Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40389894" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
How do you work that out?
Their highest transfer was previously £1.8m
Their highest transfer was previously £1.8m
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Really helped Boro getting the cash spent early.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Best of luck to Huddersfield I hope they stay up,but not at our expense,it will be tough for them but they look like they mean business,Wagner seems a good manager,would have liked him here if Dyche had of gone to Palace.
This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 3646
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
- Been Liked: 1236 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: The Moon, Outer Space.
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
They bought Mooy for £10 million last week.
-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Theoretically they have agreed to sign Mooy for £10 million and as they have broken their record for Depoitre so it could read as it's more than £10 million. It could also read that they paid £1.9 million for the Belgian. Depends if they're including Mooy's figure in with it. It's not very clear.marvbfc wrote:How do you work that out?
Their highest transfer was previously £1.8m
-
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1877 times
- Has Liked: 2238 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Getting foreign players to gel in the Premier league is not easy as Man U found with many of their expensive acquisitions Will Hudderafield get to keep all the Germans they loaned or is there not a cap on the number of loanees.
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Mooy hasn't signed up yet, so at present their record was that one for under £2 million.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
There suppose to be signing izzy brown from chelsea for around 8 million mark . They seem to be getting there deals done nice and earlyWoodleyclaret wrote:Getting foreign players to gel in the Premier league is not easy as Man U found with many of their expensive acquisitions Will Hudderafield get to keep all the Germans they loaned or is there not a cap on the number of loanees.
-
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 489 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
I mean it's quite easy to signed players you loaned the previous season and we no longer wanted by the club. We even did it with Kightly.
-
- Posts: 77753
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38050 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
They didn't - yesterday's signing was their first this summer and the Depoitre signing is absolutely nowhere near £10 million.MrTopTier wrote:They bought Mooy for £10 million last week.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
This is true and the lesson here is to find good loan signings who improve the team and who we can look to sign ala Keane rather than signing dross on loan like Bamford and FlanaganKefkaClaret wrote:I mean it's quite easy to signed players you loaned the previous season and we no longer wanted by the club. We even did it with Kightly.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
I think if they spend £18 million of their budget on Aaron Mooy and Izzy Brown they are going to struggle.
This user liked this post: Goobs
-
- Posts: 7718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4296 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
To be fair, I think the majority expected that Flanagan would be a very good loan signing, and might even have wondered whether we would in fact be able to sign him, at the end of his loan period.Devils_Advocate wrote:This is true and the lesson here is to find good loan signings who improve the team and who we can look to sign ala Keane rather than signing dross on loan like Bamford and Flanagan
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Thats a fair point as I have to admit I expected a lot more when he signed plus Lowton came on leaps and bounds and Ward had a great seasonnil_desperandum wrote:To be fair, I think the majority expected that Flanagan would be a very good loan signing, and might even have wondered whether we would in fact be able to sign him, at the end of his loan period.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Mail says £3.5 million.
Seven league appearances for Porto last season and then sold. What does that mean. 6' 3" tall.
Seven league appearances for Porto last season and then sold. What does that mean. 6' 3" tall.
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Living over Huddersfield way these days, and their fans are very mixed on transfers and being able to stop up.
Some of the the lads who know i am a Burnley fan, asked "what do you think of our chances of staying up? ". My reply was its very hard coming up via the play offs, and you need around 6-8 players lol.
Didn't go down to well, as explained there is a world of difference between the Championship and Prem, and how we struggled previously.
One hudds fan thinks they will never be in the bottom 3 and will finish way above us and even West Brom and Stoke. lol.. I told him to go back outside and finish smoking the Jamaican woodbines
Some of the the lads who know i am a Burnley fan, asked "what do you think of our chances of staying up? ". My reply was its very hard coming up via the play offs, and you need around 6-8 players lol.
Didn't go down to well, as explained there is a world of difference between the Championship and Prem, and how we struggled previously.
One hudds fan thinks they will never be in the bottom 3 and will finish way above us and even West Brom and Stoke. lol.. I told him to go back outside and finish smoking the Jamaican woodbines

This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
To be fair they are still a bit giddy on the back of the playoffs. Plus they've seen the fixtures and thought their start is pretty favourable. But as you say, they've not really factored in that their most winnable game is to beat a side at home that finished 13 points above then and bounced them 3-1 at home. That said, they've got the right to be hopeful they can stay up. But with a poor defence and not scoring a great deal (negative goal difference) - they conceded 23 and scored a pitiful 13 in the last 16 games (inc playoffs), winning only twice, it's a long hard season ahead.MK-Claret wrote:Living over Huddersfield way these days, and their fans are very mixed on transfers and being able to stop up.
Some of the the lads who know i am a Burnley fan, asked "what do you think of our chances of staying up? ". My reply was its very hard coming up via the play offs, and you need around 6-8 players lol.
Didn't go down to well, as explained there is a world of difference between the Championship and Prem, and how we struggled previously.
One hudds fan thinks they will never be in the bottom 3 and will finish way above us and even West Brom and Stoke. lol.. I told him to go back outside and finish smoking the Jamaican woodbines
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
So that means it's a bad thing then ?bfcjg wrote:Really helped Boro getting the cash spent early.
Unbelievable the mentality on here .
-
- Posts: 77753
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38050 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Spending the money on the right players is the most important, not how early you spend it.
This user liked this post: tiger76
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
As we found out in our last three matches, unless your defence is up to scratch you'll get punished for every mistake. Huddersfield won't have the players to get enough clean sheets to keep them safe unless the have enough quality upfront which doesn't seem likely at the moment.BabylonClaret wrote:To be fair they are still a bit giddy on the back of the playoffs. Plus they've seen the fixtures and thought their start is pretty favourable. But as you say, they've not really factored in that their most winnable game is to beat a side at home that finished 13 points above then and bounced them 3-1 at home. That said, they've got the right to be hopeful they can stay up. But with a poor defence and not scoring a great deal (negative goal difference) - they conceded 23 and scored a pitiful 13 in the last 16 games (inc playoffs), winning only twice, it's a long hard season ahead.
-
- Posts: 7718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4296 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
That is correct, although I think it is reasonable to say, that we might have got 6 points against Swansea and Hull at home last season, if we had made signings earlier and had a more settled team as we went into the season, rather than players arriving on deadline day.ClaretTony wrote:Spending the money on the right players is the most important, not how early you spend it.
It's true that Defour played and scored against Hull, and Hendrick came on as sub to replace him after he scored, but they had only just arrived and our performance that day was in fact v poor. (We only had 2 shots on target against a team that we really should have been expecting to beat at home).
If we had taken those additional 5 points in those 2 fixtures, we would have bee safe weeks before survival was confirmed. (They were both genuine 6 pointers in the relegation battle).
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Defense is critical. We have a good one, and if Ben Mee wasn't English we would probably have four of our back five as current internationals. 'Boro also had a good defense, it was their attack that let them down. Huddersfield will learn the nature of this.
-
- Posts: 34898
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12712 times
- Has Liked: 6320 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
and if you've watched the Confed Cup then Aaron Moy has looked rubbish. Never got a kick in the first game against Germany reserves and was just as bad against Cameroon. I wouldn't pay 10 million for him despite him being decent in the Championship
-
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3477 times
- Has Liked: 5722 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
We never lost to any of the bottom 4. It's vital that you get something out of that mini league at the bottom. Points against the rest are a bonus.
Boro's problem was losing the team ethos that got them up, even if it was on fragile ground all the previous season.
Huddersfields best chance, which is still very slim, is to tweak the team that got them up, hold onto their players when they go down, and bounce back stronger.
Just like we did in fact.
Boro's problem was losing the team ethos that got them up, even if it was on fragile ground all the previous season.
Huddersfields best chance, which is still very slim, is to tweak the team that got them up, hold onto their players when they go down, and bounce back stronger.
Just like we did in fact.
-
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 825 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's players.
-
- Posts: 7718
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4296 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
We did actually - though not to the bottom 3.Colburn_Claret wrote:We never lost to any of the bottom 4. It's vital that you get something out of that mini league at the bottom. Points against the rest are a bonus.
.
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
To be fair, if they are spending £18m on Brown and Mooy they've effectively spent £18m to stand still.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
And to not have spent it theyd have gone backwards.
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
l don't think they'll get out of the bottom two all season.
-
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3477 times
- Has Liked: 5722 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Hudds already spent over £20 million on new signings
My mistake, I thought Palace had finished above Swansea.nil_desperandum wrote:We did actually - though not to the bottom 3.