From a particular family, who, shall we say, aren't all there
Trafford’s tweet
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
-
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 453 times
- Has Liked: 2275 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Haha I think I know who you mean, those and lots moregolden days wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 3:59 pmFrom a particular family, who, shall we say, aren't all there
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Lots in that area stood and clapped him as well every game
-
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 453 times
- Has Liked: 2275 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Trafford’s tweet
We certainly didgolden days wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:04 pmLots in that area stood and clapped him as well every game
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
- Been Liked: 414 times
- Has Liked: 647 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I really cant believe that people are coming on here saying that Trafford has not been given a hard time. Virtually all season there has been a barrage of detrimental comments about a young player who is making his way in the game. To be handed your Burnley debut in a home game against Man City mustve been difficult and this in a team which had changed drastically from that which won promotion. Moans and groans were obvious to me when Im sat at the match and although players may not go on line themselves they will have family and mates who read the unkind comments. They may even try to protect him by saying "dont read the on line stuff" but this will create a feeling of unease even in the toughest and single minded individuals.
Its been bad enough on here but there are plenty of BFC linked Facebook pages and some of the disgusting absolutel drivel on there from people who surely havent a clue about professional football and the modern game is unbelievable.
Its been bad enough on here but there are plenty of BFC linked Facebook pages and some of the disgusting absolutel drivel on there from people who surely havent a clue about professional football and the modern game is unbelievable.
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I have never said that it didn’t happen! Read my posts on this and the other Trafford thread.The Project wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 3:30 pmBloody hell Jamesy. You don't half get defensive.
I am also not looking for an argument.
There is no denying that Trafford had an hard time from some supporters. You deny that it happened but then admit it was a small fraction. The size of the crowd giving a hard time is irrelevant. 10 supporters or 10,000 supporters, it happened.
You also mention - let our opinions cloud the facts, when this is exactly what you are doing.
The stuff i stated regarding Trafford are not opinions, they are experiences that i lived and witnessed first hand.
I accepted that he had received some abuse and groans, however I stated it was only a small minority. I’m not trying to defend anything and it is totally out of order if people shout abuse at him or any other player at matches.
I am just saying he didn’t get lots of stick because he definitely didn’t and I attended home and away games. That’s all.
-
- Posts: 7535
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4043 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I would suggest that the implication is "I'm a highly paid professional player and you'll only ever be good enough to pay and watch". Whether that's disrespectful is open to debate. I guess it's actually factually correct for the vast majority of us, but it's not necessarily something I think needs pointing out. I'm suspecting he's leaving.
These 2 users liked this post: Jamesy MeeActon1
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 537 times
- Has Liked: 1275 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
It's literally the same arguments on repeat
I think I am at the point where selling JT and AM might not be a bad thing for the club, if we replace them with a clear number 1 who is decent and someone we can all get behind.

This user liked this post: beeholeclaret
Re: Trafford’s tweet
He may have been young but he's paid a hell of a lot of money and he's confident enough to make a statement that he could play in a champions league final already because he's ready.....that was before he signed for us, last season proved he was wrongbeeholeclaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:21 pmI really cant believe that people are coming on here saying that Trafford has not been given a hard time. Virtually all season there has been a barrage of detrimental comments about a young player who is making his way in the game. To be handed your Burnley debut in a home game against Man City mustve been difficult and this in a team which had changed drastically from that which won promotion. Moans and groans were obvious to me when Im sat at the match and although players may not go on line themselves they will have family and mates who read the unkind comments. They may even try to protect him by saying "dont read the on line stuff" but this will create a feeling of unease even in the toughest and single minded individuals.
Its been bad enough on here but there are plenty of BFC linked Facebook pages and some of the disgusting absolutel drivel on there from people who surely havent a clue about professional football and the modern game is unbelievable.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4725 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
He's paid a lot of money = I can abuse him
It's like a Daily Mail headline about a footballer of a different colour
It's like a Daily Mail headline about a footballer of a different colour
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 1:27 pm
- Been Liked: 3 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Does what you get paid have any relevance?
I don't think it should.
I just don't think it warrants abuse.
At the beginning of this year, i went through the worst time of my life. After returning to work, i wasn't performing to my abilities and had to take more time off. Would it be acceptable for my peers to abuse me for my poor performance.
-
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
We’d have still been relegated with prime Gordon Banks and Dino Zoff in goal.Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 2:03 pmNo idea but his poor performances where a major factor in our getting relegated so he needs to keep well away from social media and any criticism of Burnley fans, who never turned on him despite some glaring errors .
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 1:27 pm
- Been Liked: 3 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Come on Jamesy.Jamesy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:26 pmI have never said that it didn’t happen! Read my posts on this and the other Trafford thread.
I accepted that he had received some abuse and groans, however I stated it was only a small minority. I’m not trying to defend anything and it is totally out of order if people shout abuse at him or any other player at matches.
I am just saying he didn’t get lots of stick because he definitely didn’t and I attended home and away games. That’s all.
I've just reread your comments on this post and in the 2nd one you state - "he wasn't given a hard time from the Burnley support"
.
You've literally argued on this thread that it didn't happen because you didn't see any of it.
Now you are saying it was a small minority and it wasn't lots while you have been arguing the opposite all through this thread
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Again, he got lots of stick on here, are you denying that?Jamesy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:26 pmI have never said that it didn’t happen! Read my posts on this and the other Trafford thread.
I accepted that he had received some abuse and groans, however I stated it was only a small minority. I’m not trying to defend anything and it is totally out of order if people shout abuse at him or any other player at matches.
I am just saying he didn’t get lots of stick because he definitely didn’t and I attended home and away games. That’s all.
This user liked this post: The Project
Re: Trafford’s tweet
He didn't get abuse, he got criticism.The Project wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:47 pmDoes what you get paid have any relevance?
I don't think it should.
I just don't think it warrants abuse.
At the beginning of this year, i went through the worst time of my life. After returning to work, i wasn't performing to my abilities and had to take more time off. Would it be acceptable for my peers to abuse me for my poor performance.
He's in a role where that will always happen, you aren't.
Plus how can you be sure your peers didn't criticise you behind your back without you knowing?
Sorry to hear about your troubles and hope you've fully recovered but they have nothing to do with James Trafford.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2024 1:27 pm
- Been Liked: 3 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Fair play, i can't be sure about my peers but i hope they didn't.bumba wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:16 pmHe didn't get abuse, he got criticism.
He's in a role where that will always happen, you aren't.
Plus how can you be sure your peers didn't criticise you behind your back without you knowing?
Sorry to hear about your troubles and hope you've fully recovered but they have nothing to do with James Trafford.
Thank you, i am steadily recovering, one of my parents passed away but you are correct, it has nothing to do with Trafford. I don't know why i was putting them together.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
He got dogs abuse on here and other social Mediabumba wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:16 pmHe didn't get abuse, he got criticism.
He's in a role where that will always happen, you aren't.
Plus how can you be sure your peers didn't criticise you behind your back without you knowing?
Sorry to hear about your troubles and hope you've fully recovered but they have nothing to do with James Trafford.
This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret
-
- Posts: 19683
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4181 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Can you show me a screen shot of what you would call dogs abuse to him please?
(Obviously not pics of dogs being abused before anyone starts)
Last edited by Quickenthetempo on Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6746
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 504 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Just seen the post screenshots and yes, it is clearly a pop at Burnley fans, but it is a defensive pop, very different from Kompany’s narcissistic behaviour where the whole world seems to revolve around him, Trafford seems offended and wants to move on.
For me he was clearly PARTLY responsible for us dropping. He was near the bottom of the keeper’s stats for goals prevented, whilst Muric was near the top, that is a fact not an opinion. He also had hesitant distribution and his collection of some high balls reminded me of a young child trying to catch confetti at a windy wedding. He will be very good, but for now in 2024 he isn’t ready to be targeted like he was by the world’s elite.
The problem is what Lampard referenced in his 2 hour diary of a CEO interview. Many English young players are on their phones minutes after finishing a game, desperate to see who has said what about them. Trafford will be well aware of fan’s opinions of him, and it has hit a raw nerve. Not sure that gives me confidence in his future success, maybe when he matures?
It sounds like his move to Newcastle is imminent now Schira has tweeted about it so that seems for the best even though I felt he would still be one of the best keepers in the Championship.
For me he was clearly PARTLY responsible for us dropping. He was near the bottom of the keeper’s stats for goals prevented, whilst Muric was near the top, that is a fact not an opinion. He also had hesitant distribution and his collection of some high balls reminded me of a young child trying to catch confetti at a windy wedding. He will be very good, but for now in 2024 he isn’t ready to be targeted like he was by the world’s elite.
The problem is what Lampard referenced in his 2 hour diary of a CEO interview. Many English young players are on their phones minutes after finishing a game, desperate to see who has said what about them. Trafford will be well aware of fan’s opinions of him, and it has hit a raw nerve. Not sure that gives me confidence in his future success, maybe when he matures?
It sounds like his move to Newcastle is imminent now Schira has tweeted about it so that seems for the best even though I felt he would still be one of the best keepers in the Championship.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I could, but it would only inflame an argument that doesn't need inflaming, but there are obvious threads you could read if you really have not seen them beforeQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:53 pmCan you show me a screen shot of what you would call dogs abuse to him please?
(Obviously not pics of dogs being abused before anyone starts)
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Strange how the ones at the centre of the abuse are now here denying it ever happened
These 2 users liked this post: Benson Bigvince
Re: Trafford’s tweet
That will never stop, I don't have sympathy for any footballer that uses social media
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Really ?Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:53 pmCan you show me a screen shot of what you would call dogs abuse to him please?
(Obviously not pics of dogs being abused before anyone starts)
You don’t think that there was much abuse on this board for Trafford.
If some of the posters on here were to count the number of abusive and critical posts they made about Trafford last season they would (or should) be embarrassed the way they acted and obsessed about a young player of a team they supposedly support.
The vast majority of posters on here did agree that Trafford needed taking out of the team for Muric. Most of these posters did not feel the need to abuse him or post incessantly about him.
Personally (and I know a lot of people who share this view) I think neither Muric or Trafford were good enough for the Premier League. And that’s especially the case when you look at the defence in front of them most weeks last season.
If Trafford does go on to much bigger and better things I would not be surprised but I think it would be in a club with a far better goalkeeping coach than we have, much better players around him and for a club that does not ask it’s keepers to take as many risks as we did. I don’t think Muric has got the potential to develop that Trafford has and think that whoever he plays for he has too many big mistakes in him.
-
- Posts: 19683
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4181 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
You're right it doesn't need inflaming.golden days wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 6:03 pmI could, but it would only inflame an argument that doesn't need inflaming, but there are obvious threads you could read if you really have not seen them before
So best to use language like 'he took a bit of stick on here' rather than 'dogs abuse'.
Unless you genuinely think it happened, then best to report it on here.
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I had a bit of spare time waiting to pick the kids up.
Stuck Trafford in the search bar and he's just a sample of the first thread I picked. There's plenty others
Stuck Trafford in the search bar and he's just a sample of the first thread I picked. There's plenty others
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184756.png (72.52 KiB) Viewed 1753 times
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184808.png (142.14 KiB) Viewed 1753 times
-
- Screenshot_20240611-185137.png (222.21 KiB) Viewed 1753 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Some more
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184656.png (54.25 KiB) Viewed 1752 times
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184709.png (56.79 KiB) Viewed 1752 times
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184747.png (56.8 KiB) Viewed 1752 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
This is just from the first couple of pages of a 15 page thread
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184627.png (319.38 KiB) Viewed 1743 times
-
- Screenshot_20240611-184643.png (119.07 KiB) Viewed 1743 times
-
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1289 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Trafford’s tweet
'Trafford strikes again....'Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 5:53 pmCan you show me a screen shot of what you would call dogs abuse to him please?
(Obviously not pics of dogs being abused before anyone starts)
‘Laughable from Trafford, a boy playing in a man's game'
'Thick from Trafford'
'he is weak and will single handedly cost us another season'
'The rest of the team must hate Trafford'
'get out of my club'
...In addition to one poster trying to get 'calamity' to stick as his nickname.
All lifted from this board throughout the season.
This user liked this post: GetIntoEm
-
- Posts: 7535
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4043 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Others may disagree as it might depend on where you sit on the Turf, but despite everything last season I don't think I ever heard criticism of Trafford voiced out loud at matches. Yes it definitely happened in normal conversations between fans at the ground, but there was no "public" airing I didn't feel. Similarly giving genuine opinions on this or any other message board is completely different and the "Trafford/Muric" debate was and still is one of the most decisive and polarising topics ever raised on here, but it really has been "on here" and I'd been more than a little surprised (in fact I'd be totally amazed!) if any actual players ever read this site.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat Jamesy
-
- Posts: 19683
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4181 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
That's someone giving stick, not dogs abuse.Darthlaw wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 6:55 pm'Trafford strikes again....'
‘Laughable from Trafford, a boy playing in a man's game'
'Thick from Trafford'
'he is weak and will single handedly cost us another season'
'The rest of the team must hate Trafford'
'get out of my club'
...In addition to one poster trying to get 'calamity' to stick as his nickname.
All lifted from this board throughout the season.
Social media has a problem with people exaggerating things to get their point accross, on both sides of any argument.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Looks like others found some examplesQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 6:27 pmYou're right it doesn't need inflaming.
So best to use language like 'he took a bit of stick on here' rather than 'dogs abuse'.
Unless you genuinely think it happened, then best to report it on here.
-
- Posts: 9808
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
... so not dogs abuse then.
Also seems like Nori has signed up for the board with a few more accounts recently.
Also seems like Nori has signed up for the board with a few more accounts recently.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I really worry for the mental health of grown adults worrying about a "tweet"
Re: Trafford’s tweet
They need somerhing to fill the void bill ... I despair for a lot of themboatshed bill wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 8:04 pmI really worry for the mental health of grown adults worrying about a "tweet"
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 253 times
- Has Liked: 74 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
GrassCoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 8:00 pm... so not dogs abuse then.
Also seems like Nori has signed up for the board with a few more accounts recently.
-
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1289 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Trafford’s tweet
As long as we’re grading ‘abuse’ then, it ok eh?CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 8:00 pm... so not dogs abuse then.
Also seems like Nori has signed up for the board with a few more accounts recently.
What level is ‘get out of my club’ in the abuse stakes to one of our own, out of interest, on the cool abuse-o-meter?
-
- Posts: 9808
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet

I think using those comments and coming to the conclusion of it being 'dogs abuse' is just hysterical, that's all.
Dogs abuse is what Brian Laws got off the numpties at half time at Oakwell.
-
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1289 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Trafford’s tweet
As long as it doesn’t reach the threshold it’s all good then.
We’ve gone from ‘there was no abuse’ to ‘there was some abuse’ to ‘it wasn’t that bad’.
Speaks volumes, those justifying the grief given to one of our young lads, really.
The good news is your bogeyman will be gone soon. Tresor next?
We’ve gone from ‘there was no abuse’ to ‘there was some abuse’ to ‘it wasn’t that bad’.
Speaks volumes, those justifying the grief given to one of our young lads, really.
The good news is your bogeyman will be gone soon. Tresor next?
Re: Trafford’s tweet
When you think it can’t go to the next random level, it has gone to the next random level.
James Trafford continues to live rent free in a few UTC posters heads.
James Trafford continues to live rent free in a few UTC posters heads.
-
- Posts: 9808
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Not justifying anything, nor have I ever said that there's been no abuse. I just think you're using the word abuse wrongly.Darthlaw wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:08 pmAs long as it doesn’t reach the threshold it’s all good then.
We’ve gone from ‘there was no abuse’ to ‘there was some abuse’ to ‘it wasn’t that bad’.
Speaks volumes, those justifying the grief given to one of our young lads, really.
The good news is your bogeyman will be gone soon. Tresor next?
Calling a player not up to it is not abuse, like, at all.
'Get out of my club' is of course different, but painting this picture that he has routinely been 'abused' en masse is just wrong.
I don't know what you expect, it's not under 11s grassroots football... It's pro football at the highest level, do you expect people to just sit and clap and pretend everything is fine?
This user liked this post: Jamesy
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Spot on.Darthlaw wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:08 pmAs long as it doesn’t reach the threshold it’s all good then.
We’ve gone from ‘there was no abuse’ to ‘there was some abuse’ to ‘it wasn’t that bad’.
Speaks volumes, those justifying the grief given to one of our young lads, really.
The good news is your bogeyman will be gone soon. Tresor next?
Is there an “abuse glossary” we can all refer to so that we could differentiate between dogs abuse and good old fashioned normal abuse ?
If Trafford understood it was “just” abuse he was getting rather than dogs abuse I am sure he would be golden.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2273 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
But you seem to think that your opinion is now a fact.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2273 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
England International set-up, Newcastle, Chelsea and Bayern, seem to appreciate what Trafford brings to the table and they haven't lost their knowledge of his age and his seemingly obvious potential.
If you accept that he should have been protected by the management, and he wasn't, or you think Muric should have started the season as first choice, there is still no excuse for the general 'lack of support' shown towards James Trafford!!
If you were pleased with the demonstration of a longer view of bringing highly rated players to the club, why did you give up on him so soon?
If you accept that he should have been protected by the management, and he wasn't, or you think Muric should have started the season as first choice, there is still no excuse for the general 'lack of support' shown towards James Trafford!!
If you were pleased with the demonstration of a longer view of bringing highly rated players to the club, why did you give up on him so soon?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I actually said I hardly heard anything from my seat near the half way line.The Project wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:58 pmCome on Jamesy.
I've just reread your comments on this post and in the 2nd one you state - "he wasn't given a hard time from the Burnley support"
.
You've literally argued on this thread that it didn't happen because you didn't see any of it.
Now you are saying it was a small minority and it wasn't lots while you have been arguing the opposite all through this thread
A few people giving him a bit of abuse in his last couple of games doesn’t constitute a hard time in my book.
Our fans have been very good to him and most recognised it was Kompany to blame.
Basically you and others are just arguing for arguments sake, or are a load of over sensitive softies.
-
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1289 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I don’t expect a 21 year old lad to be given abuse by his own ‘supporters’, of which probably the vast majority who are older and should know better. Meanwhile You're arguing the semantics of linguistics to somehow justify it’s worthwhile, all because ‘it’s pro football’ apparently.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:35 pmNot justifying anything, nor have I ever said that there's been no abuse. I just think you're using the word abuse wrongly.
Calling a player not up to it is not abuse, like, at all.
'Get out of my club' is of course different, but painting this picture that he has routinely been 'abused' en masse is just wrong.
I don't know what you expect, it's not under 11s grassroots football... It's pro football at the highest level, do you expect people to just sit and clap and pretend everything is fine?
Maybe it’s just me who thinks the abuse, constructive criticism or general critique was over the top for Trafford but gauging by the response of quite a few others on this thread I don’t think it is.
Anyway, it’s a futile arguing over this. You have your viewpoint and I strongly disagree with it so let’s leave it at that.
-
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
I too think Trafford will go on to have a fine career at a very good level, but don’t discount the ‘English factor’ with all these big clubs wanting to sign him, and don’t discount Muric either, because I still rate him better than Trafford. He’s also very young and inexperienced still in goalkeeping terms.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 6:27 pmReally ?
You don’t think that there was much abuse on this board for Trafford.
If some of the posters on here were to count the number of abusive and critical posts they made about Trafford last season they would (or should) be embarrassed the way they acted and obsessed about a young player of a team they supposedly support.
The vast majority of posters on here did agree that Trafford needed taking out of the team for Muric. Most of these posters did not feel the need to abuse him or post incessantly about him.
Personally (and I know a lot of people who share this view) I think neither Muric or Trafford were good enough for the Premier League. And that’s especially the case when you look at the defence in front of them most weeks last season.
If Trafford does go on to much bigger and better things I would not be surprised but I think it would be in a club with a far better goalkeeping coach than we have, much better players around him and for a club that does not ask it’s keepers to take as many risks as we did. I don’t think Muric has got the potential to develop that Trafford has and think that whoever he plays for he has too many big mistakes in him.
It was inevitable one of them would leave this summer and I’d be delighted if it isn’t Muric.
-
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 275 times
Re: Trafford’s tweet
Not where we sit………….
Re: Trafford’s tweet
That comment has been a sort of 'undercurrent' of many, many posts throughout the season and it does seem to me that the club has become a bit aloof in regard of the supporters.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 2:37 pmPretty much all of us said we felt no connection to any of last years team, ...............
I live too far away to attend matches and so have no idea whether 'abuse' of Traff. was vocal and easily heard at games. It puzzles me though, that if it was, why didn't VK do something about it?