Hannibal

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 3284
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 737 times
Has Liked: 64 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:12 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:08 pm
Are some people overreacting or are some people sensing that potentially further problems could be on the horizon due to his temperament. A or B it’s worthy of discussion especially in light of what’s just happened.
Depending on how Parker and his team mates handle this, it could make him or break him. He could take heed on how he’s let them down etc and how he could have really hurt someone , or he could be ridiculously stupid and think he knows best and nobody will tell him how to behave.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:14 pm

Hedontplayforyou wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:12 pm
Depending on how Parker and his team mates handle this, it could make him or break him. He could take heed on how he’s let them down etc and how he could have really hurt someone , or he could be ridiculously stupid and think he knows best and nobody will tell him how to behave.
For sure it’s now something that needs to be kept in check if indeed it ever can be.

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stonehouse » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:18 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:10 pm
The defense of Hannibal is staggering.
It’s not a question of defending him it’s a question of blowing things out of proportion ,Barton stubbed a fag out in an apprentices eye but was treated like an hero when he came to Burnley ,Andre Gray made homophobic comments but was still feted as a Claret ,what Hannibal did was wrong but it was just a spontaneous action.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clovius Boofus » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:22 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:08 pm
Are some people overreacting or are some people sensing that potentially further problems could be on the horizon due to his temperament. A or B it’s worthy of discussion especially in light of what’s just happened.
I think you can safely say that some are overreacting when we have people saying he should not be anywhere near the team when he's served his ban. We also have people saying he has deepseated psychological issues.

chekhov
Posts: 3318
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 876 times
Has Liked: 1674 times
Location: France

Re: Hannibal

Post by chekhov » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:33 pm

Definitely some over-reactions. It was a red card but he’s young and he’ll learn from it.
As some have said maybe a blessing in disguise him missing the derby.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:33 pm

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:22 pm
I think you can safely say that some are overreacting when we have people saying he should not be anywhere near the team when he's served his ban. We also have people saying he has deepseated psychological issues.
Fair enough. but you also do have some people offering reasonable views supported by legitimate concerns. Extreme views shouldn't distort the moderate argument that people have doubts whether he's got a future at the club. Aside of the overreactions on the other end of the opposite scale you have people almost treating the incident as if he's forgot to give somebody their change back after buying a mars bar & not dangerous conduct to a fellow opponent.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3685
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1460 times
Has Liked: 358 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Big Vinny K » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:52 pm

Never ceases to amaze me just how thick some of our fans can be.

One of our players made a daft mistake and he will pay for it by missing 3 games and you have our own so called supporters saying he should never play for the club again.

Just imagine holding that view every time one of our players gets a red card - or is it just reserved for the players who have a reputation ?
John Gayle ended a lads career with a horrendous challenge and Kevin Ball got a red card for slicing David Dunne in two and he almost got a statue of him commissioned.

This kind of thing happens on a football pitch at all levels - always haas and always will. Go watch snooker if it’s too much for you.
These 5 users liked this post: Stonehouse Burnley1989 CoolClaret bfcjg mybloodisclaret

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4912
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1215 times
Has Liked: 1894 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by tarkys_ears » Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:53 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:52 pm
Never ceases to amaze me just how thick some of our fans can be.
After reading your post, I can't disgaree!

warksclaret
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2261 times
Has Liked: 1242 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by warksclaret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 9:08 pm

Its pretty mild compared to Barton in his early years-but Barton was a winner with us

NL Claret
Posts: 2763
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by NL Claret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 9:10 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:52 pm
Never ceases to amaze me just how thick some of our fans can be.

One of our players made a daft mistake and he will pay for it by missing 3 games and you have our own so called supporters saying he should never play for the club again.

Just imagine holding that view every time one of our players gets a red card - or is it just reserved for the players who have a reputation ?
John Gayle ended a lads career with a horrendous challenge and Kevin Ball got a red card for slicing David Dunne in two and he almost got a statue of him commissioned.

This kind of thing happens on a football pitch at all levels - always haas and always will. Go watch snooker if it’s too much for you.
I don’t know if you have seen the incident in the WBA PNE game, the WBA CH forces PNE’s CF over the advertising hoardings with his hands on the players chest and then pushes his feet to make sure he goes full over……..yellow card……for both.

Stayingup
Posts: 5953
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 985 times
Has Liked: 2981 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stayingup » Wed Jan 01, 2025 9:30 pm

Frustrated. Lost his rag. Emotional type of player. He gets kicked about enough. He'll learn like Barnes did. Get one back on the blindside

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Hannibal

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 9:34 pm

You never know, this might be the wake up call he needs. I'm not writing him off yet
This user liked this post: Bosscat

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by aggi » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:37 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:06 pm
United sent him on loan abroad, they sent him back as the manager could not trust him to stay on the pitch. Was always a walking red card. Two years later he is no better. You cannot change stupid people.
It may shock some to discover that this isn't true. There was a falling out at Sevilla but he stayed there until the end of the season and was still in the squad and coming off the bench at the end.

(And obviously it was last year, not two years ago)
This user liked this post: Stonehouse

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stonehouse » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:45 pm

aggi wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:37 pm
It may shock some to discover that this isn't true. There was a falling out at Sevilla but he stayed there until the end of the season and was still in the squad and coming off the bench at the end.

(And obviously it was last year, not two years ago)
Some people would rather tell a good story get in the way of the truth ,some on the forum have castigated fans for trying to drive JT out of the club ,happen those slamming Hannibal should have bitten their lips before calling him the devil incarnate because if the young lad reads this forum he’ll happen think he’s no longer wanted.

Clive 1960
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 290 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clive 1960 » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:48 pm

It's been waiting to happy for a while, let Parker sort it out and hopefully we don't see him do this again..

Bosscat
Posts: 28786
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9632 times
Has Liked: 20693 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Bosscat » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:50 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 9:34 pm
You never know, this might be the wake up call he needs. I'm not writing him off yet
Hope you are right VC ... 👍

KernowHouseClaret
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:44 am
Been Liked: 105 times
Has Liked: 108 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by KernowHouseClaret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:50 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:06 pm
United sent him on loan abroad, they sent him back as the manager could not trust him to stay on the pitch. Was always a walking red card. Two years later he is no better. You cannot change stupid people.
This isn't exactly true though is it, he went to Sevilla in 2024, stayed until the end of the season. We then signed him.
Before that he was on loan at Birmingham

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by TsarBomba » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:50 pm

We’ll miss some aspects of his play on Saturday, but if he hadn’t been suspended, then Rovers players would target him massively. Perhaps not a bad thing he sits this one out.

Stupid mistake but there’s no need for an overreaction.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat mybloodisclaret

dvalley69
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2022 8:45 am
Been Liked: 172 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by dvalley69 » Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:54 pm

Stonehouse wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 7:59 pm
Deep rooted psychological issues ? Give it a break mate half of the country would be in Caldestones if everyone thought like you ,he’s an hot headed young guy that’s committed a minor offence .Has England capt Ben Stokes the same problem for smacking someone or Gerrard for doing similar or was John Prescott for thumping a guy or Akinbyi or Barton or Stan Ternent et al?
Where do you think aggressive nature issues come from then? Motor neuron control with the fist & foot? He walks the tightrope between right & wrong, and has a nastiness to him as shown today and in the past. It was totally unnecessary but his instinct was to choose that decision in that moment!

Lots to learn from Psychology and the mind. It might help people understand mental health more and broadly the reasons why we do things. There are reasons you know! But we're all just thick, and black is black and white is white, right?

Context is needed in most cases: this isn't the first incident/doubt with Hannibal and won't be the last. Good examples you brought up and they depend on the context of what happened, but if you're using Joey Barton to back up your point then he was a saint and had no anger issues at all, clearly!! Just a thick scouse.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Hannibal

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 11:24 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:50 pm
Hope you are right VC ... 👍
Unlikely, the Mrs tells I'm not most days :lol:
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Hibsclaret
Posts: 4314
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1387 times
Has Liked: 509 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Hibsclaret » Wed Jan 01, 2025 11:52 pm

People reference Barnes and I remember him getting sent off for Brighton against us probably at an age similar to Hannibal. He is still very young and will learn, hopefully, to become the dark arts master that Barnes perfected. Probably a good game to miss at Ewood tbh.

superdimitri
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 739 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by superdimitri » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:33 am

He was sick of their full back being an ass and the ref letting him get away with it. Lost it in a moment. It happens. We move on, it's really not a bad thing to have these dirty players in your team. Every good side has one.

Georgiaclaret
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:26 am
Been Liked: 5 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Georgiaclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:43 am

A lot of good points on this one. Agree with everyone saying the right back should not even have been on the field. Hannibal won a 50/50 ball with home 30 seconds before and was away until he put his arms round him and pulled him down. How that’s not a yellow card when players get a yellow card for pulling a shirt is beyond me. Even if the ref didn’t see it the linesman was two yards away. No doubt in my mind that would have raised Hannibal’s blood pressure. Unfortunately the referees and linesman are crap. Stoke fans don’t like Gavin Ward either as they were letting him know throughout the game. Can’t defend Hannibal for what he did, but like others have said massive over reaction. If I were Parker, sit him down, bollock him, fine him, tell him there’s no place for that at our club, and if he does it again he’s finished at BFC. I have to believe the fans that were applauding him in the James Hargreaves as he was walking down the touchline didn’t see what he did. Definitely a player in there somewhere if he can sort his head out. Not saying I’m glad he’s not available for Saturday, but as others have mentioned definitely could be a blessing he won’t be getting on the pitch at Ewood.

MrEyres
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:16 am
Been Liked: 11 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by MrEyres » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:24 am

Let himself down, Team and fans.Big loss against Rovers.

But..

He’s young, ambitious, talented but clearly emotional which needs to be reigned in.

Any thoughts of him not playing again for us are more emotional than the act itself. Just wish he’d done it a bit differently. E.g when the Stoke player got up, knocked him back down. What he did was cowardly.

Hey, ho, 2nd place ours to lose now , just 15 wins and 6x0-0’s to go for 100 points and a good slapping in the money league awaits.

10 yrs ago we’d of been in dream world and Scott would be king.

The truth is , the VK season was the anomaly, if we’d have kept him I don’t think he could do it again. He was out of ideas and tbh was glad to see him go the shyster.

Hope this squad pulls it off they certainly have the battling qualities of the Dyche era, but for me the ruthless streak lacks . We need an Ings/Vokes or Andre Gray/Joey Barton.

We need the edge … stamping on plumbs is not it.

UTC.

CaptJohn
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
Been Liked: 551 times
Has Liked: 407 times
Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
Contact:

Re: Hannibal

Post by CaptJohn » Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:20 am

I very rarely don't clap a player off but I didn't yesterday because of the stupidity of it. I thought he was turning a corner in his attitude but this proves he still has work to do in controlling his aggression. He is a work in progress for sure but it must test the patience of SP no end.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clovius Boofus » Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:35 am

It's good to see that we have a psychologist on here handing out free diagnosis about someone he's never even said hello to. I thought this sort of thing was not on, but hey, what do I know.

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stonehouse » Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:39 am

No doubt some posters on here will have him locked up with a mask on like Hannibal Lecter.hes not a mass murderer he’s just a very naughty boy.

Burnley1989
Posts: 8515
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2662 times
Has Liked: 2357 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:43 am

Hibsclaret wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2025 11:52 pm
People reference Barnes and I remember him getting sent off for Brighton against us probably at an age similar to Hannibal. He is still very young and will learn, hopefully, to become the dark arts master that Barnes perfected. Probably a good game to miss at Ewood tbh.
The same Barnes that once tripped the refereee up on purpose.. inagine the outrage if Hannibal had done that, we'd be having him in front of a firing squad. :lol:
This user liked this post: Stonehouse

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stonehouse » Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:18 am

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:35 am
It's good to see that we have a psychologist on here handing out free diagnosis about someone he's never even said hello to. I thought this sort of thing was not on, but hey, what do I know.
Well said.I need to make sure the cushions are straight before I go to bed ,use the same spoon for my porridge ,do you think I need to see a shrink (asking for a friend)

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by nil_desperandum » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:34 am

Although the incident was different, the context and age of the player reminded me somewhat of Maatsen’s red card against Blackpool at Turf Moor early in his Burnley career
I don’t seem to recall the same massive over-reaction on here following his violent loss of control and after a spell out of the team he never let us down again

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:49 am

nil_desperandum wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:34 am
Although the incident was different, the context and age of the player reminded me somewhat of Maatsen’s red card against Blackpool at Turf Moor early in his Burnley career
I don’t seem to recall the same massive over-reaction on here following his violent loss of control and after a spell out of the team he never let us down again
You are right he never let us down but the arrangement was temporary anyway he wasn't going to stick around for long enough to do it again. Bloody hell you sure made me chuckle with that.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:49 am

Whilst calls for him to never play for the club again are silly, the over-reactions are because he's just proved what most fans suspected of him - that he is a liability who will always be an altercation away from losing his head. The way he did it yesterday was cowardly as well, stamping on someone when he's on the floor.

It's such a shame because that role Parker found for him on the left of midfield looked like it really suited him and the whole team looked more balanced and cohesive with him there. He's now got a lot of making up to do, and I reckon one more incident like yesterday will probably cement opinion against him for good.

Stonehouse
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Stonehouse » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:56 am

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:49 am
Whilst calls for him to never play for the club again are silly, the over-reactions are because he's just proved what most fans suspected of him - that he is a liability who will always be an altercation away from losing his head. The way he did it yesterday was cowardly as well, stamping on someone when he's on the floor.

It's such a shame because that role Parker found for him on the left of midfield looked like it really suited him and the whole team looked more balanced and cohesive with him there. He's now got a lot of making up to do, and I reckon one more incident like yesterday will probably cement opinion against him for good.
Please don’t exaggerate as the definition off stamping is slamming the foot down with force Hannibal stepped on his stomach and the guy writhed around holding his ********.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:57 am

Stonehouse wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:56 am
Please don’t exaggerate as the definition off stamping is slamming the foot down with force Hannibal stepped on his stomach and the guy writhed around holding his ********.
Aye, okay then.

Burnley1989
Posts: 8515
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2662 times
Has Liked: 2357 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:11 pm

It was more standing on someone than stamping and theres a pretty big difference in force, not that either are acceotable.

scamander
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by scamander » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:13 pm

Unfortunately the extra challenge will be that teams will look to wind him up and feign injury because he has a reputation. He had one prior to joining us and it looked like he was working on it - sadly it only takes a small thing with him.

The issue of the right back needing a second yellow is irrelevant - in fact it's more concerning if Hannibal's reaction was based on this because there will often be players on the pitch who should have had a yellow.

As mentioned by others he has the opportunity to correct this. It's up to him.

The Shire Claret
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 255 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by The Shire Claret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:20 pm

This is his FIRST red card EVER

Calm down people
These 3 users liked this post: Stonehouse Quicknick boatshed bill

ClaretAndBlue94
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 37 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ClaretAndBlue94 » Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:48 pm

The Shire Claret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:20 pm
This is his FIRST red card EVER

Calm down people
The point I have been making. The posts on here make it seem like he has had a career of red cards..

Young lad who has was daft and now faces the consequences of that.

scamander
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by scamander » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:04 pm

ClaretAndBlue94 wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:48 pm
The point I have been making. The posts on here make it seem like he has had a career of red cards..

Young lad who has was daft and now faces the consequences of that.
Red cards can indicate a number of things ranging from violent conduct to two soft yellows. The sense I get from others (and certainly a point I have made) is that this isn't a random event which is not in his character. As many have noted he has a temper and can be wound up - he also plays on the edge.

The red card he got merely confirms the above and worries some of us because we want him to succeed which involves managing that part of his game.

If, say, Humphries or Koleosho had done that there wouldn't have been the same level of concern as we haven't seen that in their game (though Koleosho needs to stop on the silly shirt pulls he does).

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:41 pm

I find it quite humorous that there’s a widespread assumption that he’s paid for it by missing some games he may not want to play in whilst still being paid. Nobody really knows whether he will be financially sanctioned throwing the assumption in the other direction he’s effectively paid for it by allowing himself some free leave.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:45 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:41 pm
I find it quite humorous that there’s a widespread assumption that he’s paid for it by missing some games he may not want to play in whilst still being paid. Nobody really knows whether he will be financially sanctioned throwing the assumption in the other direction he’s effectively paid for it by allowing himself some free leave.
I do always love the assumption that players who are suspended are on “leave”. Brilliant. As though they can book a holiday now and not be required to report for training during the week and on a match day.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:48 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:45 pm
I do always love the assumption that players who are suspended are on “leave”. Brilliant. As though they can book a holiday now and not be required to report for training during the week and on a match day.
Not on leave as such but I wouldn’t class somebody paying for something by sitting some games out whilst not incurring a financial penalty. A weird take how you interpret something.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:50 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:48 pm
Not on leave as such but I wouldn’t class somebody paying for something by sitting some games out whilst not incurring a financial penalty. A weird take how you interpret something.
“He’s effectively paid for it by allowing himself some free leave”

“Not on leave as such”

Yes, a very weird take Jakub.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clovius Boofus » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:52 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:45 pm
I do always love the assumption that players who are suspended are on “leave”. Brilliant. As though they can book a holiday now and not be required to report for training during the week and on a match day.
Heh. I know what you mean.

Scott Parker; right lads. Time for a quick team talk, but before I start, I show you this lovely postcard Hanni has sent us from Antigua.
Last edited by Clovius Boofus on Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:53 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:50 pm
“He’s effectively paid for it by allowing himself some free leave”

“Not on leave as such”

Yes, a very weird take Jakub.
Ok then I still turn up for work & do odd jobs & spend the important bit in the canteen but don’t get docked. I’ll have some of that any day of week if that’s what paying for it translates to.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:56 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:53 pm
Ok then I still turn up for work & do odd jobs & spend the important bit in the canteen but don’t get docked. I’ll have some of that any day of week if that’s what paying for it translates to.
What “odd jobs” do you imagine they’re going to have Hannibal doing? I reckon they’re going to have him mucking out Pace’s daughter’s stables.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clovius Boofus » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:56 pm

Jakub thinks Hannibal works in the mill.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:59 pm

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:56 pm
Jakub thinks Hannibal works in the mill.
Or the simple premise that avoiding hard sweat isn’t paying for it quite the opposite. Anyway peeps back to the grindstone in thy mill lad.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Clovius Boofus » Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:03 pm

Hannibal's real punishment is him missing three games and letting his manager and teammates down - it will hurt. Anyway, this is getting ridiculous.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Hannibal

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:12 pm

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:03 pm
Hannibal's real punishment is him missing three games and letting his manager and teammates down - it will hurt. Anyway, this is getting ridiculous.
IMG_0071.png
IMG_0071.png (1.32 MiB) Viewed 903 times


Of course it will.

Post Reply