ENGLAND
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37344 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ENGLAND
And then we equalise
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: ENGLAND
Haha that aged!!!! He's been poor though
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37344 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ENGLAND
I wish Guardiola would take it back out of England.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:58 pmGuardiola is considered a genius for bringing it to England but they don’t play it in Spain or Germany. They are both a much better watch than PL.
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37344 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ENGLAND
2-1 Greece
-
- Posts: 19504
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4300 times
- Has Liked: 8520 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: ENGLAND
Deserve it. 

Re: ENGLAND
Dreadful defending, dreadful performance.
These 2 users liked this post: Mark the Claret BabylonClaret
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 424 times
- Has Liked: 336 times
Re: ENGLAND
At least the result means that Carsley won't get the job.
Re: ENGLAND
Should have watched the darts
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: ENGLAND
What the hell were we doing at the back for their second?
England look worse at the back than Burnley under Kompany
And created less than we are doing at the moment
England look worse at the back than Burnley under Kompany
And created less than we are doing at the moment
Last edited by BabylonClaret on Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: ENGLAND
Utter shambles. Play 2 defenders what do you expect?
These 2 users liked this post: boatshed bill Cirrus_Minor
Re: ENGLAND
Fully deserved win for Greece. They were excellent.
Re: ENGLAND
Thankfully that should bring an end to Carsleys reign. Is there any possibility that we can employ someone that atleast gives the impression they have some ambition.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: ENGLAND
Agreed. They played us well and got it spot on. Plus they really committed physically to the challenge. Our lot just ponce about falling over or running into blind alleys.
Re: ENGLAND
Greece were excellent value ...
England were awful at times ... wasting chances, misplaced passing ...
Hey ho enjoyed my beer though
England were awful at times ... wasting chances, misplaced passing ...
Hey ho enjoyed my beer though
Last edited by Bosscat on Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: ENGLAND
Stones, another one who is good at taking the ball out of defence but very poor at defending. A level below the likes of Terry & Ferdinand.
Re: ENGLAND
Unfortunately we have to put up with 3 more games of it before the FA’s crack recruitment team surge back into action.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 528 times
- Has Liked: 2420 times
Carsley
When your manager turns up looking like he's just been barred from 't Big Window
Re: ENGLAND
International football involving England is never going to be any better than absolute W A N K
-
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:19 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: ENGLAND
So, sat through that in a bar of one third Brits, one third Germans and one third Greeks.
Sodding nightmare.
So, we spent decades being crap and sometimes not even qualifying for tournaments, then Southgate takes us to TWO FINALS, which is not good enough for the keyboard experts on here, so now we are back to being crap again.
Sodding nightmare.
So, we spent decades being crap and sometimes not even qualifying for tournaments, then Southgate takes us to TWO FINALS, which is not good enough for the keyboard experts on here, so now we are back to being crap again.
-
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1044 times
- Has Liked: 323 times
Re: ENGLAND
Well that was fun to watch.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: ENGLAND
God. Both goals are utter utter shite defensively. Schoolboy (infant schoolboy) stuff
-
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 12:58 pm
- Been Liked: 84 times
- Has Liked: 39 times
-
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 2155 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ENGLAND
The greek lads wanted to play for their country and have some pride.
Our lot don't give a toss and pride is non existent.
Fancy dans worshipping their bank balance.
Sick of it all.
Our lot don't give a toss and pride is non existent.
Fancy dans worshipping their bank balance.
Sick of it all.
This user liked this post: Bop
-
- Posts: 10576
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ENGLAND
Of course it will. It is, after all, exactly what got Southgate the job.Buxtonclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:21 pmEngland U21
W 14
D 1
L 1
Most importantly, no hint of a scandal, bribes, ribald jokes or, anything else that might upset his bosses social standing.
This will probably get him the job.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 528 times
- Has Liked: 2420 times
Re: ENGLAND
Carsley can't have a shave (apart from his head) and wears a chav hood! Not peofessional.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: ENGLAND
That level of experiment suggests either of two outcomes:
He's either got the job and knows hes safe, or he hasn't got the job and has just fooked the England set-up for a laugh.
He's either got the job and knows hes safe, or he hasn't got the job and has just fooked the England set-up for a laugh.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 537 times
- Has Liked: 1276 times
Re: ENGLAND
The FA will be gutted that they can't just appoint him and point to positive results under his caretaker stint. Wonder what crap they will come out with when he still gets the job 

Re: ENGLAND
It was a poor performance, sure, but he's watched the last year or so of Southgate's tenure and all of this summer hearing the clamour to get more of our attacking talent on the pitch and to get them firing together.
He's tried that, it hasn't come off and he's shown a good number of people that it's not as simple as just blasting all of your attacking threat on the pitch and watching the goals pile high.
Now in this same thread people are annoyed that it'll be a 'safe' option like Nice guy Eddie and decrying him trying to shake it up after moaning for 10 years under Southgate that it needed a shake up
I liked that he's trying different things other than just worshipping at the altar of 4-2-3-1 and swapping out like for like as a tactical change. Id be giving him up to the end of the next major tournament personally but it's that same clamour that will now see any prospect of that off.
There is no bigger disparity in football between 'what England fans/press think they deserve and are capable of' and 'the reality of the situation'.
He's tried that, it hasn't come off and he's shown a good number of people that it's not as simple as just blasting all of your attacking threat on the pitch and watching the goals pile high.
Now in this same thread people are annoyed that it'll be a 'safe' option like Nice guy Eddie and decrying him trying to shake it up after moaning for 10 years under Southgate that it needed a shake up

I liked that he's trying different things other than just worshipping at the altar of 4-2-3-1 and swapping out like for like as a tactical change. Id be giving him up to the end of the next major tournament personally but it's that same clamour that will now see any prospect of that off.
There is no bigger disparity in football between 'what England fans/press think they deserve and are capable of' and 'the reality of the situation'.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 178 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: ENGLAND
Things in Carsleys’s favour -
Harmless, won’t rock the boat
Has the job at the moment
Won a trophy at U21 level
Will continue with the FA’s gateway nonsense
Against -
He’s Irish
Uninspiring choice so difficult to spin positively
Solid record of underachievement
Hugely inexperienced
Harmless, won’t rock the boat
Has the job at the moment
Won a trophy at U21 level
Will continue with the FA’s gateway nonsense
Against -
He’s Irish
Uninspiring choice so difficult to spin positively
Solid record of underachievement
Hugely inexperienced
-
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1044 times
- Has Liked: 323 times
-
- Posts: 18549
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7610 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ENGLAND
What a breath of fresh air from the turgid Safegate football.
-
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1044 times
- Has Liked: 323 times
Re: ENGLAND
Yeah, give him a 10-year contract.
-
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: ENGLAND
I’m not so sure the result or performance would’ve been any better under Southgate, to be honest.
Re: ENGLAND
It's not difficult to select an England team, other countries manage it fine leaving top players out just rotate them.
Not sure why we have to fit Foden in he's been terrible for England.
Why does Bellingham need playing so far forward? His goal yesterday came when he played deeper, play him alongside Rice.
Palmer in the 10.
Saka right.
Gordon, Madueke, Barnes, Sancho, Rashford, Foden probably missed some but take your pick for the left wing.
Kane or Watkins up top.
I'd seriously consider Dan Burn to play left back, let Trent get forward and push in to midfield when attacking and that'd still leave Burn to come inside to form 3 centre backs to defend.
Not sure why we have to fit Foden in he's been terrible for England.
Why does Bellingham need playing so far forward? His goal yesterday came when he played deeper, play him alongside Rice.
Palmer in the 10.
Saka right.
Gordon, Madueke, Barnes, Sancho, Rashford, Foden probably missed some but take your pick for the left wing.
Kane or Watkins up top.
I'd seriously consider Dan Burn to play left back, let Trent get forward and push in to midfield when attacking and that'd still leave Burn to come inside to form 3 centre backs to defend.
This user liked this post: Jacko
Re: ENGLAND
At the risk of over simplifying, maybe it is just this simple: pick the right team, not who you think are the best 11 players (which is another story: objectively, some of the players in that side don't deserve to be in there based on performance). Picking a balanced defence who can defend would be a start; can't recall the last time and England manager did that.bumba wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:29 amIt's not difficult to select an England team, other countries manage it fine leaving top players out just rotate them.
Not sure why we have to fit Foden in he's been terrible for England.
Why does Bellingham need playing so far forward? His goal yesterday came when he played deeper, play him alongside Rice.
Palmer in the 10.
Saka right.
Gordon, Madueke, Barnes, Sancho, Rashford, Foden probably missed some but take your pick for the left wing.
Kane or Watkins up top.
I'd seriously consider Dan Burn to play left back, let Trent get forward and push in to midfield when attacking and that'd still leave Burn to come inside to form 3 centre backs to defend.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
I rarely get beyond #1 when checking the team sheet. How on earth can Pope not get a start in that team. Baffling.
-
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
- Been Liked: 514 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
- Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man
Re: ENGLAND
He's only as Irish as Josh CullenLincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:41 amThings in Carsleys’s favour -
Harmless, won’t rock the boat
Has the job at the moment
Won a trophy at U21 level
Will continue with the FA’s gateway nonsense
Against -
He’s Irish
Uninspiring choice so difficult to spin positively
Solid record of underachievement
Hugely inexperienced
Re: ENGLAND
Because his kicking is still shocking and hasn’t improved.Dark Cloud wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 10:43 amI rarely get beyond #1 when checking the team sheet. How on earth can Pope not get a start in that team. Baffling.
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: ENGLAND
Carsley appeared to think we would win if you just play all your 'best' players, but don't actually employ any tactics.
I mean, you don't need to with those players on the pitch.
I mean, you don't need to with those players on the pitch.
-
- Posts: 10576
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ENGLAND
Really? I wouldn’t be too sure…Conroysleftfoot wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:40 pmAt least the result means that Carsley won't get the job.

Re: ENGLAND
Perhaps one of the reason it failed is because centre forwards are sometimes considered to be "attacking talent".BigGaz wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:36 amIt was a poor performance, sure, but he's watched the last year or so of Southgate's tenure and all of this summer hearing the clamour to get more of our attacking talent on the pitch and to get them firing together.
He's tried that, it hasn't come off and he's shown a good number of people that it's not as simple as just blasting all of your attacking threat on the pitch and watching the goals pile high.
Now in this same thread people are annoyed that it'll be a 'safe' option like Nice guy Eddie and decrying him trying to shake it up after moaning for 10 years under Southgate that it needed a shake up![]()
I liked that he's trying different things other than just worshipping at the altar of 4-2-3-1 and swapping out like for like as a tactical change. Id be giving him up to the end of the next major tournament personally but it's that same clamour that will now see any prospect of that off.
There is no bigger disparity in football between 'what England fans/press think they deserve and are capable of' and 'the reality of the situation'.
If we have several really good centre forwards (and I think we do), then perhaps playing 2 of them might result in more goals than playing 0. Even playing 1 up front, as proved in the Euros, is inefficient as far as goalscoring goes.
Re: ENGLAND
I agree about Stones. For both the goals, he could be seen getting his body well out of the way of the ball with his leg at full stretch so his foot might just block the shot.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: ENGLAND
Totally agree that Pope's kicking is his glaring weak spot, but he's deemed good enough to be first choice for The Toon who are awash with cash and 4th? in the PL, AND I don't see Pickford being any great shakes with the ball at his feet as regularly messes it up.