Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:11 am
- Been Liked: 148 times
- Has Liked: 58 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Maxwell to West Ham is done. Same reliable source who told me about Dwight. Not sure on the fee.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Call me cynical but the timing fits, one ready to depart and one ready to be announced, the club have played it like this all window.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Let's hope the reporting on Cornet to West Ham is accurate. It has certainly dragged on for far too long now.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Alex Crook tweeted
‘As just discussed on @talkSPORT #WHUFC are in for Maxwel Cornet after failing to agree deal for Kostic. Believe they are looking at a permanent deal.‘
Doesn’t mention any fee being agreed.
‘As just discussed on @talkSPORT #WHUFC are in for Maxwel Cornet after failing to agree deal for Kostic. Believe they are looking at a permanent deal.‘
Doesn’t mention any fee being agreed.
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Just a reminder, if anyone needs one, as to just what we'll be missing when Cornet leaves.
Scroll down for all of his spectacular goals.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... midfielder
Scroll down for all of his spectacular goals.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... midfielder
-
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3054 times
- Has Liked: 4794 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Isnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Glad he's off we can use the money to far better use.
Don't think we would have got value for money out of him in the championship he would have spent the best part of the season with the physio, especially with the WC this winter
Don't think we would have got value for money out of him in the championship he would have spent the best part of the season with the physio, especially with the WC this winter
This user liked this post: Quicknick
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Watching that highlights reel shows me where his weakness lies… he doesn’t do tap ins… every goal was a worldlyGordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:00 pmJust a reminder, if anyone needs one, as to just what we'll be missing when Cornet leaves.
Scroll down for all of his spectacular goals.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... midfielder

These 2 users liked this post: Gordaleman lesxdp
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1150 times
- Has Liked: 279 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
...and that Cornet thought he was "a loan"randomclaret2 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 pmIsnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?
Last edited by Goody1975 on Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 13023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3663 times
- Has Liked: 2111 times
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It israndomclaret2 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 pmIsnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?
He also reported that when Cornet said he wanted to return to Lyon, Jackson told him he wasn’t “a loan”
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3070 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Benson or no Benson that side deserves another run out. Bed(sic) the lad in.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1150 times
- Has Liked: 279 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If indeed we are at a point this week where Cornet leaves and Benson arrives, what is everyone expecting for the remainder of our transfer dealings?
Incomings?
Outgoings?
Incomings?
Outgoings?
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Spot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We’ll get a nice profit on Cornet and a cheaper player in Benson brought in that hopefully we’ll make a profit on in the future, for a Championship club now it decent business and from the clips I’ve seen on YouTube Benson looks a very good direct player that will help ease the pain of losing Max
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Definitely was not how it was said on the radio. Said fee agreed for permanent deal
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1843 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Sky reporting Max is a loan
Probably an error, as we need the cash agreed not loaning him out
Probably an error, as we need the cash agreed not loaning him out
-
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 427 times
- Has Liked: 80 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Surprised he is going West ham according to some on here he would not get in the Burnley teamGordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pmSpot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3070 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
From Sky just now.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Gordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pmSpot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.

How do you work that out ?
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
They are saying that that's what Wet Spam want, not Burnley.Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:13 pmSky reporting Max is a loan
Probably an error, as we need the cash agreed not loaning him out
I'm still hoping no-one divvies up and he stays. After all, I have a shirt with his name and number on it.
These 2 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret lesxdp
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Try reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.
-
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 48 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
West Ham did the same with Benrahma at Brentford - initial season loan then signed him
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Given we've struggled to get anyone to meet the release clause (we don't even know if West Ham have met it yet), I strongly suspect we would not be looking at a higher fee.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:19 pmTry reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.
-
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 724 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I’d be happy for a loan fee and 1st refusal to buy at a reasonable price. When we get promoted he can come back or if he wants to stay at WH we get a decent fee.
This user liked this post: whiffa
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Gordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:19 pmTry reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.
Maybe the release clause was part of the agreement on him signing in the first place.
How much more would he cost without the release clause, you say far higher yet nobody so far has offered 17.5m despite knowing this gets him. The idea we would get a far higher fee is crazy when people are trying to get the 17.5m lowered.
Logic is always more accurate than fantasy
-
- Posts: 13023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3663 times
- Has Liked: 2111 times
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
There was a young lad in the shop on Friday getting the new shirt telling his dad he wanted Cornet 20 on itGordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pmThey are saying that that's what Wet Spam want, not Burnley.
I'm still hoping no-one divvies up and he stays. After all, I have a shirt with his name and number on it.
His dad was trying his best to convince to pick another one without breaking it to him he’d most likely be going
Not sure if he managed it
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
1 mobile, quick number 9.
1 who can play anywhere across the front.
Outgoings, Youngsters on loan.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Looking like history repeating regarding Maxwell..
Fulham, Everton, Newcastle and now West ham all frankley trying it on....either pay up or p.ss off
Be interesting to know how many owners of the above clubs would offer me a buy to let on one of there properties...then within 12 months the roof leaks and the boiler packs in..so I hand the house back with its value having dipped.
Fulham, Everton, Newcastle and now West ham all frankley trying it on....either pay up or p.ss off
Be interesting to know how many owners of the above clubs would offer me a buy to let on one of there properties...then within 12 months the roof leaks and the boiler packs in..so I hand the house back with its value having dipped.
Last edited by NellyDBFC on Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That's just not the case. Most transfers go through on the 'Never never'. Very few clubs stump up the who fee in one go, even the top six don't.
As it is, it's only Cornet's release clause that's keeping the price so low. It shows how much other clubs value him by the fact that two or three are seemingly prepared to pay £25 million for him in instalments. Had his release clause been £25 million, we may have had offers in the region of £30 to £35 million if paid on the drip.
Personally, I think Burnley are playing hard ball with Cornet and are hoping no one will pay £17.5 million and Cornet stays at Burnley.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Absolute fantasy land nowGordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:28 pmThat's just not the case. Most transfers go through on the 'Never never'. Very few clubs stump up the who fee in one go, even the top six don't.
As it is, it's only Cornet's release clause that's keeping the price so low. It shows how much other clubs value him by the fact that two or three are seemingly prepared to pay £25 million for him in instalments. Had his release clause been £25 million, we may have had offers in the region of £30 to £35 million if paid on the drip.
Personally, I think Burnley are playing hard ball with Cornet and are hoping no one will pay £17.5 million and Cornet stays at Burnley.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

"Nobody will pay 17.5m as it has to be in 1 payment but they would paid 35m spread out"
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No, you didn't read what I wrote. I said if the release clause was £25 million they might. (Because he's worth at least £25 million.)claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:32 pm
"Nobody will pay 17.5m as it has to be in 1 payment but they would paid 35m spread out"
Anyway, let's agree to disagree. This is a discussion, not an argument and everyone is entitled to their own view, even me.
I still hope he ends up staying.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The release clause would have been negotiated at point of sale (to us). The higher fee would come into play if the buying club, as reported, want to loan for a season with the obligation to buy.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:23 pmMaybe the release clause was part of the agreement on him signing in the first place.
How much more would he cost without the release clause, you say far higher yet nobody so far has offered 17.5m despite knowing this gets him. The idea we would get a far higher fee is crazy when people are trying to get the 17.5m lowered.
Logic is always more accurate than fantasy
-
- Posts: 3900
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 1008 times
- Has Liked: 1200 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
This sounds like a cr*p deal. If they can’t afford him up front they can’t afford him.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pmFrom Sky just now.
C29666E0-C4E5-4F4B-B1C7-272543FE0C7C.jpeg
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Pretty sure the only reason Arsenal paid £70m for Pepe was because only £20m was paid upfront and the rest payable over 4/5 years whilst Palace wanted £50m for Zaha upfront. Clubs seem to have a yearly budget and it’s all about cash flow. It’s pure speculation but it would not be a surprise that the Collins fee was mainly upfront whilst Mcneil’s looks to be paid on an annual £5m basis with the fourth year probably not payable unless he has played a certain number of games.
My feeling is that we are quite keen on the possibility of getting Cornet back if we go up so the loan might be a runner. No-one is paying £17.5m upfront so assuming wages are the issue it might be the best way forward. If everyone else has dropped to a “measly” £25k per week and he is still on £50k it is going to lead to a bad feeling in the camp.
My feeling is that we are quite keen on the possibility of getting Cornet back if we go up so the loan might be a runner. No-one is paying £17.5m upfront so assuming wages are the issue it might be the best way forward. If everyone else has dropped to a “measly” £25k per week and he is still on £50k it is going to lead to a bad feeling in the camp.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Ryan Taylor
“West Ham have made an opening offer for Maxwel Cornet which falls short of #BurnleyFC valuation. Clarets still holding out for close to £17m. Filip Kostić not totally off table but understand there are various complications, not least fresh interest from Juventus. #WHUFC”
“West Ham have made an opening offer for Maxwel Cornet which falls short of #BurnleyFC valuation. Clarets still holding out for close to £17m. Filip Kostić not totally off table but understand there are various complications, not least fresh interest from Juventus. #WHUFC”
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3070 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Looks like this is going to drag on for longer thenNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:04 pmRyan Taylor
“West Ham have made an opening offer for Maxwel Cornet which falls short of #BurnleyFC valuation. Clarets still holding out for close to £17m. Filip Kostić not totally off table but understand there are various complications, not least fresh interest from Juventus. #WHUFC”
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Jacob Steinberg from the Guardian said this
‘West Ham, who are close to agreeing a deal to sign the Burnley forward Maxwel Cornet after having an offer of about £17m rejected on Tuesday night’
So many mixed reports on this - surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it
‘West Ham, who are close to agreeing a deal to sign the Burnley forward Maxwel Cornet after having an offer of about £17m rejected on Tuesday night’
So many mixed reports on this - surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Belgian sports media saying Benson is in Burnley.
Didn't know the evil Van Bommel was Antwerp manager but he says this:
"Benson isn't going to Norway [Antwerp play Lilleström tomorrow in the Conference League]. He's in the process of sorting his transfer out. Am I sad he's going? Yes, he's played well here and was happy. But when a player wants to leave you can stop him if the club really wants to at all costs.However, we haven't done so in this case. He's done well for us and we have to take that into account. He absolutely wanted to step up a level."
https://www.walfoot.be/news/2022-08-03/ ... n-empecher
Didn't know the evil Van Bommel was Antwerp manager but he says this:
"Benson isn't going to Norway [Antwerp play Lilleström tomorrow in the Conference League]. He's in the process of sorting his transfer out. Am I sad he's going? Yes, he's played well here and was happy. But when a player wants to leave you can stop him if the club really wants to at all costs.However, we haven't done so in this case. He's done well for us and we have to take that into account. He absolutely wanted to step up a level."
https://www.walfoot.be/news/2022-08-03/ ... n-empecher
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No expert on this but it probably depends on the payment structure and also on what bids we have had... If no club has activated the release clause with the payment structure instructed within that release clause then I don't see why we can't sell below that release clause value if there is value in the payment structure being offered...surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it
Whatever happens, it sounds like we may have the upper hand in the way the release clause is structured and I am quite impressed with how savvy we have been in some of these deals... We certainly seem to have a far better transfer team in place than previously anyway.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Wasn't it mentioned somewhere that the release clause is deemed void because it became public? Or did I dream it?RVclaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:09 pmJacob Steinberg from the Guardian said this
‘West Ham, who are close to agreeing a deal to sign the Burnley forward Maxwel Cornet after having an offer of about £17m rejected on Tuesday night’
So many mixed reports on this - surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it![]()
-
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
- Been Liked: 591 times
- Has Liked: 210 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I suspect Cornet outgoing and Benson incoming are both imminent.
On the admittedly limited evidence of one game, we seem to be acquiring very accomplished players for a fraction of the cost of the likes of Cornet and Weghorst. This is the ALK model, but the downside is that players like Cullen and Bastien will be off as soon as their value has increased sufficiently.
That situation may change if we get ack to the Premier League quickly.
On the admittedly limited evidence of one game, we seem to be acquiring very accomplished players for a fraction of the cost of the likes of Cornet and Weghorst. This is the ALK model, but the downside is that players like Cullen and Bastien will be off as soon as their value has increased sufficiently.
That situation may change if we get ack to the Premier League quickly.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
lakedistrictclaret wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:29 pmI suspect Cornet outgoing and Benson incoming are both imminent.
On the admittedly limited evidence of one game, we seem to be acquiring very accomplished players for a fraction of the cost of the likes of Cornet and Weghorst. This is the ALK model, but the downside is that players like Cullen and Bastien will be off as soon as their value has increased sufficiently.
That situation may change if we get ack to the Premier League quickly.
Far better business model than the old way and the way forward for all clubs our size.
Cornet as turned out a good investment but now is the time for him to move on so that we can take him of the pay roll to suit our new business model
If our new strategy works out and we get promoted we shall have more or less wiped of our debt this time next year
This user liked this post: Rumbletonk
-
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If we get Cornet’s release clause we’ve done well.
-
- Posts: 2894
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1863 times
- Has Liked: 3251 times
-
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 612 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Why would it become void if made public? If Burnley didn't want a release clause but Cornet did, then Burnley would agree to it but then make sure it leaked out.
I'm pretty sure the release clause is valid either way.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Doing a deal with those East end barrow boys won't be easy, they're the London old school and are as dodgy as feck
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That can’t be the case surely? It makes such clauses literally not worth the paper they’re written on. All it takes is an agent to leak details to a friendly journalist and his/her client is suddenly free from the clause.