Muric
-
- Posts: 4622
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2566 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
Re: Muric
He’s perfect for our team and he gets better by the week.
These 2 users liked this post: jdrobbo evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 8769
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2330 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Muric
One thing that's impressed me is our coaching. It picks up weaknesses and they then focus on it. Sure Muric, Maatsen , JBG and a few others have benefitted, and for all to see
-
- Posts: 10670
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4657 times
- Has Liked: 7307 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Muric
Whilst his performances fully warrant the praise he’s getting on here, it may become more apparent next year how good a keeper he is. Against consistently better opponents he’s gonna have to keep goal a bit more than he does now.
He’s bloody excellent with the ball at his feet. Every bit as good as an outfield player.
He’s bloody excellent with the ball at his feet. Every bit as good as an outfield player.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 973 times
- Has Liked: 593 times
Re: Muric
Let's tear the guy apart for his worst appearance. But let's not forget there were several bad performances that day. And as a team we have learnt.
One thing I think is becoming noticeable is how much comfier Muric is when he has 2 ball playing defenders in front of him, instead of one being Taylor.
The guy is a class act, hearts in mouth stuff sometimes but in my head I am confident because it's him. Yes he will throw in a howler now and again, but give me this team in all aspects of what we are to the last 3 or 4 years before any day of the week
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1021 times
- Has Liked: 1612 times
- Location: burnley
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Muric
It didn't include Barnes, which given the physicality of Sheffield's approach was a mistake and could have been rectified at half time. The fact Barnes started against Blackburn a week later was arguably a tacit admission of it.
Barnes and Rodriguez are hugely important to our ability to defend our box. They're as good defensively from set plays as anyone we've got, and they talk and organise and do the ugly stuff. There were plenty of examples of that when we had to defend against Norwich. It helps the keeper massively.
Re: Muric
I can't imagine many people would've called for Barnes to start at the time and without the benefit if hindsightclaretspice wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:06 pmIt didn't include Barnes, which given the physicality of Sheffield's approach was a mistake and could have been rectified at half time. The fact Barnes started against Blackburn a week later was arguably a tacit admission of it.
Barnes and Rodriguez are hugely important to our ability to defend our box. They're as good defensively from set plays as anyone we've got, and they talk and organise and do the ugly stuff. There were plenty of examples of that when we had to defend against Norwich. It helps the keeper massively.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Muric
Correct they weren't calling for Barnes who'd done nothing at that point to suggest he could offer much to this team. A load of idiots with the hindsight of one bad game were saying Lowton and Taylor should have been playing full back and a few wrote Maatsen off as not being able to defend.
Despite some issues in the first half we were good going forward and noone was moaning at half time. TBH and Beyer were the ones who struggled the most and this exposed Murics weakness.
We learnt from this game and the defenders (especially Beyer) have really upped their game in terms of attacking crosses and being more aggressive.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Muric
I think quite a few did, in fairness (I know I did and I'm not claiming foresight - I was one of a crowd). He'd done well without scoring against Rotherham in the midweek before to stake a claim.
Re: Muric
Your team vs Sheff Utdclaretspice wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:18 pmI think quite a few did, in fairness (I know I did and I'm not claiming foresight - I was one of a crowd). He'd done well without scoring against Rotherham in the midweek before to stake a claim.
Muric
Roberts THB Beyer Taylor
---------Cork Cullen
Benson Bastien Zaroury
------------Rodriguez
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 36 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: Muric
Not read the whole thread so don't know if this point has been made but it never ceases to amaze me that people think players who can do it all would be playing for Burnley.
Muric is brilliant for the way we play. If he could catch the ball too he wouldn't be playing for Burnley.
If Chris Wood had pace he would not have played for Burnley.
If Dwight McNeil was 2 footed he would not have played for Burnley.
If Nick Pope could have passed the ball better he would not have played for Burnley.
Etc etc
Muric is brilliant for the way we play. If he could catch the ball too he wouldn't be playing for Burnley.
If Chris Wood had pace he would not have played for Burnley.
If Dwight McNeil was 2 footed he would not have played for Burnley.
If Nick Pope could have passed the ball better he would not have played for Burnley.
Etc etc
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Muric
And then we discovered Jay would miss out, didn't we? That's when, quite reasonably, there was surprise in many quarters that Barnes didn't start. Of course, given the form he had been in to that point, Jay was preferred of the two if fit.
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
I’ve been making this point for a while. VK got it wrong, not necessarily with the defence but he played Tella as the 9. Which meant we gave up possession way to easily as the triangles between midfield and our wide men didn’t work. He quickly realised his mistake and hasn’t done it since
Re: Muric
Tella was better at 9roperclaret wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:42 pmI’ve been making this point for a while. VK got it wrong, not necessarily with the defence but he played Tella as the 9. Which meant we gave up possession way to easily as the triangles between midfield and our wide men didn’t work. He quickly realised his mistake and hasn’t done it since
Re: Muric
Yet you still wouldn't have started him against Blackburn:claretspice wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:06 pmIt didn't include Barnes, which given the physicality of Sheffield's approach was a mistake and could have been rectified at half time. The fact Barnes started against Blackburn a week later was arguably a tacit admission of it.
Barnes and Rodriguez are hugely important to our ability to defend our box. They're as good defensively from set plays as anyone we've got, and they talk and organise and do the ugly stuff. There were plenty of examples of that when we had to defend against Norwich. It helps the keeper massively.
'For that reason, I'd be tempted to make just one change to the team. That would be to bring Taylor into the team at centre back, and play Beyer at right back (which increasingly looks to me his more natural position).'
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
It really doesn't. He started out right and he was ok but was always better when he moved inside and partnered Barnes.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Muric
I cant recall exactly why I wrote that as I did - theres clearly context missing - but if you are going to trawl back through months of posts to find.what was written at the time, you might at least not quote selectively. The team I proposed for Rovers in a separate post again had Rodriguez in it on the basis he'd likely be fit, and that was obviously the intent even in the post you've quoted because it goes on to say it'd be between Tella and Benson to play wide.taio wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:50 pmYet you still wouldn't have started him against Blackburn:
'For that reason, I'd be tempted to make just one change to the team. That would be to bring Taylor into the team at centre back, and play Beyer at right back (which increasingly looks to me his more natural position).'
Re: Muric
All I'm saying is that you didn't say before the Sheff Utd game that Barnes - specifically - should've started which is what you said. Because you disputed my comment about hindsight. I think it's only fair that I try to substantiate with evidence hence the references. Not sure about the relevance of Rodriguez, Tella and Benson.claretspice wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:59 pmI cant recall exactly why I wrote that as I did - theres clearly context missing - but if you are going to trawl back through months of posts to find.what was written at the time, you might at least not quote selectively. The team I proposed for Rovers in a separate post again had Rodriguez in it on the basis he'd likely be fit, and that was obviously the intent even in the post you've quoted because it goes on to say it'd be between Tella and Benson to play wide.
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
So not a 9 then
-
- Posts: 17382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3568 times
- Has Liked: 7844 times
Re: Muric
The day we start picking centre-forwards for their defensive qualities is the day i'll give up watching.claretspice wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:06 pmIt didn't include Barnes, which given the physicality of Sheffield's approach was a mistake and could have been rectified at half time.
I
This user liked this post: HiThere
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Muric
Bloody hell. I said that quite a few people had said Barnes should start at Sheff United - to support what someone else had said. I've explained that this was in the context of a choice between Tella and Barnes once Rodriguez was ruled out. I've explained why that was the case: Rodriguez and Barnes give us a focal point up front, and - relevant to this thread - are two of our best defenders at set plays, particularly against physical opponents. That helps Muric massively by taking the pressure off him at set plays, and helps us get up the pitch in general play.taio wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:05 pmAll I'm saying is that you didn't say before the Sheff Utd game that Barnes - specifically - should've started which is what you said. Because you disputed my comment about hindsight. I think it's only fair that I try to substantiate with evidence hence the references. Not sure about the relevance of Rodriguez, Tella and Benson.
Whether you want to accept that was my opinion or not is entirely for you. I'm not going to waste any more of a Sunday evening debating it either way. But it was certainly a view expressed when Tella was selected up front and Barnes left out in Jay's absence.
-
- Posts: 9620
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2223 times
- Has Liked: 3120 times
Re: Muric
I think its more physicality… Against a WBA/Luton I’d put a fit Barnes/Rodriguez on to take some of the steam out of the opposition at both ends of the field… bring on the speed when its even more advantageous.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:17 pmThe day we start picking centre-forwards for their defensive qualities is the day i'll give up watching.
I
-
- Posts: 17382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3568 times
- Has Liked: 7844 times
Re: Muric
I think people are inclined to read far more into the Sheffield Utd result than is necessary.
They beat us because they were better on the day, it really is that simple. pointing out individual weaknesses won't alter the result.
They beat us because they were better on the day, it really is that simple. pointing out individual weaknesses won't alter the result.
Re: Muric
It isn't really. We were shattered and our normal game took us 2-1 up at half time. We were the better team and looked to take advantage and put the game to bed. Second half we looked shattered.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:26 pmI think people are inclined to read far more into the Sheffield Utd result than is necessary.
They beat us because they were better on the day, it really is that simple. pointing out individual weaknesses won't alter the result.
-
- Posts: 17382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3568 times
- Has Liked: 7844 times
Re: Muric
That's a slightly different point. I'm not really debating that.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:25 pmI think its more physicality… Against a WBA/Luton I’d put a fit Barnes/Rodriguez on to take some of the steam out of the opposition at both ends of the field… bring on the speed when its even more advantageous.
-
- Posts: 17382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3568 times
- Has Liked: 7844 times
Re: Muric
Exactly, so they were better on the day... fitness counts. I agree with you, we looked shattered.
-
- Posts: 17382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3568 times
- Has Liked: 7844 times
Re: Muric
Same here.
I think we've made massive progress since then.
Our game is basically about "working" the opposition. I'd say that at Sheff Utd we just didn't have enough in the tank; this is why they found ways to bully us.
-
- Posts: 9827
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3232 times
- Has Liked: 10728 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Muric
I can't wait to take those **** kickers on again...
Thrash those and the season's complete.
Not really, Boro will catch 'em.
Thrash those and the season's complete.
Not really, Boro will catch 'em.
-
- Posts: 9827
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3232 times
- Has Liked: 10728 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Muric
I've got a mate in the local down here in Staffordshire who is a Blade and a knob, obviously, who declared that Muric was a bellend and would cost us in the long run.
I kept quiet because it was obvious that the Blades roughed us up and we were too naive to deal with them.
Even if those gits beat us to the title, highly unlikely, we know that our prospects are far, far better than a team of journeymen **** kickers for the 23/24 Prem season.
I kept quiet because it was obvious that the Blades roughed us up and we were too naive to deal with them.
Even if those gits beat us to the title, highly unlikely, we know that our prospects are far, far better than a team of journeymen **** kickers for the 23/24 Prem season.
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
Nope, can’t agree. The fact we played Tella through the middle who was trying to run in behind, with Zaroury and Benson on the wings meant that we could not dominate possession and control midfield that day. A centre forward that drops deep and pulls opposition centre backs out is integral to the way we play. It’s no coincidence that we have never picked that forward line again since that gameboatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:26 pmI think people are inclined to read far more into the Sheffield Utd result than is necessary.
They beat us because they were better on the day, it really is that simple. pointing out individual weaknesses won't alter the result.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
This is why Pep originally benched Aguero until he learnt how do do this
-
- Posts: 17686
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4932 times
Re: Muric
For this reason I hope Tella could learn that role and how to drop in. His heading ability has really surprised me recently so I think he could play that striker role. Plus I can’t see Tella getting ahead of Benson / Zaroury when both fit & he’s too good to be on the bench.roperclaret wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:19 pmIt’s no coincidence that we have never picked that forward line again since that game
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Muric
Sheff utd was a one off, let's not forget 2 of their goals shouldn't have stood, and we missed some good chances.
Re: Muric
These 2 users liked this post: frankinwales Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Muric
and the antithesis of Muric
https://twitter.com/i/status/1625488865371750400
https://twitter.com/i/status/1625488865371750400
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Muric
How much is City’s buy back clause?
-
- Posts: 20613
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2048 times
Re: Muric
Fabulous against PNE, horrendous for their goal tonight.