Mattster wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:18 pm
Because we have four senior central midfielders already. Rather use one of the U21s as depth there than waste a wage on snail paced Shelvey to probably play about about 180 minutes all season and block progression routes for younger players. Bauress, Veevers, McDermott or Hugill are all perfectly capable of being emergency backup and picking up 5 minutes here or there.
Better still look to bring in a long term replacement for Bronwhill who we can phase in over the next month before he walks away on a free.
Not going to discuss Shelvey given the source is Turkish media, but we currently have 4 for 2 positions. In big games we’ve mainly played Laurent, Cullen and Brownhill, meaning we have 4 for 3 positions. That might be enough but an injury/illness or two and we are definitely looking short.
If I’m honest, as much as I like Laurent and think he adds something when playing alongside the aforementioned, I wouldn’t want to rely on him for any prolonged period if Cullen/Browny were out. He’s not as accomplished defensively or on the ball as Cullen or looked like replacing Browny’s goals.
More to the point though, Parker also seems to have taken to playing Hannibal LW too, meaning we have 4 players for 4 positions. This could be solved by signing a winger he really trusts I suppose.
On the U21s piece I’d love to see some lads promoted to the squad, but I think the fact we’re seeing them leave for clubs like Chester, Burton and Barnsley would suggest that’s a risk if it were for a sustained period.
Given this is going to be our best chance at getting promoted, I don’t think we should risk it at all. I think adding premier league experience in any form for the run in is a very good move.