Wout Weghorst

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 8143
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2429 times
Has Liked: 3469 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:12 am

claretinkorea wrote:
Thu Jun 09, 2022 9:03 pm
Classic, pick a characteristic to splat across 17 million people you've never met. Sound like you are well informed. No better than the people outside of the UK calling all Brits drunken hooligans... Irritates me no end when people don't judge individuals on their own merits.
Yesh, me too
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view

deanothedino
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 741 times
Has Liked: 381 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by deanothedino » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:16 am

Raconteur wrote:
Thu Jun 09, 2022 7:55 pm
It was classed as a cross because that is exactly what it was.
:lol: okay I'll be more specific, he doesn't put a ball into the box from outside it (ideally a lofted ball) and his crossing is limited to a 5 yard pass within the box.
This user liked this post: Raconteur

deanothedino
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 741 times
Has Liked: 381 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by deanothedino » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:24 am

Raconteur wrote:
Thu Jun 09, 2022 8:11 pm
Totally agree. He just tried to roll it into the goal along the floor. Any striker worthy would have absolutely smashed that chance into the back of the net
Watch it again, if he'd done that he'd have probably scored

deanothedino
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 741 times
Has Liked: 381 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by deanothedino » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:27 am

Raconteur wrote:
Thu Jun 09, 2022 8:18 pm
I would say Wout refusing to shake Roberts hand kicked it all off, so the reality is that Wout did something negative to Roberts first.
Did he? The clip just shows Roberts walking up to him giving him grief.

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 740 times
Has Liked: 1923 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by AfloatinClaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:41 am

fidelcastro wrote:
Thu Jun 09, 2022 9:04 pm
Exactly. I never discriminate. I hate everyone equally.
I don't believe you, everybody saves a little extra specifically for the Welsh ;)
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Firthy
Posts: 5389
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1718 times
Has Liked: 299 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Firthy » Fri Jun 10, 2022 10:02 am

Not sure who I'd rather see go. WW or some posters on this forum?

Raconteur
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 295 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Raconteur » Fri Jun 10, 2022 10:28 am

deanothedino wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:27 am
Did he? The clip just shows Roberts walking up to him giving him grief.
Unfortunately he did deano. I watched the game live. Just before the altercation, Roberts walked over with his hand held out and Wout just turned his back on him.

NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by NRC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:41 pm

I don’t understand the downer on WW

It sounds like he has a contract that is 4 years long that states he needn’t play in the championship, but, hey, if the club gets promoted again he still has two years to go. Anything he has stated public ally is along those lines, perhaps without emotion, but reflecting the facts.

Roberts saying what he did was unnecessary and provocative. No wonder he told him to shut up

RVclaret
Posts: 16207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4469 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:44 pm

NRC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:41 pm
I don’t understand the downer on WW

It sounds like he has a contract that is 4 years long that states he needn’t play in the championship, but, hey, if the club gets promoted again he still has two years to go. Anything he has stated public ally is along those lines, perhaps without emotion, but reflecting the facts.

Roberts saying what he did was unnecessary and provocative. No wonder he told him to shut up
I think it’s more the fact he’s come in, underperformed himself, missed some big chances at key times and then starts marketing himself as this guy who’s superior to us.

On the other hand, Cornet, likely to not be with us next season in the Championship either, did a post to say how he will ‘give his all to get the club back to where they should be etc’. And that’s it. Oh and he actually contributed quite significantly unlike WW.
These 3 users liked this post: tiger76 Zlatan Quicknick

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1433 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by daveisaclaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:45 pm

NRC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:41 pm
I don’t understand the downer on WW

It sounds like he has a contract that is 4 years long that states he needn’t play in the championship, but, hey, if the club gets promoted again he still has two years to go. Anything he has stated public ally is along those lines, perhaps without emotion, but reflecting the facts.

Roberts saying what he did was unnecessary and provocative. No wonder he told him to shut up
It's hard to believe you don't understand the downer on a crap player who contributed to our relegation and is publicly letting everyone know he has no interest in the consequences.
These 3 users liked this post: RVclaret jedi_master tiger76

NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by NRC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:52 pm

Pitch performance aside, I’m referring to his contractual situation. It is what it is, and who can blame him for it. What is he supposed to do, contradict his contract or rip it up and say eff it I’ll play in the championship? He wants to play for his country in the World Cup in a few months time

Do we not like facts? Do we want false platitudes? He’s a footballer not a politician

jedi_master
Posts: 8240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4125 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by jedi_master » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:00 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:45 pm
It's hard to believe you don't understand the downer on a crap player who contributed to our relegation and is publicly letting everyone know he has no interest in the consequences.
Putting aside how much of a clear bellend Weghorst is (Watford away, statements since relegation, refusal to shake Roberts hand, refusal to take a vaccine that contributes to the betterment of human kind), it's almost perverse that people are defending him on a footballing front. He contributed the square root of **** all in 17/20 appearances, and the endless defence of him and finger pointing at our tactics, our other players, our manager(s), our fans etc, etc as the reason for his inability to perform is nauseating.

I would love this thread to be deleted because the thought of the five or six Wout loving posters repeatedly bumping it as this flat track bully puts a hat-trick past Yeni Malatyaspor as proof of his brilliance and how we were all wrong will become tiresome very quickly.
These 2 users liked this post: FeedTheArf Braindead

lakedistrictclaret
Posts: 1693
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
Been Liked: 591 times
Has Liked: 210 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by lakedistrictclaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:07 pm

After watching his first couple of appearances, I genuinely thought we'd got a better player than Chris Wood, at half the price.
By the end, my opinion was similar to that of jedi_master.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by dsr » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:12 pm

NRC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:41 pm
I don’t understand the downer on WW

It sounds like he has a contract that is 4 years long that states he needn’t play in the championship, but, hey, if the club gets promoted again he still has two years to go. Anything he has stated public ally is along those lines, perhaps without emotion, but reflecting the facts.

Roberts saying what he did was unnecessary and provocative. No wonder he told him to shut up
I doubt in the world of football banter, WW would get much sympathy for being provoked by a comment as lightweight as that. More typically, he might have shaken hands for image sake and replied with something like "Because I couldn't get anywhere near your [deleted] crosses".

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by tiger76 » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:16 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:00 pm
Putting aside how much of a clear bellend Weghorst is (Watford away, statements since relegation, refusal to shake Roberts hand, refusal to take a vaccine that contributes to the betterment of human kind), it's almost perverse that people are defending him on a footballing front. He contributed the square root of **** all in 17/20 appearances, and the endless defence of him and finger pointing at our tactics, our other players, our manager(s), our fans etc, etc as the reason for his inability to perform is nauseating.

I would love this thread to be deleted because the thought of the five or six Wout loving posters repeatedly bumping it as this flat track bully puts a hat-trick past Yeni Malatyaspor as proof of his brilliance and how we were all wrong will become tiresome very quickly.
A poor signing alas, and now we just need to get rid ASAP, sure he might score a few goals in the Turkish league, but frankly who cares.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6747
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1973 times
Has Liked: 504 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:24 pm

Talk today that Eintracht Frankfurt want him, the media story translated from German was implying it is a clause in his contract that allows him to go on loan, which if true is far from ideal and implies we were so desperate to sign him we’d agree to all kinds of clauses that in hindsight we may wish we didn’t.

Still the right thing to do, we were in a bind, but we are in a worse one now it seems.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1433 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by daveisaclaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:29 pm

If we really signed him with a clause in his contract that he could go on loan if we were relegated, unless that clause also says we need to be paid a hell of a lot of money for it, then it is a shocking way to run a football club. We went into January not planning to sign anyone, how did we end it throwing so much money away?

RVclaret
Posts: 16207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4469 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:34 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:24 pm
Talk today that Eintracht Frankfurt want him, the media story translated from German was implying it is a clause in his contract that allows him to go on loan, which if true is far from ideal and implies we were so desperate to sign him we’d agree to all kinds of clauses that in hindsight we may wish we didn’t.

Still the right thing to do, we were in a bind, but we are in a worse one now it seems.
Yeah, weird clause that. Doesn't really suit us. Only positive is it will get his wages off the books and his attitude away from the camp. But then in a year we get him back. Hmm.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:37 pm

NRC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 1:41 pm
I don’t understand the downer on WW

I've been a defender of Wout, even I understand the downer on him and I agree with it. His comments have been a disgrace imo. Not that I agree with Roberts acting like a bell end, Roberts should also be asking himself why he didn't do it at Burnley. The Burnley fans hailing Roberts as some kind of hero are the same ones who were slagging his performances off, bizarre bunch.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:39 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:00 pm
Putting aside how much of a clear bellend Weghorst is (Watford away, statements since relegation, refusal to shake Roberts hand, refusal to take a vaccine that contributes to the betterment of human kind), it's almost perverse that people are defending him on a footballing front. He contributed the square root of **** all in 17/20 appearances, and the endless defence of him and finger pointing at our tactics, our other players, our manager(s), our fans etc, etc as the reason for his inability to perform is nauseating.

I would love this thread to be deleted because the thought of the five or six Wout loving posters repeatedly bumping it as this flat track bully puts a hat-trick past Yeni Malatyaspor as proof of his brilliance and how we were all wrong will become tiresome very quickly.
That's absolutely horseshite though, even from his biggest hater in you.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:51 pm

Man United home, brilliant assist for Rodriguez.
Wolves home, squared for a Vydra game winning tap in. Highest number of presses recorded in the PL.
Brighton away, brilliant.
Spurs home, worked like an absolute dog and held the ball very well.
West Ham away, scored.
Soton home, granted he missed a sitter but he was highly effective and influential in that first half, the best 45 i've seen from the team all season.
Palace away, very good imo put the ball in the net too, Rodriguez was a toe offside.

The last 5 games he was barely used and it cost us imo, we played our best football with him on the pitch against Newcastle. There was certainly poor performances in there, he barely touched the ball at home to Man City and Chelsea. I thought the team was rank bad at Norwich and in both Watford games so he's included in that. Villa home he was poor (that Barnes/Wout partnership is one I wanna see never again). Leicester home he was ****.
These 3 users liked this post: Quicknick Zlatan CoolClaret

jedi_master
Posts: 8240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4125 times
Has Liked: 1134 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by jedi_master » Fri Jun 10, 2022 3:00 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:39 pm
That's absolutely horseshite though, even from his biggest hater in you.
I dunno if I am his biggest hater, I wanted him in the Championship, a few others on here didn't even want him for that. Most vocal critic I will get on board with but it's not a title I will proudly wear, I don't criticise a player and enjoy it. He's the most disappointing signing ever though - if you look back to January you'd see I was absolutely delighted at the prospect of him playing for us - then again I should have realised that YouTube made even Dane Richards look like Raheem Sterling.

17 games out of 20 was an exaggeration though, I'll give you that. The Villa game at home was his worst performance though, for me, out of the ones you listed.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jun 10, 2022 3:11 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 3:00 pm
I dunno if I am his biggest hater, I wanted him in the Championship, a few others on here didn't even want him for that. Most vocal critic I will get on board with but it's not a title I will proudly wear, I don't criticise a player and enjoy it. He's the most disappointing signing ever though - if you look back to January you'd see I was absolutely delighted at the prospect of him playing for us - then again I should have realised that YouTube made even Dane Richards look like Raheem Sterling.

17 games out of 20 was an exaggeration though, I'll give you that. The Villa game at home was his worst performance though, for me, out of the ones you listed.
That Barnes Wout combo was truly horrific. I'm no Rodriguez or Vydra super fan but I think we missed those two badly, really unsettled team, he had a new partner every game. Soton home with Rodriguez was great, the next game he's next to Vydra with Rodriguez out wide, the next game Rodriguez isn't in the team. Such a dysfunctional ineffective group as a whole.

clive40golf
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 178 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by clive40golf » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:09 am

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:51 pm
Man United home, brilliant assist for Rodriguez.
Wolves home, squared for a Vydra game winning tap in. Highest number of presses recorded in the PL.
Brighton away, brilliant.
Spurs home, worked like an absolute dog and held the ball very well.
West Ham away, scored.
Soton home, granted he missed a sitter but he was highly effective and influential in that first half, the best 45 i've seen from the team all season.
Palace away, very good imo put the ball in the net too, Rodriguez was a toe offside.

The last 5 games he was barely used and it cost us imo, we played our best football with him on the pitch against Newcastle. There was certainly poor performances in there, he barely touched the ball at home to Man City and Chelsea. I thought the team was rank bad at Norwich and in both Watford games so he's included in that. Villa home he was poor (that Barnes/Wout partnership is one I wanna see never again). Leicester home he was ****.


Pretty fair assessment that.

Quicknick
Posts: 6713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1434 times
Has Liked: 9462 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Quicknick » Sat Jun 11, 2022 6:12 am

clive40golf wrote:
Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:09 am
Pretty fair assessment that.
Agreed.

deanothedino
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 741 times
Has Liked: 381 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by deanothedino » Sat Jun 11, 2022 7:40 am

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:37 pm
I've been a defender of Wout, even I understand the downer on him and I agree with it. His comments have been a disgrace imo. Not that I agree with Roberts acting like a bell end, Roberts should also be asking himself why he didn't do it at Burnley. The Burnley fans hailing Roberts as some kind of hero are the same ones who were slagging his performances off, bizarre bunch.
Roberts seemed to ascend to some sort of hero status during the season without ever actually playing well to be fair.

AwayClaret
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 1:09 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by AwayClaret » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:27 pm

Eintracht Frankfurt have apparently entered the race to sign Wout. And they are in the champions league next season so could be off back to Germany.

bumba
Posts: 4662
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by bumba » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:40 pm

Frankfurt to pay £10 million would be good business if we could get that

RVclaret
Posts: 16207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4469 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by RVclaret » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:42 pm

bumba wrote:
Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:40 pm
Frankfurt to pay £10 million would be good business if we could get that
I’d snap their hand off for 8m to be honest.

Exeterclaret
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:36 pm
Been Liked: 87 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Exeterclaret » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:47 pm

It hasn't worked out and if we can recover a decent chunk of what we paid then we should take that chance. Europa League winners and next season champions League participants being interested really does suggest he's not nearly as bad a player as some are making out on here. Would have been good for us had we stayed up I reckon.

Marney&Mee
Posts: 1527
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:37 pm
Been Liked: 724 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Marney&Mee » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:53 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:51 pm
Man United home, brilliant assist for Rodriguez.
Wolves home, squared for a Vydra game winning tap in. Highest number of presses recorded in the PL.
Brighton away, brilliant.
Spurs home, worked like an absolute dog and held the ball very well.
West Ham away, scored.
Soton home, granted he missed a sitter but he was highly effective and influential in that first half, the best 45 i've seen from the team all season.
Palace away, very good imo put the ball in the net too, Rodriguez was a toe offside.


The last 5 games he was barely used and it cost us imo, we played our best football with him on the pitch against Newcastle. There was certainly poor performances in there, he barely touched the ball at home to Man City and Chelsea. I thought the team was rank bad at Norwich and in both Watford games so he's included in that. Villa home he was poor (that Barnes/Wout partnership is one I wanna see never again). Leicester home he was ****.
Have to agree. I rate him. Ok didn’t score many but his link up play was superb. Put him up front for city and he’s score 20+. As he would do for us in the Championship..no doubt at all. But he’s not happy here so time to move on.

Myk
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:35 am
Been Liked: 58 times
Has Liked: 75 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Myk » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:55 pm

AwayClaret wrote:
Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:27 pm
Eintracht Frankfurt have apparently entered the race to sign Wout. And they are in the champions league next season so could be off back to Germany.
But I thought he left Germany due to some sort of Vaccination thing? or has that all changed now etc?

bumba
Posts: 4662
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by bumba » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:37 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:42 pm
I’d snap their hand off for 8m to be honest.
I'd take it too to be honest but with his record over there and then in the champions league I'd hope we could push it up a bit.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:39 pm

Marney&Mee wrote:
Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:53 pm
Have to agree. I rate him. Ok didn’t score many but his link up play was superb. Put him up front for city and he’s score 20+. As he would do for us in the Championship..no doubt at all. But he’s not happy here so time to move on.
He does his best work deep, abit like what Harry Kane is criticised for. He'd dribble past players somehow, more of a wriggle past. The ball just seems to stick to him when he's playing well, I remember at home to United, some of his work on the halfway line was superb. The home game against Watford early in the 2nd half when he hit the bar, that touch around the defender was disgustingly good, like from a Bergkamp highlight reel. That kinda summed his spell up, absolute zero luck there with the wind taking it onto the crossbar. Newcastle home, Barnes drills it in, Weghorst at absolute full stretch, any kind of touch and you'd expect a goal, does everything right and it goes wide.

Pearcey
Posts: 4215
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1438 times
Has Liked: 1785 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Pearcey » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:42 pm

We need to get rid on a permanent transfer asap. Not a premier league player and he’s decided he won’t play in the championship. He’s a very expensive passenger.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:42 pm

Watford away he's waiting to take a penalty and its called back for a freekick. He's also there for a tap in and Lennon gets the cross wrong, 2nd half he's there for a tapin and Lennon decides to shoot.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11477
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2249 times
Has Liked: 1357 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by FCBurnley » Sat Jun 11, 2022 3:09 pm

Beginning to sound like another Gibson saga.

leelad
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:21 pm
Been Liked: 82 times
Has Liked: 131 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by leelad » Sat Jun 11, 2022 3:35 pm

We need to recoup as much as we can on him and move on.

BuryClaret
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by BuryClaret » Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:36 pm

More on Weghorst today...
Attachments
Screenshot (411).png
Screenshot (411).png (251.16 KiB) Viewed 2995 times

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19684
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4184 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:55 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:00 pm
Putting aside how much of a clear bellend Weghorst is (Watford away, statements since relegation, refusal to shake Roberts hand, refusal to take a vaccine that contributes to the betterment of human kind), it's almost perverse that people are defending him on a footballing front. He contributed the square root of **** all in 17/20 appearances, and the endless defence of him and finger pointing at our tactics, our other players, our manager(s), our fans etc, etc as the reason for his inability to perform is nauseating.

I would love this thread to be deleted because the thought of the five or six Wout loving posters repeatedly bumping it as this flat track bully puts a hat-trick past Yeni Malatyaspor as proof of his brilliance and how we were all wrong will become tiresome very quickly.
To say you're usually a level headed poster is is embarrassing.
The type of post some might do in the early hours when they have been on the drink and regret it in the morning.

What right do you have to comment on someone's medical choices?
This user liked this post: bobinho

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8508
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1844 times
Has Liked: 2186 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Woodleyclaret » Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:38 pm

Wout wants out ,too proud to play in the Championship so we want all of the money back
That means a £12m cost or hes stuck with us next season.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:51 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:38 pm
Wout wants out ,too proud to play in the Championship so we want all of the money back
That means a £12m cost or hes stuck with us next season.
We're stuck between a rock and a hard place with this guy, ideally we want him out the building, but equally we also need to recoup as much of our outlay as possible.

And if he stays you do have to wonder how that'll impact on our dressing room, given the seeming bad blood between him and the rest of the squad, as the incident with Roberts illustrates.

If we can get anywhere near £12m I'd bide him goodbye ASAP, the last thing we want is any bad eggs in the camp, plus he's also one of our higher earners.

NewClaret
Posts: 17423
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3926 times
Has Liked: 4892 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:55 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:51 pm
We're stuck between a rock and a hard place with this guy, ideally we want him out the building, but equally we also need to recoup as much of our outlay as possible.

And if he stays you do have to wonder how that'll impact on our dressing room, given the seeming bad blood between him and the rest of the squad, as the incident with Roberts illustrates.

If we can get anywhere near £12m I'd bide him goodbye ASAP, the last thing we want is any bad eggs in the camp, plus he's also one of our higher earners.
Agreed, although disappointed how it’s turned out as I liked him as a player.

Very worrying if we agreed to a “free loan” if relegated. That’s a terrible deal, although perhaps what was necessary to secure him.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:02 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:55 pm
Agreed, although disappointed how it’s turned out as I liked him as a player.

Very worrying if we agreed to a “free loan” if relegated. That’s a terrible deal, although perhaps what was necessary to secure him.
Some transfers work out some don't, sadly he falls into the latter camp. I only hope we can manage to offload him for a decent fee that allows us to bring in a young pacy striker to give us another dimension to our play.

CnBtruntru
Posts: 4365
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
Been Liked: 715 times
Has Liked: 662 times
Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by CnBtruntru » Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:20 pm

I doubt anyone is willing to take him off our hands for £12 mill or 8 for that matter, he had a clause in his contract that says he can go on loan if we ended up in the Championship, Burnley FC agreed that when he joined, if we loan him out to Besiktas then whatever we were paying him is saved for 12 months and we could use elsewhere for loanees etc. I honestly doubt we will sell him except at a loss.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19684
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4184 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:43 pm

Centre forwards always sell well.

Just need to wait until clubs get desperate at the end of the window.
These 2 users liked this post: mdd2 boatshed bill

NewClaret
Posts: 17423
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3926 times
Has Liked: 4892 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:52 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:02 pm
Some transfers work out some don't, sadly he falls into the latter camp. I only hope we can manage to offload him for a decent fee that allows us to bring in a young pacy striker to give us another dimension to our play.
As Dyche used to say - putting the ball in the back of the net is the hardest job in football. There will always be demand for strikers. WW had a hard half a season with us, arguably due to our pretty **** style, but he’s an established international with an unquestionable goal scoring record - so I’m pretty confident we’ll be able to find a buyer.

Really, I wish we could keep him because I think he could be an asset, but as you say that’s not feasible after his comments so we need to ship out & move on.

distortiondave
Posts: 1155
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 573 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by distortiondave » Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:02 pm

I'm sure this has been brought up, and apologies if it's a daft question, but what's in it for Weghorst to go on loan to Turkey?

If he's on, say, £60k* a week here reduced to £30k a week upon relegation, is the loaning club going to pay us the £30k and him £30k so he ends up fully paid? So we pay him nothing, we get £30k a week, he gets £60k a week. Is that the general gist of it?

*arbitrary figures plucked from thin air

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:59 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:51 pm


And if he stays you do have to wonder how that'll impact on our dressing room, given the seeming bad blood between him and the rest of the squad, as the incident with Roberts illustrates.
rest of the squad? you mean Roberts acting like a dickhead? Interesting how you can to this conclusion, how do you know it's not Robert's the rest of the squad have an issue with?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Wout Weghorst

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:00 pm

distortiondave wrote:
Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:02 pm
I'm sure this has been brought up, and apologies if it's a daft question, but what's in it for Weghorst to go on loan to Turkey?

If he's on, say, £60k* a week here reduced to £30k a week upon relegation, is the loaning club going to pay us the £30k and him £30k so he ends up fully paid? So we pay him nothing, we get £30k a week, he gets £60k a week. Is that the general gist of it?

*arbitrary figures plucked from thin air
I would suggest that if there’s an agreement he wouldn’t play in the championship then I imagine he’s also not agreed to a pay cut on relegation.

Post Reply