Based on last season Tark/Long as a pairing simply aren't good enough, If Mee gets injured we look fooked.Bin Ont Turf wrote:Who's Tarky's replacement then?
At the end of last season we had Keane and Mee injured which meant Long and Tarky coming in.
If the same happens this season we'll have Long and Taylor coming in.
And that isn't f***ing good enough.
No further deals
Re: No further deals
This user liked this post: tiger76
Re: No further deals
So let me get this straight, because we didn't sign a CB the points we got at Chelsea and Spurs don't count?BFC88 wrote:I may also add it was such a great opportunity to build on the momentum of the positive start to the season. This will rightly leave a lot of fans deflated when there was absolutely no need or excuse.
Re: No further deals
It's not been a 'great window' but shambolic is way over the top.burnley007 wrote:A shambolic window. Again. Embarrassingly bare in defence. Tons of mediocrity up front. No pace.
Not good enough.
Garlick has been made to look a fool.
Re: No further deals
The results have papered over the cracks
-
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 823 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: No further deals
Nowt to do with that.KRBFC wrote:I forgot to add, we sold two of our better players for £30M. Sold far too early, rookies in the market it will probably never change.
If they are in the last year of the contract and they aren't for signing another, the manager and club want them gone.
It's all about being a team across the whole club.
Re: No further deals
If this if that.
Maybe the club looked into the possibility of acquiring a new center half. But they wasn't a good deal to be had so they decided against it and will revaluate in January.
Maybe the club looked into the possibility of acquiring a new center half. But they wasn't a good deal to be had so they decided against it and will revaluate in January.
Re: No further deals
The concern isn't the side that played against Tottenham.dsr wrote:Can you please look at the side that played Tottenham last Sunday and analyse where everything has gone so very wrong?
The legitimate and very real concern is when injuries and suspensions take their toll, and we're suddenly looking very light in key positions.
We had two defenders out last year at the same time in Mee and Keane. We're now in a ludicrous position where this can't happen.
-
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
- Been Liked: 542 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
Good window for me. Not everything we might want but not many clubs seem to have been able to strengthen everywhere they might need. And it's great to see the positive endorsement given by the Burnley faithful on here to Long who has done well and deserves his chance as a back up centre half. Nothing like supporting your own.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 45 times
Re: No further deals
What cracks are those then?KRBFC wrote:The results have papered over the cracks
This user liked this post: burnley007
-
- Posts: 3060
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
- Been Liked: 1091 times
- Has Liked: 554 times
Re: No further deals
All a bit 'meh' for me. I believe we've improved the squad, but feel we could have stuck our neck out a little first for a new centre back. Tarks and Mee are fine for me, and I don't dislike Long at all, but I really think we should have spent to get a really good replacement in. Who? Haven't the foggiest.
Can we bring loans in after the window or is that just EFL? I forget.
Can we bring loans in after the window or is that just EFL? I forget.
-
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 pm
- Been Liked: 987 times
- Has Liked: 1056 times
- Location: Yavin 4
Re: No further deals
This.Dyched wrote:If this if that.
Maybe the club looked into the possibility of acquiring a new center half. But they wasn't a good deal to be had so they decided against it and will revaluate in January.
It wouldn't surprise me if we broke our transfer record again in January should the need arise in a particular area.
Overall we are a stronger first 18 than last season with much higher quality cover in all areas except centre half. If the worst happens and we lose either Tarkowski or Mee, I still reckon that, given a run of games, Long could turn into a decent defender.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: No further deals
Go and support another team then if you don't like ours.ours is doing pretty well at the moment.Some of you don't deserve the team and success we are having at the moment.Plastic fans.burnley007 wrote:A shambolic window. Again. Embarrassingly bare in defence. Tons of mediocrity up front. No pace.
Not good enough.
Garlick has been made to look a fool.
These 3 users liked this post: welsbyswife tim_noone Falcon
-
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: No further deals
A bad injury to Brady and Mee and we are in trouble
Re: No further deals
Apparently Middlesbrough fans still talk with pride about the two fantastic transfer windows they had last season.
This user liked this post: brigante
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: No further deals
I'm just here to see the meltdowns.
Not been disappointed so far.
Not been disappointed so far.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: No further deals
Just free agentsClaretforever wrote:All a bit 'meh' for me. I believe we've improved the squad, but feel we could have stuck our neck out a little first for a new centre back. Tarks and Mee are fine for me, and I don't dislike Long at all, but I really think we should have spent to get a really good replacement in. Who? Haven't the foggiest.
Can we bring loans in after the window or is that just EFL? I forget.
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 337 times
- Has Liked: 1519 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: No further deals
Seriously do PC World sell laptops in Burnley for deadline day with a PANIC button?
-
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: No further deals
Dsr do you not understand that players always get it injured and suspended.
-
- Posts: 76654
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37351 times
- Has Liked: 5704 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No further deals
I've sold it to a Sheffield Wednesday message boardMDWat wrote:Would have liked a winger too but hey, I'm still delightedly Boyd has gone so I can give the 3 key on my keyboard a rest.

These 3 users liked this post: Sidney1st tiger76 MDWat
-
- Posts: 76654
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37351 times
- Has Liked: 5704 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No further deals
It was just the Football League clubs but they can't either now - emergency loan system no longer exists.Claretforever wrote:Can we bring loans in after the window or is that just EFL? I forget.
Re: No further deals
If it's good enough for dyche, then I'm happy with what we got! Utc
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: No further deals
Glad it's all over now! Would've liked a pacy winger to give us something different. That aside, we have a much stronger squad than we did last season and are looking every bit a premier league side.
Re: No further deals
And Hull's January window was the stuff of legends. It made their season.martin_p wrote:Apparently Middlesbrough fans still talk with pride about the two fantastic transfer windows they had last season.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
Its been a strange window for me. We've lost 4 starters from the end of last season - Keane, Barton, Boyd and Gray. Gray and Boyd I'm a bit meh about. We seem to be 50/50 about Gray and 70/30 against Boyd on here. I think we've brought in 2 1st teamers in Cork and Wood (who I believe will be the 1 in a 4-5-1). then we've got JBG who spent most of the season injured (although it remains to be seen if he can do a job at this level) and the big one for me, Defour. He is like the best signing we could have hoped for in this window in my opinion but we seem to overlook him when talking about strengthening the 1st 11. I've no idea where Wells fits in and my only worry is keeping that number of strikers happy if there's only one position available. Thats where SD's group mentality really kicks in.
After the Spurs game I think Tarks will be sound, he just needs a run of games and some confidence. Giving him the armband against Rovers was SD's way of saying I believe in you and, judging by his performance at Wembley, it was a master stroke. SD is clearly happy with the CBs he has with Taylor as the back up to Long, who I think is very underrated.
He must see Walters as the 2nd option for right midfield as we haven't heard much speculation of us chasing a specialist winger in this window.
I was hoping for another Craig Dawson, Aaron Lennon and a youthful Gianfranco Zola number 10. Never going to happen.
Cannot wait for Palace, bring it on!
After the Spurs game I think Tarks will be sound, he just needs a run of games and some confidence. Giving him the armband against Rovers was SD's way of saying I believe in you and, judging by his performance at Wembley, it was a master stroke. SD is clearly happy with the CBs he has with Taylor as the back up to Long, who I think is very underrated.
He must see Walters as the 2nd option for right midfield as we haven't heard much speculation of us chasing a specialist winger in this window.
I was hoping for another Craig Dawson, Aaron Lennon and a youthful Gianfranco Zola number 10. Never going to happen.
Cannot wait for Palace, bring it on!
Re: No further deals
Barton was a marginal starter last season. He only started 12 games, of which we won 2; plus his 2 sub appearances, one against Southampton where he scored the winning goal. I reckon the addition of Cork plus the improved form of Defour and Brady more than makes up for the loss of Barton and Boyd. Wood looked much more involved against Tottenham than Gray generally was last year (small sample size I know), and while we couldn't expect to replace Keane with an equivalent standard player, Tarkowski looks pretty good to me.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Wells play as the wide midfielder. With a 5-man midfield, there's a bit more scope for the wide men to join the centre forward as auxiliary forwards.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Wells play as the wide midfielder. With a 5-man midfield, there's a bit more scope for the wide men to join the centre forward as auxiliary forwards.
-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 358 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
- Location: Dallas, TX & Jefferson, MD
- Contact:
Re: No further deals
I think Dyche has made it clear he sees Taylor as CB cover. This was an OK window. The manager and his backroom team have earned my trust. £25 million for Keane seemed like a bargain price at the time and I think we could have got £10 million more by waiting and playing hardball. Wood for Gray seems like a fair swap, Cork is a rock solid signing and Dyche-fit Defour and Brady are like two new quality signings.
-
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: No further deals
Tarkowski looks pretty good to me. Yep, until he or Mee is injured and or Suspended
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: No further deals
Being so quick to shift Keane was completely stupid. The only logic behind that is that we were sure of getting another body in. We havent and have lost another CB albeit one who has never played in Anderson.
Keane if he was leaving in August should have left today. And for a good deal more.
Keane if he was leaving in August should have left today. And for a good deal more.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 17188
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: No further deals
Tarky looks indestructible to me.Wokingclaret wrote:Tarkowski looks pretty good to me. Yep, until he or Mee is injured and or Suspended
It's not a disastrous window. I think some of you need to look at the bigger picture; we are not in the market for the majority of available players because we have a structure on pay in place, just live with it.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: No further deals
I am living with it, just stating facts. Today part and parcel being a Burnley supporter
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1458 times
- Has Liked: 468 times
Re: No further deals
We've done pretty well in some areas and not so well in others. The centre half situation is absolutely bizarre, to be honest.
If someone had told me at the end of last season that come the 1st of September we'd only have Mee, Tarkowski and Long as centre backs, I would have told them to put the crack pipe down.
But that's where we are.
It just seems like a really, really big gamble on our part, and an unnecessary one, too.
If someone had told me at the end of last season that come the 1st of September we'd only have Mee, Tarkowski and Long as centre backs, I would have told them to put the crack pipe down.
But that's where we are.
It just seems like a really, really big gamble on our part, and an unnecessary one, too.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 17188
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: No further deals
Yes, unless we have tried and failed to get someone.JohnMcGreal wrote:We've done pretty well in some areas and not so well in others. The centre half situation is absolutely bizarre, to be honest.
If someone had told me at the end of last season that come the 1st of September we'd only have Mee, Tarkowski and Long as centre backs, I would have told them to put the crack pipe down.
But that's where we are.
It just seems like a really, really big gamble on our part, and an unnecessary one, too.
Re: No further deals
For me I think the word Average sums up our Transfer Window signings
This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: No further deals
I will be honest, I would be underwhelmed if it was our defence in the championship. But life goes on.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
We weren't quick. It was clearly on the cards that Keane was going to move. We couldn't any way but who would want to stop him from trying to further his career and trebling his wages. SD has clearly thought of Tarks as his replacement for the whole of last season and told him to bide his time. He's just come good with his promise and after Spurs it's difficult to argue with. I know its only one game but I think the foundations are there. £30M is decent for a player with 12 months left. You clearly spent your Wood goal winnings on miserable pills. Just wish I'd have lumped on when you saidcricketfieldclarets wrote:Being so quick to shift Keane was completely stupid. The only logic behind that is that we were sure of getting another body in. We havent and have lost another CB albeit one who has never played in Anderson.
Keane if he was leaving in August should have left today. And for a good deal more.
-
- Posts: 17188
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: No further deals
For all any of us knows the Keane deal was struck 12 months ago.Rumbletonk wrote:We weren't quick. It was clearly on the cards that Keane was going to move. We couldn't any way but who would want to stop him from trying to further his career and trebling his wages. SD has clearly thought of Tarks as his replacement for the whole of last season and told him to bide his time. He's just come good with his promise and after Spurs it's difficult to argue with. I know its only one game but I think the foundations are there. £30M is decent for a player with 12 months left. You clearly spent your Wood goal winnings on miserable pills. Just wish I'd have lumped on when you said
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
I think Tarks was promised a shot, knowing that Keane was off to a bigger club. Just a well handled situation as far as I can see
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
Keane strikes me as an honest, sensible man who would have spoken to SD (a man he holds in high regard) about his ambitions. There is no way on this Earth that an 1st/2nd choice England CB is going to stay at Burnley and the management team have made sure they have a replacement 12 months in advance. I thought he was poor for the last few games of last season and doubted him to fill that role. The Spurs game showed I know very little and SD knows his business, yet again.
Re: No further deals
We have received £18M for Keane, forget the £30M figure its nonsense and makes the sale sound better than it is. We paid £6m to Utd and rest is installments we may never see. The board knew they would receive just £18M when the offer was on the table, yet they took it without hesitation. They shot our team in the foot over £18M and allocated nothing from this years income or the remaining money from last season. Dyche was scraping the barrel to bring in quantity over quality because the only funds available were from sales. The best financial position we've ever been in and we had to sell before we could buy, a f*** ing disgrace. 14/ 15 all over again, 7 signings at a total cost of approximately £35M, £5M a man on average. We have lost 4 key players from last season and replaced only Barton. Dyche didnt want the cheap options like Taylor, Reid, Juke and Sordell in 2014, he had no option but to sign sh***, nothing has changed at this club and it never will.
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No further deals
Whilst I agree we maybe should have looked for a more experienced CB the one thing Dyche is really good at is setting up a defence. If he reckons Taylor can play CB then Taylor can play CB, at the end of the day it's Dyche's reputation in the line. I think it would be very fair to say that Mee, Lowton and Ward have improved a huge amount since coming to Burnley so there is nothing to suggest that the same won't be true of Tarks, Taylor and Long given game time.
Having said all that I'm still ****** off we missed out on Neymar and Mbappe, no ******* ambition
Having said all that I'm still ****** off we missed out on Neymar and Mbappe, no ******* ambition

This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 34435
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6265 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No further deals
there you goKRBFC wrote:We have received £18M for Keane, forget the £30M figure its nonsense and makes the sale sound better than it is. We paid £6m to Utd and rest is installments we may never see. The board knew they would receive just £18M when the offer was on the table, yet they took it without hesitation. They shot our team in the foot over £18M and allocated nothing from this years income or the remaining money from last season. Dyche was scraping the barrel to bring in quantity over quality because the only funds available were from sales. The best financial position we've ever been in and we had to sell before we could buy, a f*** ing disgrace. 14/ 15 all over again, 7 signings at a total cost of approximately £35M, £5M a man on average. We have lost 4 key players from last season and replaced only Barton. Dyche didnt want the cheap options like Taylor, Reid, Juke and Sordell in 2014, he had no option but to sign sh***, nothing has changed at this club and it never will.

This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
All reports said 25 rising to 30 or 31M for Keane. Where do you get the 18 from? You also don't mention Defour in any of that, why not?KRBFC wrote:We have received £18M for Keane, forget the £30M figure its nonsense and makes the sale sound better than it is. We paid £6m to Utd and rest is installments we may never see. The board knew they would receive just £18M when the offer was on the table, yet they took it without hesitation. They shot our team in the foot over £18M and allocated nothing from this years income or the remaining money from last season. Dyche was scraping the barrel to bring in quantity over quality because the only funds available were from sales. The best financial position we've ever been in and we had to sell before we could buy, a f*** ing disgrace. 14/ 15 all over again, 7 signings at a total cost of approximately £35M, £5M a man on average. We have lost 4 key players from last season and replaced only Barton. Dyche didnt want the cheap options like Taylor, Reid, Juke and Sordell in 2014, he had no option but to sign sh***, nothing has changed at this club and it never will.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
14/15 we had Jones, Marney and Arfield as back up. If you can't see the improvement there then we'll have to agree to disagree and leave it here
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: No further deals
We also had Shackell, Mee, Keane, Long, Duff, Ward and Trippier.Rumbletonk wrote:14/15 we had Jones, Marney and Arfield as back up. If you can't see the improvement there then we'll have to agree to disagree and leave it here
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1434 times
- Has Liked: 9462 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: No further deals
Taylor, Cork and Wood = really good acquisitions, but probably the best piece of business was retaining Defour. Wells may well prove a lot of people wrong. He's certainly two-footed, well-balanced and a natural scorer. The others: very good squad players.
I am concerned by the lack of a centre back, but seemingly SD isn't. For me, the lack of pace at the back is worrying.
Glad we didn't sell Barnes.
I am concerned by the lack of a centre back, but seemingly SD isn't. For me, the lack of pace at the back is worrying.
Glad we didn't sell Barnes.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: No further deals
If you wanted a like for like for Englands CB and RB then you were always going to feel let downcricketfieldclarets wrote:We also had Shackell, Mee, Keane, Long, Duff, Ward and Trippier.
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1434 times
- Has Liked: 9462 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: No further deals
Just had a quick read of a BHA forum. They are up in arms about failing to sign a striker.
Re: No further deals
Some on here need to get a life
I've never read such whinging drivel
Support a top six club if you want big name signings.
Fair play to all concerned at Burnley football club.
Looking forward to the season.
I've never read such whinging drivel
Support a top six club if you want big name signings.
Fair play to all concerned at Burnley football club.
Looking forward to the season.
These 3 users liked this post: Quicknick Eloise Laws Falcon
Re: No further deals
Its poor in terms of not signing a centre half or winger. An injury/suspension and were really up **** creek so yes we've added depth but enough depth in key areas? Not at all, in fact no where near.
Its like Dyche has given the board a list of options an they've signed cork an wood then signed the cheapest option for every other position he wanted or just not bothered we a few at all
Its like Dyche has given the board a list of options an they've signed cork an wood then signed the cheapest option for every other position he wanted or just not bothered we a few at all
-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: No further deals
Not a bad window but I am going to spend the next four months praying Mee and Tarks don't get inured. Bearing in mind monies generated from Keane and Gray's sales, we expected better players. But can't complain about results overall can we?