Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:36 pm
Lots of articles similar to that around
They are all drawing the same conclusions as well
I'd love to know what is working in the south, but not working at all in the north
Trading space for time?
I don't think its that now
Quality of troops better?
The NATO trained Ukrainian troops are certainly around Kiev, but there must be combat experienced troops all over the front, due to the ongoing fighting in the East
Who knows?
I’m not sure that the south has been all that successful if honest but has certainly seemed to have more success than the north.
Some possible/ likely reasons
1. The ground much more firm in the South than in the North
2. Mainly conscripts in North the fact it is mainly Naval soldiers in the south means they are mostly professional. Motivation clearly different
3. Equipment maybe better maintained in the South some of the stuff captured around Kyiv has had obvious maintenance issues (oil leaking from wheel hubs cheap/ flat tyres etc)
4. Whilst I think there has been some ground for time going, I read quite early on that the ground outside of crimea was very open so perfect for Russias Tanks and air to ground aircraft SU 25 etc. so it was expected that the Ukrainians would give up all that anyway as they would have been torn to shreds if they hadn’t.
That said there success at engaging low level air targets with man pads and Armour with NLAW and Javelin may have negated it not sure.