Bart Verbruggen

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
basil6345789
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 531 times
Has Liked: 2435 times

Bart Verbruggen

Post by basil6345789 » Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:55 pm

Now valued at £60m. Didn't we nearly sign him?

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:02 am

Yes, Dyche's parting words to Mr Pace was "if you sell Popey in the summer go after that Vertbruggen chappy from from Anderlecht"

NewClaret
Posts: 17684
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by NewClaret » Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:12 am

If Verbruggen is worth £60m that’s at least what we must demand for Trafford (notwithstanding City buy back clause). Personally think Trafford is better.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14916
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3525 times
Has Liked: 6426 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 29, 2025 6:34 am

Brighton will make sure they get good money for him

Our owners appear intent on making sure they get good money for our players, so if Trafford goes, I'd expect us to get very good money for him

Grimsdale
Posts: 699
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:44 am
Been Liked: 620 times
Has Liked: 95 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Grimsdale » Sat Mar 29, 2025 6:35 am

Interesting that of the four players who have made the most errors leading to goals in the Premier League this season, two used to play for us and one nearly did

Image

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1877 times
Has Liked: 2238 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:09 am

I personally don't rate him either.Brighon lost a decent keeper and would grab £60m if the Bluffer is prepared to spend on a keeper he wanted at Burnley. Traff the Clean Sheet king has to be worth North of the £40m being mention especially as we have a percentage due to City.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77740
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38038 times
Has Liked: 5774 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:39 am

basil6345789 wrote:
Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:55 pm
Now valued at £60m. Didn't we nearly sign him?
We didn't come close to signing him from what I was told but we wanted to sign him. Brighton were able to offer much more than us. I thought they handled him well last season, much better than we handled Trafford, in that they would give him games and then take him out of the side. I haven't seen enough of him to know how good he is.

Row x
Posts: 2390
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 631 times
Has Liked: 124 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Row x » Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:48 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:39 am
We didn't come close to signing him from what I was told but we wanted to sign him. Brighton were able to offer much more than us. I thought they handled him well last season, much better than we handled Trafford, in that they would give him games and then take him out of the side. I haven't seen enough of him to know how good he is.
They produced the Bart Simpson video ready for his signing, which was then used for Muric. That was the season before he went to Brighton. We tried both summers.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3775
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Big Vinny K » Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:50 am

Valued at £60m by who ?
Brighton ?
Is it like Southampton valueing their young lad this week at £100m.

Not seen enough of him this season to know how good he is. Looks a good shot stopper but made a few big mistakes - but Brighton play risky football so may be unavoidable

In his first season he was alternated with Steele wasn’t he ? Steele had been a reserve keeper for a while and seem very little first team football in the Premier league so I guess this was not a planned strategy and more that Vebruggen was not as ready as they thought he would be when they signed him.

But Brighton are very good at getting a lot of money for their players so who knows ?!!

ClaretTony
Posts: 77740
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38038 times
Has Liked: 5774 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:01 am

Row x wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:48 am
They produced the Bart Simpson video ready for his signing, which was then used for Muric. That was the season before he went to Brighton. We tried both summers.
We did try that first summer to but it was in the second summer that he actually got as far as coming here.

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6605
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2751 times
Has Liked: 1612 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by gandhisflipflop » Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:52 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:09 am
I personally don't rate him either.Brighon lost a decent keeper and would grab £60m if the Bluffer is prepared to spend on a keeper he wanted at Burnley. Traff the Clean Sheet king has to be worth North of the £40m being mention especially as we have a percentage due to City.
Who is the bluffer?

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6832
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:55 am

I haven’t seen much of him this season, but I thought he wasn’t very convincing last year.

Claret86
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2022 3:31 pm
Been Liked: 54 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Claret86 » Sat Mar 29, 2025 10:12 am

Everytime I watch Brighton play he seems to make a mistake. At least he can pass out from the back which is very important

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by IanMcL » Sat Mar 29, 2025 11:09 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:12 am
If Verbruggen is worth £60m that’s at least what we must demand for Trafford (notwithstanding City buy back clause). Personally think Trafford is better.
I agree, having seen Verbruggen. Still contains errors.
This user liked this post: Anonymous

Lakeland Claret
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2024 9:02 am
Been Liked: 20 times
Has Liked: 30 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Lakeland Claret » Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:24 pm

BBC sports paper review talking about it too . Wonder who the link with Bayern comes from ..?!https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ar ... g1gexjpneo

Tall Paul
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 735 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:56 pm

Row x wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:48 am
They produced the Bart Simpson video ready for his signing, which was then used for Muric. That was the season before he went to Brighton. We tried both summers.
Bart Simpson wasn't in the Muric announcement video.

Row x
Posts: 2390
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 631 times
Has Liked: 124 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Row x » Sat Mar 29, 2025 3:28 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:56 pm
Bart Simpson wasn't in the Muric announcement video.
Perhaps age is taking its toll, but I'd swear he was

Any chance of a link to the one you've seen?

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: Bart Verbruggen

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Mar 29, 2025 3:33 pm

Bart Simpson wasn't in the video but the video was from a Simpsons episode

Post Reply