Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
claretlegend
Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:11 am
Been Liked: 148 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretlegend » Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:50 am

Maxwell to West Ham is done. Same reliable source who told me about Dwight. Not sure on the fee.

Conroy92
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 707 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Conroy92 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:54 am

Call me cynical but the timing fits, one ready to depart and one ready to be announced, the club have played it like this all window.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:54 am

Let's hope the reporting on Cornet to West Ham is accurate. It has certainly dragged on for far too long now.

RVclaret
Posts: 16203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:59 am

Alex Crook tweeted

‘As just discussed on @talkSPORT #WHUFC are in for Maxwel Cornet after failing to agree deal for Kostic. Believe they are looking at a permanent deal.‘

Doesn’t mention any fee being agreed.

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:00 pm

Just a reminder, if anyone needs one, as to just what we'll be missing when Cornet leaves.

Scroll down for all of his spectacular goals.

https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... midfielder

randomclaret2
Posts: 7743
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3054 times
Has Liked: 4793 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by randomclaret2 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:59 am
Alex Crook tweeted

‘As just discussed on @talkSPORT #WHUFC are in for Maxwel Cornet after failing to agree deal for Kostic. Believe they are looking at a permanent deal.‘

Doesn’t mention any fee being agreed.
Isnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:03 pm

Glad he's off we can use the money to far better use.

Don't think we would have got value for money out of him in the championship he would have spent the best part of the season with the physio, especially with the WC this winter
This user liked this post: Quicknick

Zlatan
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2230 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:00 pm
Just a reminder, if anyone needs one, as to just what we'll be missing when Cornet leaves.

Scroll down for all of his spectacular goals.

https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... midfielder
Watching that highlights reel shows me where his weakness lies… he doesn’t do tap ins… every goal was a worldly :D
These 2 users liked this post: Gordaleman lesxdp

Goody1975
Posts: 3304
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 1150 times
Has Liked: 279 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Goody1975 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm

randomclaret2 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 pm
Isnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?
...and that Cornet thought he was "a loan"
Last edited by Goody1975 on Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13019
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3663 times
Has Liked: 2111 times
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by wilks_bfc » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm

randomclaret2 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 pm
Isnt this the fella who told us Brownhill was leaving as he was out of contract this summer ?
It is

He also reported that when Cornet said he wanted to return to Lyon, Jackson told him he wasn’t “a loan” 🤦‍♂️

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10444
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3069 times
Has Liked: 2434 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:08 pm

Benson or no Benson that side deserves another run out. Bed(sic) the lad in.

Goody1975
Posts: 3304
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 1150 times
Has Liked: 279 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Goody1975 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pm

If indeed we are at a point this week where Cornet leaves and Benson arrives, what is everyone expecting for the remainder of our transfer dealings?

Incomings?

Outgoings?

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm
Watching that highlights reel shows me where his weakness lies… he doesn’t do tap ins… every goal was a worldly :D
Spot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.
This user liked this post: Zlatan

Robbo1882
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:41 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Robbo1882 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:10 pm

We’ll get a nice profit on Cornet and a cheaper player in Benson brought in that hopefully we’ll make a profit on in the future, for a Championship club now it decent business and from the clips I’ve seen on YouTube Benson looks a very good direct player that will help ease the pain of losing Max

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:11 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:59 am
Alex Crook tweeted

‘As just discussed on @talkSPORT #WHUFC are in for Maxwel Cornet after failing to agree deal for Kostic. Believe they are looking at a permanent deal.‘

Doesn’t mention any fee being agreed.
Definitely was not how it was said on the radio. Said fee agreed for permanent deal

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8505
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1839 times
Has Liked: 2185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Woodleyclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:13 pm

Sky reporting Max is a loan
Probably an error, as we need the cash agreed not loaning him out

claretcarrot93
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
Been Liked: 427 times
Has Liked: 80 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretcarrot93 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:16 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pm
Spot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.
Surprised he is going West ham according to some on here he would not get in the Burnley team

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10444
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3069 times
Has Liked: 2434 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm

From Sky just now.
C29666E0-C4E5-4F4B-B1C7-272543FE0C7C.jpeg
C29666E0-C4E5-4F4B-B1C7-272543FE0C7C.jpeg (225.91 KiB) Viewed 6070 times

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11589
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4725 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pm
Spot on. It's criminal that if someone pays cash, we have to let him go for £17.5 million.
:D

How do you work that out ?

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:13 pm
Sky reporting Max is a loan
Probably an error, as we need the cash agreed not loaning him out
They are saying that that's what Wet Spam want, not Burnley.

I'm still hoping no-one divvies up and he stays. After all, I have a shirt with his name and number on it.
These 2 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret lesxdp

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:19 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm
:D

How do you work that out ?
Try reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.

kenyon6923
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 48 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kenyon6923 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:20 pm

West Ham did the same with Benrahma at Brentford - initial season loan then signed him

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:21 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:19 pm
Try reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.
Given we've struggled to get anyone to meet the release clause (we don't even know if West Ham have met it yet), I strongly suspect we would not be looking at a higher fee.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3925
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 724 times
Has Liked: 3194 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:22 pm

I’d be happy for a loan fee and 1st refusal to buy at a reasonable price. When we get promoted he can come back or if he wants to stay at WH we get a decent fee.
This user liked this post: whiffa

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11589
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4725 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:23 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:19 pm
Try reading the original posts and look at the context. If it wasn't for his release clause we'd be looking at a far higher fee.

Maybe the release clause was part of the agreement on him signing in the first place.

How much more would he cost without the release clause, you say far higher yet nobody so far has offered 17.5m despite knowing this gets him. The idea we would get a far higher fee is crazy when people are trying to get the 17.5m lowered.

Logic is always more accurate than fantasy

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13019
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3663 times
Has Liked: 2111 times
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by wilks_bfc » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:24 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm
They are saying that that's what Wet Spam want, not Burnley.

I'm still hoping no-one divvies up and he stays. After all, I have a shirt with his name and number on it.
There was a young lad in the shop on Friday getting the new shirt telling his dad he wanted Cornet 20 on it

His dad was trying his best to convince to pick another one without breaking it to him he’d most likely be going

Not sure if he managed it

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:25 pm

Goody1975 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:09 pm
If indeed we are at a point this week where Cornet leaves and Benson arrives, what is everyone expecting for the remainder of our transfer dealings?

Incomings?

Outgoings?
1 mobile, quick number 9.
1 who can play anywhere across the front.

Outgoings, Youngsters on loan.

NellyDBFC
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NellyDBFC » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:28 pm

Looking like history repeating regarding Maxwell..

Fulham, Everton, Newcastle and now West ham all frankley trying it on....either pay up or p.ss off

Be interesting to know how many owners of the above clubs would offer me a buy to let on one of there properties...then within 12 months the roof leaks and the boiler packs in..so I hand the house back with its value having dipped.
Last edited by NellyDBFC on Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:28 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:21 pm
Given we've struggled to get anyone to meet the release clause (we don't even know if West Ham have met it yet), I strongly suspect we would not be looking at a higher fee.
That's just not the case. Most transfers go through on the 'Never never'. Very few clubs stump up the who fee in one go, even the top six don't.

As it is, it's only Cornet's release clause that's keeping the price so low. It shows how much other clubs value him by the fact that two or three are seemingly prepared to pay £25 million for him in instalments. Had his release clause been £25 million, we may have had offers in the region of £30 to £35 million if paid on the drip.

Personally, I think Burnley are playing hard ball with Cornet and are hoping no one will pay £17.5 million and Cornet stays at Burnley.

ksrclaret
Posts: 7907
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2987 times
Has Liked: 855 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:30 pm

Gordaleman wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:28 pm
That's just not the case. Most transfers go through on the 'Never never'. Very few clubs stump up the who fee in one go, even the top six don't.

As it is, it's only Cornet's release clause that's keeping the price so low. It shows how much other clubs value him by the fact that two or three are seemingly prepared to pay £25 million for him in instalments. Had his release clause been £25 million, we may have had offers in the region of £30 to £35 million if paid on the drip.

Personally, I think Burnley are playing hard ball with Cornet and are hoping no one will pay £17.5 million and Cornet stays at Burnley.
Absolute fantasy land now

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11589
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4725 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:32 pm

:D

"Nobody will pay 17.5m as it has to be in 1 payment but they would paid 35m spread out"

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:44 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:32 pm
:D

"Nobody will pay 17.5m as it has to be in 1 payment but they would paid 35m spread out"
No, you didn't read what I wrote. I said if the release clause was £25 million they might. (Because he's worth at least £25 million.)

Anyway, let's agree to disagree. This is a discussion, not an argument and everyone is entitled to their own view, even me.

I still hope he ends up staying.

Rumbletonk
Posts: 815
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
Been Liked: 314 times
Has Liked: 285 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rumbletonk » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:59 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:23 pm
Maybe the release clause was part of the agreement on him signing in the first place.

How much more would he cost without the release clause, you say far higher yet nobody so far has offered 17.5m despite knowing this gets him. The idea we would get a far higher fee is crazy when people are trying to get the 17.5m lowered.

Logic is always more accurate than fantasy
The release clause would have been negotiated at point of sale (to us). The higher fee would come into play if the buying club, as reported, want to loan for a season with the obligation to buy.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3900
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 1008 times
Has Liked: 1200 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Boss Hogg » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:00 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:17 pm
From Sky just now.
C29666E0-C4E5-4F4B-B1C7-272543FE0C7C.jpeg
This sounds like a cr*p deal. If they can’t afford him up front they can’t afford him.

claretbob
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:22 am
Been Liked: 144 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretbob » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:01 pm

Pretty sure the only reason Arsenal paid £70m for Pepe was because only £20m was paid upfront and the rest payable over 4/5 years whilst Palace wanted £50m for Zaha upfront. Clubs seem to have a yearly budget and it’s all about cash flow. It’s pure speculation but it would not be a surprise that the Collins fee was mainly upfront whilst Mcneil’s looks to be paid on an annual £5m basis with the fourth year probably not payable unless he has played a certain number of games.
My feeling is that we are quite keen on the possibility of getting Cornet back if we go up so the loan might be a runner. No-one is paying £17.5m upfront so assuming wages are the issue it might be the best way forward. If everyone else has dropped to a “measly” £25k per week and he is still on £50k it is going to lead to a bad feeling in the camp.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:04 pm

Ryan Taylor

“West Ham have made an opening offer for Maxwel Cornet which falls short of #BurnleyFC valuation. Clarets still holding out for close to £17m. Filip Kostić not totally off table but understand there are various complications, not least fresh interest from Juventus. #WHUFC”

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10444
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3069 times
Has Liked: 2434 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:04 pm

Boss Hogg wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:00 pm
This sounds like a cr*p deal. If they can’t afford him up front they can’t afford him.
I’d be more concerned about the “club and player performances”.
A massive get out in there favour unless we are very careful.

RVclaret
Posts: 16203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:06 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:04 pm
Ryan Taylor

“West Ham have made an opening offer for Maxwel Cornet which falls short of #BurnleyFC valuation. Clarets still holding out for close to £17m. Filip Kostić not totally off table but understand there are various complications, not least fresh interest from Juventus. #WHUFC”
Looks like this is going to drag on for longer then

RVclaret
Posts: 16203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:09 pm

Jacob Steinberg from the Guardian said this

‘West Ham, who are close to agreeing a deal to sign the Burnley forward Maxwel Cornet after having an offer of about £17m rejected on Tuesday night’

So many mixed reports on this - surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it :lol:

ecc
Posts: 6103
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2090 times
Has Liked: 1707 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ecc » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:24 pm

Belgian sports media saying Benson is in Burnley.

Didn't know the evil Van Bommel was Antwerp manager but he says this:

"Benson isn't going to Norway [Antwerp play Lilleström tomorrow in the Conference League]. He's in the process of sorting his transfer out. Am I sad he's going? Yes, he's played well here and was happy. But when a player wants to leave you can stop him if the club really wants to at all costs.However, we haven't done so in this case. He's done well for us and we have to take that into account. He absolutely wanted to step up a level."

https://www.walfoot.be/news/2022-08-03/ ... n-empecher

BigChaCha
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 293 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BigChaCha » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:26 pm

surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it
No expert on this but it probably depends on the payment structure and also on what bids we have had... If no club has activated the release clause with the payment structure instructed within that release clause then I don't see why we can't sell below that release clause value if there is value in the payment structure being offered...

Whatever happens, it sounds like we may have the upper hand in the way the release clause is structured and I am quite impressed with how savvy we have been in some of these deals... We certainly seem to have a far better transfer team in place than previously anyway.

bpgburn
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:02 pm
Been Liked: 232 times
Has Liked: 90 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by bpgburn » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:28 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:09 pm
Jacob Steinberg from the Guardian said this

‘West Ham, who are close to agreeing a deal to sign the Burnley forward Maxwel Cornet after having an offer of about £17m rejected on Tuesday night’

So many mixed reports on this - surely there can’t be a release clause if they’ve bid 500k underneath it :lol:
Wasn't it mentioned somewhere that the release clause is deemed void because it became public? Or did I dream it?

lakedistrictclaret
Posts: 1693
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
Been Liked: 591 times
Has Liked: 210 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by lakedistrictclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:29 pm

I suspect Cornet outgoing and Benson incoming are both imminent.
On the admittedly limited evidence of one game, we seem to be acquiring very accomplished players for a fraction of the cost of the likes of Cornet and Weghorst. This is the ALK model, but the downside is that players like Cullen and Bastien will be off as soon as their value has increased sufficiently.
That situation may change if we get ack to the Premier League quickly.

RVclaret
Posts: 16203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:30 pm

bpgburn wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:28 pm
Wasn't it mentioned somewhere that the release clause is deemed void because it became public? Or did I dream it?
It was. Seems to be some confusion / difference on reporting depending on which journo you follow.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:34 pm

lakedistrictclaret wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:29 pm
I suspect Cornet outgoing and Benson incoming are both imminent.
On the admittedly limited evidence of one game, we seem to be acquiring very accomplished players for a fraction of the cost of the likes of Cornet and Weghorst. This is the ALK model, but the downside is that players like Cullen and Bastien will be off as soon as their value has increased sufficiently.
That situation may change if we get ack to the Premier League quickly.

Far better business model than the old way and the way forward for all clubs our size.

Cornet as turned out a good investment but now is the time for him to move on so that we can take him of the pay roll to suit our new business model

If our new strategy works out and we get promoted we shall have more or less wiped of our debt this time next year
This user liked this post: Rumbletonk

agreenwood
Posts: 4461
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2462 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:35 pm

If we get Cornet’s release clause we’ve done well.

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1863 times
Has Liked: 3251 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Stalbansclaret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:36 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 pm
It is

He also reported that when Cornet said he wanted to return to Lyon, Jackson told him he wasn’t “a loan” 🤦‍♂️
Err that was a joke based around the Michael Jackson song "You Are Not Alone"

Gordaleman
Posts: 4028
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 862 times
Has Liked: 612 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Gordaleman » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:37 pm

bpgburn wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:28 pm
Wasn't it mentioned somewhere that the release clause is deemed void because it became public? Or did I dream it?
Why would it become void if made public? If Burnley didn't want a release clause but Cornet did, then Burnley would agree to it but then make sure it leaked out.

I'm pretty sure the release clause is valid either way.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:41 pm

Doing a deal with those East end barrow boys won't be easy, they're the London old school and are as dodgy as feck

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by martin_p » Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:43 pm

bpgburn wrote:
Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:28 pm
Wasn't it mentioned somewhere that the release clause is deemed void because it became public? Or did I dream it?
That can’t be the case surely? It makes such clauses literally not worth the paper they’re written on. All it takes is an agent to leak details to a friendly journalist and his/her client is suddenly free from the clause.

Post Reply