Bid rejected for chris wood

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Blyclaret
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:26 am

We play to our strengths.
Fancy dans is not what we are about.
Support spurs,manure ..city if that's what u want

mikeS
Posts: 2071
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:21 am
Been Liked: 719 times
Has Liked: 27 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by mikeS » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:34 am

Sounds like Wood will soon be a Claret. Well done all

Goalposts
Posts: 3096
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 155 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Goalposts » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:44 am

Quicknick wrote:Deeney or Austin at Leeds?! :lol:

Lol Austin on 65k a week and deeney on 68k,Leeds think they can land those when they were paying woods 15k a week ,
This user liked this post: Quicknick

Inchy
Posts: 3141
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1547 times
Has Liked: 107 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Inchy » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:48 am

When was the last time Dyche signed someone for big money that ended up being crap?


I trust Dyche
This user liked this post: Mansfield-Claret

Hapag Lloyd
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
Been Liked: 318 times
Has Liked: 469 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Hapag Lloyd » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:03 am

John Johnson 1605 wrote:The problems are that we have signed a relatively limited footballer for an awful lot of money. I doubt he'll add anything more than Vokes can do and it suggests our forward line will be based on balls into the box rather than artistry. It is an uninspiring signing and poses further questions of our scouting/recruitment team.
We sold a more limited footballer for even more money.

scrambledclaret
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:14 pm
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 156 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by scrambledclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:03 am

Watching the youtube video of his goals last year I was surprised by the relatively low numbers of headers and the large proportion of "poacher" type goals around the six yard box. He certainly seems to have had a knack of finding a yard of space in the championship, hopefully he can make the step up.

Blyclaret
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:06 am

Agreed watched them too
Always seemed to be Johnny on the spot in right place
Sign of a good striker

DCWat
Posts: 9975
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4501 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by DCWat » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:07 am

Not what I'd have chosen but he's a goal scorer, a decent age and seems to be improving year on year. Quicker than Vokes from I've seen.

There must be another forward / winger coming in and a defender.

Jeremy_Bentham
Posts: 415
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:40 pm
Been Liked: 194 times
Has Liked: 78 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Jeremy_Bentham » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:08 am

Inchy wrote:When was the last time Dyche signed someone for big money that ended up being crap?


I trust Dyche
. is yet to be convinced by Brady.

DCWat
Posts: 9975
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4501 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by DCWat » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:09 am

Brady will be better this season, I'm sure of it.

box_of_frogs
Posts: 5083
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 1018 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by box_of_frogs » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:09 am

Has he had a medical yet?

warksclaret
Posts: 8771
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2332 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by warksclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:23 am

Great perseverance and good business. This guy is a natural goal scorer and not someone most defences will like to play against. I think his control and finishing in the box , with service from Brady, Ward and Lowton will prove him to be a good buy

I suggested we bought him when he went to Leeds for peanuts but was rubbished on here. I watch Leicester quite a lot as my family are season ticket holders and they had a big range of strikers so he rarely featured. His goal v us when we and LCFC got promoted was awesome

Well done Burnley
This user liked this post: billyhamilton82

South West Claret.
Posts: 5904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 511 times
Location: Devon

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by South West Claret. » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:44 am

mikeS wrote:Sounds like Wood will soon be a Claret. Well done all
Why?

ClaretAL
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1163 times
Has Liked: 982 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by ClaretAL » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:45 am

Interesting to see most posters think that this season creativity and balls in to the box will suddenly arrive despite the same outlets we have in the team as last yearm and the commone theme seemed to be lack of creativity. That said I thought the 5 man midfield we had out last week created more chances by allowing the the full backs to push up more, who would have thought it against Chelsea. I think Wood is a great signing as was Taylor but will like Taylor will he get in the team in a 4 5 1 with Ward and Vokes playing so well?

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 947 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:47 am

Happy enough with this signing if it is indeed around £15mil though I suspect any add-ons will take it to nearer £20mil. His goalscoring record last season is not to be sniffed at. However, I seriously hope we are still looking at Andone or Long to further add to our attacking options. If we finish the transfer window having brought in Wood, Andone (or Long) and a CB such as Shawcross, I'll be very pleased.

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 489 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by KefkaClaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:56 am

Honestly this is worth it just so see Leeds' fans reaction. My favourite so far is that he is moving for the money.

Quicknick
Posts: 6792
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 9644 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Quicknick » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:01 am

Tinribs wrote:its a safe signing,Lad who knows the English game well
better than a punt on a fancy name from deportivo ,or that preville bloke? Can you see either of them two scraping ice off a windscreen in December.
Given where they play their football, very definitely. Try a holiday in Lille and La Corunna in January.

Tinribs
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 302 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Tinribs » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:06 am

Lowest temp in Lille in January is around 3 or 4 degrees.bit like our August.

Doubt theres ice

Quicknick
Posts: 6792
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 9644 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Quicknick » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:09 am

I don't know where you got that. Lille is almost in Belgium.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 511 times
Location: Devon

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by South West Claret. » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:12 am

mikeS wrote:Sounds like Wood will soon be a Claret. Well done all
Why?

Tall Paul
Posts: 7442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 736 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:13 am

ClaretAL wrote:Interesting to see most posters think that this season creativity and balls in to the box will suddenly arrive despite the same outlets we have in the team as last yearm and the commone theme seemed to be lack of creativity. That said I thought the 5 man midfield we had out last week created more chances by allowing the the full backs to push up more, who would have thought it against Chelsea. I think Wood is a great signing as was Taylor but will like Taylor will he get in the team in a 4 5 1 with Ward and Vokes playing so well?
If Wood can't get in the team it'll mean Vokes is playing well and scoring goals.

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:21 am

Unsurprising we've gone for what can be reasonably considered the safe option. Assume this spells the end of intetest in Andone ? Thought he might have added a little bit of variety to what looks a fairly samey forward line.
Suspect we might still end up with Shane Long, it's another low risk option. My one reservation with Long is that it's another player who will be well into his thirties by the end of his contract, we're stockpiling them - would be 5 this summer.

bfc1984
Posts: 244
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 61 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by bfc1984 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:22 am

Always kept a eye on him ever since that worldly he smashed in against us at the turf.Happy with this if true!Think we will struggle to start initially doubt we would move away from the Chelsea system,but injuries and suspensions will come and he will get starts.A good player and if you look at his wiki page quite clearly a goal scorer some good numbers.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 736 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:23 am

SkiptonClaret wrote:Unsurprising we've gone for what can be reasonably considered the safe option. Assume this spells the end of intetest in Andone ? Thought he might have added a little bit of variety to what looks a fairly samey forward line.
Suspect we might still end up with Shane Long, it's another low risk option. My one reservation with Long is that it's another player who will be well into his thirties by the end of his contract, we're stockpiling them - would be 5 this summer.
What's wrong with low risk, safe options?

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:26 am

Tall Paul wrote:What's wrong with low risk, safe options?

Nothing but I don't think the odd one or two gambles on (younger) players would go a miss. In addition, as I said, I don't think the signing of Wood adds much of a "plan B" in respect of our foward options.

jrgbfc
Posts: 9884
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2380 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by jrgbfc » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:27 am

Can't say I'm overly thrilled with this one to be honest. Makes us extremely predictable and one dimensional. At least with JBG and Brady wide we've finally got some wide players capable of putting some quality into the box.

RocketLawnChair
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 947 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by RocketLawnChair » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:29 am

If the 'safe options' ensure safety am all for um.
This user liked this post: Tall Paul

Claret-On-A-T-Rex
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 947 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Claret-On-A-T-Rex » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:29 am

Brilliant signing. I'm very happy with this.

claretdj
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:35 am
Been Liked: 305 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by claretdj » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:29 am

Q. Assombalonga or Wood?
Wood all day for me. Utc

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6539
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2122 times
Has Liked: 991 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:29 am

SkiptonClaret wrote:Nothing but I don't think the odd one or two gambles on (younger) players would go a miss. In addition, as I said, I don't think the signing of Wood adds much of a "plan B" in respect of our foward options.
We might sign two younger players as well yet.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:31 am

Sensible price (in todays market), offers differing options (contrary what is being said by a few), premier league experience and still only 25.

Not unhappy with this one at all.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2759
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 659 times
Has Liked: 339 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Winstonswhite » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:32 am

Great signing.

John Johnson 1605
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 9:49 am
Been Liked: 255 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by John Johnson 1605 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:35 am

Unsurprising to say the least. I'd say Long is a given and I wouldn't be surprised to see Shawcross following him.

Safron
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 275 times
Has Liked: 201 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Safron » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:36 am

Brady and jbg have to play well as we have no back up .or that the next piece of the jigsaw

taio
Posts: 12829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by taio » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:36 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:Sensible price (in todays market), offers differing options (contrary what is being said by a few), premier league experience and still only 25.

Not unhappy with this one at all.
In what way do you think he's different?

Longsider
Posts: 2801
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 948 times
Has Liked: 810 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Longsider » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:37 am

Weeds forum think that the deal for Wood includes Vokes going to them. Dream on. As if big Sam would go to little old Leeds.

http://www.motforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:42 am

Longsider wrote:Weeds forum think that the deal for Wood includes Vokes going to them. Dream on. As if big Sam would go to little old Leeds.

http://www.motforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Throw them the battering ram Barnes

Quicknick
Posts: 6792
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 9644 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Quicknick » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:43 am

Safron wrote:Brady and jbg have to play well as we have no back up .or that the next piece of the jigsaw
I'd like to think it is, plus that Italian centre half.

martin_p
Posts: 11180
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4098 times
Has Liked: 755 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by martin_p » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:44 am

Longsider wrote:Weeds forum think that the deal for Wood includes Vokes going to them. Dream on. As if big Sam would go to little old Leeds.

http://www.motforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Blimey, they're even more deluded than I thought! Of course our first choice striker who has scored in his last four Premier League games is included!!!

South West Claret.
Posts: 5904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 511 times
Location: Devon

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by South West Claret. » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:45 am

mikeS wrote:Sounds like Wood will soon be a Claret. Well done all
Why?

ExistentialWanderer
Posts: 1117
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by ExistentialWanderer » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:45 am

Longsider wrote:Weeds forum think that the deal for Wood includes Vokes going to them. Dream on. As if big Sam would go to little old Leeds.

http://www.motforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I knew Leeds fans were delusional but that's taken it to a whole new level!

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6871
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1999 times
Has Liked: 510 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:46 am

Wood gets goals against the top sides more than Gray did, e.g. Late last season against Brighton and Newcastle.

That bodes well for the step up. It was always the concern about Gray when we came up, and which proved accurate - one goal in open play in 2017.

I firmly believe he will be a far better player than Gray at this level. He has a habit of sniffing out goals even against good sides.

mdd2
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 762 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by mdd2 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:49 am

One sensible post on that Weeds site- one poster thought rather than selling Wood they should try and get SD as their manager.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:55 am

Funniest post is defo the one that states Gary Madine is "quality"

Quicknick
Posts: 6792
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 9644 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Quicknick » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:02 am

Just read that Leeds link. What a deluded bunch they are. Vokes included in the deal and value at 7M. Laughed out loud reading that.

Walton
Posts: 2169
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Been Liked: 866 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Walton » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:10 am

Tinribs wrote:Lowest temp in Lille in January is around 3 or 4 degrees.bit like our August.

Doubt theres ice
I've trudged through 6 inches of snow in Lille in December. Was ******* freezing.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

claretspice
Posts: 6442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3179 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by claretspice » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:10 am

taio wrote:In what way do you think he's different?
From what I've seen, the only thing they really have in common is that they are tall. Vokes likes to come off the centre halves (instead of getting into a wrestle) and link play and wants others bursting beyond him. In the box, he likes to get across the front of defenders and help the ball on its way. Wood appears to me to be far more interested in playing on the last shoulder, getting into physical confrontation with the centre halves, trying to roll them and get behind them. My understanding is he's quicker (I believe he's much quicker than he's getting credit for) and more direct than Vokes and much more of a bully, both outside the box and when he's got a chance of an effort on goal.

I am with Lancaster really. I think at £15 million he's a decent option and pretty good business considering he's only 25. Stepping up will be a challenge for him and only a few players have done it without being promoted with a team to a Premier League, but he has at least been around this level before.

We still need a bit of pace - but we were always known to be in the market for a winger and I'd like to think we'll be looking for another option - perhaps Long, perhaps even the lad at Deportivo if he's capable of playing wide - who does have pace and who can slot in on the right hand side of our 4-5-1 whilst Wood, Vokes and possibly Barnes fight for the lone striker berth.
This user liked this post: IndigoLake

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 947 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:10 am

Longsider wrote:Weeds forum think that the deal for Wood includes Vokes going to them. Dream on. As if big Sam would go to little old Leeds.

http://www.motforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
These 2 users liked this post: mybloodisclaret tiger76

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13296
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3732 times
Has Liked: 2149 times
Contact:

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:19 am

But do you not think we should be approaching Burnley for their MANAGER

Yeah. Like that's going to happen :lol:

taio
Posts: 12829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by taio » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:20 am

claretspice wrote:From what I've seen, the only thing they really have in common is that they are tall. Vokes likes to come off the centre halves (instead of getting into a wrestle) and link play and wants others bursting beyond him. In the box, he likes to get across the front of defenders and help the ball on its way. Wood appears to me to be far more interested in playing on the last shoulder, getting into physical confrontation with the centre halves, trying to roll them and get behind them. My understanding is he's quicker (I believe he's much quicker than he's getting credit for) and more direct than Vokes and much more of a bully, both outside the box and when he's got a chance of an effort on goal.

I am with Lancaster really. I think at £15 million he's a decent option and pretty good business considering he's only 25. Stepping up will be a challenge for him and only a few players have done it without being promoted with a team to a Premier League, but he has at least been around this level before.

We still need a bit of pace - but we were always known to be in the market for a winger and I'd like to think we'll be looking for another option - perhaps Long, perhaps even the lad at Deportivo if he's capable of playing wide - who does have pace and who can slot in on the right hand side of our 4-5-1 whilst Wood, Vokes and possibly Barnes fight for the lone striker berth.
Apologies if this is too direct but that's nothing other complete waffle. If you can't see any similarities with Vokes you haven't often seen Wood play.

Post Reply