Trump n Kim..

[Imploding Turtle]

He’s putting Trump first.

His supporters will never believe that though. They're too emotionally invested, and they last the emotional maturity to divest.

[LongsideFacingUp]

You can mock me all you want for wanting him removed, but i'm the one not in denial of his blatant corruption. His voters, and fans like you, wanted to put him in power to "drain the swamp" yet he is far more corrupt than probably even Nixon. People like me were warning people like you before he was elected. So yes, i want him removed, but i enjoy that i get to laugh in your face at just how easily and completely he is making a fool of his voters and supporters.

And i'll laugh in your faces again when he is removed.

[FCBurnley]

Dont cry for me Avenatti !!!!

[Imploding Turtle]

Why are Republicans blocking the report from being released if it exonerates him? (Hint: probably because it is damning)

[FCBurnley]

Why are Republicans blocking the report from being released if it exonerates him? (Hint: probably because it is damning)

This has to be your most pathetic post of all time. The AG has clearly stated that he will release the whole Report subject to any redactions that are required for legal reasons . The report is over 800 pages long so that will hardly be a 5 minute job. Mueller has clearly stated no collusion and anybody with half a brain knows that without a crime there can be no obstruction. Even Brennan and Clapper are back tracking so fast to save their scrawny necks. `Bad Information` claims Brennan. Well I wonder where that came from. No doubt the same fake Mainstream media as yours.

[Imploding Turtle]

This has to be your most pathetic post of all time. The AG has clearly stated that he will release the whole Report subject to any redactions that are required for legal reasons . The report is over 800 pages long so that will hardly be a 5 minute job. Mueller has clearly stated no collusion and anybody with half a brain knows that without a crime there can be no obstruction. Even Brennan and Clapper are back tracking so fast to save their scrawny necks. `Bad Information` claims Brennan. Well I wonder where that came from. No doubt the same fake Mainstream media as yours.

Please quote the part of the report that clearly states no collusion.

As for this ******* corker "anybody with half a brain knows that without a crime there can be no obstruction" that is just abso-*******-lutely false Literally and legally false.

If you are innocent of a murder for which you are being investigated, if you tell witnesses to lie, if you do ANYTHING to obstruct the investigation you can and should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. "Anybody with half a brain" Imagine being so confident as to attach that to something that you are completely ******* wrong about. lol.

[FCBurnley]

Please quote the part of the report that clearly states no collusion.

As for this ******* corker "anybody with half a brain knows that without a crime there can be no obstruction" that is just abso-*******-lutely false Literally and legally false.

If you are innocent of a murder for which you are being investigated, if you tell witnesses to lie, if you do ANYTHING to obstruct the investigation you can and should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. "Anybody with half a brain" Imagine being so confident as to attach that to something that you are completely ******* wrong about. lol.

Yea I guess the whole of the US legal system is wrong and you are right. Cant wait to see your examples of obstruction.

[Imploding Turtle]

Yea I guess the whole of the US legal system is wrong and you are right. Cant wait to see your examples of obstruction.

How about going on TV and admitting that he fired the FBI Director because he was investigating Russian collusion. Literally.
Here's a clip of him just outright admitting it. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... estigation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

His. Own. Words.

Not to mention all the public witness tampering and threats he's made, but this one above is the most blatant, in-your-face example of obstruction of justice there is.

But you'll still deny it, because "what you're seeing and what you're reading isn't what's happening".

[FCBurnley]

How about going on TV and admitting that he fired the FBI Director because he was investigating Russian collusion. Literally.
Here's a clip of him just outright admitting it. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... estigation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

His. Own. Words.

Not to mention all the public witness tampering and threats he's made, but this one above is the most blatant, in-your-face example of obstruction of justice there is.

But you'll still deny it, because "what you're seeing and what you're reading isn't what's happening".

Read the headline very carefully. It is somewhat different to your opening sentence where you claim ` Trump admitted firing the FBI Director because he was investigating Russian Collusion`The Headline actually says ` Trump admits `this Russia thing ` part of reasoning for firing Comey. Good try but as usual you change the narrative to suit your case.
As for your other claims of public witness tampering etc I will await your proof. Perhaps you are not aware that the AG had information from Mueller re potential obstruction for at least 3 weeks prior to last weekend during which time he took legal advice before making his decision not to file charges. So thats Mueller and the AG who both agree that there is no obstruction and IT who thinks there is. Trump must be quaking in his boots.

[Pstotto]

March last year, exactly the same... They are trying to convince everybody that we are in The Truman Show.

[Stayingup]

They will probably give it to both of them. Trump will reluctantly accept that. It’s about having the Nobel Peace Prize because Obama got one.

Its quite amazing how you can be a complete dud like Obama was and get a prize.