Al Dakhill
-
- Posts: 2742
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 337 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Sorry if I’ve missed it, not seen anything mentioned, but does anyone know if he was injured or was it tactical?
-
- Posts: 17423
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Would love to know. It was a bizarre one.
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Surely it must’ve been an injury.
Re: Al Dakhill
I bloody hope it was injury and not a “tactical” switch because the hapless O’Shea ought to be nowhere near the team.
-
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 2155 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Al Dakhill
Can only assume an injury or a falling out do.
I'll opt for the former.
I'll opt for the former.
-
- Posts: 2742
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 337 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Just seems a bit harsh if not an injury.
Played well enough first half, own goal, subbed. This, after being hung out to dry being played out right vs Spurs.
Hope I’m wrong and it was a niggle.
Played well enough first half, own goal, subbed. This, after being hung out to dry being played out right vs Spurs.
Hope I’m wrong and it was a niggle.
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
Re: Al Dakhill
The two central defender's that we had on the pitch at the end filled me with fear,both not very good,to many wingers in our squad and not enough quality defender's,money has been spunked in the wrong areas.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Can't have been tactical cos there's no way any sane person would take him off ahead of Delcroix.
-
- Posts: 1730
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 600 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Filled everyone with fear I'm sure, Al dakill if tactical has been made a scapegoat yet again imo, he has vitinho right delcroix left and a keeper that has now shipped 20 goals in he's first 8 games. Nothing against vitinho or delcroix but we've had what I believe to be a capable and settled back 4 that ad has become used to playing with of late, so to have changes on each side of him and expect to stay cool with an also suspect keeper behind him is for me a tall order.Vincent'sCap wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 11:19 pmThe two central defender's that we had on the pitch at the end filled me with fear,both not very good,to many wingers in our squad and not enough quality defender's,money has been spunked in the wrong areas.
This user liked this post: Anonymous Claret
Re: Al Dakhill
At the start of the second half I was (metaphorically) spitting feathers. Don’t care what was said (yes, I am assuming something was said) but you don’t take off an 18 year old defender who has performed quite well so far this season 5 minutes after he’s scored an own goal. And that’s before you take into account who you replace him with.
I thought al dakhil had actually marshalled the defence quite well in the first half. He dealt with Broja which left sterling and palmer quite isolated on the wings. If it was obvious in the stands that broja would be taken off, don’t take off your best defender (which in itself is a ridiculous statement cos the lad is so young) and let them dictate the play around the box. Not helped by taking Cullen off as well btw who did well helping the two centre backs
I thought al dakhil had actually marshalled the defence quite well in the first half. He dealt with Broja which left sterling and palmer quite isolated on the wings. If it was obvious in the stands that broja would be taken off, don’t take off your best defender (which in itself is a ridiculous statement cos the lad is so young) and let them dictate the play around the box. Not helped by taking Cullen off as well btw who did well helping the two centre backs
These 2 users liked this post: gawthorpe_view NewClaret
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Al Dakhill
... and replace him with O'Shea.quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 11:29 pmCan't have been tactical cos there's no way any sane person would take him off ahead of Delcroix.
This user liked this post: NewClaret
Re: Al Dakhill
O'Shea was quite expensive, wasn't he? A lot o money for a fifth choice defender anyway. I don't think there is any reasonable complaint that we have spent too little on the defence, but you can if you like complain that it was spent on the wrong man or men.Vincent'sCap wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 11:19 pmThe two central defender's that we had on the pitch at the end filled me with fear,both not very good,to many wingers in our squad and not enough quality defender's,money has been spunked in the wrong areas.
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Al Dakhill
£9m, which currently looks about £8m too much.
-
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 177 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Surely it can't have been tactical. I think over the last few weeks since we had a settled back 5 of Trafford, Roberts, Taylor, AAD and Beyer we looked a lot more solid defensively.
Before the game started I was a little worried when I saw the line up. Decroix for Beyer is understandable as I can only assume Beyer was injured. I can understand that VK may have preferred Vitinho to Roberts as he may have been able to deal with Sterling's pace a little more. As was seen for the penalty he couldn't deal with Sterling but then again neither could Roberts who was skinned for the 4th goal.
At half time we were still well in the game but that second half our defence was all over the place. They looked like they had never played together and in all honesty they may never well have done as I can't be bothered checking all our previous games.
Before the game started I was a little worried when I saw the line up. Decroix for Beyer is understandable as I can only assume Beyer was injured. I can understand that VK may have preferred Vitinho to Roberts as he may have been able to deal with Sterling's pace a little more. As was seen for the penalty he couldn't deal with Sterling but then again neither could Roberts who was skinned for the 4th goal.
At half time we were still well in the game but that second half our defence was all over the place. They looked like they had never played together and in all honesty they may never well have done as I can't be bothered checking all our previous games.
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Al Dakhill
Seeing as Al Dakhil was our last remaining proper CB it would surely have been suicidal to remove him for tactical reasons?
Re: Al Dakhill
After Al Dakhil went off we were left with back four of Vitinho/Roberts O'Shea Delcroix Taylor
Not good to put it mildly
Not good to put it mildly
-
- Posts: 8508
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1844 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Re: Al Dakhill
Delcroix and Taylor played well OShea and non tackling Roberts were dire