Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2022 10:02 am
- Been Liked: 12 times
Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
In this division.
Went from 64.5% average in the Champ to 47.2 % in the Prem. The difference is huge. Was expecting around 53-55.
Went from 64.5% average in the Champ to 47.2 % in the Prem. The difference is huge. Was expecting around 53-55.
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Some matches this season have been a mirror image of last season, especially the early games.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
- Been Liked: 187 times
- Has Liked: 116 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
We can't keep it half as well as we do and don't recycle it around the oppositions box like we did last year.
It's usually an attack from us and hand over the ball.
We are playing a different way though this season
It's usually an attack from us and hand over the ball.
We are playing a different way though this season
-
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
We tried but the players weren't good enough at passing the ball under pressure.
Remember though, possession is only our number of passes Vs their number into a percentage.
If we passed short from the keeper like last season the pass count would be a lot higher.
Remember though, possession is only our number of passes Vs their number into a percentage.
If we passed short from the keeper like last season the pass count would be a lot higher.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
I’ve been surprised how many long balls we have gone for.
Currently rank third in the league for the most long balls with an average of 58 a game.
For reference under Dyche we were averaging 68.
Currently rank third in the league for the most long balls with an average of 58 a game.
For reference under Dyche we were averaging 68.
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
I posted yesterday that I thought VK had slackened the reins a little and was letting Trafford play an higher % of long balls which seems to tie in with his overall improvement,and obviously with Foster being more involved it gives Trafford a better outlet for the long balls.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 12:57 pmI’ve been surprised how many long balls we have gone for.
Currently rank third in the league for the most long balls with an average of 58 a game.
For reference under Dyche we were averaging 68.
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Now we've got Foster back for, hopefully, an extended run of games, direct balls in behind are going to play to our strengths. We could do with getting the most advanced wide man to run behind more frequently (JBL seems to the best of our current wingers at this) as well.
It's great that we've got players who are comfortable on the ball and can knock it about a bit, but without a threat in behind the opposition pushes up and we frequently turn the ball over in our own half.
It's great that we've got players who are comfortable on the ball and can knock it about a bit, but without a threat in behind the opposition pushes up and we frequently turn the ball over in our own half.
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
The irony isn't lost on me at all that we're now playing a 4-4-2 and launching it a lot more 
Moyes and Dyche get called Dinosaurs for this - VK and Emery revolutionaries apparently...
Moyes and Dyche get called Dinosaurs for this - VK and Emery revolutionaries apparently...
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Villa under Emery don't play many long balls. Not that it would be a problem if they did more often.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:25 pmThe irony isn't lost on me at all that we're now playing a 4-4-2 and launching it a lot more
Moyes and Dyche get called Dinosaurs for this - VK and Emery revolutionaries apparently...
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Yes and a good tactic playing to Watkins' strengths. But they are still anything but a long ball team.
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
There's lots of contrast in styles in the premier league. Nothing wrong with a direct style though when it suits.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:41 pmI never said they were.
It was a jibe about perceptions of managers when a lot of them are doing very similar things
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
No not at all. I can't believe anyone though we really would
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Answering the OP’s question, I think we tried to play the way we did last year earlier in the season, which ultimately led to us getting picked off on the counter or pressed out of possession high up the pitch.
Since then, we have clearly had to adapt resulting in us having to be a bit more selective about when and when not to tippy tappy it around which has inevitably led to us losing more possession of the ball. Personally, I couldn’t really care less about how much possession we maintain as long as it’s not 20% or less like it sometimes used to be.
More importantly, how sharp are we when the ball is in and around either penalty area? At the moment, this is what’s killing us at this level IMO.
Since then, we have clearly had to adapt resulting in us having to be a bit more selective about when and when not to tippy tappy it around which has inevitably led to us losing more possession of the ball. Personally, I couldn’t really care less about how much possession we maintain as long as it’s not 20% or less like it sometimes used to be.
More importantly, how sharp are we when the ball is in and around either penalty area? At the moment, this is what’s killing us at this level IMO.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 34427
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
no, seeing exactly what I thought we would see in terms of possession. We lack physicality (pace and power) to punch consistently at this level and that is something that needs addressing going forward.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Prem teams don’t give much if any ‘soft’ time in possession. If they lose the ball the pressure hard and fast to get it back. In the Champs a good team can have all the possession they want in their own half. Think THB had most touches last season
-
- Posts: 10577
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Did anyone else think we'd have more of the ball than we do?
Nope. I thought we’d have less of the ball than we were used to, based purely on the quality of the opposition. Without wanting to sound like a smartarse, I was right. To be fair tho, it couldn’t really be otherwise - Stevie Wonder could see that happening.
Unsure why anyone would think our impressive championship possession stats would remain the same or increase????
Unsure why anyone would think our impressive championship possession stats would remain the same or increase????