You’re not watching the same player as me then. His ability to control a ball, especially when running with it - is breath taking. His low centre of gravity is a joy to behold, so either Marcus Edwards has done something to upset you, or you’re loving on another planet to me!Goalkeeper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 11:07 pmAt times, his first touch is poor. He obviously isn't physical, given his stature. He is at very best a top 6 Championship player, he will sink without trace in the Premier League.
Marcus Edwards
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 383 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
These 2 users liked this post: xxmunkyennuixx Overseascricketer
Re: Marcus Edwards
I mentioned earlier in the week that one of the misgivings I have about him is that he isn't much of a fighter. If he loses the ball he doesn't like he wants to win it straight back.
He is talented though and there's no one will else In the league I'd rather have in the league running at a defence when he's on it. Over the past few games he hasn't looked like he wants to run at his man, which is his main strength, and was largely gaffered by 36 year old Craig Forsyth.
Don't know if it's confidence or motivation or what but we need to get him back in the game and trying to run at people because he doesn't offer a right lot else. It's no surprise to me that he hasn't played well these last few games and we've gone back to struggling to make chances.
He is talented though and there's no one will else In the league I'd rather have in the league running at a defence when he's on it. Over the past few games he hasn't looked like he wants to run at his man, which is his main strength, and was largely gaffered by 36 year old Craig Forsyth.
Don't know if it's confidence or motivation or what but we need to get him back in the game and trying to run at people because he doesn't offer a right lot else. It's no surprise to me that he hasn't played well these last few games and we've gone back to struggling to make chances.
-
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 177 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Interestingly against Norwich as soon as Edwards got the ball in the final third, he immediately had 3 opponents covering his 2 main options of taking on the full back or cutting in on his stronger foot. This definitely nullified him a fair bit, however this should have allowed others more space and time on the ball which Hannibal took advantage of on several occasions.
-
- Posts: 5300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Marcus Edwards
Jeez.....undefeated in god knows how long..playing some cracking football at times...a town not much bigger than Trumpton on the verge of a return to the best league in the world..club and town buzzing...
and people have to post sh1te like that of "goalkeeper".
and people have to post sh1te like that of "goalkeeper".
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret CalamityClaret
-
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 775 times
- Has Liked: 126 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
I think he'll have much more space against the Blades and therefore be much more of a threat.
Its looking like it's going to be a must win for them so they'll have to take some risks and probably leave players in advanced positions.
Its looking like it's going to be a must win for them so they'll have to take some risks and probably leave players in advanced positions.
Re: Marcus Edwards
I like Edwards, but assuming we go up not sure how much use he'll be next season when its going to be a backs to the wall job.
Re: Marcus Edwards
You'd think we'd use him as an impact sub occasionally. Probably depends if he's a sulker or not as to whether that's a realistic option.
Re: Marcus Edwards
He's been poor the last two games. But as I've mentioned before, the opposition are so worried about him, it is no coincidence it has given Pires and Anthony more space to work in. As seen again on friday night.
These 4 users liked this post: basil6345789 Colburn_Claret KateR Dark Cloud
-
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 290 times
- Has Liked: 531 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Class players attract flies i we used to say meaning players doubling up on you, but like other posters have said will free up space for others to exploit...
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 528 times
- Has Liked: 2420 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
In February I was speaking with in The Algarve a Portuguese man from Porto but a big fan overall. He said that "Edwards plays well for about 5 games then loses interest - a bit like Rashford but he is good". He also said that Amorin will end up managing Benfica, his number one club from childhood through.
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:45 am
- Been Liked: 29 times
- Has Liked: 192 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Please tell me which part of my post isn't true. I didn't see any Premier league clubs trying to sign him. There is a reason for this.fatboy47 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 9:09 amJeez.....undefeated in god knows how long..playing some cracking football at times...a town not much bigger than Trumpton on the verge of a return to the best league in the world..club and town buzzing...
and people have to post sh1te like that of "goalkeeper".
-
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 66 times
- Has Liked: 37 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
If we are promoted, our attacking players may have much more freedom to play as defenders will not be doubling/tripling up. Koleosho looked excellent in PL when allowed time on the ball
-
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3100 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
If you cannot see the direct correlation between the addition & inclusion of Edwards into the team and the margins of our games swinging to wins, then I don't know what to tell you...
As stated earlier in the season, the system was/is absolutely fine; we were creating plenty of 1 vs 1 matchups and getting a spare man free on occasion; we just didn't have enough quality options in the final third to execute properly.
Now that we do and Edwards, is being heavily marked/pressed, which is opening the space up for other players to operate in.
As stated earlier in the season, the system was/is absolutely fine; we were creating plenty of 1 vs 1 matchups and getting a spare man free on occasion; we just didn't have enough quality options in the final third to execute properly.
Now that we do and Edwards, is being heavily marked/pressed, which is opening the space up for other players to operate in.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
Re: Marcus Edwards
I thought he defended well on Friday in his own way. He's not a defender but he closed down and helped the team.
Re: Marcus Edwards
I’d personally file that under what the Fulham and Bournemouth said about Parker, what Stoke fans said about Laurent and Huddersfield fans about Arfield.basil6345789 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 3:47 pmIn February I was speaking with in The Algarve a Portuguese man from Porto but a big fan overall. He said that "Edwards plays well for about 5 games then loses interest - a bit like Rashford but he is good". He also said that Amorin will end up managing Benfica, his number one club from childhood through.
This user liked this post: Oakworth claret
-
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2263 times
- Has Liked: 1242 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Always amazed how much trust some fans place in what a total stranger has said about one of our players
Re: Marcus Edwards
Exactly, Edwards put in a good shift on Friday night, certainly looked interested,warksclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:29 pmAlways amazed how much trust some fans place in what a total stranger has said about one of our players
Re: Marcus Edwards
You don't have to be a genius to see what Edwards brings to the table. With some players you don't miss them until they're not in the team and I think Edwards fits that bill nicely.
Prior to his arrival we were trying various options on the opposite wing to Anthony (Sarmiento, Koleosho, Foster, and Hannibal at the very least). None of them caused the opposition any real problems in the final third so we were relatively easy to defend against. If they stopped Anthony, they stopped us.
Now we look a different beast. We have two wingers that can cause problems. Teams are allowing Anthony more space because they're worried about Edwards, and he's punishing them. Take Edwards away and we revert back to what we were seeing earlier in the season. I know which I prefer.
It's the same with Brownhill. There are some who don't rate him that highly. Personally, I always think we're much better with him in the starting 11. He might not always appear to be having a direct impact on the game, but he usually is. His running and positional play are a huge factor in getting us up the pitch. Take him away and we've tended to look a bit aimless at times.
Prior to his arrival we were trying various options on the opposite wing to Anthony (Sarmiento, Koleosho, Foster, and Hannibal at the very least). None of them caused the opposition any real problems in the final third so we were relatively easy to defend against. If they stopped Anthony, they stopped us.
Now we look a different beast. We have two wingers that can cause problems. Teams are allowing Anthony more space because they're worried about Edwards, and he's punishing them. Take Edwards away and we revert back to what we were seeing earlier in the season. I know which I prefer.
It's the same with Brownhill. There are some who don't rate him that highly. Personally, I always think we're much better with him in the starting 11. He might not always appear to be having a direct impact on the game, but he usually is. His running and positional play are a huge factor in getting us up the pitch. Take him away and we've tended to look a bit aimless at times.
These 3 users liked this post: dsr Buxtonclaret Burnley1989
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3071 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
I wish he could form some sort of partnership with Roberts. As good as Roberts/Anthony were there is nothing between Roberts/Edwards. I’ve watched Fridays match again this morning and whilst we are getting it wide at every opportunity there were a few times when Roberts passed infield with Edwards wide open, from a couple of them Cullen immediately switched it to Edwards who by then had been covered.
Roberts has also stopped overlapping him and isn’t the player he was before Edwards arrival.
Sit down with the videos and please sort it guys.
Roberts has also stopped overlapping him and isn’t the player he was before Edwards arrival.
Sit down with the videos and please sort it guys.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 528 times
- Has Liked: 2420 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Simply conveying what a man who's close to it in Portugal said - he had no axe to grindwarksclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:29 pmAlways amazed how much trust some fans place in what a total stranger has said about one of our players
Re: Marcus Edwards
Our old mate Tim Sherwood likes him.
Re: Marcus Edwards
If we go up I'd have no hesitation in paying the reported 12m euros for him. I'd be surprised if we could get another winger of the same quality for that money. Definitely seems to have made the difference between not losing and winning more often than not.
-
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 504 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
In recent years we have had obligations to buy where in hindsight we wished we hadn’t.
Edwards is the opposite. An obligation (on both sides) if we go up that suits us perfectly. I cannot see us letting him go anywhere else. Opponents will target us down that side of course due to the defensive weakness but we will have to guard against it, not a reason not to play him.
Edwards is the opposite. An obligation (on both sides) if we go up that suits us perfectly. I cannot see us letting him go anywhere else. Opponents will target us down that side of course due to the defensive weakness but we will have to guard against it, not a reason not to play him.
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
I'm not surprised Roberts has given up with the overlapping runs, more often than not he makes the effort and then doesn't get the ball played to him even when he's wide open.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:05 pmI wish he could form some sort of partnership with Roberts. As good as Roberts/Anthony were there is nothing between Roberts/Edwards. I’ve watched Fridays match again this morning and whilst we are getting it wide at every opportunity there were a few times when Roberts passed infield with Edwards wide open, from a couple of them Cullen immediately switched it to Edwards who by then had been covered.
Roberts has also stopped overlapping him and isn’t the player he was before Edwards arrival.
Sit down with the videos and please sort it guys.
-
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2662 times
- Has Liked: 2357 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Fully agree with you therejlup1980 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:46 pmYou don't have to be a genius to see what Edwards brings to the table. With some players you don't miss them until they're not in the team and I think Edwards fits that bill nicely.
Prior to his arrival we were trying various options on the opposite wing to Anthony (Sarmiento, Koleosho, Foster, and Hannibal at the very least). None of them caused the opposition any real problems in the final third so we were relatively easy to defend against. If they stopped Anthony, they stopped us.
Now we look a different beast. We have two wingers that can cause problems. Teams are allowing Anthony more space because they're worried about Edwards, and he's punishing them. Take Edwards away and we revert back to what we were seeing earlier in the season. I know which I prefer.
It's the same with Brownhill. There are some who don't rate him that highly. Personally, I always think we're much better with him in the starting 11. He might not always appear to be having a direct impact on the game, but he usually is. His running and positional play are a huge factor in getting us up the pitch. Take him away and we've tended to look a bit aimless at times.
-
- Posts: 5300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Marcus Edwards
So Roberts sulking now is he?ClaretOfMancunia wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:48 amI'm not surprised Roberts has given up with the overlapping runs, more often than not he makes the effort and then doesn't get the ball played to him even when he's wide open.
Nothing to do with the manager's set-up and tactics ?
Re: Marcus Edwards
Brownhill goes down that side quite often too. If Roberts makes the run and draws a defender surely that's still a useful run?ClaretOfMancunia wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:48 amI'm not surprised Roberts has given up with the overlapping runs, more often than not he makes the effort and then doesn't get the ball played to him even when he's wide open.
Re: Marcus Edwards
But since we moved Anthony to the left we've had Pires noticeably bombing on and getting past him a lot more. I think it's possibly tactical that we are using Roberts a bit more for control and Pires to bomb on. We probably want to get Edwards 1 v 1 so don't want Roberts to come in and crowd the area as much.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:05 pmI wish he could form some sort of partnership with Roberts. As good as Roberts/Anthony were there is nothing between Roberts/Edwards. I’ve watched Fridays match again this morning and whilst we are getting it wide at every opportunity there were a few times when Roberts passed infield with Edwards wide open, from a couple of them Cullen immediately switched it to Edwards who by then had been covered.
Roberts has also stopped overlapping him and isn’t the player he was before Edwards arrival.
Sit down with the videos and please sort it guys.
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3071 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Marcus Edwards
Fair point. I’d wondered that myself.Goliath wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 10:55 amBut since we moved Anthony to the left we've had Pires noticeably bombing on and getting past him a lot more. I think it's possibly tactical that we are using Roberts a bit more for control and Pires to bomb on. We probably want to get Edwards 1 v 1 so don't want Roberts to come in and crowd the area as much.