The case for classic journalism

[CharlieinNewMexico]

Burnley v Chelsea

Good, old school, well written synopsis of a game.

Lovely.

Few write like this anymore...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/201 ... ive-score/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[CrispyClaret]

The whole link is good reading, very level headed posts throughout the blog. Danny Bakers owl brought a chuckle

[minnieclaret]

Excellent piece. Loved the touches map. Shows how advanced Lowton And Ward played.

[RammyClaret61]

The graphic for Brady's goal is completely wrong. It was never that straight!!

[cricketfieldclarets]

It wasnt barton whofailed to stop moses either

[martin_p]

It wasnt barton whofailed to stop moses either

Torygraph lies again!

[FactualFrank]

Good article. It reminded me of something Conte said - that they deserved to win the game.

I'm not really sure how a team who has just 2 chances on goal over the whole match, and not one of them after 6-7 minutes, deserves 3 points.

[Goody1975]

"It was turning into a fine physical, energetic and committed encounter. Chelsea, who have not lost here since August 1973"

Well except for April 1983.

[Sheffield Claret]

"It was turning into a fine physical, energetic and committed encounter. Chelsea, who have not lost here since August 1973"

Well except for April 1983.

And April 1977 through the Ginger Pele - though neither "in the top flight" which is what the article should have said!

[Goody1975]

There is no football outside the top flight.

[NRC]

in the world of 140 characters, that article deserves 5 - WRONG

[ClaretTony]

So many errors in that article