No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:32 pm

Been rescinded by the FA
These 25 users liked this post: tarkys_ears summitclaret randomclaret2 Colburn_Claret Claretmisterg Dark Cloud Cajun evensteadiereddie JanetM frankinwales Mayoclaret Juan Tanamera k90bfc mkmel RalphCoatesComb Oakworth claret IanMcL AfloatinClaret Quicknick yosserhughes longsidepies theonlywayisup kentonclaret mybloodisclaret Darnhill Claret

Rileybobs
Posts: 18549
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7610 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:32 pm

Superb and surprising news.

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by martin_p » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:33 pm

Just posted another thread Tony, you can delete mine. Great news!

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by RVclaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:33 pm

Great news!

northeastclaret
Posts: 1097
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 389 times
Has Liked: 286 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by northeastclaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:38 pm

Brilliant, no point having an appeal process unless appeals this can succeed, unlike a lot of posters on here who said no chance of winning, what do they know.

MrTopTier
Posts: 3585
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
Been Liked: 1220 times
Has Liked: 1086 times
Location: The Moon, Outer Space.

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by MrTopTier » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:38 pm

Rightly so.

Also saw that Joao Pedro at Hull had his appeal upheld. Fancy putting in an appeal for that challenge.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 419 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Roosterbooster » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:38 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:32 pm
Superb and surprising news.
100%

Never a red card
But never did I think it would be overturned

So important to keep CJER and Esteve for the run in

DukeOfBar
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by DukeOfBar » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:39 pm

has Mr Parkers card also been rescinded? Given his card was a reaction to the now rescinded card..? ;)

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:41 pm

DukeOfBar wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:39 pm
has Mr Parkers card also been rescinded? Given his card was a reaction to the now rescinded card..? ;)
Any appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9265
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2739 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by fidelcastro » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:43 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:41 pm
Any appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.
Weird one that. I thought managers spoke to officials after virtually every game.

As for the ref, has he purposely been stood down this weekend?

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4912
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1215 times
Has Liked: 1894 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by tarkys_ears » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:44 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:41 pm
Any appeal for Scott Parker's will be later which means he will be on the touchline at Swansea. However, he was red carded for speaking to the referee which apparently he is not allowed to do so not sure he'd succeed in an appeal.
Not even after the final whistle?

Sounds bizarre.

ralph8
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ralph8 » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:47 pm

Good News - does he now get his minus 1s on his Man of the Match scores added back on :D

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:54 pm

wow, common sense prevails. Great news, he'll be like a new signing !

agreenwood
Posts: 4461
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2462 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by agreenwood » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pm

Parker says he wasn’t abusive or aggressive towards the referee. He says he was calm and measured.

If that’s true, imagine being such an arsehole that you’d apply the absolute letter of the law and send off a manager for simply trying to have a conversation about a decision with you.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5499 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Devils_Advocate » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pm

Great news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
These 2 users liked this post: CharlieinNewMexico mybloodisclaret

summitclaret
Posts: 4497
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1003 times
Has Liked: 1595 times
Location: burnley

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by summitclaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:00 pm

Justice. A crucial reprieve for our season. Think this will drive us on now.
Last edited by summitclaret on Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

agreenwood
Posts: 4461
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2462 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by agreenwood » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:00 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pm
Parker says he wasn’t abusive or aggressive towards the referee. He says he was calm and measured.

If that’s true, imagine being such an arsehole that you’d apply the absolute letter of the law and send off a manager for simply trying to have a conversation about a decision with you.
You see managers trying and to speak to referees at half-time and full time on a regular basis. You rarely see a red card.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20415
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4516 times
Has Liked: 2032 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ElectroClaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:00 pm

That'll be a huge boost to morale.
Really good news.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin k90bfc

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:04 pm

lets hops we follow it up with a request that Gavin Ward never gets another of our games.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin mybloodisclaret

randomclaret2
Posts: 7745
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3054 times
Has Liked: 4794 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by randomclaret2 » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:06 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pm
Great news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
Or Leeds...
These 2 users liked this post: northeastclaret jtv

Row x
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 571 times
Has Liked: 111 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Row x » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:08 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:04 pm
lets hops we follow it up with a request that Gavin Ward never gets another of our games.
Apparently he hasn't got any game this weekend
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret

billyhamilton82
Posts: 916
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by billyhamilton82 » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:11 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:59 pm
Great news for us but I bet if it was a small club like Oxford, Plymouth or Blackburn it would never have been overturned.
or Leeds?
These 2 users liked this post: northeastclaret jtv

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1646
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 721 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:12 pm

Absolutely astonished we’ve won that appeal. Right decision but very rare common sense prevails. Bet Ward feels a bit of a prat.

Cooclaret
Posts: 1371
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2022 8:34 am
Been Liked: 286 times
Has Liked: 617 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Cooclaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:12 pm

Genuinely agreed with the red card, good job I’m not a ref!

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:16 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:43 pm
Weird one that. I thought managers spoke to officials after virtually every game.

As for the ref, has he purposely been stood down this weekend?
1. They do as far as I can see but they are not allowed to approach them on the pitch.

2. Appointments announced on Monday so no is the answer to that.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Bacchus
Posts: 1030
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 701 times
Has Liked: 181 times
Contact:

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Bacchus » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:16 pm

Great news, but agree looked a fair red card to me from 70 yards away.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:18 pm

I saw the red card shown at the end but not the incident that brought it about. When I did see it later I was stunned, no way should that have been red.
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Stan Tastic

fidelcastro
Posts: 9265
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2739 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by fidelcastro » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:19 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:16 pm
1. They do as far as I can see but they are not allowed to approach them on the pitch.

2. Appointments announced on Monday so no is the answer to that.
I'd be a rich man if I had a quid for the number of times I've seen a manager approach a ref on the pitch.
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3429 times
Has Liked: 5646 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Colburn_Claret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:19 pm

Should never have been a red, but like others surprised they had the courage to admit the error.
Ward really is .................
.

Murger
Posts: 5294
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1479 times
Has Liked: 959 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Murger » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:20 pm

Excellent news. Worrall will be gutted.

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by martin_p » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:36 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:19 pm
I'd be a rich man if I had a quid for the number of times I've seen a manager approach a ref on the pitch.
I think the wording in the laws of the game are that managers aren’t allowed to ‘confront’ the referee on the pitch. I guess one man’s conversation is another man’s confrontation. Although given Ward has seen a trip as violent conduct I’m minded to believe Parker’s version of events.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7536
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2279 times
Has Liked: 4044 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Dark Cloud » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:42 pm

I actually assumed Parker was more incensed about the possible handball/penalty right at death, although tbf I didn't see it. The players and the crowd in the JM were absolutely incandescent, but yet it's not been mentioned on here (I don't think) and it's not on the highlights.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 440 times
Has Liked: 610 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:43 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:32 pm
Superb and surprising news.
Not one bit surprised. It was never a red card

Goalposts
Posts: 3021
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 155 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Goalposts » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:43 pm

Absolutely bloody fantastic

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by dougcollins » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:44 pm

The way that lot stick together, I'm absolutely gobsmacked.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 419 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Roosterbooster » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:47 pm

martin_p wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:36 pm
I think the wording in the laws of the game are that managers aren’t allowed to ‘confront’ the referee on the pitch. I guess one man’s conversation is another man’s confrontation. Although given Ward has seen a trip as violent conduct I’m minded to believe Parker’s version of events.
Depends what he's said
He looked very calm
Certainly wasn't a physical confrontation
I certainly wouldn't assume Parker has done anything wrong based purely on the fact Ward gave him a Red card

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 724 times
Has Liked: 3194 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Burnley Ace » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:49 pm

So at the end of that little contretemps, CJ gets no punishment and the WBA player gets a yellow? That’s about right!

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by nil_desperandum » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:54 pm

ralph8 wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:47 pm
Good News - does he now get his minus 1s on his Man of the Match scores added back on :D
Absolutely not.
Rescinding the card is the correct call, but what CJ did was absolutely stupid and with a referee like Ward who hands out red cards like confetti it was asking for trouble.

mdd2
Posts: 6916
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 751 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by mdd2 » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:00 pm

Apparently Parker asked the ref if being a ba***rd resulted from an accident of birth or was he a self-made man?
Maybe the ref is being stood down this weekend to see how things go and if it's a success he can be nailed down.
In all seriousness there are errors refs make all the time and we have to get on with it, but his failure over that free kick, not securing the ball, no spray, not apparently noting where the offence occurred and ensuring the FK was taken from the place of the offence were such basic errors he deserves the purple card aka P45.

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by dougcollins » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:14 pm

Roosterbooster wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:47 pm
Depends what he's said
He looked very calm
Certainly wasn't a physical confrontation
I certainly wouldn't assume Parker has done anything wrong based purely on the fact Ward gave him a Red card
I seriously can't believe that Parker would be abusive to anyone. That little sh!t Ward should have his whistle removed with immediate effect.
This user liked this post: Stayingup

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10447
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3070 times
Has Liked: 2434 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Tricky Trevor » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pm

I’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 323 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Clovius Boofus » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pm

What a good do. Also a lesson learned at not much cost to CJ.

CoolClaret
Posts: 9810
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3097 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by CoolClaret » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:21 pm

Fantastic news

- wonder if this leads to a performance review of some kind for Gavin Ward?

Probably wishful thinking but he is an absolute disgrace. 1 yellow card in a game with 27 fouls then 2 sending offs at full time so Gavin Ward can stamp his seal on the game.

I think we shouldn't know referees' names or consider them personalities at all. They should take far more of a back seat than they currently do.

You may not like American Football, but the level of officiating is light years ahead of association football in England. Genuinely think we could learn a lot from that sport.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by nil_desperandum » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:24 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pm
I’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
I don't think that that can be described as a "hack". It was a fairly innocuous trip and had no impact on the game as it was full-time.
It was probably a yellow but I don't see that as a red anywhere on the pitch even if the game was "active"

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by dougcollins » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:27 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:24 pm
I don't think that that can be described as a "hack". It was a fairly innocuous trip and had no impact on the game as it was full-time.
It was probably a yellow but I don't see that as a red anywhere on the pitch even if the game was "active"
Can you give a yellow after the final whistle?

I don't think I've ever seen it. A fair few reds over the years.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 811 times
Has Liked: 284 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Jakubs Tash » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:28 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:32 pm
Been rescinded by the FA
Great news. I am surprised they overturned it though.

Has it been completely rescinded or downgraded to a yellow card. Most would agree it was worthy of a yellow card….

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 811 times
Has Liked: 284 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Jakubs Tash » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:29 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:27 pm
Can you give a yellow after the final whistle?

I don't think I've ever seen it. A fair few reds over the years.
Didn’t Lankshear get a yellow for his part in the incident?

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by dougcollins » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:30 pm

Jakubs Tash wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:29 pm
Didn’t Lankshear get a yellow for his part in the incident?
That's a really good and obvious point!

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7536
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2279 times
Has Liked: 4044 times

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by Dark Cloud » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:34 pm

Bet Worral's absolutely delighted!! 😉

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:37 pm

mdd2 wrote:
Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:00 pm
Maybe the ref is being stood down this weekend to see how things go and if it's a success he can be nailed down.
He isn't being stood down - the appointments are announced on the Monday over a day before this game. He just hasn't been allocated a game this week.

Post Reply