Gaston Ramirez
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:19 pm
- Been Liked: 13 times
Gaston Ramirez
Middleborough looking to sell there best player to Leicester.Good news for us
-
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12664 times
- Has Liked: 6308 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Gaston Ramirez
wow that's insane if correct, how many players do they have at Karwankaville ? 187 ?
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Gaston Ramirez
I don't think he's been their best player has he?
I think he's a bit lightweight for the PL, possibly a luxury player that Boro can't afford to carry right now.
I think he's a bit lightweight for the PL, possibly a luxury player that Boro can't afford to carry right now.
Re: Gaston Ramirez
In the last 12 months he has been there best player from what I have seen - with the possible exception of Ben Gibson at the back who is an excellent player and right up there with Keane in terms of future England team / prospect.Sidney1st wrote:I don't think he's been their best player has he?
I think he's a bit lightweight for the PL, possibly a luxury player that Boro can't afford to carry right now.
In all the recent Boro v Burnley games Ramirez has been very good - he struggled at Southampton after a £16m transfer but lost weight and got a lot fitter at Boro - he is a quality player. Moving to Leicester and Ranieri might be a bit of a risk for him though as he could easily end up the lazy / overweight player he was at Southampton.
Good news for us though if Leicester are after him as it might give us a better chance with Brady. Ramirez will be at least £15m depending on his contract situation
-
- Posts: 10650
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5416 times
- Has Liked: 1034 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Adam Foreshaw for me, who incidentally, ran the game for Boro on the Turf.
-
- Posts: 6413
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Agreed. We should have signed Forshaw 2 years ago when Boro did.jdrobbo wrote:Adam Foreshaw for me, who incidentally, ran the game for Boro on the Turf.
As for Ramirez, he's been their only creative outlet, so this would be odd. But he is inconsistent.
On the plus side, would presumably end Leicester's interest in Brady.
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Really? May have been one of their better players but "ran the show"jdrobbo wrote:Adam Foreshaw for me, who incidentally, ran the game for Boro on the Turf.
Thought boro were a much better organised side when we played them 9 months ago at the Turf.
-
- Posts: 6413
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Gaston Ramirez
He was their orchestrator and best player on the day, thats what JDR meant i think. He did take control of the gsme for half an hour in the second half although i see what you are saying.
-
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1946 times
- Has Liked: 2891 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Gaston Ramirez
[quote="Tinribs"]Really? May have been one of their better players but "ran the show"
The only place he 'ran the show' was in his own half where he was very comfortable. A ' water carrier', I believe, is the modern day description.
The only place he 'ran the show' was in his own half where he was very comfortable. A ' water carrier', I believe, is the modern day description.
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Ramirez is their Defour. They are struggling for creativity already. Losing him would be a massive blow for them
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Who needs creativity we don't.
Re: Gaston Ramirez
Forshaw wasn't even a regular in the Boro side, not sure why you rate him so highly. Clayton is far better than Forshaw.claretspice wrote:He was their orchestrator and best player on the day, thats what JDR meant i think. He did take control of the gsme for half an hour in the second half although i see what you are saying.