Brownhill

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Stevie Morgan
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:54 am
Been Liked: 114 times
Has Liked: 220 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Stevie Morgan » Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:07 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:03 pm
The issue we have throughout the team (not just midfield) isnt defence splitting passes but that in general we dont pass it enough with pace and purpose meaning players have to wait for the ball or break their run. This is what slows our play down and makes us easy to defend against.

Basically we need to transition from the back to the front much quicker but with a string of several passes rather than going longer. What the answer is im not sure but from small glimpses I think Hannibal in a central position rather than being pushed further forward will help this and the reason we look a little better with Laurent on is because there is more urgency in his passing and general play.

Brownhill has been our best and more consistent midfielder this season but I think we might actually play better as a team without him but I think we are a long way from that and from thinking about dropping our captain
Hadn't read you post before posting mine!

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6864
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1999 times
Has Liked: 510 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:10 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2024 7:04 pm
He played a ball back towards goal as we approached 90 mins and copped a fair amount of stick from the JHL.

He had nowhere to go to be fair.
He did do that, I felt I saw a pass but maybe there wasn’t.

But for me the problem is that when Sarmiento gets the ball he faces forward and with quick movement and fast feet tries to get past a man or thread a pass. When Brownhill gets the ball he looks up, if there is no obvious pass on the ball goes back.

It is a quality problem.

Now, Josh isn’t that player. But he needs players around him that are. We don’t have enough of them, well, ones not with the physio.

Pearcey
Posts: 4361
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1494 times
Has Liked: 1876 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Pearcey » Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:35 pm

I like Brownhill. His decision to give the ball to Jay after we got the pen was exceptional.
These 3 users liked this post: IanMcL jjclaret Holtyclaret

LincsWoldsClaret
Posts: 764
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
Been Liked: 195 times
Has Liked: 107 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by LincsWoldsClaret » Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:40 pm

And yet in the first half we had 11 shots on goal.
Parker deliberately played Cullen further forwards and he was central to our attack (until his booking put paid to that).
Naturally Laurent and Hannibal looked good when they came on - one or both of them should be starting but can’t as we don’t have a centre forward for them to support

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3274
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 550 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:44 pm

I agree with most of the points made because the problem is we have a mish mash of a squad that could produce two decent Championship teams but not one top of the table championship team because we have a striker issue and arguably a manager that is expecting players to play in a way they can't....!

The key is Plan A, we get Foster back and he plays well with Flemming and we have a plausible Plan B because Plan A looks doubtful.

If we can't make the above two work then we won't make the top two because we won't score enough.

It's as simple as that...!

DCWat
Posts: 9974
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4500 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by DCWat » Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:13 pm

Tempo is definitely an issue. We are doing some good things but in no way quickly enough to cause sufficient problems, as often as we should.

Not intending to weigh in on Trafford, and appreciating that at times we are looking to draw the opposition on to us, there are times that he’s far too slow to get the ball moving again.

These delays suck away any momentum that we have been building and allow the opposition a full reset.

I’m still a bit puzzled with Hannibal and how we are utilising him. He has to be dropped further back, where I think we’d see much more from him.

I’d be interested to see Hannibal alongside Laurent for a game or two.

Jimmymaccer
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
Been Liked: 661 times
Has Liked: 286 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Jimmymaccer » Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:28 am

Josh is a top bloke, and loves the club……….but he’s a paid professional and maybe just needs a quick check ………he’s just as frustrated as we are but maybe like us in our jobs…………….go home.

Can’t be much fun getting pumped last season, the challenges of this one……and your own giving you grief.

But as an experienced chap………don’t rise to the bait.

UTC

Alan Young
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 9:35 pm
Been Liked: 33 times
Has Liked: 32 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Alan Young » Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:51 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:42 pm
Anyone found out how he had a pop at the fans yet?
No. What a thread.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

fatboy47
Posts: 5351
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2886 times
Has Liked: 3247 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Brownhill

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:12 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:42 pm
Anyone found out how he had a pop at the fans yet?
He didnt.
More sh1te from the usual suspects that stink out this board.
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Bosscat

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3083
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 241 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by GetIntoEm » Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:38 am

exactly, utter nonsense.

one of the repeated negative posters even went home for a chicken dinner.

either he's whipped, or they are too mentally deficient to plan their dinner for after the match finishes. strange times.

TheOriginalLongsider
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:41 am
Been Liked: 466 times
Has Liked: 235 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by TheOriginalLongsider » Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:53 am

I honestly think Brownhill is better since becoming captain.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

IanMcL
Posts: 34802
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6948 times
Has Liked: 10366 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by IanMcL » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:03 am

Nrownhill had a good game yesterday. He broke up their attacks several times with interceptions and tackles. He also geed up others, inc Trafford and kept the ball for the pen, in his words, to take any gamesmanship from them. Then Jay steps forward and he hands it straight to him. Excellent thought and action.

We knew Jay is the pen taker. I was expecting Jay to take it. Swans obviously not.

One pass right before the goal, got a groan. He could have tried a pass, however, the player to whom he passed, was facing the right way and had a clearer picture. All good.

Captain Brownhill is essential to this team.
This user liked this post: jjclaret

The Shire Claret
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 370 times
Has Liked: 282 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by The Shire Claret » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:07 am

I often wonder if the people who criticise players like Brownhill have ever played the game before

Work off the ball matters
Filling space matters
Being a nuisance matters


Brownhill Matters
These 2 users liked this post: jjclaret IanMcL

Ric_C
Posts: 2851
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 181 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Ric_C » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:11 am

Thought the groan when he did that pass was just general frustration tbh. Felt a bit sorry for him in that moment.

His shielding of Jay for the pen was exceptional. The ref was so weak in that situation and should've booked a couple of their players.
This user liked this post: jjclaret

Folkestoneclaret
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2023 12:03 pm
Been Liked: 45 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Folkestoneclaret » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:14 am

The Shire Claret wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:07 am
I often wonder if the people who criticise players like Brownhill have ever played the game before

Work off the ball matters
Filling space matters
Being a nuisance matters


Brownhill Matters
That's why I never join such threads!

Anonymous Claret
Posts: 620
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
Been Liked: 300 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Anonymous Claret » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:20 am

GetIntoEm wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:38 am
exactly, utter nonsense.

one of the repeated negative posters even went home for a chicken dinner.

either he's whipped, or they are too mentally deficient to plan their dinner for after the match finishes. strange times.
I think that was Burnley1989 and I wouldn't consider him a negative poster. He just a left a bit early because he was hungry :lol:

It's something I have done occasionally over the years either to make a train connection or beat the traffic. I am glad that I stayed until the end yesterday

Anonymous Claret
Posts: 620
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
Been Liked: 300 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Anonymous Claret » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:46 am

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:03 pm
The issue we have throughout the team (not just midfield) isnt defence splitting passes but that in general we dont pass it enough with pace and purpose meaning players have to wait for the ball or break their run. This is what slows our play down and makes us easy to defend against.

Basically we need to transition from the back to the front much quicker but with a string of several passes rather than going longer. What the answer is im not sure but from small glimpses I think Hannibal in a central position rather than being pushed further forward will help this and the reason we look a little better with Laurent on is because there is more urgency in his passing and general play.

Brownhill has been our best and more consistent midfielder this season but I think we might actually play better as a team without him but I think we are a long way from that and from thinking about dropping our captain
I often think this when watching the game. It starts at Trafford who I have been very happy with btw. He has done nothing wrong and I have always thought that he is a better all around keeper than Muric. The one area Muric was far stronger is distribution as he moved it much quicker. A lot of the passes made by our players are often to feet or sometimes just behind them rather than being played slightly in front of them. As you rightly say the build up can be a little slow at times. It's easy to be critical from the stands when you can see a man in space and the ball needs to be released quickly but the player holding the ball either fails to see the said player or doesn't have the confidence to execute the pass.

At the moment I don't think that we have the players with the tactical nous to move it quickly, especially around the opposition box. I am hopeful that the absent 3 players in Ramsey, Redmond and Tresor may offer the solution. These 3 are probably the most capable of playing fast interlinking 1 touch football around the box and it may be a forlorn hope but I hope that at least a couple of them return to the match day squad sometime soon. As you say Laurent and Hannibal add urgency but they are not the players to produce that defence splitting pass.

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1872 times
Has Liked: 3260 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Stalbansclaret » Mon Nov 11, 2024 11:43 am

Hmm.....cant help thinking you ar being tad optimistic there. Tresor has shown us pretty much the square root of nothing so far and possibly doesn't want to even play for us, Redmond WAS good at this but has to be open to doubt now given his age and the injury he's had. That leaves Ramsey where the jury is still very much out but where his time at Middlesbrough indicates that you could be right...hope so !
This user liked this post: Anonymous Claret

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6830
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by BurnleyFC » Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:01 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:12 am
He didnt.
More sh1te from the usual suspects that stink out this board.
They mentioned he did on Radio Lancs at the end of the game when they were discussing the penalty incident, which is why I asked the question on here.

Listen to it back on BBC sounds if needs be.

Bosscat
Posts: 28919
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9661 times
Has Liked: 20810 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Bosscat » Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:10 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:01 pm
They mentioned he did on Radio Lancs* at the end of the game when they were discussing the penalty incident, which is why I asked the question on here.

Listen to it back on BBC sounds if needs be.
* Radio Blackburn
This user liked this post: BurnleyFC

xxmunkyennuixx
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
Been Liked: 138 times
Has Liked: 377 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by xxmunkyennuixx » Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:22 pm

Anonymous Claret wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:46 am
At the moment I don't think that we have the players with the tactical nous to move it quickly, especially around the opposition box. I am hopeful that the absent 3 players in Ramsey, Redmond and Tresor may offer the solution. These 3 are probably the most capable of playing fast interlinking 1 touch football around the box and it may be a forlorn hope but I hope that at least a couple of them return to the match day squad sometime soon. As you say Laurent and Hannibal add urgency but they are not the players to produce that defence splitting pass.
If we up the tempo, then the gaps in their defence should be bigger meaning the pass does not need to be as accurate to be effective. I think linking Browny with Hannibal and having two up top helps us in this division when we are being expected to set the tempo and be the aggressor.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6830
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by BurnleyFC » Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:22 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:10 pm
* Radio Blackburn
It was the co-commentator that mentioned it (didn’t catch who he was or recognised his voice) and he seemed fairly pro-Burnley and was pleased we won, to be fair!

aggi
Posts: 9712
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by aggi » Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:29 pm

Ric_C wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:11 am
Thought the groan when he did that pass was just general frustration tbh. Felt a bit sorry for him in that moment.

His shielding of Jay for the pen was exceptional. The ref was so weak in that situation and should've booked a couple of their players.
The ref did lose a bit of control there and it was a sensible move from Brownhill but I was entertained by Iwelumo on Sky suggesting that Brownhill may take the penalty as our regular penalty taker and lauding his previous consistent penalties.

Bosscat
Posts: 28919
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9661 times
Has Liked: 20810 times

Re: Brownhill

Post by Bosscat » Mon Nov 11, 2024 3:31 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:22 pm
It was the co-commentator that mentioned it (didn’t catch who he was or recognised his voice) and he seemed fairly pro-Burnley and was pleased we won, to be fair!
Makes a change ... usually we are back in the outskirts of LP before BFC gets a mention on Radio Bla.. (I mean) Lancashire 😉

Post Reply