Osmajic

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
daveisaclaret
Posts: 2762
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1444 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Osmajić

Post by daveisaclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:12 am

Looks like we'll hit six months without anything happening - it's an absolute disgrace. The FA are making it very clear that their stance on racism is all PR and no action.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 894 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:22 am

The fly in the ointment appears to be somebody denying the allegation & no concrete evidence stating otherwise as frustrating as that may be! Some people have said from the start you do need something more substantially damning than 2 opposing conflicting accounts.

billyhamilton82
Posts: 1041
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 539 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by billyhamilton82 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:23 am

I hope they are waiting to hit them when it will hurt most.

Make the decision when the transfer window closes so they can't replace him.

beddie
Posts: 6315
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by beddie » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:27 am

I agree that things like this need thorough investigation and the appropriate time to be dealt with but this particular incident has taken far too long. It should have been decided what action if any is required before the new season kicked off. To quote
“ time is a great healer”, I’ll leave you with that one to think about.

agreenwood
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2518 times
Has Liked: 358 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by agreenwood » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:47 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:22 am
The fly in the ointment appears to be somebody denying the allegation & no concrete evidence stating otherwise as frustrating as that may be! Some people have said from the start you do need something more substantially damning than 2 opposing conflicting accounts.
The FA don’t need to be certain that he said what Hannibal alleged. The need to be satisfied that it’s more likely than not that he said it (balance of probabilities).

It’s hard to fathom what could possibly be holding up a hearing being set at this point. They’ve had 6 months to collect all the relevant statements. It’s unlikely that they’ve had to bring in lip reading specialists given the lack of a clear TV footage, but even if they have, it shouldn’t be taking this long.

It feels very much like they’ve allowed Preston to stall this or they are simply hoping that it’ll go away quietly. That said, no doubt this clown will be back in front of them again at some point regardless of the outcome of these proceedings. He seems incapable of behaving himself.

Procrastinate B
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 33 times
Has Liked: 46 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by Procrastinate B » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:15 pm

It’s going to be found ‘unproven’, I’d imagine. Hannibal definitely heard him say it, Osmajic is adamant he said ‘bad’ *******.

I’d imagine the proximity of Osmajic’s face when he was saying whatever he said pretty much renders any camera footage useless.

The length of time this is taking is unfair on both players, the clubs and fans. It needs closure.

NottsClaret
Posts: 4284
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2924 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Osmajić

Post by NottsClaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:19 pm

How long did it take for Jay Rod’s case to get resolved when he was accused?

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2762
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1444 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Osmajić

Post by daveisaclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:23 pm

NottsClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:19 pm
How long did it take for Jay Rod’s case to get resolved when he was accused?
3 months

NottsClaret
Posts: 4284
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2924 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Osmajić

Post by NottsClaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:04 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:23 pm
3 months
Don't see why this is much different then. One player's word against another. It's going to be 'not proven' anyway, just get on with it.

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6583
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 1610 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Osmajić

Post by gandhisflipflop » Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:09 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:12 am
Looks like we'll hit six months without anything happening - it's an absolute disgrace. The FA are making it very clear that their stance on racism is all PR and no action.
That’s the sound of the penny dropping I hear!

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2762
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1444 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Osmajić

Post by daveisaclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:13 pm

NottsClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:04 pm
Don't see why this is much different then. One player's word against another. It's going to be 'not proven' anyway, just get on with it.
There's no particular reason to think it's going to be not proven.

Duffer_
Posts: 2371
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 813 times
Has Liked: 1397 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by Duffer_ » Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:35 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:13 pm
There's no particular reason to think it's going to be not proven.
Apart from the ridiculous length of time involved. A very generous interpretation of events, to the FA at least, might be that they feel there is insufficient evidence to find Osmajic guilty but are at least making him sweat on it.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1714
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by JarrowClaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:50 pm

NottsClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:19 pm
How long did it take for Jay Rod’s case to get resolved when he was accused?
Jay Rods case was about the meaning of what was said not necessarily what was said, I don’t think there was ever a question about what Jay said.

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1248 times
Has Liked: 213 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by AlargeClaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:41 pm

The time it’s taken has been quite alarming bearing in mind there’s only 2 witnesses ( the accused and accuser )
While personally I think it likely that a racial slur of sorts was said to Hannibal , it doesn’t help that it’s “ he said she said “ without any decent footage though . Also not helped by Hannibal being a proven cheat and borderline nutcase for much of last season . Let’s hope for a quick resolution.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 894 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:47 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:13 pm
There's no particular reason to think it's going to be not proven.
I'm surprised the FA haven't asked you to step forward to provide the compelling evidence you purport to possess.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Aug 10, 2025 5:40 pm

Wasn’t something said last week from Preston that the hearing was going to be after the start of the season?
This user liked this post: Spike

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11235
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3626 times
Has Liked: 2234 times

Re: Osmajić

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Aug 10, 2025 5:53 pm

JarrowClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:50 pm
Jay Rods case was about the meaning of what was said not necessarily what was said, I don’t think there was ever a question about what Jay said.
I’m not sure that’s right.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajić

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Aug 10, 2025 5:58 pm

JarrowClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:50 pm
Jay Rods case was about the meaning of what was said not necessarily what was said, I don’t think there was ever a question about what Jay said.

It was a question of what was said. Bong claims Jay Rod said: “You’re black and you stink.” Jay Rod claimed he’d said: “Your breath f****** stinks.”

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Sat Aug 16, 2025 10:49 am

High profile incident at Anfield yesterday. Loads of virtue signalling flags being waved today.

KernowHouseClaret
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:44 am
Been Liked: 107 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by KernowHouseClaret » Sat Aug 16, 2025 11:18 am

claret wizard wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 10:49 am
High profile incident at Anfield yesterday. Loads of virtue signalling flags being waved today.
That's because it was a fan against a player in the Premier League, can't have the leagues good name being linked to racism.
If ours had been on the Prem it would have been sorted before now without a shadow of a doubt
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

Procrastinate B
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 33 times
Has Liked: 46 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Procrastinate B » Sat Aug 16, 2025 11:36 am

Would imagine fans around the incident would corroborate that racial abuse took place. The Hannibal incident wasn’t heard by anyone else.

jos
Posts: 2020
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 314 times
Has Liked: 441 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by jos » Sat Aug 16, 2025 12:53 pm

I was chatting with a Preston fan about this and whilst he agreed Osmajic was a thug he also stated that Hannibal was known for claiming this sort of thing.
I wasn’t aware of any previous claims.

jackmiggins
Posts: 803
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:29 pm
Been Liked: 202 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by jackmiggins » Sat Aug 16, 2025 1:12 pm

jos wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 12:53 pm
I was chatting with a Preston fan about this and whilst he agreed Osmajic was a thug he also stated that Hannibal was known for claiming this sort of thing.
I wasn’t aware of any previous claims.
Not a good idea to perpetuate hearsay without actually checking that it has any truth.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 894 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Jakubclaret » Sat Aug 16, 2025 1:16 pm

Procrastinate B wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 11:36 am
Would imagine fans around the incident would corroborate that racial abuse took place. The Hannibal incident wasn’t heard by anyone else.
Completely agree although the popular opinion seems to be is that the 2 incidents are identical & should be dealt with in the same manner & timeframe which is frankly preposterous.
This user liked this post: Procrastinate B

jos
Posts: 2020
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 314 times
Has Liked: 441 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by jos » Sat Aug 16, 2025 1:58 pm

jackmiggins wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 1:12 pm
Not a good idea to perpetuate hearsay without actually checking that it has any truth.
That’s what I’m trying to find out!

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1714
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by JarrowClaret » Sat Aug 16, 2025 2:02 pm

jos wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 12:53 pm
I was chatting with a Preston fan about this and whilst he agreed Osmajic was a thug he also stated that Hannibal was known for claiming this sort of thing.
I wasn’t aware of any previous claims.
Probably because there aren’t any claims out there certainly I’m not aware of any. Anyway it is irrelevant what he has claimed in the past maybe if he has made other claims it was because he believed he was racially abused. It is clear if you look at the incident without any form of tribal bias that Hannibal reacts immediately as if something very bad has been said. So whatever the outcome Hannibal at least truly believes he was racially abused so it wasn’t some made up claim as some Preston fans would have us believe. That doesn’t mean he was definitely racially abused though, they were both gobbing off he could have just misheard as Osmajic claims.
This user liked this post: jos

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:41 am

Procrastinate B wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 11:36 am
Would imagine fans around the incident would corroborate that racial abuse took place. The Hannibal incident wasn’t heard by anyone else.
Seems that is not what happened according to fans reports. Semenyo goes to take throw, fan goes down and says something to him, noone else hears this, 2 mins later the game is stopped. This is according to a Nick Collins in X a Liverpool fan seated near the incident. So let’s see how long this takes to be dealt with now the initial furore has passed.

Procrastinate B
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 33 times
Has Liked: 46 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Procrastinate B » Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:48 am

claret wizard wrote:
Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:41 am
Seems that is not what happened according to fans reports. Semenyo goes to take throw, fan goes down and says something to him, noone else hears this, 2 mins later the game is stopped. This is according to a Nick Collins in X a Liverpool fan seated near the incident. So let’s see how long this takes to be dealt with now the initial furore has passed.
Ah, I imagined wrong then!

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Mon Aug 18, 2025 2:28 pm

Osmajic should have been banned from every stadium in the UK?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyvdp2n205o

Roosterbooster
Posts: 3248
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 421 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Roosterbooster » Mon Aug 18, 2025 2:41 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 2:28 pm
Osmajic should have been banned from every stadium in the UK?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyvdp2n205o
Osmajic hasn't been arrested

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:27 pm

Roosterbooster wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 2:41 pm
Osmajic hasn't been arrested
Should Osmajic been arrested?

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:59 pm

KernowHouseClaret wrote:
Sat Aug 16, 2025 11:18 am
That's because it was a fan against a player in the Premier League, can't have the leagues good name being linked to racism.
If ours had been on the Prem it would have been sorted before now without a shadow of a doubt
Just to point out that such incidents are not anything to do with the league. If it is a player involved then it’s the FA no matter which league the game is played in.

Yesterday’s was a matter for neither league or FA but the club involved and the police I would imagine.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:59 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 2:28 pm
Osmajic should have been banned from every stadium in the UK?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyvdp2n205o
Why?

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:09 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:59 pm
Why?
I’m asking the question. But to add some context both incidents are effectively identical, someone says an allegedly racist remark that no one else hears, it’s reported to the referee. In one instance someone is arrested and barred from every football ground in the country awaiting a trial, whilst in the other effectively nothing has happened.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 894 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:11 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:09 pm
I’m asking the question. But to add some context both incidents are effectively identical, someone says an allegedly racist remark that no one else hears, it’s reported to the referee. In one instance someone is arrested and barred from every football ground in the country awaiting a trial, whilst in the other effectively nothing has happened.
It's not that simple he's denied it. The person who's been banned probably accepted guilt. When people deny things investigations take place to establish facts.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:14 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:09 pm
I’m asking the question. But to add some context both incidents are effectively identical, someone says an allegedly racist remark that no one else hears, it’s reported to the referee. In one instance someone is arrested and barred from every football ground in the country awaiting a trial, whilst in the other effectively nothing has happened.
The bloke on Friday has been arrested and was in custody. He's barred as part of his bail conditions. The situation at Preston is totally different in that it is one man's word against the other as far as we know and I'd assume the FA are still investigating. It wasn't a police matter.

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:26 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:11 pm
It's not that simple he's denied it. The person who's been banned probably accepted guilt. When people deny things investigations take place to establish facts.
Probably….that’s the key word here. We don’t know. However, that’s not the point. I’m wondering why the Police weren’t involved at Preston?

claret wizard
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by claret wizard » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:28 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:14 pm
The bloke on Friday has been arrested and was in custody. He's barred as part of his bail conditions. The situation at Preston is totally different in that it is one man's word against the other as far as we know and I'd assume the FA are still investigating. It wasn't a police matter.
That’s my point, why was this guy arrested, but not the Preston player? I mention above in the thread that this is also one mans word against another according to fans nearby. No one heard what was said.



So why wasn’t it a Police matter? Did we not make a formal complaint to them?

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 894 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:32 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:26 pm
Probably….that’s the key word here. We don’t know. However, that’s not the point. I’m wondering why the Police weren’t involved at Preston?
He's denied it & nobody can be 100% & that could possibly include Hannibal if he's misheard something. The evidence friday was probably overwhelming due to the high profile nature of the game & the fans in close proximity.

Row x
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 622 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Row x » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:51 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:26 pm
Probably….that’s the key word here. We don’t know. However, that’s not the point. I’m wondering why the Police weren’t involved at Preston?
To eject him from the ground?

ClaretTony
Posts: 77393
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37863 times
Has Liked: 5752 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:56 pm

claret wizard wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:26 pm
Probably….that’s the key word here. We don’t know. However, that’s not the point. I’m wondering why the Police weren’t involved at Preston?
I doubt the police would arrest someone off the say so of one person

Row x
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 622 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Row x » Mon Aug 18, 2025 5:07 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:56 pm
I doubt the police would arrest someone off the say so of one person
Plus there's a process in place when it happens on the pitch between players staff etc.
The Anfield incident involved a member of the public, so it became a police issue. He was ejected from the ground, and arrested later when evidence had been gathered

Guller Bull
Posts: 3472
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 1352 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Guller Bull » Mon Aug 18, 2025 5:26 pm

TOE

Tresor
Osmajic
Everton

Three modern day Burnley suspense mysteries.
Will the puzzles ever be solved?

Spike
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 695 times
Has Liked: 1625 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Spike » Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:15 pm

Knobbers rumoured to want £20m for him

Post Reply