasn't Roberts booked for being the third one on Tues?

beddie
Posts: 6341
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1777 times
Has Liked: 669 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by beddie » Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:26 am

Commy wrote:
Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:43 am
Wasn't Roberts booked for being the third one on Tues?
I did wonder that myself and it would make sense. I’ve always thought that the referee should go into both dressing rooms before the game and spell out what he expects from the players and how/reasons why they will get booked. Lay it on the line from the off and then there’s no excuse.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5271
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2956 times
Has Liked: 833 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by quoonbeatz » Sat Feb 18, 2023 10:10 am

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:20 pm
I’ve noticed, the last fortnight the refs have been booking the third player to approach them. Reportedly one of Howard Webbs ideas. Not a bad one but the only player to speak to the ref should be the nearest or the captain.
Have they told anyone else about this, given everyone including the players were mystified when that wolves player was sent off for being 3rd last week?

What an idiotic approach.

Why the 3rd player? And what if there's a 4th etc?

These bozos really don't help themselves.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2448
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 971 times
Has Liked: 233 times

Re: Norwich charged by FA

Post by duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 18, 2023 11:37 am

Indeed. Referee's aren't going to get respect if they send off relative nobodies like Lemina for being the 3rd man, but allow Andy Robertson to have a tantrum whenever he wants.

Post Reply