Eiffel Tower.
The Royals.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: The Royals.
Have you managed to get there yet?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:59 amThey are a complete waste of time & most importantly resources. I'd abolish the monarchy. Surely there comes a time where you have to stand on your own 2 feet.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
-
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 701 times
- Location: Château d'If
Re: The Royals.
i'd abolish jakub before i start on the royal family.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
-
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 701 times
- Location: Château d'If
Re: The Royals.
es tevez?
Re: The Royals.
Dispatches documentary on channel 4 tonight looking into the finances of the royals.
Re: The Royals.
Who would be head of state? Would you give the Prime Minister absolute power?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:59 amThey are a complete waste of time & most importantly resources. I'd abolish the monarchy. Surely there comes a time where you have to stand on your own 2 feet.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: The Royals.
Whoever the people elected by democracy. I don't see how it's influenced positively elsewhere. We don't need it it's there because we don't really know any different so just go along with it.
-
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2261 times
- Has Liked: 1242 times
Re: The Royals.
When you see how many people struggle financially to make ends meet in this country, then this does not sit comfortably with me. What a priviliged position the Royals have
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: The Royals.
Absolutely disgraceful information revealed on their finances this weekend.
Charging the NHS £11m a year to park ambulances!
William outed as a slum landlord, renting out mouldy properties.
Harry and Megan are better off cutting all ties with this lot.
Charging the NHS £11m a year to park ambulances!
William outed as a slum landlord, renting out mouldy properties.
Harry and Megan are better off cutting all ties with this lot.
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: The Royals.
Get rid. Bunch of parasites and freeloaders.
-
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 213 times
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
- Been Liked: 421 times
- Has Liked: 429 times
Re: The Royals.
Never minded the Royal family but the money they’re making out of the NHS is disgraceful however wouldn’t give H & M oxygen,used to like Harry but she’s turned him into a woke whimp.helmclaret wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 10:27 pmAbsolutely disgraceful information revealed on their finances this weekend.
Charging the NHS £11m a year to park ambulances!
William outed as a slum landlord, renting out mouldy properties.
Harry and Megan are better off cutting all ties with this lot.
-
- Posts: 12179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5988 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: The Royals.
Put your Daily Mail down.Stonehouse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 8:02 pmNever minded the Royal family but the money they’re making out of the NHS is disgraceful however wouldn’t give H & M oxygen,used to like Harry but she’s turned him into a woke whimp.
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret
Re: The Royals.
https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andre ... s-13269337
He's one sponging,dodgy dealing piece of useless sh1t ( allegedly).
Would a normal person be questioned by the police to see if state security had been compromised?
He's one sponging,dodgy dealing piece of useless sh1t ( allegedly).
Would a normal person be questioned by the police to see if state security had been compromised?
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2229 times
Re: The Royals.
He must be incredibly easy to manipulate.
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
Re: The Royals.
Agreed as pensioners freeze this winter having had their winter fuel allowance stolen from them these parasites continue to dip into taxpayers cash to live their fantasy lives like you said a bunch of parasites and freeloaders.
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
Re: The Royals.
Send for Emily Maitland it's time he did another of those hilarious live interviews were he tries to explain everything his last one was one of the funniest things I have ever seenbfcjg wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2024 11:59 amhttps://news.sky.com/story/prince-andre ... s-13269337
He's one sponging,dodgy dealing piece of useless sh1t ( allegedly).
Would a normal person be questioned by the police to see if state security had been compromised?
Re: The Royals.
Burnleys number one fan.
Re: The Royals.
And the head of state we have bring in an estimated £1.1bn worth of income the others don't,the head of state we have earns £billions for the charities they support,the others don't.The homeless problem we have has been created by our elected representatives,and if William and Kate throw their support behind the charities helping these people,it will be more helpful then anything any Government will do.bfcjg wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:05 pmI suppose we need a head of state and if so I'd sooner have what we have as opposed to a Putin, Trump,Biden Macron etc. It's all ceremonial they have no actual power and wouldn't have a hope of standing against parliament.
That said the antiquated House of Lords needs scrapping, a load of daft old fart lords, ladies, bishops and cronies playing ping pong with the sitting government of noth parties whilst drawing a fortune in expenses is tiresome.
It's disappointing to see a poster saying the news has nothing better to report.I assume that he is not homeless so it's not important to him.
Anyone who is unfortunate to get cancer and needs a scan,if they opposed the Royals then either refuse to have it or pay for it yourself, because it's highly likely that the scanner was purchased by a charity supported by the Royals
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
Re: The Royals.
Maybe, maybe not,but he chose Burnley to help ease the poverty in the area with the Princes Trust, remind me again what the politicians have actually done other than a policy of managed decline
-
- Posts: 6786
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2856 times
- Has Liked: 7024 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: The Royals.
He knows exactly where Burnley is, as it’s just a few miles south east of one of his favourite watering holes near Clitheroe
Re: The Royals.
Imagine the good that could be done if they paid tax like everyone else too.gtclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 9:37 amAnd the head of state we have bring in an estimated £1.1bn worth of income the others don't,the head of state we have earns £billions for the charities they support,the others don't.The homeless problem we have has been created by our elected representatives,and if William and Kate throw their support behind the charities helping these people,it will be more helpful then anything any Government will do.
It's disappointing to see a poster saying the news has nothing better to report.I assume that he is not homeless so it's not important to him.
Anyone who is unfortunate to get cancer and needs a scan,if they opposed the Royals then either refuse to have it or pay for it yourself, because it's highly likely that the scanner was purchased by a charity supported by the Royals
-
- Posts: 18549
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7610 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Royals.
Tourism income is not a sufficient reason for an outdated social hierarchy.
-
- Posts: 5300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: The Royals.
Oh, I don't know..if we strung up one of the parasites every month on tower green (or maybe Wembley) I'd imagine pay-per-view rights would be pretty phenomenal...and the hotels, local buisness and transport links would have 2 or 3 years they could only dream of.
Gotta think outside the box sometimes.
Re: The Royals.
They do pay tax,it's just that there's no legal obligation for them to do so.The problem is the way the government spend the money and the tax avoiding billionaires that do have an obligation to pay tax
-
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 317 times
- Has Liked: 187 times