I'm telling you now, if Chris Rea doesn't bring out 'It's Coming Home for Christmas', I'll be very disappointed

https://www.foxsports.com.au/football/w ... a0857170bb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
People were complaining about Russia. Was always going to be a great world cup and its been best ever.Claretmatt4 wrote:I remember the heat was one of the main reasons why people said it wouldn't work, so they said all stadia would have state of the art air con to battle it.
Then after winning it they said actually it wouldn't.
Beggars belief how they can lie and get away with it, but oh well.
Not confirmed yet but likely to be 48 teams as well...
They're going to 48 teams from the 2026 World Cup, Qatar will be 32.Claretmatt4 wrote:I remember the heat was one of the main reasons why people said it wouldn't work, so they said all stadia would have state of the art air con to battle it.
Then after winning it they said actually it wouldn't.
Beggars belief how they can lie and get away with it, but oh well.
Not confirmed yet but likely to be 48 teams as well...
Italy 90 for me. No denying that this has been a good World Cup though.cricketfieldclarets wrote:People were complaining about Russia. Was always going to be a great world cup and its been best ever.
Juat leave them be will be another great one.
Qatar can afford it.Cirrus_Minor wrote:Let’s hope it is a good competition since they have paid enough to get it (allegedly).
Is that Russia or Qatar you are referring to, DA?Devils_Advocate wrote:The stats around its record on human rights, its use of torture as legal punishment and the way it enslaves migrant workers should have been the ones focused on and should have prevented it from hosting a world cup
Yeah but consider the legacy. At least they’ll have some world class venues where they can hang the homosexuals.Devils_Advocate wrote:The stats around its record on human rights, its use of torture as legal punishment and the way it enslaves migrant workers should have been the ones focused on and should have presented it from hosting a world cup
Qatar, that is what this topic is aboutPaul Waine wrote:Is that Russia or Qatar you are referring to, DA?
EDIT: and before anyone else raises it, or the 2026 countries, USA, Mexico and Canada? Or, Argentina back in 1978 or Mussolini's Italy 1934.
No impressive teams, just a bunch of average big boys and boring scrapping minnows. I haven't been impressed with France at all but they've cruised to a final, probably the best of a pretty bad bunch of International sides. The standard has never been so low.piston broke wrote:It’s tradition after every Olympics and World Cup to say it’s the best ever.
This has been a long way off for me. 3 or 4 outstanding games, nothing new tactically, no new superstar although we have had more of a look at Mbappe.
I think we’ve got over hyped by Englands unexpected success.
The fact that this World Cup has been a success doesn't alter the fact that Russia should never have been awarded it.cricketfieldclarets wrote:People were complaining about Russia. Was always going to be a great world cup and its been best ever.
Juat leave them be will be another great one.
30 degrees in New Mexico they start putting coats on!IanMcL wrote:Yes about 30 degrees!
Absolutely.DCWat wrote:Italy 90 for me. No denying that this has been a good World Cup though.
Would we say the same for either, if it hadn’t been for England though? When you get the buzz around the country for the national team, it always coincides with the tournament being great.
Ok thenmkmel wrote:The fact that this World Cup has been a success doesn't alter the fact that Russia should never have been awarded it.
And the same applies to Qatar
Naughty ... but that made me laugh out loud.Yeah but consider the legacy. At least they’ll have some world class venues where they can hang the homosexuals.
Well I for one won't be going to Pluto. There is no atmosphere in any of the Stadia!!cricketfieldclarets wrote: If people start worrying about political views and suchlike the next world cup would only be able to be played on pluto.
Scantily clad male's.....CaptJohn wrote:Having lived in Qatar I'll be interested to see how they handle the cultural differences. I think alcohol and exhibitionism is part and parcel of every World Cup I've ever seen. Think beer in the stands and scantily clad males and females. That really does not go down well in Muslim countries
I think it’s been a fantastic World Cup. Loads of great games,great goals, unexpected outcomes and a bit of excitement from England.piston broke wrote:It’s tradition after every Olympics and World Cup to say it’s the best ever.
This has been a long way off for me. 3 or 4 outstanding games, nothing new tactically, no new superstar although we have had more of a look at Mbappe.
I think we’ve got over hyped by Englands unexpected success.
Thats a good thing. It took me about 12 hours to get to Donetsk from Kiev in 2012 for England France. Thats after a 24 hour train from Warsaw where we had watched the opening ceremony between poland and greece!agreenwood wrote:They haven’t officially decided whether it’ll be a 32 or 48 team tournament, but as it’s going to be crammed into 28 days (as opposed to the usual full calendar month), I can’t see it being 48 teams.
Forget the temperatures, it’s geographically a tiny country to be hosting a World Cup alone. It’d take you barely 3 hours to drive the length of Qatar.
Why was it the best ever? It was a world cup finals, what made it so much better than, say, Argentina '78 or even '66 when we won it? Or even Mexico '70 when the best team that ever walked the planet won it? Personally, apart from us doing better than expected, I don't think this one was anything special.cricketfieldclarets wrote:People were complaining about Russia. Was always going to be a great world cup and its been best ever.
Juat leave them be will be another great one.
Plenty of goalshouseboy wrote:Why was it the best ever? It was a world cup finals, what made it so much better than, say, Argentina '78 or even '66 when we won it? Or even Mexico '70 when the best team that ever walked the planet won it? Personally, apart from us doing better than expected, I don't think this one was anything special.
Each to their own mate and I can see why you enjoyed it but there were, in my opinion, better. My personal favourite was Argentina '78 and we weren't even in it.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Plenty of goals
Plenty of surprises / shocks
Holders getting knocked out by South Korea
Host nation and rank outsiders getting to the quarters, with a mix of style and efficiency including defeating the favourites
Most successful team ever knocked out by Belgium with excellent football
Ronaldo Hat Trick in the big derby and probably best game of the competition
Unfancied Croatia getting to the final
One of the best finals I can remember
Great atmospheres with zero bother
England progressing beyond where we expected and winning the golden boot
Excellent refereeing (in the main)
The likes of Japan exceeding expectations (on and off the field)
Was great.
houseboy wrote:Why was it the best ever? It was a world cup finals, what made it so much better than, say, Argentina '78 or even '66 when we won it? Or even Mexico '70 when the best team that ever walked the planet won it? Personally, apart from us doing better than expected, I don't think this one was anything special.You can't relate to something you have never witnessed I watched the seventies world cups...way better than this one or others past.but this has been a good one! And for CC. The best ever.![]()