Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:04 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:02 pm
You know that isn't true because you are aware of Ryan Christie.
Pete that was last summer, I’m talking about the one before

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:04 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
When we sell our best players and replace them with freebies and loans, oh wait....


PSG paid £170m for Mbappe, Burnley FC paid £170m for Alan Pace.

To what benefit? I'd bet we spent more under Garlick (net) than under ALK. Higher ticket prices and more empty seats. Academy gone backwards, communication at an all time low. Income (minus TV deal/transfers out) was down? This idea they were gonna generate extra revenue by making us more of a global brand and selling more shirts turned out to be a complete myth. Relegated under their watch.

So what exactly has the benefit been? I liked the bold decision to sack Dyche and I like the Kompany appointment. Transfer reveal videos are pretty cool compared to the old Crouch robot video. Is this worth the club paying £102M in debts for new owners? (I'll even remove the money owed to Garlick still)

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:04 pm

Cleveleys_claret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:01 pm
Shock Horror!!! A Premier League standard player doesn't want to stay at a relegated club. This is the reality of us being relegated.

Just like we don't seem to be hanging around signing players, moving into next targets quickly rather than hanging around we seem to be doing the same when players are wanting to leave, yes we may not our desired value but once a player wants to go...he is going, so best getting them out the door.

Not happy with this but was always going to happen, now let's get him out the door, get the money and re invest
Pace has seen Tarkowski walk for free and decided he's never letting that happen again. If there's profit there, he's going to take it.

Commy
Posts: 4248
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Commy » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:05 pm

Didn't someone say Wolves were skint?

warksclaret
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2261 times
Has Liked: 1242 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:07 pm

Works both ways-the 5/ 6 guys we have signed were all happy to leave and join us

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 534 times
Has Liked: 187 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretPete001 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:11 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:04 pm
Pete that was last summer, I’m talking about the one before
Oh ok, yes they didn't spend anything the season before.

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 424 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:12 pm

Row Z wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm
Release clause on relegation?
I get the release clause, it's the amount that we agreed to that seems very low.
But, as an earlier poster pointed out, perhaps Collins only agreed to join us if the release clause was that low.

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:13 pm

Nixon reckons we want around 30m.

Worth mentioning he was the one who broke Wolves’ interest in the first place.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:13 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:04 pm
When we sell our best players and replace them with freebies and loans, oh wait....


PSG paid £170m for Mbappe, Burnley FC paid £170m for Alan Pace.

To what benefit? I'd bet we spent more under Garlick (net) than under ALK. Higher ticket prices and more empty seats. Academy gone backwards, communication at an all time low. Income (minus TV deal/transfers out) was down? This idea they were gonna generate extra revenue by making us more of a global brand and selling more shirts turned out to be a complete myth. Relegated under their watch.

So what exactly has the benefit been? I liked the bold decision to sack Dyche and I like the Kompany appointment. Transfer reveal videos are pretty cool compared to the old Crouch robot video. Is this worth the club paying £102M in debts for new owners? (I'll even remove the money owed to Garlick still)
Some fair points there tbh.

I was very excited and optimistic about this season. It is quickly evaporating with this news. It’s now pretty likely we are not going to be promoted.

gawthorpe_view
Posts: 5479
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
Been Liked: 1467 times
Has Liked: 3227 times
Location: 'Turf

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by gawthorpe_view » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:14 pm

Andreshotboots wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:56 pm
When's our first home game again? At this rate the stadium might have been sold by the time we get back!!
Wouldn't be the first time though.

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:15 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:13 pm
It’s now pretty likely we are not going to be promoted.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:15 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:15 pm
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Saving this for end of the season.

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2705 times
Has Liked: 1588 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by gandhisflipflop » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:16 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:13 pm
Some fair points there tbh.

I was very excited and optimistic about this season. It is quickly evaporating with this news. It’s now pretty likely we are not going to be promoted.
Jesus Christ.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:17 pm

gandhisflipflop wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:16 pm
Jesus Christ.
Do you still think promotion is likely then?

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:18 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:15 pm
Saving this for end of the season.
I’m just laughing at your ability to suggest at this exact point in time, without knowing the full facts of the deal, without knowing what reinvestment we’ll do, how the new signings will do and pretty much everything else, that we are now likely to not be promoted because of an expected sale.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9265
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:18 pm

I'm not sure how anyone can possibly know if we're promotion contenders yet.

How do I know this? Well... we haven't played a sodding game yet!
These 2 users liked this post: RVclaret tiger76

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:20 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:18 pm
I’m just laughing at your ability to suggest at this exact point in time, without knowing the full facts of the deal, without knowing what reinvestment we’ll do, how the new signings will do and pretty much everything else, that we are now likely to not be promoted because of an expected sale.
I’m basing it purely on our business so far.

Sell, get rid of our current performers and buy unproven talent.

Collins and McNeil were the two players we needed to build our promotion push around.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:20 pm

gawthorpe_view wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:48 pm
It could be that without the quoted release clauses, Collins and Cornet would not have signed for us.
Correct.

Paddy1882
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 168 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Paddy1882 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:21 pm

No surprise that Collins is off, dissapointed to be losing a good player but this was always going to be the ALK model, sell players for X amount, allow a small amount of that to be reinvested and the rest goes towards financing loans, debt however you want to put it. Also think the Collins deal will go the way of quite a lot of undisclosed ones, the club buying will say to their sources or local press etc closer to £20million and the club selling will say closer to £30million, either way it’s rare bar the clubs involved anyone finds out the true price.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:21 pm

Burnley Ace wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:03 pm
If it hadn’t been for an injury Collins wouldn’t have played more than a handful of games and nobody would have missed him.
In the words of Gino D’Accampo…. If my auntie had wheels she’d be a bike.
This user liked this post: FeedTheArf

fidelcastro
Posts: 9265
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:21 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:20 pm
I’m basing it purely on our business so far.

Sell, get rid of our current performers and buy unproven talent.

Collins and McNeil were the two players we needed to build our promotion push around.
Are you actually planning to attend this season, or just mainly snipe from the sidelines as usual?

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:23 pm

Seems a fair bit of business. That’s the market and if he wants to go what can we do. He’s played less than 20 games in the EPL and looked ok.
This user liked this post: Elizabeth

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:23 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:13 pm
Some fair points there tbh.

I was very excited and optimistic about this season. It is quickly evaporating with this news. It’s now pretty likely we are not going to be promoted.
You really do come across as a child. Do you mind me asking how old you actually are?

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:24 pm

We were always going to sell these players, by the way. How many other defenders of his profile have gone for £30m in recent times? £20m isn't as wacky as some of you are making out here.
These 2 users liked this post: RVclaret Elizabeth

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:25 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:23 pm
You really do come across as a child. Do you mind me asking how old you actually are?
Why result to degrading comments.
My opinion is that we are losing a critical member of the squad. Top talents are the difference between championship mediocrity and promotion.

We are losing one of our only genuine premier league talents, so yes I personally think this move will likely result in promotion not happening.

How is that a childish view?
This user liked this post: Elizabeth

claret2018
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 886 times
Has Liked: 29 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claret2018 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:29 pm

Yeah £20m+ seems about right for an unproven PL centre half with potential.

Some fans have got mental ideas of how much we should sell players. We vastly over-egg how good some of our players actually are. No one wanted to pay a fee for Tarks, no one wants Mee for free and Pope sold for a fee that some were expecting 4x the amount for.

Get real. No one is going to spend big on any of the players that just got relegated and played bloody awfully for the last year.
This user liked this post: TsarBomba

AwayClaret
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 1:09 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AwayClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:33 pm

Been away for a few hours have I missed anything?? 😃

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:35 pm

Can we all stop losing our minds until the deal is actually finalised.

Collins was never worth £40M as I’ve seen people trying to suggest, and Nixon is saying we want £30M.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:35 pm

claret2018 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:29 pm
No one wanted to pay a fee for Tarks
That is very definitely not the case - we had offers but chose not to sell

NewClaret
Posts: 17419
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3923 times
Has Liked: 4892 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:36 pm

AwayClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:33 pm
Been away for a few hours have I missed anything?? 😃
There’s always one AwayClaret 😂

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:36 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:35 pm
That is very definitely not the case - we had offers but chose not to sell
Dyche chose not to sell
This user liked this post: yosserhughes

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 291 times
Has Liked: 600 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by alwaysaclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:38 pm

Ben Davies anybody ?

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:39 pm

alwaysaclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:38 pm
Ben Davies anybody ?
Is that the lad who went from Preston to Liverpool? I’ve seen him linked with someone today.

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 291 times
Has Liked: 600 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by alwaysaclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:20 pm
I’m basing it purely on our business so far.

Sell, get rid of our current performers and buy unproven talent.

Collins and McNeil were the two players we needed to build our promotion push around.
You don't rate cornet then 🤔

BigChaCha
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 293 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BigChaCha » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm

Collins and McNeil were the two players we needed to build our promotion push around.
Extremely naive to think we would be building a team around our saleable assets... We were only ever going to keep 2 of them at best and even that is pushing it.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm

alwaysaclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm
You don't rate cornet then 🤔
Yep. Just basing it on the fact he’s already gone in my thinking. No chance he stays

RVclaret
Posts: 16205
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:39 pm
Is that the lad who went from Preston to Liverpool? I’ve seen him linked with someone today.
Stoke and Blackburn linked I think. Problem is he’s on 60k a week.

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 291 times
Has Liked: 600 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by alwaysaclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:41 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:39 pm
Is that the lad who went from Preston to Liverpool? I’ve seen him linked with someone today.
Stoke and b******s, but I'd certainly have him.

AwayClaret
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 1:09 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AwayClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:43 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:36 pm
There’s ONLY one AwayClaret 😂
Corrected that for ya :D

So Collins is off. I'll be surprised if it's for £20.5m. But it is what it is.

JR1882
Posts: 930
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 283 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by JR1882 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:50 pm

This is how the best clubs operate (has been city’s model for the last few years)

Everyone is for sale always, player X costs £y - Meet it or go elsewhere.

I’d argue we have set our £y a little low here for Collins but you have to get the logic - we could have sold Tarks for 15-20m last summer but we wanted to stay up (we still went down with him) so lost 20m + 2-2.5m in Wages for no gain - hindsight is easy but I guess this strategy is about preventing that.

kaptin1
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 486 times
Has Liked: 110 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kaptin1 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:53 pm

It’s nonsense to be arguing over a single figure. Even if the £20.5m is correct, there could be lots of other variables such as proportion paid up front, potential for add ons and the size of any sell on clause. Those factors could make a huge difference to the overall “value”. Deal structure is massively important.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7392
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tall Paul » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:55 pm

Dear god, the overreactions to every bit of news are mental.
These 5 users liked this post: RVclaret tiger76 CoolClaret bpgburn yosserhughes

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2705 times
Has Liked: 1588 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by gandhisflipflop » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:56 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:17 pm
Do you still think promotion is likely then?
I don’t know is the answer. What I do know is that you was coming on here less than 9 months ago saying how you rated Collins as being ‘bambi on ice’, so forgive me if I don’t take your opinions seriously.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76626
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37343 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:56 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:40 pm
Stoke and Blackburn linked I think. Problem is he’s on 60k a week.
I should have remembered that given it was Blackburn.

I did hear we were close to getting him and then Liverpool stepped in.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:59 pm

gandhisflipflop wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:56 pm
I don’t know is the answer. What I do know is that you was coming on here less than 9 months ago saying how you rated Collins as being ‘bambi on ice’, so forgive me if I don’t take your opinions seriously.
I’m sure I could take a snippet from one post you made in the past to use it against you as well.

So your sitting on the fence. Very brave of you to criticise people that arnt.

warksclaret
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2261 times
Has Liked: 1242 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:00 pm

No one welcomes the Collins news-he was our shining light last season. But who would have betted their house he was staying, and at times we need to remind ourselves of reality. Make no mistake I will be gutted if he goes

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by spt_claret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:01 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
When we've been in League One for a couple of years most likely. Remember the Orient, Sky Digital and all that.
But hey we'll be the most youthful team in the lower leagues so there's something to be excited about.

AwayClaret
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 1:09 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AwayClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:02 pm

🤣🤣

Rileybobs
Posts: 18549
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7610 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:03 pm

Surprised there’s interest above £20m to be honest. The lad has got potential that’s for sure, but he’s played just half a season, fairly averagely, for a relegated side. I would certainly prefer to keep him but getting anything above £20m would represent a very tidy profit in a very short space of time.

The problem is of course we know what the significant part of this sum will be used for and unfortunately it won’t be re-investment in the playing squad.
This user liked this post: Elizabeth

Shaggy
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 510 times
Has Liked: 178 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Shaggy » Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:04 pm

Top notch drama queenery already on display and we are only mid July.

Post Reply