No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Been rescinded by the FA
These 25 users liked this post: tarkys_ears summitclaret randomclaret2 Colburn_Claret Claretmisterg Dark Cloud Cajun evensteadiereddie JanetM frankinwales Mayoclaret Juan Tanamera k90bfc mkmel RalphCoatesComb Oakworth claret IanMcL AfloatinClaret Quicknick yosserhughes longsidepies theonlywayisup kentonclaret mybloodisclaret Darnhill Claret
-
- Posts: 18549
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7610 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Superb and surprising news.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Just posted another thread Tony, you can delete mine. Great news!
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news!
-
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 389 times
- Has Liked: 286 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Brilliant, no point having an appeal process unless appeals this can succeed, unlike a lot of posters on here who said no chance of winning, what do they know.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
- Been Liked: 1220 times
- Has Liked: 1086 times
- Location: The Moon, Outer Space.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Rightly so.
Also saw that Joao Pedro at Hull had his appeal upheld. Fancy putting in an appeal for that challenge.
Also saw that Joao Pedro at Hull had his appeal upheld. Fancy putting in an appeal for that challenge.
-
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
has Mr Parkers card also been rescinded? Given his card was a reaction to the now rescinded card..? 

-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Any appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.
-
- Posts: 9265
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2748 times
- Has Liked: 2739 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Weird one that. I thought managers spoke to officials after virtually every game.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:41 pmAny appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.
As for the ref, has he purposely been stood down this weekend?
-
- Posts: 4912
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1215 times
- Has Liked: 1894 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Not even after the final whistle?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:41 pmAny appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.
Sounds bizarre.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Good News - does he now get his minus 1s on his Man of the Match scores added back on 

-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
wow, common sense prevails. Great news, he'll be like a new signing !
-
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Parker says he wasn’t abusive or aggressive towards the referee. He says he was calm and measured.
If that’s true, imagine being such an arsehole that you’d apply the absolute letter of the law and send off a manager for simply trying to have a conversation about a decision with you.
If that’s true, imagine being such an arsehole that you’d apply the absolute letter of the law and send off a manager for simply trying to have a conversation about a decision with you.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
These 2 users liked this post: CharlieinNewMexico mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Justice. A crucial reprieve for our season. Think this will drive us on now.
Last edited by summitclaret on Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
You see managers trying and to speak to referees at half-time and full time on a regular basis. You rarely see a red card.agreenwood wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pmParker says he wasn’t abusive or aggressive towards the referee. He says he was calm and measured.
If that’s true, imagine being such an arsehole that you’d apply the absolute letter of the law and send off a manager for simply trying to have a conversation about a decision with you.
-
- Posts: 20415
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4516 times
- Has Liked: 2032 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
That'll be a huge boost to morale.
Really good news.
Really good news.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin k90bfc
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
lets hops we follow it up with a request that Gavin Ward never gets another of our games.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3054 times
- Has Liked: 4794 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Or Leeds...Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pmGreat news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
These 2 users liked this post: northeastclaret jtv
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Apparently he hasn't got any game this weekendVegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:04 pmlets hops we follow it up with a request that Gavin Ward never gets another of our games.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
or Leeds?Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pmGreat news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
These 2 users liked this post: northeastclaret jtv
-
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Absolutely astonished we’ve won that appeal. Right decision but very rare common sense prevails. Bet Ward feels a bit of a prat.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Genuinely agreed with the red card, good job I’m not a ref!
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
1. They do as far as I can see but they are not allowed to approach them on the pitch.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:43 pmWeird one that. I thought managers spoke to officials after virtually every game.
As for the ref, has he purposely been stood down this weekend?
2. Appointments announced on Monday so no is the answer to that.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
-
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
- Been Liked: 701 times
- Has Liked: 181 times
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news, but agree looked a fair red card to me from 70 yards away.
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I saw the red card shown at the end but not the incident that brought it about. When I did see it later I was stunned, no way should that have been red.
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Stan Tastic
-
- Posts: 9265
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2748 times
- Has Liked: 2739 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I'd be a rich man if I had a quid for the number of times I've seen a manager approach a ref on the pitch.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:16 pm1. They do as far as I can see but they are not allowed to approach them on the pitch.
2. Appointments announced on Monday so no is the answer to that.
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Should never have been a red, but like others surprised they had the courage to admit the error.
Ward really is .................
.
Ward really is .................
.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Excellent news. Worrall will be gutted.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I think the wording in the laws of the game are that managers aren’t allowed to ‘confront’ the referee on the pitch. I guess one man’s conversation is another man’s confrontation. Although given Ward has seen a trip as violent conduct I’m minded to believe Parker’s version of events.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:19 pmI'd be a rich man if I had a quid for the number of times I've seen a manager approach a ref on the pitch.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I actually assumed Parker was more incensed about the possible handball/penalty right at death, although tbf I didn't see it. The players and the crowd in the JM were absolutely incandescent, but yet it's not been mentioned on here (I don't think) and it's not on the highlights.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 440 times
- Has Liked: 610 times
-
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 155 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Absolutely bloody fantastic
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
The way that lot stick together, I'm absolutely gobsmacked.
-
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Depends what he's saidmartin_p wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:36 pmI think the wording in the laws of the game are that managers aren’t allowed to ‘confront’ the referee on the pitch. I guess one man’s conversation is another man’s confrontation. Although given Ward has seen a trip as violent conduct I’m minded to believe Parker’s version of events.
He looked very calm
Certainly wasn't a physical confrontation
I certainly wouldn't assume Parker has done anything wrong based purely on the fact Ward gave him a Red card
-
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 724 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
So at the end of that little contretemps, CJ gets no punishment and the WBA player gets a yellow? That’s about right!
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Absolutely not.
Rescinding the card is the correct call, but what CJ did was absolutely stupid and with a referee like Ward who hands out red cards like confetti it was asking for trouble.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Apparently Parker asked the ref if being a ba***rd resulted from an accident of birth or was he a self-made man?
Maybe the ref is being stood down this weekend to see how things go and if it's a success he can be nailed down.
In all seriousness there are errors refs make all the time and we have to get on with it, but his failure over that free kick, not securing the ball, no spray, not apparently noting where the offence occurred and ensuring the FK was taken from the place of the offence were such basic errors he deserves the purple card aka P45.
Maybe the ref is being stood down this weekend to see how things go and if it's a success he can be nailed down.
In all seriousness there are errors refs make all the time and we have to get on with it, but his failure over that free kick, not securing the ball, no spray, not apparently noting where the offence occurred and ensuring the FK was taken from the place of the offence were such basic errors he deserves the purple card aka P45.
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I seriously can't believe that Parker would be abusive to anyone. That little sh!t Ward should have his whistle removed with immediate effect.Roosterbooster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:47 pmDepends what he's said
He looked very calm
Certainly wasn't a physical confrontation
I certainly wouldn't assume Parker has done anything wrong based purely on the fact Ward gave him a Red card
This user liked this post: Stayingup
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3070 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
-
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1044 times
- Has Liked: 323 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
What a good do. Also a lesson learned at not much cost to CJ.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Fantastic news
- wonder if this leads to a performance review of some kind for Gavin Ward?
Probably wishful thinking but he is an absolute disgrace. 1 yellow card in a game with 27 fouls then 2 sending offs at full time so Gavin Ward can stamp his seal on the game.
I think we shouldn't know referees' names or consider them personalities at all. They should take far more of a back seat than they currently do.
You may not like American Football, but the level of officiating is light years ahead of association football in England. Genuinely think we could learn a lot from that sport.
- wonder if this leads to a performance review of some kind for Gavin Ward?
Probably wishful thinking but he is an absolute disgrace. 1 yellow card in a game with 27 fouls then 2 sending offs at full time so Gavin Ward can stamp his seal on the game.
I think we shouldn't know referees' names or consider them personalities at all. They should take far more of a back seat than they currently do.
You may not like American Football, but the level of officiating is light years ahead of association football in England. Genuinely think we could learn a lot from that sport.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I don't think that that can be described as a "hack". It was a fairly innocuous trip and had no impact on the game as it was full-time.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pmI’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
It was probably a yellow but I don't see that as a red anywhere on the pitch even if the game was "active"
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Can you give a yellow after the final whistle?nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:24 pmI don't think that that can be described as a "hack". It was a fairly innocuous trip and had no impact on the game as it was full-time.
It was probably a yellow but I don't see that as a red anywhere on the pitch even if the game was "active"
I don't think I've ever seen it. A fair few reds over the years.
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news. I am surprised they overturned it though.
Has it been completely rescinded or downgraded to a yellow card. Most would agree it was worthy of a yellow card….
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Didn’t Lankshear get a yellow for his part in the incident?dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:27 pmCan you give a yellow after the final whistle?
I don't think I've ever seen it. A fair few reds over the years.
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
That's a really good and obvious point!Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:29 pmDidn’t Lankshear get a yellow for his part in the incident?
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2279 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Bet Worral's absolutely delighted!! 
-
- Posts: 76626
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
He isn't being stood down - the appointments are announced on the Monday over a day before this game. He just hasn't been allocated a game this week.