Andre Gray

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Milltown1882
Posts: 3475
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1253 times
Has Liked: 902 times

Andre Gray

Post by Milltown1882 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:01 pm

Is there another striker available in that mould on the free agency market? Lack an absolute killer up top.

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Rowls » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm

I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.

DCWat
Posts: 9934
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4471 times
Has Liked: 3882 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by DCWat » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:07 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm
I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.
There were three great chances and should have been more but for poor passing. Not bringing in a goalscorer was a mistake.
These 5 users liked this post: deanothedino Clive 1960 Hanoverusaclaret randomclaret2 kentonclaret

Elizabeth
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1474 times
Has Liked: 1462 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:09 pm

Lack of chances is not something that you can say about today. What you could say today is that we missed some easy chances.
We do not have a natural goalscorer and that has been the case all season
This user liked this post: k90bfc

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Rowls » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:09 pm

DCWat wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:07 pm
There were three great chances and should have been more but for poor passing. Not bringing in a goalscorer was a mistake.
Today, yes.

Generally, no.

We don't create chances.

DCWat
Posts: 9934
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4471 times
Has Liked: 3882 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by DCWat » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:14 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:09 pm
Today, yes.

Generally, no.

We don't create chances.
We do seem to be starting to create a few more.

Two issues for me, the first being that we are still guilty of picking a poor option / making a poor final pass.

The second that we don’t really have someone in the box whose instinct is to find great positions and finish opportunities that their movement / timing could create.

deanothedino
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 741 times
Has Liked: 381 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by deanothedino » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:28 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:09 pm
Today, yes.

Generally, no.

We don't create chances.
We’ve created loads in our last three league games and wasted most of them.
These 3 users liked this post: Hanoverusaclaret randomclaret2 kentonclaret

scamander
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by scamander » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:49 pm

The issue is that a stiker replaces Flemming who does a lot of work in picking the ball up deep, closing lines down and that sort of defensive work. We play an out and out goalscorer and those gaps open up. It's a trade off and like others I see the issue more of us not finishing chances as opposed to not creating them. Foster had two such chances today, Antony an easy pass to create another and Flemming/Humphries got into a mix up.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8507
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 2186 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:55 pm

Lyle Foster could have a had a hat trick but it's fine margins that we lacked today
It was a shame SP didn't gamble on Ashley and Jonjo with 20 mins to go
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Clive 1960

burnley007
Posts: 4173
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 952 times
Has Liked: 786 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by burnley007 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:57 pm

Let's just hope that today was a blip

Clive 1960
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 290 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Clive 1960 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:06 pm

burnley007 wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:57 pm
Let's just hope that today was a blip
Had to many blips this season, if we had a decent striker with good movement he would have buried them chances today, someone like Armstrong on loan at WBA who as scored plenty in the Championship ..

Goliath
Posts: 3760
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 708 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Goliath » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:10 pm

scamander wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:49 pm
The issue is that a stiker replaces Flemming who does a lot of work in picking the ball up deep, closing lines down and that sort of defensive work. We play an out and out goalscorer and those gaps open up. It's a trade off and like others I see the issue more of us not finishing chances as opposed to not creating them. Foster had two such chances today, Antony an easy pass to create another and Flemming/Humphries got into a mix up.
Barnes is more of a nuisance than Flemming and possibly more of a goal threat. I don't really see any reason to start Flemming over him apart from age.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

dvalley69
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2022 8:45 am
Been Liked: 172 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by dvalley69 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:10 pm

Still plenty of games to go, and many twists and turns, for all the draws to not matter in the end. But a pattern is developing and it's hard not to say that we're not gonna have enough for automatic the way things are panning out. Too many times already we've said 'we've should've won today'.

scamander
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by scamander » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:14 pm

Goliath wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:10 pm
Barnes is more of a nuisance than Flemming and possibly more of a goal threat. I don't really see any reason to start Flemming over him apart from age.
Very different players. Barnes is much older and therefore an option to come on and try to disrupt their defence. Flemming is a deeper player, ideally he'd play behind the front man but we don't have one. Parker's team presses high and Barnes is far too slow at his age, we couldn't press as easily with him (today Flemming would often drop and have Hannibal lead the closing down).

I don't see it as a simple swap, we'd have to change our setup and looking long term having Flemming getting more used to the system and refining his game is probably better than Ashley (who I love dearly) looking to annoy a couple of centre backs.

Goliath
Posts: 3760
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 708 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Goliath » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:21 pm

scamander wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:14 pm
Very different players. Barnes is much older and therefore an option to come on and try to disrupt their defence. Flemming is a deeper player, ideally he'd play behind the front man but we don't have one. Parker's team presses high and Barnes is far too slow at his age, we couldn't press as easily with him (today Flemming would often drop and have Hannibal lead the closing down).

I don't see it as a simple swap, we'd have to change our setup and looking long term having Flemming getting more used to the system and refining his game is probably better than Ashley (who I love dearly) looking to annoy a couple of centre backs.
Is Barnes slower than Flemming, I'm not convinced. Personally I think Barnes pressed better against Southampton than I've ever seen from Flemming.

I don't think the way we are playing Flemming there is any reason not to compare them, he's being asked to be a number 9 with his back to goal so the direct comparison is fair.
This user liked this post: Clive 1960

Silkyskills1
Posts: 6587
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1929 times
Has Liked: 2869 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Silkyskills1 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:40 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm
I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.
Do you mean like the one Foster missed on half time? How many more should he require?

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Andre Gray

Post by dougcollins » Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:41 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm
I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.
Or putting the personnel into their correct roles.

equinox
Posts: 1498
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 63 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by equinox » Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:53 pm

Andre Gray isn't a good example of the type of striker we're missing, although he'd more than do.

Give me an Andy Payton/ Charlie Austin any day, my God just imagine?
These 3 users liked this post: k90bfc boatshed bill HandforthClaret

bobinho
Posts: 10576
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4612 times
Has Liked: 7256 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Andre Gray

Post by bobinho » Sat Feb 15, 2025 6:30 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm
I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.
There have undoubtedly been games when that’s been the case, but not today. Most definitely not today. Poor finishing, poor refereeing and a lack of composure is the reason we haven’t scored today.

Alan Young
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 9:35 pm
Been Liked: 30 times
Has Liked: 29 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Alan Young » Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:28 pm

Goliath wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:10 pm
Barnes is more of a nuisance than Flemming and possibly more of a goal threat. I don't really see any reason to start Flemming over him apart from age.
Good grief. We really do see some nonsense posted after a disappointing result.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 915 times
Has Liked: 580 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:09 am

Goliath wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:10 pm
Barnes is more of a nuisance than Flemming and possibly more of a goal threat. I don't really see any reason to start Flemming over him apart from age.
I’d say the 8 goals in the last 12 games or whatever it is disagrees with you

willsclarets
Posts: 3264
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1086 times
Has Liked: 285 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by willsclarets » Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:20 pm

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:09 am
I’d say the 8 goals in the last 12 games or whatever it is disagrees with you
Flemming has scored 6 of his 7 league goals since the Norwich game. 6 in 13 isn't bad, not prolific but he's definitely getting into better positions as a 9. I'm not sure Barnes gives us a better return than that as a starter.

Inc the cup his ratio is a little better with his brace against reading

jos
Posts: 1996
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 309 times
Has Liked: 437 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by jos » Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:37 pm

equinox wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:53 pm
Andre Gray isn't a good example.
FTFY

helmclaret
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 610 times
Has Liked: 438 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by helmclaret » Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:30 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:09 pm
Today, yes.

Generally, no.

We don't create chances.
Have you watched the last three games? We’ve created loads of goalscoring opportunities!

kwwden
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:47 pm
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Andre Gray

Post by kwwden » Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:38 pm

Rowls wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:02 pm
I don't think it's an issue with personnel. It's more to do with a lack of chances.
Wrong way around. It's an issue with finishing the many chances we are creating.

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Rowls » Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:24 pm

helmclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:30 pm
Have you watched the last three games? We’ve created loads of goalscoring opportunities!
I really don't know what to say about this Helm.

The acknowledgement that we created a half decent amount of chances is very literally in the post of mine you've quoted. Literally is literally overused these days but it's literally there in the quote.

This is one of the most bizarre things you've ever posted.

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Rowls » Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:27 pm

kwwden wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:38 pm
Wrong way around. It's an issue with finishing the many chances we are creating.
Foster was guilty of missing a clear chance and one decent chance. Flemming and Humphreys got in each other's way to snuff another potential chance.

Three chances to score, one a clear cut chance.

That's not a glut of chances. Under the best sides we had with Kompany, Dyche or Coyle we could create five or six chances in a half. We're undoubtedly slowly getting better at creating chances (as I've acknowledged) but it's still not enough.

ralph8
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by ralph8 » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:41 pm

I'm of the opinion Dara Costelloe would have finished one of them yesterday.

JohnMac
Posts: 7683
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2565 times
Has Liked: 4135 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Andre Gray

Post by JohnMac » Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:37 pm

ralph8 wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:41 pm
I'm of the opinion Dara Costelloe would have finished one of them yesterday.
Lou Costello would have buried at least one!

beddie
Posts: 6262
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1729 times
Has Liked: 653 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by beddie » Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:40 pm

ralph8 wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:41 pm
I'm of the opinion Dara Costelloe would have finished one of them yesterday.
I would have finished one of them and I’m 71 years old with two knee replacements. :)

Post Reply