Home KIt 2025/26

[bobinho]

Looks better with the sponsor on.

[Firthy]

I think it would look better if the crest on the badge was light blue. Would tie in with rest of the shirt. Not a fan of the monochrome badge. Otherwise its OK.

[gandhisflipflop]

I don’t like it. Those hideous monochrome badges or messing with the badge colour isn’t right.

I’m not paying 60 quid to wear a blue and white sponsor.

[dsr]

Looks better with the sponsor on.

I don't think anything would look better with a logo of a company so dodgy it isn't even allowed to trade here.

[RammyClaret61]

I like it. Not the 96 of course.

[wadeswondergoal]

I don’t like it. Those hideous monochrome badges or messing with the badge colour isn’t right.

I’m not paying 60 quid to wear a blue and white sponsor.

The same tone of blue and white that are on the shorts, trim of the shirt and on the socks?

[martin_p]

I don’t like it. Those hideous monochrome badges or messing with the badge colour isn’t right.

I’m not paying 60 quid to wear a blue and white sponsor.

It’s a gallant effort (all three of them) but I don’t think you’re going to get anyone to bite on the sponsor.

[wilks_bfc]

Apologies if this has been mentioned previously but can you purchase a shirt without the sponsor?

[CrosspoolClarets]

A 7/10 from me - not too garish to wear away from matches and quite clean.

But I still refuse to buy a shirt with a betting sponsor on it given the lives that industry ruins, particularly online. Would I buy the sponsorless? Maybe.

Having grown up on Pendle Hill I love the Nick O Pendle location they chose around the corner from the old ski slope. Looks like that rocky dip near where cars always park at the top.

[Tricky Trevor]

Purple. Won’t be buying another shirt again until it’s claret.
Are the club trying to push this colour until it becomes the accepted norm?

Get thisen to Specsavers lad. This is purple.

IMG_4936.jpeg (242.93 KiB) Viewed 2274 times

[Fez]

I think it looks well without that hideous sponsor!

[martin_p]

Get thisen to Specsavers lad. This is purple.
IMG_4936.jpeg

Although to be fair he thought rain was purple so what does he know about colour!

[fidelcastro]

Although to be fair he thought rain was purple so what does he know about colour!

I always thought he was more of a purple helmet, to be honest!

[gandhisflipflop]

It’s a gallant effort (all three of them) but I don’t think you’re going to get anyone to bite on the sponsor.

Not after anyone biting. I’m not a fan, I don’t like the blue and white halved sponsor, and to me a Burnley shirt should have blue sleeves, and the correct badge. So based on that, I’ll save 60 quid.

[Ric_C]

Reminds me a little bit of the 2015-16 Oak furnitureland shirt

And the 2007-08 Hollands Pie's one

As for the kit, it looks ok, bit bland, but glad the sponsor isn't gold anymore

[Cornwallclaret]

It’s a decent kit with a nice retro feel and anyone surprised at the price must have been living under a roach for the past few years. Surprising how exercised some people get about this stuff….feels like they just love a moan.

Completely agree.. I quite like it, will I buy it? Maybe, maybe not till I see it in the flesh but people moaning about it, colour, sleeves not blue, sponsor colour blah blah blah is moaning for the sake of it. If you don’t like it don’t buy it.. simples.. I don’t support the shirt configuration I support the team/ club… one things for sure it’s unique to Burnley and it doesn’t look like a villa or hammers shirt

[martin_p]

I think it looks well without that hideous sponsor!

Putting aside the discussion on the rights and wrongs of a betting sponsor I think the way the sponsor logo looks on the kit is the best for years. No clashing colours and a simple logo.

[NewClaret]

Putting aside the discussion on the rights and wrongs of a betting sponsor I think the way the sponsor logo looks on the kit is the best for years. No clashing colours and a simple logo.

Absolutely agree.

I am one that would never buy a sponsorless kit. To me they just look unfinished and too plain/boring.

I would not buy a kit at all if I had a major issue with the sponsor firm or I thought the look of the sponsor ruined it (like a big red “spud bros” sponsor on a white and blue kit).

The colours of this logo look great though in my view, so setting aside the gambling aspect, it looks brilliant.

Just my opinion, but I think we’ll see far more purchased with the sponsor this time than we did last season.

[NewClaret]

Completely agree.. I quite like it, will I buy it? Maybe, maybe not till I see it in the flesh but people moaning about it, colour, sleeves not blue, sponsor colour blah blah blah is moaning for the sake of it. If you don’t like it don’t buy it.. simples.. I don’t support the shirt configuration I support the team/ club… one things for sure it’s unique to Burnley and it doesn’t look like a villa or hammers shirt

Agree with your point, very original and will look unique to us.

I imagine most of the fans proclaiming that they won’t buy it would not have bought it regardless of the design, but irrespective shirt designs will always be personal tastes and some will like it and buy it and others won’t. No big deal, it’s the same every season.

[NewClaret]

Plus they’ve managed to get them out well before summer holiday season. This must be the earliest kit release in years.

Good point, hadn’t thought of that. Got their act together this year.

[Big Vinny K]

Like the collar and simplicity of the design. As always better to see it in the flesh first especially with the way we have changed the colour of the shirt recently.

The sponsor is what it is - not sure many people “like” it as such. It’s just become a necessary evil which clubs like Burnley cannot real afford to take a stand on individually. Even if there was some collective decision to ban betting companies (which I would support) a club like Burnley would lose out relatively as we have so little other non match day or tv income compared to most other clubs so we fall even further behind financially.

As for the backdrop on the shirts personally I’m not sure what all this adds to it. I get the whole concept, design brief, etc process but that does not mean I think it is needed.

Still think that we are missing a trick every season with the new shirts. There seems so little difference from season to season and there’s no real attempt to design something bold or iconic. Trying to recreate the V shirt for example or even the Man City / Palace diagonal stripe across the shirt for example. Even some of the football shirts that fans thought were horrendous at the time end up being iconic and at the very least remembered. Not sure this seasons shirt is going to be one of those.

[burnmark]

The blue and white sponsor bit worried me a little but it’s not as if it’s royal blue or that we’ve never had white and blue away kits. There will be people moaning about it who on the other hand will going mad for the retro white and blue adidas away kit on sale at the club shop.

[Falcon]

My first impression is that I like it, quite a lot actually.

Definitely would be buying sponsorless if I get one.

[CyrilEbokiPoh]

Still think that we are missing a trick every season with the new shirts. There seems so little difference from season to season and there’s no real attempt to design something bold or iconic. Trying to recreate the V shirt for example or even the Man City / Palace diagonal stripe across the shirt for example. Even some of the football shirts that fans thought were horrendous at the time end up being iconic and at the very least remembered. Not sure this seasons shirt is going to be one of those.

I disagree. Think the whole kit is different. We also had the classic football shirts top which was great. And some fairly unique away shirts in recent times.

Last two home kits have been forgettable. But this and the classic one were great.

[123EasyasBFC]

I don’t like it. Those hideous monochrome badges or messing with the badge colour isn’t right.

I’m not paying 60 quid to wear a blue and white sponsor.

You don’t have to pay £60 to wear a blue and white sponsor, you can spent £60 and get one without a sponsor

[bobinho]

Starbucks better?

My point is the unsponsored shirt looks a bit “meh”. It looks like a burgundy t shirt with a bit of blue trim. Swap out the silly monochrome badge for the colour one and it may improve it, but I think anything that draws the eye would help.

[ClaretTony]

The blue and white sponsor bit worried me a little but it’s not as if it’s royal blue or that we’ve never had white and blue away kits. There will be people moaning about it who on the other hand will going mad for the retro white and blue adidas away kit on sale at the club shop.

Have to confess I didn't even pick up on the colour of the sponsor in terms of relating it to them down the road.

[martin_p]

Have to confess I didn't even pick up on the colour of the sponsor in terms of relating it to them down the road.

I’m not sure why anyone would to be honest, blue and white have been part of our kit for over 100 years. It’s not even the same sort of blue.

[ClaretTony]

I’m not sure why anyone would to be honest, blue and white have been part of our kit for over 100 years. It’s not even the same sort of blue.

Strange now that a shirt without a sponsor looks strange yet there were complaints when clubs started sticking them on back in the 1980s.

[CyrilEbokiPoh]

I’m not sure why anyone would to be honest, blue and white have been part of our kit for over 100 years. It’s not even the same sort of blue.

It’s the first thing I thought when I saw it.

Luckily it’s 96 not 95.

96 being the season that Batty and Le Saux had a scrap on the pitch and 96 being the year they lost shearer.

[Longsider]

I think it is a great kit. Having spent many happy memories walking with my dad around Pendle I love the contoured concept.
UTC

[The Shire Claret]

I think it’s absolutely banging

Can’t believe anyone has tried to link the colours of the sponsor to another club

It’s absolutely the best colour to blend it and nothing remotely similar to the tone of said club

Ridiculous reaching there

[Dark Cloud]

Photo looks like the Nick of Pendle to me tbf.

[gandhisflipflop]

You don’t have to pay £60 to wear a blue and white sponsor, you can spent £60 and get one without a sponsor

Yeah I hadn’t realised that there would be a sponsorless version.

[deanothedino]

Purple. Won’t be buying another shirt again until it’s claret.
Are the club trying to push this colour until it becomes the accepted norm?

It’s claret, it’s the same colour we’ve used for 20+ years on all printed materials

[The Hung Juror]

Strange now that a shirt without a sponsor looks strange yet there were complaints when clubs started sticking them on back in the 1980s.

You’re right it is. A shirt without a sponsor now looks a bit too drab imo, and more like a trading top.

[ClaretTony]

You’re right it is. A shirt without a sponsor now looks a bit too drab imo, and more like a trading top.

We’ve got so used to it although Chelsea played last season without a sponsor and Forest the season before.

[wadeswondergoal]

You’re right it is. A shirt without a sponsor now looks a bit too drab imo, and more like a trading top.

Hope your cold clears up soon.

[bumba]

The infant kit went up to ages 7-8 last season but only to 6-7 as my lad moves up to size 7-8

I'd try the 6-7 before buying, last year the 7-8 infant kit was actually bigger than the junior 8-9

[Inchy]

I’m going to get my east lancs OS map out and see if those lines on the shirt match anything in the local area

my guess is they won’t. Will just be random

[hoskinsgoalatswansea]

It’s claret, it’s the same colour we’ve used for 20+ years on all printed materials

[Tricky Trevor]

Tried to get the shirt online. £15 delivery to Ireland so I was going to have it delivered to the eldest. Changed delivery address to UK mainland but it then took me to pay(paypal or google pay), I prefer credit card. As I hadn’t had the opportunity to enter her address I left it. Our kid will get me one on his account.
I know it will be me that’s screwed up but just a heads up for others.

[ŽižkovClaret]

Tried to get the shirt online. £15 delivery to Ireland so I was going to have it delivered to the eldest. Changed delivery address to UK mainland but it then took me to pay(paypal or google pay), I prefer credit card. As I hadn’t had the opportunity to enter her address I left it. Our kid will get me one on his account.
I know it will be me that’s screwed up but just a heads up for others.

You can pay by CC via Google Pay easy enough.....

[deanothedino]

The power of light.

The new monstrosity of a monochrome badge is the correct colour, pretty much the only thing that is right about it though.

[ollieclarets8]

Purple. Won’t be buying another shirt again until it’s claret.
Are the club trying to push this colour until it becomes the accepted norm?

Purple is the royal colour so the King will like it.

[rob63]

Get thisen to Specsavers lad. This is purple.
IMG_4936.jpeg

Claret rain, claret rain..........

[exilecanada]

Nice classy design, without the sponsor it'll pass as a regular everyday summer tee shirt.

[burnmark]

Just bought a couple for the kids. I can confirm, if it hasn’t already above, that it is Purple Potion and Tropical Breeze again. The photos online do look darker than the actual thing.

[Pickles]

If you ignore the fact it's the wrong colour, has the wrong badge and has the blue and white half and half logo of an illegal betting company on the front... then yeah, it's okay.

[Tribesmen]

Yer very plain but don't like castore anyway .