This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Rileybobs
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Post
by Rileybobs » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:16 pm
KRBFC wrote:Yeah you're right we had 2 attackers, 8 defenders and a keeper.
No we didn't, why do you make things up that are clearly untrue? We get it, you don't like Dyche's style of play - but when you come out and say ridiculous things like us parking the bus or playing with 8 defenders how can you expect people to take you seriously? You come across as a spoiled child.
We didn't play great but we attacked Middlesbrough as much as they attacked us. We had the best chance of the game and hit the bar. We set up just fine with our best available 11 players in our most successful formation. We went to win the game but were unable, and with 10 minutes to go, in our respective league positions, it wasn't worth risking an important point to try and get the 3.
These 2 users liked this post: PaintYorkClaretnBlue Quicknick
-
KRBFC
- Posts: 19078
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 3973 times
- Has Liked: 1078 times
Post
by KRBFC » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:44 pm
Rileybobs wrote:No we didn't, why do you make things up that are clearly untrue? We get it, you don't like Dyche's style of play - but when you come out and say ridiculous things like us parking the bus or playing with 8 defenders how can you expect people to take you seriously? You come across as a spoiled child.
We didn't play great but we attacked Middlesbrough as much as they attacked us. We had the best chance of the game and hit the bar. We set up just fine with our best available 11 players in our most successful formation. We went to win the game but were unable, and with 10 minutes to go, in our respective league positions, it wasn't worth risking an important point to try and get the 3.
Agreed.
"hit the bar" sounds promising when you put it like that but that doesn't tell the real story does it? Valdez knew it was never going in so let it clip the bar and go out for a goal kick.
-
Rileybobs
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Post
by Rileybobs » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:47 pm
KRBFC wrote:Agreed.
"hit the bar" sounds promising when you put it like that but that doesn't tell the real story does it? Valdez knew it was never going in so let it clip the bar and go out for a goal kick.
It doesn't need that much context, unless you're trying really hard to make it appear like it wasn't close to being a goal, which it was.
-
KRBFC
- Posts: 19078
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 3973 times
- Has Liked: 1078 times
Post
by KRBFC » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:53 pm
Rileybobs wrote:It doesn't need that much context, unless you're trying really hard to make it appear like it wasn't close to being a goal, which it was.
It wasn't though.... the keeper knew it wasn't going in.
-
Chester Perry
- Posts: 20133
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3296 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Post
by Chester Perry » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:08 pm
KRBFC is right in saying Valdes had the fk covered all the way and left it so he could get a gk
-
IanMcL
- Posts: 34403
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 10238 times
Post
by IanMcL » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:14 pm
Never going to be a goal, even if it was under the bar. Valdes was there.