Sycamore Gap verdict

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Bacchus
Posts: 1065
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 743 times
Has Liked: 183 times
Contact:

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Bacchus » Fri May 09, 2025 10:49 pm

This case epitomises so much about modern society. Two bell ends who think that mindless destruction is a hilarious route to online infamy now face having their lives ruined at huge expense to the tax payer and will no doubt come out of that experience as even less productive members of society than they are now.

They deserve a significant proverbial kicking (let's be honest, chopping down a very specific tree in the middle of nowhere is hardly a spur of the moment bad decision, it's the kind of scummy vandalism that blights most parts of this country) but surely there is a better way of dealing with this than a prison sentence. Some sort of community service based punishment like spending a year's worth of Saturday evenings planting trees while listening to Coldplay on repeat would be more appropriate.
Last edited by Bacchus on Fri May 09, 2025 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by fidelcastro » Fri May 09, 2025 10:50 pm

Ampth7 wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 9:17 pm
Where’s the eye roll emoji when you need it!? 😂

I think the country’s problems are a bit bigger for just my eyes to deal with!

Please bear in mind that the aforementioned crime data is absolutely clear on this issue and comes from the Home Office!!! It’s not ‘fake news’, it’s genuine data and information being reported by just about every single media outlet in the country! You can literally Google search said problem and you will be inundated with endless articles saying exactly the same thing!! 😂🙈
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

NewClaret
Posts: 17683
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by NewClaret » Sat May 10, 2025 12:26 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 10:48 pm
How would you have your way with them?
They’d have no hands to play on their station, put it that way ;)

Exeterclaret
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:36 pm
Been Liked: 89 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Exeterclaret » Sat May 10, 2025 6:30 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 5:13 pm
10 years of Playstations funded by good honest taxpayers that's exactly what we don't need!
Have you seen what prisons are like in Norway? I wouldn't bother looking if I were you mate. Gotta watch the blood pressure.

agreenwood
Posts: 4619
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by agreenwood » Sat May 10, 2025 6:37 am

I reckon these lads are angels compared to some extremely wealthy people who have been doing far worse to the environment for decades. We don’t tend to like people getting angry about the latter though.
These 3 users liked this post: LDNBFC87 Lord Beamish Enola Gay

RicardoMontalban
Posts: 791
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 380 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by RicardoMontalban » Sat May 10, 2025 6:55 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 12:26 am
They’d have no hands to play on their station, put it that way ;)
You’d chop their hands off? A tad OTT maybe?

Goalkeeper
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:45 am
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 264 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Goalkeeper » Sat May 10, 2025 7:40 am

I see vandalism as someone throwing a brick through a window, scratching a car as they walk past, or generally being a destructive knob.
These guys planned this carefully, did recces, filmed their actions and afterwards revelled in what they had done. They knew the tree had national if not international interest, and for some unfathomable reason wanted to destroy it.
It's more than wanton vandalism, but not a ten year jail time sort of crime.
My question is really simple; why?

IanMcL
Posts: 34802
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10366 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by IanMcL » Sat May 10, 2025 2:04 pm

Bacchus wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 10:49 pm
This case epitomises so much about modern society. Two bell ends who think that mindless destruction is a hilarious route to online infamy now face having their lives ruined at huge expense to the tax payer and will no doubt come out of that experience as even less productive members of society than they are now.

They deserve a significant proverbial kicking (let's be honest, chopping down a very specific tree in the middle of nowhere is hardly a spur of the moment bad decision, it's the kind of scummy vandalism that blights most parts of this country) but surely there is a better way of dealing with this than a prison sentence. Some sort of community service based punishment like spending a year's worth of Saturday evenings planting trees while listening to Coldplay on repeat would be more appropriate.
Whatever the worst punishment is, that helps the community considerably, let it be forever.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3775
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Big Vinny K » Sat May 10, 2025 3:28 pm

RicardoMontalban wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 6:55 am
You’d chop their hands off? A tad OTT maybe?
It’s ok he put a winky emoji on…..like they do in Saudi Arabia when they are having a good laugh in the hand chopping cells.

Leisure
Posts: 22199
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 4679 times
Has Liked: 15315 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Leisure » Sat May 10, 2025 4:01 pm

Bacchus wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 10:49 pm
while listening to Coldplay on repeat would be more appropriate.
If it was me I'd go for the prison sentence!

Inchy
Posts: 3139
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1547 times
Has Liked: 107 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Inchy » Sat May 10, 2025 4:14 pm

These two idiots shouldn’t be locked up. They are not a danger to anyone. They chopped down a tree. It was very scummy, but they didn’t harm anyone. I’ve ran past that tree on the pennine way many times. It was majestic. I’m as ****** off as the rest of us. But locking them up will just cost a fortune.


Stick them on community service, ideally looking after a national park. Make them realise beauty. Educate them.

1000 hours looking after a national park might make them appreciate it

boatshed bill
Posts: 17369
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 7833 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by boatshed bill » Sat May 10, 2025 4:20 pm

Inchy wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 4:14 pm
These two idiots shouldn’t be locked up. They are not a danger to anyone. They chopped down a tree. It was very scummy, but they didn’t harm anyone. I’ve ran past that tree on the pennine way many times. It was majestic. I’m as ****** off as the rest of us. But locking them up will just cost a fortune.


Stick them on community service, ideally looking after a national park. Make them realise beauty. Educate them.

1000 hours looking after a national park might make them appreciate it
Yes, this sort of punishment is far better. (and 1,000hrs of Coldplay :D )
Prison? They go in as idiots , but what would be the effects of a stretch in clink?

Inchy
Posts: 3139
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1547 times
Has Liked: 107 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Inchy » Sat May 10, 2025 5:12 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 4:20 pm
Yes, this sort of punishment is far better. (and 1,000hrs of Coldplay :D )
Prison? They go in as idiots , but what would be the effects of a stretch in clink?


I’d rather face the firing squad than Coldplay
This user liked this post: Leisure

AmbleClaret
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 192 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by AmbleClaret » Sat May 10, 2025 5:25 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 2:10 pm
Get some perspective people.

It's a ******* tree...
And Turf Moor is just a football ground, so you'd be happy for someone to torch it?

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by fidelcastro » Sat May 10, 2025 6:07 pm

AmbleClaret wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 5:25 pm
And Turf Moor is just a football ground, so you'd be happy for someone to torch it?
I suppose that's one way of forcing the ground redevelopment! :twisted:
This user liked this post: AmbleClaret

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4295 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon May 12, 2025 10:40 am

We need a huge review of sentencing.
I am still angry about this incident, but what's the point of giving them a long custodial sentence (at our expense)?
As others have suggested, much better to make them work under supervision for the forestry commission every weekend for a long period, (without pay and paying their own travel expenses)
How long? Well, perhaps look at the appropriate jail sentence, and work out how many days they would serve, and then calculate how many weekends that equates too. They would not be doing anything at weekends other than tree preservation for many years.

Greenmile
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1156 times
Has Liked: 4529 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Greenmile » Mon May 12, 2025 11:01 am

These “two-minute hate” threads are always fun.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish

ecc
Posts: 6330
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 1775 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by ecc » Mon May 12, 2025 11:12 am

"Educate them."

That might take ten years.

NewClaret
Posts: 17683
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by NewClaret » Mon May 12, 2025 12:14 pm

RicardoMontalban wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 6:55 am
You’d chop their hands off? A tad OTT maybe?
Well they wouldn’t do it again… ;)

Although that’s what they do in some countries that unsurprisingly have much lower crime rates than the UK.

Spijed
Posts: 18056
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3053 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Spijed » Mon May 12, 2025 1:02 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 12:14 pm
Well they wouldn’t do it again… ;)

Although that’s what they do in some countries that unsurprisingly have much lower crime rates than the UK.
Or just pardon them, no matter how violent their crimes ;)

RicardoMontalban
Posts: 791
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 380 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by RicardoMontalban » Mon May 12, 2025 1:34 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 12:14 pm
Well they wouldn’t do it again… ;)

Although that’s what they do in some countries that unsurprisingly have much lower crime rates than the UK.
There’s that winky face again that BVK alluded to...

boyyanno
Posts: 2232
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 168 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by boyyanno » Mon May 12, 2025 2:21 pm

I think some people see the word tree and think it's a nothing crime.

Two guys planned and drove many miles to commit hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of criminal damage just so that they could laugh at the misery it caused.

How many posters on here (if they had an asset that was valued equally) would think it was a joke and that they didn't deserve jail time?

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3083
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 241 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by GetIntoEm » Mon May 12, 2025 2:31 pm

Melting over a tree that most never even heard of, or bothered to visit before this case.

The scruffs in Burnley town centre do worse on a daily basis

boyyanno
Posts: 2232
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 168 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by boyyanno » Mon May 12, 2025 2:38 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 2:31 pm
Melting over a tree that most never even heard of, or bothered to visit before this case.

The scruffs in Burnley town centre do worse on a daily basis
So let's say you've got a 650k asset and someone destroys it just to laugh at your misery, do you let them off because the scruffs in Burnley do worse?

Can you also show me where I can view an article confirming the recent 650k worth of bins that get damaged every day as well? That would be grand.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3476 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon May 12, 2025 2:45 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 2:31 pm
Melting over a tree that most never even heard of, or bothered to visit before this case.

The scruffs in Burnley town centre do worse on a daily basis
Very few people won't have heard of the Sycamore gap or tree. It's iconic and made famous in many films and tv programmes including Robin Hood Prince of Thieves.
To say it's just a tree is like comparing your picture of 4 dogs playing pool to the Mona Lisa. If you don't understand that, all you are exposing is your ignorance.

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3083
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 241 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by GetIntoEm » Mon May 12, 2025 3:25 pm

When people were pushing historical statues into rivers people were cheering. Don't remember any prison sentences for that

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4295 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon May 12, 2025 3:41 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 3:25 pm
When people were pushing historical statues into rivers people were cheering. Don't remember any prison sentences for that
If you are referring to the Colston statue pushed into Bristol Harbour, it went to Crown Court and a jury acquitted the perpetrators. You may disagree with this verdict, but it's why they didn't get any sentence.
These 2 have been found guilty. Again you may disagree with the verdict, but it's how our judicial system works.

LDNBFC87
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 4:35 pm
Been Liked: 70 times
Has Liked: 594 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by LDNBFC87 » Mon May 12, 2025 3:48 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Sat May 10, 2025 6:37 am
I reckon these lads are angels compared to some extremely wealthy people who have been doing far worse to the environment for decades. We don’t tend to like people getting angry about the latter though.
I wish the country got equally angry about more important things such as the tearing down of SureStart and our NHS.
This user liked this post: agreenwood

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3476 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon May 12, 2025 4:05 pm

LDNBFC87 wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 3:48 pm
I wish the country got equally angry about more important things such as the tearing down of SureStart and our NHS.
Many people do, but they aren't comparable.
Tearing down our institutions is a political act, that can be rectified by replacing the incumbent government for a more enlightened one. The felling of the Sycamore tree was apathetic act of wanton violence, to serve no other purpose than to 'have a laugh'. It can't be repaired for at least 60 years. a whole generation deprived of its beauty.
Those who understand don't need an explanation, those who don't will never get it. Their lives are the shallower for it.
These 2 users liked this post: durhamclaret aclaretinstevenage

NewClaret
Posts: 17683
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by NewClaret » Mon May 12, 2025 6:04 pm

RicardoMontalban wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 1:34 pm
There’s that winky face again that BVK alluded to...
;)

Dressinggown
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 113 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Dressinggown » Mon May 12, 2025 9:41 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Mon May 12, 2025 4:05 pm
Many people do, but they aren't comparable.
Tearing down our institutions is a political act, that can be rectified by replacing the incumbent government for a more enlightened one. The felling of the Sycamore tree was apathetic act of wanton violence, to serve no other purpose than to 'have a laugh'. It can't be repaired for at least 60 years. a whole generation deprived of its beauty.
Those who understand don't need an explanation, those who don't will never get it. Their lives are the shallower for it.
I get it but see lives being destroyed on my doorstep. Being 'shallow' is not a consideration.

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 8320
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2471 times
Has Liked: 3530 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Tue May 13, 2025 2:15 pm

My prediction is 8 years each total.

KRBFC
Posts: 19183
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 4003 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by KRBFC » Tue May 13, 2025 3:01 pm

durhamclaret wrote:
Fri May 09, 2025 2:14 pm
I give up, people who think it’s just a tree have no morals in this world
Trees have feelings too

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by fidelcastro » Tue May 13, 2025 3:05 pm

Isn't it weird how some people are only angry when it's statues of racists that are pulled down or damaged?

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3476 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue May 13, 2025 4:23 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue May 13, 2025 3:05 pm
Isn't it weird how some people are only angry when it's statues of racists that are pulled down or damaged?
He was a philanthropist and a man of his time. Of course what happened in slavery is deplorable, and undefendable, but if he was alive today, he would probably be as abhorred by slavery as we are, but still a philanthropist.
If Mozart or Beethoven were alive today, they wouldn't be writing Eine Kleine Nacht Musik. They be playing electric guitars. Just as if many of todays entrepreneurs were born in the 1700's, they'd probably be involved with the slave trade.
I find it really strange and sad that we judge people from latter years by todays standards. Far better to just use history as a lesson for the future.
This user liked this post: aclaretinstevenage

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by fidelcastro » Tue May 13, 2025 4:42 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Tue May 13, 2025 4:23 pm
He was a philanthropist and a man of his time. Of course what happened in slavery is deplorable, and undefendable, but if he was alive today, he would probably be as abhorred by slavery as we are, but still a philanthropist.
If Mozart or Beethoven were alive today, they wouldn't be writing Eine Kleine Nacht Musik. They be playing electric guitars. Just as if many of todays entrepreneurs were born in the 1700's, they'd probably be involved with the slave trade.
I find it really strange and sad that we judge people from latter years by todays standards. Far better to just use history as a lesson for the future.
If we're a progressive country, then statues of the likes of him need pulling down.

Well done the jury in both cases!!

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3476 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue May 13, 2025 5:18 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue May 13, 2025 4:42 pm
If we're a progressive country, then statues of the likes of him need pulling down.

Well done the jury in both cases!!
In your opinion.

kentonclaret
Posts: 8026
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1204 times
Has Liked: 249 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by kentonclaret » Tue May 13, 2025 6:06 pm

Having read through the posts a lot of people seem to be at loggerheads over the sentencing :lol:

lakedistrictclaret
Posts: 1704
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
Been Liked: 600 times
Has Liked: 211 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by lakedistrictclaret » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:38 pm

Four years and three months apiece.

CyrilEbokiPoh
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri May 30, 2025 11:13 am
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 38 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by CyrilEbokiPoh » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:39 pm

Wow. Obviously a shocking act. But they are really heavy sentences. People literally get less for taking a life or other serious violent crimes.

burnley007
Posts: 4338
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 999 times
Has Liked: 809 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by burnley007 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:41 pm

CyrilEbokiPoh wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:39 pm
Wow. Obviously a shocking act. But they are really heavy sentences. People literally get less for taking a life or other serious violent crimes.
I've known people get 3 years or even less for manslaughter, that is heavy.

Bet it's quietly reduced on appeal.

Casper2
Posts: 2364
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 474 times
Has Liked: 153 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Casper2 » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:45 pm

burnley007 wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:41 pm
I've known people get 3 years or even less for manslaughter, that is heavy.

Bet it's quietly reduced on appeal.
Quietly reduced, what does that mean ?

agreenwood
Posts: 4619
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by agreenwood » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:46 pm

CyrilEbokiPoh wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:39 pm
Wow. Obviously a shocking act. But they are really heavy sentences. People literally get less for taking a life or other serious violent crimes.
In my line of work I’ve certainly seen individuals convicted of GBH and Sexual Assault receive shorter stints.

That said, they’ll only serve 40% of it under the rules brought in last year.

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2396
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1070 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by Clovius Boofus » Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:49 pm

I reckoned on 5 years. Anyway, they were always going to get a sentence that would discourage other like-minded dickheads.

If they had been given a none-custodial sentence, we'd quickly have other mindless idiots cutting down iconic trees and posting videos on social media in order to revel in their notoriety.

dougcollins
Posts: 9383
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2437 times
Has Liked: 2411 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by dougcollins » Tue Jul 15, 2025 9:10 pm

I've no idea what defence was used, but we - by law - must remove and destroy alien species, for example:

Grey Squirrels
Signal Crayfish
Japanese Knotweed

The Sycamore is an alien species.

CyrilEbokiPoh
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri May 30, 2025 11:13 am
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 38 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by CyrilEbokiPoh » Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:28 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 9:10 pm
I've no idea what defence was used, but we - by law - must remove and destroy alien species, for example:

Grey Squirrels
Signal Crayfish
Japanese Knotweed

The Sycamore is an alien species.
I remember when I first heard about Japanese knotweed. Evil Stuff! :o

CyrilEbokiPoh
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri May 30, 2025 11:13 am
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 38 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by CyrilEbokiPoh » Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:28 pm

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:49 pm
I reckoned on 5 years. Anyway, they were always going to get a sentence that would discourage other like-minded dickheads.

If they had been given a none-custodial sentence, we'd quickly have other mindless idiots cutting down iconic trees and posting videos on social media in order to revel in their notoriety.
You raise a valid point. And I kind of agree. And perhaps it's the soft nature of other crimes punishment that is the problem. But over 4 years seems very excessive!
This user liked this post: Leisure

bumba
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 950 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by bumba » Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:02 am

Clovius Boofus wrote:
Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:49 pm
I reckoned on 5 years. Anyway, they were always going to get a sentence that would discourage other like-minded dickheads.

If they had been given a none-custodial sentence, we'd quickly have other mindless idiots cutting down iconic trees and posting videos on social media in order to revel in their notoriety.
Why didn't Huw Edwards get a prison sentence then to discourage more mindless peadophiles??

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3083
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 241 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by GetIntoEm » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:12 am

It's a crazy sentence. Paedos get less, sometimes suspended sentences. Those Manchester airport subhumans will get a similar sentence to this. Doesn't make sense.

They deserve punishing as they were guilty, but to me this seems disproportionate

RicardoMontalban
Posts: 791
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 380 times

Re: Sycamore Gap verdict

Post by RicardoMontalban » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:47 am

I think there’s a couple of things going on with the sentence that probably puts it at the higher end of the tariff.

Firstly the offence, it’s not just criminal damage. It’s criminal damage to a prominent landmark that was chosen precisely for this reason. And then there’s the additional damage to UNESCO site of Hadrian’s Wall.

Then there’s the contrition and admission of guilt, or lack of. Following the trial there doesn’t seem to be have any moment at which they’ve held their hands up, admitted they did it etc. Despite evidence that has put them fairly bang to rights, they’ve denied it, tried to throw the other under the bus, and generally avoid any responsibility or explanation for the offence. That too is taken into account.

As mentioned above they’ll serve less than half inside anyway, the rest in license, and I think one of them has spent time on remand which will probably count as time served. I’m generally of the view the prison system is falling over and needs a massive rethink, but you can absolutely see how they’ve ended up with the sentences they got.
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret

Post Reply