Burnley v Lowerhouse
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Was the umpire at the Belvedere Rd end Tripathi's uncle?
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
-
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3036 times
- Has Liked: 342 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Remember when Stockport fans questioned the neutrality of the referee in the play off final, when they had 2 players correctly sent off?
This user liked this post: Alan Young
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I also seem to remember we had a hell of a lot more fans there than Stockport..so your analogy doesn't really work does it? 

-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Sorry fishy but you were totally outplayed in every department of this particular game. To hear you blaming the umpire for giving his decisions is actually quite sad. I assume you had a perfect clear close up view to back up your accusations. If so how many of the not outs that went against Snowden did you think were correct ( all I suspect)
Best to just put it out of your mind and move on to hosting your cup final. Lots of beer sales and revenue especially if the sun shines
We will just concentrate on trying to stop the title going to a suburb of Blackburn
Up the Clarets
Best to just put it out of your mind and move on to hosting your cup final. Lots of beer sales and revenue especially if the sun shines
We will just concentrate on trying to stop the title going to a suburb of Blackburn
Up the Clarets
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
My oh my you CPCC lot aint half touchy...and you say it's all one sided.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:37 amSorry fishy but you were totally outplayed in every department of this particular game. To hear you blaming the umpire for giving his decisions is actually quite sad. I assume you had a perfect clear close up view to back up your accusations. If so how many of the not outs that went against Snowden did you think were correct ( all I suspect)
Best to just put it out of your mind and move on to hosting your cup final. Lots of beer sales and revenue especially if the sun shines
We will just concentrate on trying to stop the title going to a suburb of Blackburn
Up the Clarets

My post about the umpire..if you hadn't noticed...had a laughing face and a wink. Chill out. Knew the usual suspects would bite

If you had cared to read this thread properly you will see further up my thoughts on the game and my admiration for the Burnley bowling as a unit.
Get a grip.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
That's twice now Lowerhouse have been properly pumped by Burnley this season in the league isn't it ?
You would have thought they would have turned up at least once, maybe the day is too big for them.
You would have thought they would have turned up at least once, maybe the day is too big for them.
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2230 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Slight improvement. 83 runs earlier in the season, 74 runs yesterday.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:53 amThat's twice now Lowerhouse have been properly pumped by Burnley this season in the league isn't it ?
You would have thought they would have turned up at least once, maybe the day is too big for them.
-
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I think it proves that Burnley are the better side this year.
Although Lowerhouse could have the better season with a cup win and 20/20 win.
Although Lowerhouse could have the better season with a cup win and 20/20 win.
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Superb performance from the town team. Bedford, Snowden & Tripathi were outstanding in a very satisfying afternoon. Easiest victory imaginable & never in doubt.
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Well beaten yesterday, one should not question the impartiality of the umpires but 5 out LBW? On to the Worsley cup and hopefully a return to form.
UTH
UTH
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
So in fact you are questioning the impartiality of the umpires? There could be 10 LBWs in an innings - if in the opinion of the umpire it's out, then it's out. I did the job at a high level for 15 years - perhaps you should have a go?
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
there were at least a couple that looked dodgy calls, but thats how the cookie crumbles.
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
There could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2230 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Here we go.
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
That's some accusation aimed at the umpires.Bigbopper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 amThere could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
These 4 users liked this post: sjb MeeActon1 helmclaret CoolClaret
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
And I would suggest they did their job fairly without any crumbling at all. You don't get to officiate at Lancashire League level if you can't take pressure. Anyway, I'll take the 12 point win, the easy double & the reduction of the title race to 2 teams. Come on Burnley.Bigbopper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 amThere could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
This user liked this post: FCBurnley
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Good to see a hammering being taken well.
How bitter do you have to be to question the umpires in a Lancs league game. I take it that it was the same umpires as the game at Lowerhouse at the start of the season.
How bitter do you have to be to question the umpires in a Lancs league game. I take it that it was the same umpires as the game at Lowerhouse at the start of the season.
-
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2662 times
- Has Liked: 2357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I didn't see the game live so couldn't comment but a top bowling attack are more likely to hit the pads on wickets they play on most weeks, it's sour grapes to blame the umpires. Get bat on ball, and take the decision out of the equation
As others have said, we've got to dust ourselves down and move on to next weekend.
As others have said, we've got to dust ourselves down and move on to next weekend.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 1:51 am
- Been Liked: 8 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
]
looks absolutely plum
Bigbopper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 amThere could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
looks absolutely plum
- Attachments
-
- pic 1.jpg (47.8 KiB) Viewed 1384 times
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Quite an accusation for umpires who give up their time (for very little compensation) and who enable games to be played.Bigbopper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 amThere could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
Getting umpires is harder and harder in league cricket every season and this lack of respect is a disgrace.
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
https://lancashireleague.play-cricket.c ... ts/6107880
3 bowled and 5 lbw suggest they bowled very straight.
All wickets can be viewed on the scorecard if you still think you have been cheated.
3 bowled and 5 lbw suggest they bowled very straight.
All wickets can be viewed on the scorecard if you still think you have been cheated.
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
i dont think a single Lowerhouse fan has said that Burnley didnt deserve to win? Their fast bowlers in particular were on fire.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:16 amGood to see a hammering being taken well.
How bitter do you have to be to question the umpires in a Lancs league game. I take it that it was the same umpires as the game at Lowerhouse at the start of the season.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
The 2 superstar ( best in the league we were told ) openers were both clean bowled. Heap survived 13 deliveries ( not sure how ) before departing for a duck. Whitehead lasted much longer but was also bowled. The game was already done and dusted before he was out
I have never seen the Burnley opening bowlers before but they both bowled a great line and length in direct contrast to the visitors attack.
I think it was Hopey who described Salpietro as the best pro in the league. Yesterday against top opposition he was anonymous
I have never seen the Burnley opening bowlers before but they both bowled a great line and length in direct contrast to the visitors attack.
I think it was Hopey who described Salpietro as the best pro in the league. Yesterday against top opposition he was anonymous
-
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2662 times
- Has Liked: 2357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Tbf, I'd still stand by those statements. Their league averages shows it to be fairly accurate.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:05 pmThe 2 superstar ( best in the league we were told ) openers were both clean bowled. Heap survived 13 deliveries ( not sure how ) before departing for a duck. Whitehead lasted much longer but was also bowled. The game was already done and dusted before he was out
I have never seen the Burnley opening bowlers before but they both bowled a great line and length in direct contrast to the visitors attack.
I think it was Hopey who described Salpietro as the best pro in the league. Yesterday against top opposition he was anonymous
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
and the same poster says we were well beaten.
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Poor form this pal. I responded to your initial call jokingly and got grief (because people can't be bothered to read) yet you seem to be genuinely asking questions. The one on the pro was perhaps the iffiest so I am told. I was sat square so have no idea. Was told it looked to be going down the leg side and the wicket keepers movements would suggest that. However the decisions are made in good faith. You shouldn't question that.Bigbopper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 amThere could also be 20 run outs but unlikely to ever happen.
Burnley are well known throughout the league for intimidating appealing, it is a thing of wonder to see all 11 players go up as one shouting and screaming. The umpires need to be strong and I would suggest yesterday they may have crumbled in the face of pressure.
UTH
I also didn't think Burnley were over the top with their claiming yesterday. Try going to Clitheroe or Walsden if you want to see that in action. We had a guy fielding in front of us on the square leg boundary shouting loudly and prolonged at Clitheroe. Someone pulled him up on it and he just shrugged his shoulders and said "why not? It all helps"
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
The stats suggest we do have the best batsmen in the league and the best pro when you combine his bowling (most wickets) and his batting. It isn't up for opinion. It is freely available to be seen on the Lancs League website. What that does mean is that Burnleys bowling yesterday was exceptional. It had to be. As I've said a few times now (which you seem to miss every time) is that i think taken as a whole the Burnley attack is the best. They bowl very straight and very economically right from the off (that can slso be seen via stats). No looseners. They also have 3 fast bowlers and I don't think any other team in the league has this. It is quite a rarity. Pair that with Ocky who has always been a tight bowler (perhaps less so yesterday to be fair, got swiped for 6 a couple of times) and Bharat then you have quite an attack. No weak bowler to hit about.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:05 pmThe 2 superstar ( best in the league we were told ) openers were both clean bowled. Heap survived 13 deliveries ( not sure how ) before departing for a duck. Whitehead lasted much longer but was also bowled. The game was already done and dusted before he was out
I have never seen the Burnley opening bowlers before but they both bowled a great line and length in direct contrast to the visitors attack.
I think it was Hopey who described Salpietro as the best pro in the league. Yesterday against top opposition he was anonymous
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Says it all.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:05 pmThe 2 superstar ( best in the league we were told ) openers were both clean bowled. Heap survived 13 deliveries ( not sure how ) before departing for a duck. Whitehead lasted much longer but was also bowled. The game was already done and dusted before he was out
I have never seen the Burnley opening bowlers before but they both bowled a great line and length in direct contrast to the visitors attack.
I think it was Hopey who described Salpietro as the best pro in the league. Yesterday against top opposition he was anonymous

-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
And I have never seen Lowerhouse opening batters either. I know who were superior yesterday though. I also had a rather better view of the paid for Umpires LBW decisions you were so incensed by. Then you freely admit you were sat at square leg !!! Now THAT really says it all
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
So you are dishing out what amounts to a gloating based off one game? You have no idea(certainly in a wider conversation about local cricket) what you are talking about have you? I'd hazard a guess this goes for the majority of those purporting to support Burnley CC on here.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:21 pmAnd I have never seen Lowerhouse opening batters either. I know who were superior yesterday though. I also had a rather better view of the paid for Umpires LBW decisions you were so incensed by. Then you freely admit you were sat at square leg !!! Now THAT really says it all
I can't speak for the other House fans on here but I know my stuff as I follow the league as well as House.
Oh and YET AGAIN you are claiming I was incensed by the LBWs. Please point out where I said that? Can you even read and comprehend what has been written because you aren't demonstrating you can?
Go back and re-read you absolute whopper because you are making a fool of yourself here.
-
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2020 5:26 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Time for the prohouse fans to watch the film frozen and singalong to the song upthecolne
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Pipe down Lenny. I can only see Bigbopper who has been unfairly grumpy about the umpiring (and even he said Burnley deserved it). Everyone else has held their hands up. Another one who needs to re-read what has been said. All I'm seeing is Burnley CC supporters ( a term i use loosely from what has been discovered) using that as an opening to perpetuate the gloating.Longsidelenny1882 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:01 pmTime for the prohouse fans to watch the film frozen and singalong to the song upthecolne
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
There We Are Then !Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:49 pmI did wonder how much of the car park takings it took for him to keep putting his finger up on every shout?![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Are you conveniently missing the wink at the end? I'll give you a clue. It sort of signifies it was made in jest. You have well and truly bitten

As an aside..I never saw any winks when the snide accusations about paying players etc was being thrown about. Never saw any evidence being offered either. Hmmm interesting.
Again. Making a fool of yourself.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
So now you have been challenged it’s all good fun and you didn’t mean it. Suggest in future if you don’t mean something then don’t write or say it. Keeps you out of trouble. Anyway thank you for paying to watch yesterday. Nice of you to make a donation
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Give it a rest now yeah? You refuse to listen or read. Going round in circles. Clearly a wink there and most definitely a joke in response to Bigboppers initial remark about the umpire. I've qualified it since..and ive said that countless times. You just choose to ignore it. You are here for the argument and have been from the start. You don't even watch the games. You've freely admitted it. You are a joke pal.
I also suggest you practice what you preach regarding the keeping out of trouble.
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I'd actually go as far to say it's trolls like you that make this messageboard so difficult at times.
-
- Posts: 6440
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2089 times
- Has Liked: 969 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
All handbags this compared to the carrier bag battle on Kay Street car park in 1994 between Jackie Barnes and Eddie Cobb following a disputed run out in the Rawtenstall Bacup derby.
These 2 users liked this post: helmclaret JohnDearyMe
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Ahhh but what was in the bags?Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:56 pmAll handbags this compared to the carrier bag battle on Kay Street car park in 1994 between Jackie Barnes and Eddie Cobb following a disputed run out in the Rawtenstall Bacup derby.

-
- Posts: 6440
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2089 times
- Has Liked: 969 times
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
Or the time Jackie came on the pitch for drinks and Colin Hyland nearly went for him…
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm
-
- Posts: 19684
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I can't believe you keep reacting to him.Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:48 pmI'd actually go as far to say it's trolls like you that make this messageboard so difficult at times.
He lives in America doesn't he?
-
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
- Been Liked: 415 times
- Has Liked: 647 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
He also caused a rumpus in the Winter I believe?Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:56 pmAll handbags this compared to the carrier bag battle on Kay Street car park in 1994 between Jackie Barnes and Eddie Cobb following a disputed run out in the Rawtenstall Bacup derby.
Managed to dig this out from the archives. Picture censored to protect the innocent.
RIP JB

- Attachments
-
- 7OF72-~1.jpg (1.17 MiB) Viewed 911 times
These 2 users liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm JohnDearyMe
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
I confess I don’t know Eddie Cobb but Jackie Barnes was certainly a character.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:56 pmAll handbags this compared to the carrier bag battle on Kay Street car park in 1994 between Jackie Barnes and Eddie Cobb following a disputed run out in the Rawtenstall Bacup derby.
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 722 times
- Has Liked: 2352 times
Re: Burnley v Lowerhouse
He certainly was. There was a banner with his face (and a slogan I can't remember) at the old Rossendale Utd ground on Dark Lane behind one of the goalsClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:41 pmI confess I don’t know Eddie Cobb but Jackie Barnes was certainly a character.