Anti Parker Agenda

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
warksclaret
Posts: 8517
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2259 times
Has Liked: 1241 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by warksclaret » Sun Dec 01, 2024 10:09 pm

The main difference between SP and VK is that the former does not have a big ego and comes out more genuinely, the other had an ego bigger than the club and using us as just a stepping stone
These 3 users liked this post: Quicknick Since62 Bosscat

Quicknick
Posts: 6707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1434 times
Has Liked: 9454 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Quicknick » Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:58 am

warksclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 01, 2024 10:09 pm
The main difference between SP and VK is that the former does not have a big ego and comes out more genuinely, the other had an ego bigger than the club and using us as just a stepping stone
And SP has far more tactical nous.

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 19504
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 4300 times
Has Liked: 8520 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Buxtonclaret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:18 am

Quicknick wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:58 am
And SP has far more tactical nous.
He also seems to be able to play players in positions they're used to.

NL Claret
Posts: 2763
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by NL Claret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:12 am

Buxtonclaret wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:18 am
He also seems to be able to play players in positions they're used to.
And he signs players that want to play for the club which helps to build a strong dressing room.

fatboy47
Posts: 5300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2852 times
Has Liked: 3210 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:15 am

NL Claret wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:12 am
And he signs players that want to play for the club which helps to build a strong dressing room.
Yes, but apart from that?

NL Claret
Posts: 2763
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by NL Claret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:24 am

fatboy47 wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:15 am
Yes, but apart from that?
He’s a good lad? He knows what he’s doing? Rotating players well.

Not sure what you are getting at here to be honest.

Blyclaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Blyclaret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:31 am

burnley007 wrote:
Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:01 pm
I do find it fascinating how upset some people get when I have a different opinion to them, very typical of modern society currently.

Let's just accept that people have different thoughts and feelings, this is a forum to discuss those kinda things is it not?

I am too stubborn, admittedly, but I just find it difficult to find anything to feel excited about looking forwards under Parker, I can only see this as a short term thing, until it inevitably crashes down. BUT...

Things in the last 2 games have looked more positive than they did, players seem happy, Pace is strangely quiet atm. If things continue to improve and performances start to be interesting, I will be forced to admit I was wrong, but we're not there yet...
Wow the bellend is back …. Changing his story …. Rather that admitting he was wrong.
This user liked this post: Bosscat

fatboy47
Posts: 5300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2852 times
Has Liked: 3210 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:06 am

NL Claret wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:24 am
He’s a good lad? He knows what he’s doing? Rotating players well.

Not sure what you are getting at here to be honest.
Sorry for going right over your head NL... I really can't be arsed explaining why.
This user liked this post: aclaretinstevenage

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6786
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2856 times
Has Liked: 7024 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Rick_Muller » Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:08 am

NL Claret wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:24 am
He’s a good lad? He knows what he’s doing? Rotating players well.

Not sure what you are getting at here to be honest.
what have the Romans ever done for us...? ;)
These 2 users liked this post: fatboy47 aclaretinstevenage

Guller Bull
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 960 times
Has Liked: 1330 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Guller Bull » Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:59 am

Done well in the last few games and it has been slightly more easy on the eye. Boro will be a test of his tactical nous though.

Bosscat
Posts: 28785
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9632 times
Has Liked: 20693 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Bosscat » Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:10 am

Guller Bull wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:59 am
Done well in the last few games and it has been slightly more easy on the eye. Boro will be a test of his tactical nous though.
Depends which Boro turn up ... a bit like Dirty Leeds they blow hot and cold ...
This user liked this post: Guller Bull

warksclaret
Posts: 8517
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2259 times
Has Liked: 1241 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by warksclaret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:23 am

Rick_Muller wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:08 am
what have the Romans ever done for us...? ;)
Watling Street and the Fosse Way, just to mention two things.I use both regularly
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller

Walt
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:01 pm
Been Liked: 156 times
Has Liked: 267 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Walt » Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:26 am

burnley007 wrote:
Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:01 pm
I do find it fascinating how upset some people get when I have a different opinion to them, very typical of modern society currently.

Let's just accept that people have different thoughts and feelings, this is a forum to discuss those kinda things is it not?

I am too stubborn, admittedly, but I just find it difficult to find anything to feel excited about looking forwards under Parker, I can only see this as a short term thing, until it inevitably crashes down. BUT...

Things in the last 2 games have looked more positive than they did, players seem happy, Pace is strangely quiet atm. If things continue to improve and performances start to be interesting, I will be forced to admit I was wrong, but we're not there yet...
I dont think anyone denied your right to an opinion. It is making you look daft now though.

Time and patience was always required but the all guns blazing approach you had against Parker from the outset wasn't well thought out at all.

Yes, the football has been extremely frustrating to watch at times, most people accepted that. However, there has been slow and steady improvement and we're now very well placed approaching half way.

You say there's nothing look forward to in the long term with Parker. I'd strongly disagree, he's got a squad full of character and togetherness, a good blend of youth and experience. We also see a much improved outlook with players coming back from injury, making the squad very strong. I'd say comfortably the strongest in the division in a month or so.

What he's done with our defensive set up is remarkable.

If we go up, I have absolute faith we will make a far better stab at it than with Kompany and his unfathomable approach last season. Continued pragmatism adding a few key players rather than going for a 4th consecutive overhaul.

Time will tell obviously, but there's a lot to look forward to in my opinion.
These 2 users liked this post: warksclaret Bosscat

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2705 times
Has Liked: 1588 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by gandhisflipflop » Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:33 am

If we went up as things stand, we would require improvement in the full back area on both sides, a striker or two and perhaps a cm

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 3042
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 2273 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Darnhill Claret » Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:40 am

The main reason we are doing better over the last few games is because the players are playing better. They are getting to know each other's game and responding accordingly. Sometimes they go 'auto pilot' not doing enough. Sometimes like second half at Stoke they go 'auto pilot' doing all the right things.
The most impressive thing for me was everyone seemed to give the man in possession an option. Their running off the ball was top notch and they seemed to hunt in 3's all over the pitch, in or out of possession. The front men making space and aggressive runs to receive a pass.
Occasionally our front men seem to mark their defender instead of trying to escape from them.

Claret53
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 94 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Claret53 » Mon Dec 02, 2024 1:47 pm

Having followed the Clarets for over 60 years, and having seen over 25 managers in that time, perhaps I can offer a few thoughts on Scott Parker and this thread? I hope not from an antediluvian viewpoint.
1. When he came to the club, he was facing a chaotic situation. When you looked at the squad list it was very impressive, but that concealed a more difficult truth: that several of the more saleable players came because of VK and were signed as premier league players. He was faced with a fractured dressing room, with several players wanting away, and a high turnover of players, some of whom clearly needed to be offloaded for financial and playing reasons.
2. What was immediately necessary was stability. It is easy to see how a few bad results, allied with players leaving, would have caused panic in the club generally - and in the crowd. He has been phenomenally successful in building solidity into the team to the extent that the team is breaking records with its sound defence. Sir Alex notably said that you can entertain with exciting forward play, but it is defences which win championships.
3. Whatever you now think of VK, in the championship season the team started slowly and only grew into the match winning machine which it became after several months. It was one of our most enjoyable seasons, but that took time to develop. We are currently ahead of that team on points and the pattern seems to be repeating itself.
4. When players are heading for the exits and you have inexperienced players in the squad, signing steady professionals who can have an effect in the dressing room is a smart move. The suggestion that his signings are a bit meh not only ignores the obvious quality of people such as Laurent, Anthony and Sarmiento, but misses the importance in the dressing room of players who are good examples - good professionals.
5. Suggestions that matches are ever easy in the Championship are well wide of the mark. The margins between defeat and winning can be small and to set about building a season by getting the team tightly structured has been absolutely sensible. We are now seeing the attacks being more fruitful and penetrative and this can only happen when players have got to know each others' play very well and can allow instinct as to where other team members will be positioning themselves play a role in their decision making.
6. It is obvious that great team spirit has been built up. This is very much in the Burnley tradition and it is in no small part due to the manager and his team. When interviewed, he seems genuinely to care for, and admire, his players and such a positive attitude can only help players to flourish.
7. People suggest that SP will be OK at getting us out of the Championship but has not been good at keeping promoted teams in the premier league. As an observation, that may be true, but it does not take into accountant not only that people can learn from their mistakes, but it also ignores issues such as who was operating the transfer policies at his previous clubs.
So, in summary, there is no doubt that some of the games have not been easy on the eye, but the primary task at the start of this season was to consolidate and provide a firm base. This SP has patently achieved and if you are tempted to discount the level of this achievement, you don't really understand professional football. The signs of an improved attacking style are emerging and the proof is in the results.
These 9 users liked this post: Falcon jrtod61 Darnhill Claret NL Claret warksclaret Walt kentonclaret IWOODLOVETT GDK

burnley007
Posts: 4170
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 952 times
Has Liked: 786 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by burnley007 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:49 pm

Have to admit, I'm starting to look forward to our games recently.
We're still not 'exciting', but we are FAR better to watch since the Christmas period.
Hats off to Parker, the coaches and the players.

The team spirit sounds fantastic too.

Long may it continue.


Another slice of humble pie please chef....
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret

JR1882
Posts: 930
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 283 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by JR1882 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:04 pm

I think we all want Scott to succeed, he’s a genuine bloke and has given it everything so far and conducted himself very well through some difficult moments.

It is boring but that’s what he is on the field, strangely if we go up it will stand us in better stead I think,

Last season was so demoralising and shocking we all needed a bit of free flowing attacking football to blow the cobwebs away and it hasn’t come, I think as well the first 2 games gave everyone a false perception of how the season would be, in terms of entertainment.

Doing a super job (his way) that can’t be argued.
This user liked this post: burnley007

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 409 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:08 pm

I think a sponsorship from Nytol might be on the cards if we go up

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Stonehouse » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:12 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:08 pm
I think a sponsorship from Nytol might be on the cards if we go up
We were playing a team 4th in the league and a **** ref ,what did you expect a 6 goal thriller?

louieollie
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:28 pm
Been Liked: 186 times
Has Liked: 1209 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by louieollie » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:15 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:08 pm
I think a sponsorship from Nytol might be on the cards if we go up
Or maybe you don't watch anymore 👍

brexit
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
Been Liked: 272 times
Has Liked: 65 times
Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by brexit » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:15 am

He needs to go now
bring back the ginger dinosaur
This user liked this post: Claretnick

Benson
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 119 times
Has Liked: 153 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Benson » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:30 am

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:08 pm
I think a sponsorship from Nytol might be on the cards if we go up
Do they sponsor you ?

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by dsr » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:46 am

Astonishingly, on Sky, they said nobody could have predicted a 0-0 draw. :shock:

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19680
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4181 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:53 am

If we end up in the play offs, is anyone confident enough that a Scott Parker team could win 3 games on the bounce against half decent opposition?

bumba
Posts: 4660
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 333 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by bumba » Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:56 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:53 am
If we end up in the play offs, is anyone confident enough that a Scott Parker team could win 3 games on the bounce against half decent opposition?
We could draw 3 and still get promoted

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19680
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4181 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:59 am

bumba wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:56 am
We could draw 3 and still get promoted
Probably just as well.

bumba
Posts: 4660
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 333 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by bumba » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:00 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:59 am
Probably just as well.
Three 0-0 draws best defensive record the play offs have ever seen

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19680
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4181 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:06 am

bumba wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:00 am
Three 0-0 draws best defensive record the play offs have ever seen
Owen Coyle, who was regarded as an attacking manager won 1-0, 0-2 and 1-0 in the play offs 09.

agreenwood
Posts: 4461
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2462 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by agreenwood » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:14 am

Common sense tells you that you can’t go up with a goals to game ratio of less than 1 (0.88 over the last 25 games) and that we can’t continue to accrue points without scoring more goals.

That said, we’ve managed it this long, so who knows.

I’ve warmed to Parker though. It’s not a fluke that we’ve got such a good defensive record or that we’re sat in the top two. Yes, I’d like to turn the draws into wins and get out of my seat a bit more during matches, but he’s doing a good job.

The aim is promotion. Anything else is failure for a club with our budget. So far he’s on track and it’s hard to be too critical.

Spijed
Posts: 17931
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Spijed » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:27 am

Our system relies on us usually taking the one or two golden chances in a game. The last minute one against Stoke, Flemming's chance at the start of the second half.

Once we go in front it's usually end of the match and had we really sat back last night even Sunderland wouldn't have got close to getting the penalties.

It's working very well so far.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6440
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2089 times
Has Liked: 969 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:29 am

If our defenders and keeper didn’t spend so much time passing the ball around to each other we’d probably get up pitch more and create a few chances. The first ten minutes tempo is what we need to play throughout the game.

The Shire Claret
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 255 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by The Shire Claret » Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:39 am

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:29 am
If our defenders and keeper didn’t spend so much time passing the ball around to each other we’d probably get up pitch more and create a few chances. The first ten minutes tempo is what we need to play throughout the game.
It’s impossible to play at that pace for 98 minutes

I think they are instructed to play high tempo in spells but you can’t discount the quality of the opposition

We started well again in the second half

We didn’t score but we had enough chances last night for me to put it down as another 0-0 and we can’t score goals

helmclaret
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 610 times
Has Liked: 438 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by helmclaret » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:01 am

We’ve got nothing up front. No movement or pace. That’s why we end up passing it back more often than not in wide positions. I’d like to see us have some pace down the middle because we are far too predictable in our build up play.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6440
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2089 times
Has Liked: 969 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:01 am

The Shire Claret wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:39 am
It’s impossible to play at that pace for 98 minutes

I think they are instructed to play high tempo in spells but you can’t discount the quality of the opposition

We started well again in the second half

We didn’t score but we had enough chances last night for me to put it down as another 0-0 and we can’t score goals
I’m not expecting 90 mins at that tempo but we need more than 10 minute spells. As has happened in every home game this season we slow it down to snails pace, create little and see the crowd largely lose interest.

The Shire Claret
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 255 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by The Shire Claret » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:12 am

helmclaret wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:01 am
We’ve got nothing up front. No movement or pace. That’s why we end up passing it back more often than not in wide positions. I’d like to see us have some pace down the middle because we are far too predictable in our build up play.
I think once Foster has had a few more games he might be the answer to the problem you state

He made some great powerful runs down the middle and if it wasn’t for a great save from their keeper … he would have assisted Anthony

He’s great at that

KlyBfc
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:38 pm
Been Liked: 305 times
Has Liked: 156 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by KlyBfc » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:13 am

It’not an agenda for people to be highly critical of how we play / try to play at home. 7 draws out of 13 home games of which 5 are 0-0 is something which deserves to be questioned. The tactical straight jacket which is almost never taken off makes the home games tedious.
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1433 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Jan 18, 2025 10:26 am

Can anyone imagine us scoring a goal in the Premier League?

boyyanno
Posts: 2131
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 157 times

Re: Anti Parker Agenda

Post by boyyanno » Sat Jan 18, 2025 10:36 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:53 am
If we end up in the play offs, is anyone confident enough that a Scott Parker team could win 3 games on the bounce against half decent opposition?
We literally just did that about 2-3 weeks ago.

Norwich, Watford, Sheff United...
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret

Post Reply