Stop talking in riddles, just say what you really mean.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jun 15, 2024 10:36 pmAs an observation with the time consumed on the T word you seem to be doing an exemplary job on the thing you are advising against & not just on this thread alone.
Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
And for what it’s worth, I refrained from engaging in debate with them on anything to do with JT two days ago as it’s futile.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jun 15, 2024 10:36 pmAs an observation with the time consumed on the T word you seem to be doing an exemplary job on the thing you are advising against & not just on this thread alone.
Just offering a bit of advice to someone else who is flogging a dead horse trying to reason with them. You got a problem with this?
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
No but I do find it odd when observing somebody who seemingly seems to forever prattle on about JT whether provoked or unprovoked then encourages somebody else to not get involved in doing the exact same thing you are doing. I'm backing out now because I'm in danger of doing the same thing & diminishing the essence of the point. You probably won't get it you far too immersed. Good evening.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 741 times
- Has Liked: 381 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Again. Those mistakes don’t make him erratic. He made those mistakes because he is erratic.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Jun 15, 2024 9:08 pmThe mistakes Muric made against Everton and Brighton are absolute shockers no denying that but I don’t think in any way that makes him erratic.
You’re right it should be a foul but it’s still erratic to come and claim for the ball at that moment.
‘How much does muric pay’ come on let’s not be childish, you don’t have to agree but comments like that are poor
I’m not sure you fully understand what the word means from your posts.
Childish? Not really, just making a point.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 741 times
- Has Liked: 381 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Just like it’s futile debating Muric with his number 1 fan?
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Anyone who thinks Trafford is better than Muric isn’t worth listening too.
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 253 times
- Has Liked: 74 times
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Simply not true, Allison has made countless mistakes in his premier league career and isn’t erratic.deanothedino wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:17 amAgain. Those mistakes don’t make him erratic. He made those mistakes because he is erratic.
I’m not sure you fully understand what the word means from your posts.
Childish? Not really, just making a point.
Likewise when a cb passes it straight to an attacker they don’t do it because they are erratic players.
Your point your comment about how much is muric paying me is making is how extremely childish you are
-
- Posts: 751
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 183 times
- Has Liked: 458 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Muric is clearly a much more talented keeper but I’m open minded and will listen to all observations about Trafford … apart from how good a shot stopper he is 
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Genuine question, if Muric “is clearly a much more talented keeper”Carlos the Great wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 8:38 amMuric is clearly a much more talented keeper but I’m open minded and will listen to all observations about Trafford … apart from how good a shot stopper he is![]()
Why has no premier league club shown interest? Yet Trafford has at least two top premier league teams after him?
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
NationalityNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:00 amGenuine question, if Muric “is clearly a much more talented keeper”
Why has no premier league club shown interest? Yet Trafford has at least two top premier league teams after him?
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
You’re going to have to explain that one?
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
English players, especially goalkeepers, are a premium, when it comes to UEFA rules regarding home grown talent.
It's why talent is so much cheaper abroad.
It's why talent is so much cheaper abroad.
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Muric is also classed as homegrown. Though there are other factors that can mean English players attract a premium - there’s an interesting discussion about it on page 7.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:11 amEnglish players, especially goalkeepers, are a premium, when it comes to UEFA rules regarding home grown talent.
It's why talent is so much cheaper abroad.
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Wolves linked with muric so again you are wrong.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:00 amGenuine question, if Muric “is clearly a much more talented keeper”
Why has no premier league club shown interest? Yet Trafford has at least two top premier league teams after him?
Newcastle and Chelsea are after Trafford because he’s English it’s pretty simple
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
That is pure nonsense123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:27 amWolves linked with muric so again you are wrong.
Newcastle and Chelsea are after Trafford because he’s English it’s pretty simple
Neither club are close to there homegrown quota so why would they be after him?
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
What’s pure nonsense, the fact you are factually wrong because wolves are interested in muric.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 10:09 amThat is pure nonsense
Neither club are close to there homegrown quota so why would they be after him?
Do you live under a rock, Chelsea want to sell most of their home grown players to comply with FFP.
Just because clubs have enough home grown players now doesn’t mean they always will have.
Take Newcastle for example, pope, trippier, lascelles amd targett won’t be at the club much longer, so having a backup keeper who’s English for home grown rules makes total sense.
Man united have done it for years with Lee grant and Tom Heaton
-
- Posts: 9819
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3109 times
- Has Liked: 3103 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
I think using Chelsea as some sort of barometer for smart player signings in 2024 is very silly in all honesty.
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
If they just wanted a back up keeper that was homegrown why don’t they go for someone that is going to cost pennys? Like a Lee Grant or a Tom Heaton??123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 10:18 amWhat’s pure nonsense, the fact you are factually wrong because wolves are interested in muric.
Do you live under a rock, Chelsea want to sell most of their home grown players to comply with FFP.
Just because clubs have enough home grown players now doesn’t mean they always will have.
Take Newcastle for example, pope, trippier, lascelles amd targett won’t be at the club much longer, so having a backup keeper who’s English for home grown rules makes total sense.
Man united have done it for years with Lee grant and Tom Heaton
Why would they spend a top ten fee in history for a back up keeper?
You’re talking absolute nonsense. There’s no way in hell clubs like Newcastle and Chelsea who are both up against it FFP wise will spend a fee that high on a back up keeper.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
This scenario has just crossed my mind.
Trafford gets sold to Newcastle.
New manager comes in, doesn’t fancy Muric as no.1 so puts him on the bench and brings in a better keeper.
How would some posters react?
Turn on the manager before a ball is kicked?
Make things up about the new GK, over scrutinise his performances and take every opportunity to call him out?
Trafford gets sold to Newcastle.
New manager comes in, doesn’t fancy Muric as no.1 so puts him on the bench and brings in a better keeper.
How would some posters react?
Turn on the manager before a ball is kicked?
Make things up about the new GK, over scrutinise his performances and take every opportunity to call him out?
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Again you are ignoring the fact you are completely wrong about no premier league club being interested in muric.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:06 amIf they just wanted a back up keeper that was homegrown why don’t they go for someone that is going to cost pennys? Like a Lee Grant or a Tom Heaton??
Why would they spend a top ten fee in history for a back up keeper?
You’re talking absolute nonsense. There’s no way in hell clubs like Newcastle and Chelsea who are both up against it FFP wise will spend a fee that high on a back up keeper.
Remember when you said Gyokeres wouldn’t be worth the money hahaha, and one month claiming jack Clarke wasn’t better than benson or zaroury and a month later saying he wasn’t. Then coming out with complete nonsensical net spend figures and getting called out for it.
The only person talking nonsense on here week in week out is you
I was using grant and heaton as an example.
Newcastle aren’t signing Trafford to be number 1 because he’s absolutely nowhere near Popes level but they know they have an English player who can count for home grown numbers for years to come even as a back up. 15m is about the going rate for a squad player these days in the premier league. Trafford is also Newcastle’s 3rd choice, they originally wanted Ramsdale and the Georgian keeper from velenica, Trafford is plan C
-
- Posts: 13054
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Trafford won’t go for 15m so again another pointless point.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:27 amAgain you are ignoring the fact you are completely wrong about no premier league club being interested in muric.
Remember when you said Gyokeres wouldn’t be worth the money hahaha, and one month claiming jack Clarke wasn’t better than benson or zaroury and a month later saying he wasn’t. Then coming out with complete nonsensical net spend figures and getting called out for it.
The only person talking nonsense on here week in week out is you
I was using grant and heaton as an example.
Newcastle aren’t signing Trafford to be number 1 because he’s absolutely nowhere near Popes level but they know they have an English player who can count for home grown numbers for years to come even as a back up. 15m is about the going rate for a squad player these days in the premier league. Trafford is also Newcastle’s 3rd choice, they originally wanted Ramsdale and the Georgian keeper from velenica, Trafford is plan C
He will go for above 20m which will put him in the top ten most expensive goalkeepers of all time.
But yes off course Newcastle are signing him as a back up
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Who turned on Trafford before a ball was kicked? The criticism started when it was clear he wasn’t up to the levelNL Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:08 amThis scenario has just crossed my mind.
Trafford gets sold to Newcastle.
New manager comes in, doesn’t fancy Muric as no.1 so puts him on the bench and brings in a better keeper.
How would some posters react?
Turn on the manager before a ball is kicked?
Make things up about the new GK, over scrutinise his performances and take every opportunity to call him out?
Wouldn’t performances determine who the better keeper is, rightly so fans didn’t understand why muric had been dropped for a league one keeper and performances showed.
So if a new manager came in, signed a keeper instantly replaced Muric and their performances weren’t good then obviously the manager and new keeper would be scrutinised
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Ignoring it again because you are wrong.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:28 amTrafford won’t go for 15m so again another pointless point.
He will go for above 20m which will put him in the top ten most expensive goalkeepers of all time.
But yes off course Newcastle are signing him as a back up![]()
It will be 15m with add ons.
You can’t seriously think they are signing Trafford to be number one over Pope
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
10th most expensive keeper is ramsdale to arsenal for 25m so again you are completely wrong, he will be nowhere near thatNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:28 amTrafford won’t go for 15m so again another pointless point.
He will go for above 20m which will put him in the top ten most expensive goalkeepers of all time.
But yes off course Newcastle are signing him as a back up![]()
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
For all fhe stick certain individuals on here with a northeast reference in their name have given Amdouni this season, it’s very rich that they are so quick to defend Trafford
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
That's absolute nonsense.NL Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:08 amThis scenario has just crossed my mind.
Trafford gets sold to Newcastle.
New manager comes in, doesn’t fancy Muric as no.1 so puts him on the bench and brings in a better keeper.
How would some posters react?
Turn on the manager before a ball is kicked?
Make things up about the new GK, over scrutinise his performances and take every opportunity to call him out?
If we sign a better player and play them then the fans will be happy.
Sign a worse one and play him instead and fans would be rightly unhappy.
This user liked this post: MeeActon1
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Definition of a scenario - a description of possible events or actions in the future. Possible and future are the key words in the definition.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
It was a scenario, I didn’t say that it will happen or happened in the past although I’m not going to rule it out. If we sign a “worse one” no doubt there will be whole season long debate again about Muric is the best keeper and it was his shirt to lose whilst the “worse one” gets regularly called out by the Muric fan club.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Again- nonsense.NL Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:45 pmIt was a scenario, I didn’t say that it will happen or happened in the past although I’m not going to rule it out. If we sign a “worse one” no doubt there will be whole season long debate again about Muric is the best keeper and it was his shirt to lose whilst the “worse one” gets regularly called out by the Muric fan club.
If you honestly believe that people don't want us to play our best 11 then you've lost your mind.
There's a few extremists that love Muric, as there are some that love Trafford, Amdouni, Kompany etc. What you're saying is just silly.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
It was a scenario, some posters can’t get their head around scenarios at all. Anything can happen. Wow, lost my mind

Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
You've made up a scenario to post nonsense so yes I think you've lost your mind.
There's no way in a scenario where we sign a new keeper fans will be dissenting if he's better than Muric and plays- that's the scenario you've given.
Fans want to see the best 11 on the pitch- it's that simple.
-
- Posts: 19686
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
It won't happen again, the manager/keeper will get stick within a month if they're not good enough.NL Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 2:45 pmIt was a scenario, I didn’t say that it will happen or happened in the past although I’m not going to rule it out. If we sign a “worse one” no doubt there will be whole season long debate again about Muric is the best keeper and it was his shirt to lose whilst the “worse one” gets regularly called out by the Muric fan club.
All the patience ran out with the last duo.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Scenarios are generally made up, in fact what am I saying, scenarios are made up. It could still happen, mark my words.boyyanno wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:02 pmYou've made up a scenario to post nonsense so yes I think you've lost your mind.
There's no way in a scenario where we sign a new keeper fans will be dissenting if he's better than Muric and plays- that's the scenario you've given.
Fans want to see the best 11 on the pitch- it's that simple.
Lost my mind or have an open mind or read so much nonsense posted by a few on UTC? It’s not the first one, I can’t be convinced that I’ve lost my mind. Anyway, bored of this now, time to rest my mind that I have not lost and watch the 2nd half.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
On matchdayday thread for city game?123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 11:30 amWho turned on Trafford before a ball was kicked? The criticism started when it was clear he wasn’t up to the level
After one of the friendlies?
It was certainly very early on, but he wasn't the only one our "fans" went after
This user liked this post: NL Claret
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
On the city thread and After the friendlies isn’t before is ball is kicked is it though.golden days wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:12 pmOn matchdayday thread for city game?
After one of the friendlies?
It was certainly very early on, but he wasn't the only one our "fans" went after
After muric has an excellent game against benfica in the friendly and Trafford then gets chipped from half way line against real betis, I think fans well in their right to think muric deserved to start the first game
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Your right certain ‘fans’ on here who are right on the defensive about Trafford have been very critical of Amdouni, O’Shea, Tresor and even Vitinhogolden days wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:12 pmOn matchdayday thread for city game?
After one of the friendlies?
It was certainly very early on, but he wasn't the only one our "fans" went after
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
So you are making up a scenario of fans turning on a player before a ball has been kicked without any history of that happening previous
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Scenarios are made up yes. I’m surprised how over excited a couple of posters have got with my made up scenario. Some are so precious when it comes to Muric.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:27 pmSo you are making up a scenario of fans turning on a player before a ball has been kicked without any history of that happening previous
Anything is possible, Weghorst won a cup with Manchester United, who’d have thought that.
It’s good to be open minded.
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
What’s the scenario got to do with muric? You didn’t mention muric or are you now trying to base your scenario on the Trafford and Muric debate?NL Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:34 pmScenarios are made up yes. I’m surprised how over excited a couple of posters have got with my made up scenario. Some are so precious when it comes to Muric.
Anything is possible, Weghorst won a cup with Manchester United, who’d have thought that.
It’s good to be open minded.
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
You didn’t mention Muric? See part of scenario below…….I will leave it there.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 3:40 pmWhat’s the scenario got to do with muric? You didn’t mention muric or are you now trying to base your scenario on the Trafford and Muric debate?
New manager comes in, doesn’t fancy Muric as no.1 so puts him on the bench and brings in a better keeper.
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
So you did mention muric so how is it it a made up scenario you are trying to base the scenario on the muric Trafford situation so posters are rightly calling you out for the nonsense
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
I didn't realise how difficult this was going to be.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:00 pmSo you did mention muric so how is it it a made up scenario you are trying to base the scenario on the muric Trafford situation so posters are rightly calling you out for the nonsense
Correct I did mention Muric.
The scenario includes a new manager, the Muric Trafford situation did not include turning on a new manager.
When you say posters, it sounds like a lot of posters are calling me out. That's misinformation, had you said one poster has called it out then that would be accurate. I suppose changing facts and using misinformation makes arguments stronger.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 741 times
- Has Liked: 381 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
You’re not getting it. Making mistakes isn’t why he is erratic. I’m not saying every keeper who has made mistakes is erratic. I’m saying Muric is erratic.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 7:45 amSimply not true, Allison has made countless mistakes in his premier league career and isn’t erratic.
Likewise when a cb passes it straight to an attacker they don’t do it because they are erratic players.
Your point your comment about how much is muric paying me is making is how extremely childish you are
Yes, I’m the childish one. Bet you’re fun at parties if you can’t even take such a small joke.
-
- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Jesus wept.
-
- Posts: 18557
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7616 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
This is one of the most deluded things I’ve read on here.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:27 amNewcastle and Chelsea are after Trafford because he’s English it’s pretty simple
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
-
- Posts: 18557
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7616 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
You seriously think Chelsea and Newcastle want to sign Trafford because he’s English? That’s deluded.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:47 pmIt’s pretty simple, if he wasn’t English they would be nowhere near trying to sign him
Starting to think you and Newcastle are the same person
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
He's English, very young and already has Premier league experience. He ticks every box that the top clubs look for. He's also relatively cheap because he's had a bad season so it's fairly low risk for a big club.
It doesn't suddenly mean he's a top keeper, they are clearly taking a risk hoping he reaches the potential that City and England both think he has, I don't see it personally but we will wait and see.
-
- Posts: 6538
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1249 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Newcastle bid £15m for Trafford
Nobody has ever tried to deny that Trafford has what it takes to be a good keeper but Chelsea and Newcastle wouldn’t be signing Trafford after the season he’s had if he was from Austria, they are doing it because he’s English, I don’t know why that’s hard for people to grasp.
City did it years ago with Jack rodwell, he had a average season with Everton but they signed him because he was English
The argument being made that Chelsea have enough home grown players, it’s all their home grown players being linked with moves away, likes of chalobah, cowill and Gallagher