You do know muric was asked to **** about with short passes off VK don’t you ?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:58 amSorry, Cool, but the Spurs goal is very much a goalkeeping error.
I'm not going into the tactical side of things, but the errors are there.
For me all 3 goalkeepers are good enough for the Championship, Trafford may end up higher but that's not a given.
I'd sell all 3, get a couple of new ones in, start afresh with our new GK coach... simple as that![]()
Trafford to Chelsea?
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 440 times
- Has Liked: 611 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
This user liked this post: CnBtruntru
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I'm not sure that's relevant. I'm sure that neither goalkeeper used last season was up to it.blatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:00 amYou do know muric was asked to **** about with short passes off VK don’t you ?
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 440 times
- Has Liked: 611 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
It’sboatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:03 amI'm not sure that's relevant. I'm sure that neither goalkeeper used last season was up to it.
-
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1289 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Muric’s famed distribution fell away toward the end of the season as teams learned to press us, so I think a full PL season in nets wouldn’t have been as different to Traffords, as some are suggesting.
Regardless, as per Trafford, this was down to VK’s tactics, rather than Muric’s passing deteriorating.
I’ve said it before, Trafford needs games to develop but he won’t be able to do that at BFC without a good heap of supporters on his back.
Regardless, as per Trafford, this was down to VK’s tactics, rather than Muric’s passing deteriorating.
I’ve said it before, Trafford needs games to develop but he won’t be able to do that at BFC without a good heap of supporters on his back.
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Why would you want to sell all three? That's ridiculous.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:58 amSorry, Cool, but the Spurs goal is very much a goalkeeping error.
I'm not going into the tactical side of things, but the errors are there.
For me all 3 goalkeepers are good enough for the Championship, Trafford may end up higher but that's not a given.
I'd sell all 3, get a couple of new ones in, start afresh with our new GK coach... simple as that![]()
One has just posted the best save percentage (min 8 games) in the PL since David De Gea's best season.
Honestly more people need to realise that suicide tactics and training ground routines make stuff like this happen - it was the same with Maatsen in the UCL final for Dortmund.
Under stress/pressure you default to your training - if in your training you're doing intricate routines up and down the pitch at all costs and get b0llocked for ever lining it then what do you think will happen when those situations arise in game?
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos
-
- Posts: 6514
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1248 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Trafford is only being linked with a move away because he’s English and it’s English tax, if Trafford was from Kosovo coming off the season he’s had nobody would be looking at him
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Muric proved to us imo that he can do the job of a keeper to a very high standard in the PL.
Have a manager that will drop the line 5/10 yard deeper and have him put his foot through it on more occasions rather than forcing him and you have a top keeper there for 7-10 years, that cost us 3 mill.
It's that simple for me.
Have a manager that will drop the line 5/10 yard deeper and have him put his foot through it on more occasions rather than forcing him and you have a top keeper there for 7-10 years, that cost us 3 mill.
It's that simple for me.
These 7 users liked this post: CaptJohn Carlos the Great Ric_C IanMcL k90bfc bobinho spt_claret
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:37 amWhy would you want to sell all three? That's ridiculous.
Because, while any of the 3 will be fine in the Championship, I don't think they are PL standard.
So if we are fortunate enough to get promoted next season we may well find ourselves wanting a better goalkeeper.
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I think you're looking at the game wrong tbh Bill.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:48 amBecause, while any of the 3 will be fine in the Championship, I don't think they are PL standard.
So if we are fortunate enough to get promoted next season we may well find ourselves wanting a better goalkeeper.
A better manager last season not hellbent on promoting their 'brand' keeps that side up, imo.
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I've heard several excuses: manager, tactics, goalie coach, crowd's moaning...CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:49 amI think you're looking at the game wrong tbh Bill.
A better manager last season not hellbent on promoting their 'brand' keeps that side up, imo.
Suffice to say it's my opinion that they are not quite up to PL standard. Compare, say, with Tom Heaton.
-
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 213 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
or Bayern Munich
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
How do you think Tom Heaton or Nick Pope would look taking 90 touches a game with one of the highest defensive lines in world football?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 10:58 amI've heard several excuses: manager, tactics, goalie coach, crowd's moaning...
Suffice to say it's my opinion that they are not quite up to PL standard. Compare, say, with Tom Heaton.
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I said Tom Heaton, who would have (IMO) kept us in more games with his quality.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 11:43 amHow do you think Tom Heaton or Nick Pope would look taking 90 touches a game with one of the highest defensive lines in world football?
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Can you not appreciate that Dyche's system is much 'friendlier' to goalkeepers?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 11:59 amI said Tom Heaton, who would have (IMO) kept us in more games with his quality.
Muric posted the best save percentage that any Burnley goalkeeper has done in the PL with a team that's wide open and asks a lot of their keeper.
I love(d) Heaton and Pope - two brilliant players for us but they'd have struggled (Pope especially) doing what VK asked of his team/goalkeepers last year.
These 2 users liked this post: blatherwickstattoos NewClaret
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 141 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I heard a whisper from a sauce that Kompany is contractually obliged to take him to Munich
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:30 am
- Been Liked: 69 times
- Has Liked: 15 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Trafford - Anything over £15m we paid for him and that would be a bonanza - a £5m profit would be nice.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2275 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Both of our keepers will continue to improve with time and experience. Trafford is a 'baby' age wise and Muric, still a 'youngster' in their goalkeeping development.
Both are Premier League class, but haven't yet found the consistency required due to their age and lack of experience.
Both are Premier League class, but haven't yet found the consistency required due to their age and lack of experience.
This user liked this post: Fizzy
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 440 times
- Has Liked: 611 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Penwortham_Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 1:54 pmI heard a whisper from a sauce that Kompany is contractually obliged to take him to Munich
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Brown or red ?Penwortham_Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 1:54 pmI heard a whisper from a sauce that Kompany is contractually obliged to take him to Munich
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
So Kompany wants Trafford at Munich. Let him have him but the price is £40 million plus 30% add on for a future transfer. If Liverpool, Chelsea or Newcastle want him then £25m plus 20% add on is more realistic but make the Germans pay a higher price as they clearly like paying well over the odds rather than a true value. Kompany's reported wage is testament to that.
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
It's friendlier in terms of clean sheets and having less big chances to save. But a wide open team usually flatters goalkeepers in that they get to show off their shot stopping ability.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 12:46 pmCan you not appreciate that Dyche's system is much 'friendlier' to goalkeepers?
Muric posted the best save percentage that any Burnley goalkeeper has done in the PL with a team that's wide open and asks a lot of their keeper.
I love(d) Heaton and Pope - two brilliant players for us but they'd have struggled (Pope especially) doing what VK asked of his team/goalkeepers last year.
-
- Posts: 9812
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Whilst I do agree there'll generally be more saves (and more 'good looking' saves), it's more the save % remaining high which is impressive, as well as the 'goals prevented' metric.
-
- Posts: 7949
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Penwortham_Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 1:54 pmI heard a whisper from a sauce that Kompany is contractually obliged to take him to Munich
That sounds like a Bratwurst.
A bit of a whopper.


Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I think in Trafford’s case, he would benefit massively if we had a good goalkeeping coach.Darnhill Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:04 pmBoth of our keepers will continue to improve with time and experience. Trafford is a 'baby' age wise and Muric, still a 'youngster' in their goalkeeping development.
Both are Premier League class, but haven't yet found the consistency required due to their age and lack of experience.
He is obviously a good goalkeeper, otherwise he wouldn’t have been at City and England U-21’s. He can obviously master the basics, however I feel if he had someone who could “toughen him up” both physically and mentally, he could reach that top echelon of goalkeepers.
By this I mean proper coaching on when to come for a high ball, or stay at home. Having the confidence to clean out players in his path when coming for a cross or corner. These are the areas he was struggling with last season.
He is never going to be a big imposing keeper like David Seaman or Peter Scmeichel, however if we look at Pickford for Everton and England he makes the most of his presence, and size and stature similar to Trafford’s and has been England’s number one for many years now, even though he plays for a team that flirts with relegation every season.
If the lad does get a move this summer it will be money in the bank for us and hopefully he will find a coach who can take him to the next level in his development. If he doesn’t, let’s hope the new manager brings a good goalkeeping coach with him to benefit both Trafford and Muric.
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Pickford is good with his feet as well, often pinging some accurate long balls, Traff will need to improve in this area also.
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
few pages back, but the story about Trafford and little kid is absolute codswallop. i've met him a few times and he's fantastic with kids, always engages with them and has a little chat. Maybe he was in game mode, and it didnt meet the expectations of the kid, but to say "get him out of my club" is a bit excessive.
he's a really nice lad.
he's a really nice lad.
-
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1244 times
- Has Liked: 211 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
But but but he’s crap isn’t he ? can’t catch , dive , sweep, kick , control his box etc ? I’d imagine a few of UTC resident pitiful alcoholic “ keeper coaches “ are a bit embarrassed.
Surely we only paid 1 or 2 instalments on his transfer fee though ? I’d always imagined city still owned about 80% of him .
Surely we only paid 1 or 2 instalments on his transfer fee though ? I’d always imagined city still owned about 80% of him .
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Ketchup?Penwortham_Claret wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 1:54 pmI heard a whisper from a sauce that Kompany is contractually obliged to take him to Munich
-
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 207 times
- Has Liked: 123 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
To add to this, my nephew used to take one of his sons to training at Carlisle a few seasons back, and living in West Cumbria they used to to give JT a lift now and again. When we were linked I asked my nephew what he was like; response:GetIntoEm wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:53 pmfew pages back, but the story about Trafford and little kid is absolute codswallop. i've met him a few times and he's fantastic with kids, always engages with them and has a little chat. Maybe he was in game mode, and it didnt meet the expectations of the kid, but to say "get him out of my club" is a bit excessive.
he's a really nice lad.
He went to Carlisle on trial outfield and didn't quite cut it so they asked him to go in goal, and he's been there since a very young age though. He was a nice kid, off farming stock from outside Cockermouth and good family from my interactions with them.
-
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 523 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Muric was obviously nervous starting last season and the crowdn got on his case big time. Took him ages to turn it around.
Dean Marney got dogs abuse before he started getting cult status and worshipped for identical performances.
Chris Iwelumo.
Chris Wood when his performance levels dropped.
Wout Weghorst.
Dwight McNeil got loads of undue stick.
Jeff Hendrick.
Kyle Lafferty.
Lee Grant.
David Jones.
Leon Cort - granted he was bobbins.
We have our fair share of idiots in the stands. Let's not pretend otherwise.
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
The issue last season was the idiot in the dugoutwhat_no_pies wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 12:37 amMuric was obviously nervous starting last season and the crowdn got on his case big time. Took him ages to turn it around.
Dean Marney got dogs abuse before he started getting cult status and worshipped for identical performances.
Chris Iwelumo.
Chris Wood when his performance levels dropped.
Wout Weghorst.
Dwight McNeil got loads of undue stick.
Jeff Hendrick.
Kyle Lafferty.
Lee Grant.
David Jones.
Leon Cort - granted he was bobbins.
We have our fair share of idiots in the stands. Let's not pretend otherwise.
These 3 users liked this post: AGENT_CLARET Rumpelstiltskin bfcjg
-
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 190 times
- Has Liked: 320 times
- Location: Dorset
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Newcastle reported as having made a bid with both clubs in discussions:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... nsfer.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... nsfer.html
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
David Eyres must feel like he’s won the lottery
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Let’s hope there are other clubs bidding, we might then get to the figure the club are looking for.
-
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
I agree with pretty much everything you've posted, but I don't go along with the the idea that the only thing that changed with Marney was the reaction to his performances.what_no_pies wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 12:37 am
Dean Marney got dogs abuse before he started getting cult status and worshipped for identical performances.
At times in his first season I thought I was watching a taller, balder version of James O'Connor. The consistently good performances he was turning in when he left were miles away from the performances he was putting in when he arrived.
-
- Posts: 17421
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
No way we should be accepting £16m from Newcastle so early in the summer with other bidders to potentially come in (Bayern, Chelsea, etc).
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Looking more and more like we will get out of this without taking a loss, which is good. Find it a bit funny to imagine VK trying to persuade Bayern's big wigs he needs to spend £20 million on a goalie he had to drop last season.
-
- Posts: 17421
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Don’t think it’ll be that hard really, he’ll just say he’s a big talent for the future, will learn under Neuer, etc. That’s if he wants him of course. He might’ve been put off too.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 1:12 pmLooking more and more like we will get out of this without taking a loss, which is good. Find it a bit funny to imagine VK trying to persuade Bayern's big wigs he needs to spend £20 million on a goalie he had to drop last season.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
If VK took Trafford to Bayern then it should set alarm bells ringing as presumably his company is set to gain from any sell-on profit.
-
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:14 pm
- Been Liked: 126 times
- Has Liked: 15 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Told we paid initial £12m with add ons taking it up to a potential £19m. I’d be shocked if any of those add ons were achieved as likely relating to both survival and England caps, neither of which have occurred. City will have a sell on clause but only on profit. I could see us taking a £16m rising to £20m offer which even with City’s sell on would give us a good return for what has been a pretty unsuccessful signing.
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 6514
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1248 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
When it’s put like that it would be a very good deal, along with the 10m plus add ons for kompany and then hopefully 5m form Ajax or twente for weghorst. 35m in sales before we have even got started properlyLongsideClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 1:35 pmTold we paid initial £12m with add ons taking it up to a potential £19m. I’d be shocked if any of those add ons were achieved as likely relating to both survival and England caps, neither of which have occurred. City will have a sell on clause but only on profit. I could see us taking a £16m rising to £20m offer which even with City’s sell on would give us a good return for what has been a pretty unsuccessful signing.
-
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 523 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
We're you one of the people booing him?Enola Gay wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:41 pmI agree with pretty much everything you've posted, but I don't go along with the the idea that the only thing that changed with Marney was the reaction to his performances.
At times in his first season I thought I was watching a taller, balder version of James O'Connor. The consistently good performances he was turning in when he left were miles away from the performances he was putting in when he arrived.
Granted it was a lot more enjoyable watching him with the crowd behind him rather than listening to him getting abused for putting the same graft in.
He wasn't and still isn't bald either.
-
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
Re: Trafford to Chelsea?
Who told you that Longside and why do you think we would have a baseline figure rising to a total figure and other clubs wouldn't...!LongsideClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 1:35 pmTold we paid initial £12m with add ons taking it up to a potential £19m. I’d be shocked if any of those add ons were achieved as likely relating to both survival and England caps, neither of which have occurred. City will have a sell on clause but only on profit. I could see us taking a £16m rising to £20m offer which even with City’s sell on would give us a good return for what has been a pretty unsuccessful signing.
This is how the BBC reported it....
'Newly promoted Burnley have signed goalkeeper James Trafford from Manchester City in a four-year deal worth up to £19m with add-ons.
City have a 20% sell-on clause and a buy-back option within the deal, which is £15m up front and £4m add-ons.'