Gary Lineker

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:31 pm

gandhisflipflop wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:26 pm
Don’t really care about his political leanings (it ain’t worth the stress), I wouldn’t agree with him if it’s similar to Linekers but I’d enjoy his shows. FWIW, I don’t actually think Lineker is a bad presenter at all.
I think that is key

He's very good at what he does and that is all that should matter when its being talked about whether he should be sacked or not

Course, if I wanted to show people that his comparisons to 1930s Germany weren't valid, I reckon I wouldn't demand his sacking (for very obvious reasons one would think)

IanMcL
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6928 times
Has Liked: 10327 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by IanMcL » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:33 pm

martin_p wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:14 pm
To be fair, they are illegal aliens.
Even Dale's and Vybermen should be properly processed, to ascertain their status....if they ask, of course!

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:33 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:28 pm
Yes you did - apologies Rowls
I’ll ask it another way then.

Why do you think it’s ok for Sally Nugent to express and promote her political views on national TV on the BBC programme she hosts to millions of viewers yet you think it’s not ok for Lineker to express his political views on a media outlet that is not even the BBC ?
I'm having to look up who this lady is, TBH.

As a journalist she should (and will) come under a much higher level of restriction and scrutiny than Lineker who is a sports presenter.

However, that doesn't mean there should be zero scrutiny or restriction on Lineker - everybody and anybody can be a political commentator these days.

As I've said before, it never used to matter. Does anybody know which way Des Lynam voted in 1992? No. And nobody cares.

But given that Lineker is one of THE faces of the BBC, if he continues his role of high-profile political commentator he will undermine the BBC's ability to present itself as impartial. The BBC cannot allow that to happen.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9817
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3230 times
Has Liked: 10711 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by evensteadiereddie » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:34 pm

Indeed, Lancaster. Censure rather than censorship?

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:35 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:27 pm
You wouldn't Rowls.
Trust me on this one.
How very drole, fatboy.

I'm grateful for the giggle.

fatboy47
Posts: 5333
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2873 times
Has Liked: 3232 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by fatboy47 » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:36 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 12:41 pm
No one is illegal until they have been processed.

After that, 80% will prove (from current statistics) to be legitimate refugees.

The Government is unable to repatriate the other 20%, so all pointless. Just a political stunt....the new Brexshit to try and galvanise some sort of tory vote at an election they are currently likely to be decimated. Hate counts.

Good Post Ian.
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie jetblackcat

MrTopTier
Posts: 3630
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
Been Liked: 1232 times
Has Liked: 1101 times
Location: The Moon, Outer Space.

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by MrTopTier » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:38 pm

1882Clarets1882 wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:24 pm
See my OP.
I have.

Suspect even without the first paragraph, the thread would have followed a similar direction, we just see things differently.

basil6345789
Posts: 3050
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 530 times
Has Liked: 2434 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by basil6345789 » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:39 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:07 pm
You’ve spelled “country” wrong ;)
wrongly

MrTopTier
Posts: 3630
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
Been Liked: 1232 times
Has Liked: 1101 times
Location: The Moon, Outer Space.

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by MrTopTier » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:39 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:35 pm
How very drole, fatboy.

I'm grateful for the giggle.
It’s droll Rowls. Although drole could work.
This user liked this post: Rowls

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:43 pm

basil6345789 wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:39 pm
wrongly
Wrong.

https://grammarist.com/usage/wrong-wrongly/

(actually, maybe just debatable, but I wanted to use the word “wrong” again.)

Bigbopper
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:21 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 18 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Bigbopper » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:43 pm

Winston is his middle name, bet he loves that one. Married twice and both fired him off can not for the life of me think why. Pay your taxes Winston and shut up.
This user liked this post: sjb

1882Clarets1882
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 198 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by 1882Clarets1882 » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:43 pm

MrTopTier wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:38 pm
I have.

Suspect even without the first paragraph, the thread would have followed a similar direction, we just see things differently.
Fair enough.
This user liked this post: MrTopTier

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:27 pm
You wouldn't Rowls.
Trust me on this one.
FAO those that "like" this post:

Joke or no joke, I have a sneaking suspicion that you "likers" happen to think it's true. It's pointless me rebutting it. However, the fact is, it's nott.

But here's a question:

What could I do to convince you I'm sincere?

If the answer is 'nothing', then what?

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:45 pm

MrTopTier wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:39 pm
It’s droll Rowls. Although drole could work.
Thank you. I've mistakenly used the French spelling.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3763
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1481 times
Has Liked: 364 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Big Vinny K » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:45 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:33 pm
I'm having to look up who this lady is, TBH.

As a journalist she should (and will) come under a much higher level of restriction and scrutiny than Lineker who is a sports presenter.

However, that doesn't mean there should be zero scrutiny or restriction on Lineker - everybody and anybody can be a political commentator these days.

As I've said before, it never used to matter. Does anybody know which way Des Lynam voted in 1992? No. And nobody cares.

But given that Lineker is one of THE faces of the BBC, if he continues his role of high-profile political commentator he will undermine the BBC's ability to present itself as impartial. The BBC cannot allow that to happen.
She was promoting Marcus Rashford in his political campaign against the government - he’s a rather popular sportsman if you know him ?

After looking her up do you think she should have been sacked ?

Surely you are not arguing that what she did was less directly impartial than Lineker ? She didn’t do it on her twitter feed - she did it directly on the programme she was hosting to millions of viewers.

Just admit it’s the subject matter that upsets you and not what Lineker did

Whilst it’s fun to watch you dig yourself into holes in these debates it would save us all a bit of time and effort if you took the Wrongo approach !
This user liked this post: Foreverly Claret

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:47 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 pm
FAO those that "like" this post:

Joke or no joke, I have a sneaking suspicion that you "likers" happen to think it's true. It's pointless me rebutting it. However, the fact is, it's nott.

But here's a question:

What could I do to convince you I'm sincere?

If the answer is 'nothing', then what?
Maybe if you had called out racism and antisemitism coming from anyone other than Jeremy Corbyn, that might have done the trick. It’s a bit too late now, though, I’m afraid.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish

Rileybobs
Posts: 18707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7668 times
Has Liked: 1590 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:48 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 pm
What could I do to convince you I'm sincere?
Probably by not having an extensive history of being insincere.
These 3 users liked this post: Greenmile Bordeauxclaret Lord Beamish

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:48 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:44 pm
FAO those that "like" this post:

Joke or no joke, I have a sneaking suspicion that you "likers" happen to think it's true. It's pointless me rebutting it. However, the fact is, it's nott.

But here's a question:

What could I do to convince you I'm sincere?

If the answer is 'nothing', then what?
Time travel back to a time before you started posting on the board?

Being serious for a sec Rowls, why do you think people have liked that?

I'm 100% happy to defend my position on stuff, and when I'm wrong (which can happen!) I'm perfectly happy to admit I'd wrong, and also perfectly happy to accept that my position might not be the majority position on this board.

Are you sure you are?

Shaggy
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 511 times
Has Liked: 178 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Shaggy » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:53 pm

The government are perfectly correct with their small boats bill. We can’t have people swarming in causing a rise in crime, and putting pressure on our public services.

Lineker is just another woke blowbag. He’s entitled to his opinion but using his privileged platform to express it shouldn’t be allowed. If he had the opposite view it would be dealt with very quickly with his dismissal.
These 2 users liked this post: Volvoclaret sjb

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:54 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:45 pm
After looking her up do you think she should have been sacked ?
I have to confess I've only viewed a few stories, which I skim read.

It's not something I want to devote more time to. She seems to garner a lot of vitriol from the Daily Express so for an apparent political bias.

On the whole, the BBC do a good to decent job of moderating their political / news presenters.

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:54 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:47 pm
Maybe if you had called out racism and antisemitism coming from anyone other than Jeremy Corbyn, that might have done the trick. It’s a bit too late now, though, I’m afraid.
I didn't realise there was a cut off point. Is there also an end point for highlighting these issues?

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:57 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:48 pm
Probably by not having an extensive history of being insincere.
I've been flippant on the odd occasion because everybody has the right to be flippant once in a while. But I think it's obvious 99.99% of the time when I'm being flippant and when I'm not.

However, ask yourself this: If people regularly engage in political debate with me only to pull the "you don't really believe what you're saying, what you really believe is xxxx" and the "xxxx" is basically just a strawman position which they are attributing to me, then where does that leave us?

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:59 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:48 pm
Time travel back to a time before you started posting on the board?

Being serious for a sec Rowls, why do you think people have liked that?

I'm 100% happy to defend my position on stuff, and when I'm wrong (which can happen!) I'm perfectly happy to admit I'd wrong, and also perfectly happy to accept that my position might not be the majority position on this board.

Are you sure you are?
I hope people have 'liked" it because it was a funny remark.

But the joke appears to have been lost on greenmile, for example, who appears to have taken it all very earnestly. Do you want to explain it to him?

Rileybobs implying it too, to a much lesser extent. Rileybobs is more likely to be having a bit of fun.
Last edited by Rowls on Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11763
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4773 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:59 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:59 pm
I hope people have 'liked" it because it was a funny remark.

But the joke appears to have been lost on greenmile, for example and has taken it all very seriously.

Rileybobs implying it too, to a much lesser extent.

Are you nervous about the risk of snow tomorrow ? Will you be ok if it gets called off

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:01 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:54 pm
I didn't realise there was a cut off point. Is there also an end point for highlighting these issues?
No start point, or end point, but you passed up so many opportunities to do so that any attempt to do so now will likely come across as incredibly insincere. Remember “no no no! This is a thread to discuss antisemitism in Corbyn’s Labour Party. Start your own thread if you want to talk about the Tories’ Islamophobia” ? (I’m paraphrasing, but only slightly)

…or how about when you banged on and on about Corbyn’s links to Irish terrorism, and the you had to pretend you’d been away on a stag do to avoid answering the obvious questions when Theresa May climbed into bed with Arlene Foster’s DUP.
Last edited by Greenmile on Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2490
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1468 times
Has Liked: 468 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by JohnMcGreal » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:01 pm

Just a reminder that it was only 2 months ago that Braverman was confronted in person by a holocaust survivor over her use of language around refugees:

In footage of the exchange, provided by the charity Freedom from Torture, Ms Salter said: "When I hear you using words against refugees like 'swarms' and an 'invasion', I am reminded of the language used to dehumanise and justify the murder of my family and millions of others.

"Why do you find the need to use that kind of language?"


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-64282961

Play the ball and not the man. Stop hiding behind your dislike of Linekar and his position and try addressing the actual substance of what he's saying.
These 8 users liked this post: Greenmile Lancasterclaret nil_desperandum Lord Beamish Foreverly Claret jetblackcat longsidepies IanMcL

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:59 pm
Are you nervous about the risk of snow tomorrow ? Will you be ok if it gets called off
In the Championship, not really. If the snow is heavy and it's impossible to play football then the game ought to be called off.

One of the things that really gets to me is moral cowardice. I objectly so strongly to the spuds match being called off because that game could have kicked off, on time and it would have taken place under a blue sky.

It was called off because the spuds officials pressured the referee into calling it off and they did so because they had a handful of players not available.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3763
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1481 times
Has Liked: 364 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Big Vinny K » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:54 pm
I have to confess I've only viewed a few stories, which I skim read.

It's not something I want to devote more time to. She seems to garner a lot of vitriol from the Daily Express so for an apparent political bias.

On the whole, the BBC do a good to decent job of moderating their political / news presenters.
Are you saying (or pretending) that you don’t know much about what Marcus Rashford did ?

You knew about the immigration debate - Lineker didn’t bring that to your attention did he ?

Let’s forget about Sally Nugent for a second !!

Do you believe that anyone on the BBC who spoke against the government on the policy that Marcus Rashford campaigned for should not have been allowed to do so ?

Or is it just on certain political subjects that you do not think they should express their political views ?

If it’s the latter which ones ?


And btw - The Daily Express !!!

Chobulous
Posts: 2132
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:27 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Chobulous » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:05 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 12:39 pm
When have I ever claimed cancel culture was acceptable? When I have I ever called for someone to lose their job because they exercised their right to free speech?
To be fair I don’t remember you specifically endorsing cancel culture.

But then again, I don’t remember you specifically condemning it either, until now that is. Why is that I wonder? What is different about this example, and all the other widely reported examples?

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:07 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:59 pm
I hope people have 'liked" it because it was a funny remark.

But the joke appears to have been lost on greenmile, for example, who appears to have taken it all very earnestly. Do you want to explain it to him?

Rileybobs implying it too, to a much lesser extent. Rileybobs is more likely to be having a bit of fun.
I take hypocrisy pretty seriously, yes. You don’t need to explain anything to me.

Falcon
Posts: 3363
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
Been Liked: 931 times
Has Liked: 1268 times
Location: Proudsville

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Falcon » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:08 pm

Chobulous wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:05 pm
To be fair I don’t remember you specifically endorsing cancel culture.

But then again, I don’t remember you specifically condemning it either, until now that is. Why is that I wonder? What is different about this example, and all the other widely reported examples?
I suspect they haven't specifically condemned doing Nazi salutes, or half and half scarves, or throwing jelly at orphans. Doesn't mean that they're a supporter...
This user liked this post: Greenmile

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:08 pm

Chobulous wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:05 pm
To be fair I don’t remember you specifically endorsing cancel culture.

But then again, I don’t remember you specifically condemning it either, until now that is. Why is that I wonder? What is different about this example, and all the other widely reported examples?
Maybe it’s the hypocrisy of those bemoaning cancel culture (which I have never done either btw - I think it’s all overblown culture war nonsense), now calling for Lineker to be cancelled.

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:11 pm

Falcon wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:08 pm
I suspect they haven't specifically condemned doing Nazi salutes, or half and half scarves, or throwing jelly at orphans. Doesn't mean that they're a supporter...
I could be wrong, but I’ve a feeling I have condemned Nazi salutes, as it happens.

Your wider point still stands though.

NottsClaret
Posts: 4288
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2924 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by NottsClaret » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:12 pm

This is definitely one of the threads AI could complete for us.
These 2 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Enola Gay

Stockbrokerbelt
Posts: 773
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
Been Liked: 303 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Stockbrokerbelt » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:16 pm

I think we all know this is just another page out of the Trump/fascist playbook, pick on the weak immigrants & make them the enemy that plays for a large part of the UK electorate, camouflage for all the things that have gone wrong from the economy to the NHS to Brexit. It’s clearly against the law & will end like everything else they have touched. It shows how far the UK has fallen, the mess just becomes normal for the cowed population. The French or most other European populations would be on the streets, UK is gutless, lost & suffering a lack of morals.
These 4 users liked this post: Foreverly Claret fatboy47 jrgbfc IanMcL

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:21 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:01 pm
No start point, or end point, but you passed up so many opportunities to do so that any attempt to do so now will likely come across as incredibly insincere. Remember “no no no! This is a thread to discuss antisemitism in Corbyn’s Labour Party. Start your own thread if you want to talk about the Tories’ Islamophobia” ? (I’m paraphrasing, but only slightly)

…or how about when you banged on and on about Corbyn’s links to Irish terrorism, and the you had to pretend you’d been away on a stag do to avoid answering the obvious questions when Theresa May climbed into bed with Arlene Foster’s DUP.
I don't follow your logic at all. I find you difficult to engage with you. You're openly are not prepared to take what I say on face value, so let me instead share a little story with you.

I've got a friend, an Englisman, who lives in France. He's got dual nationality nowadays and lives there permanently. He's an academic and has the intelligence to match. He's also highly articulate and thoughtful. However despite his intelligence (here you go Rileybobs, a bit flippancy snook into a serious subject) he also what I like to call "a massive lefty".

He brought up the question of Corbyn's alleged anti-semitism to me one day. The question he asked me was, "I've seen this storm about anti-semitism in the Labour party and centred around Jeremy Corbyn. Tell me Rowls, do you think Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-semite?"

He's used to asking questions, because he's a lecturer. And, unlike most of the responses on here, he really can tear an argument apart if it's weak or unfounded or insincere. So I made sure I thought about my response, moreso than I often do here.

"Let me show you something," I said.

And I found a picture online of the infamous mural that Jeremy Corbyn had "liked". For reference, the picture can be found at the link below, and if you need to the context about this, then click the link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_for_Humanity

And then I told him that, no, I do not think that Jeremy Corbyn is, himself, an antisemite. However, Corbyn's politics had given him a massive blindspot when it came to antisemitism because it so often accompanied the kind of left wing politics that he was receptive to.

I think Jeremy Corbyn is a genuine and honest guy, a man of principle. But he certainly did (and still does) have a massive blindspot when it comes to anti-semitism.

My friend hadn't seen the mural before. He doesn't read British newspapers or obtain much that is contemporary from a British perspective. He'd only read a left-wing French article describing the debate, from a left leaning, pro-Corbyn bias so he hadn't seen the mural before. He was actually shocked that a high level politician could have been so stupid as to publicly endorse a mural like the one Jeremy Corbyn did.

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:29 pm

Inline answers for ease of response:
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
Are you saying (or pretending) that you don’t know much about what Marcus Rashford did ?
No.
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
You knew about the immigration debate - Lineker didn’t bring that to your attention did he ?
No, saw it on the BBC website.
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
Let’s forget about Sally Nugent for a second !!
Deal! In fact, I'm prepared to forget about her for much longer. It's only via this thread that I've learned her name.
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
Do you believe that anyone on the BBC who spoke against the government on the policy that Marcus Rashford campaigned for should not have been allowed to do so ?
It depends on their role. Some are there as commentators, some as hosts. The hosts should not comment. The commentators should. It's the hosts role to challenge, question and probe the people commenting but we should come away not having any inclination of the host's opinion.
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
Or is it just on certain political subjects that you do not think they should express their political views ?
See above. It depends on their role. A host should remain impartial.
Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:03 pm
And btw - The Daily Express !!!
The Daily Express!!!

Yes, THE DAILY EXPRESS!!!

I think I understand the point you're making here - THE DAILY EXPRESS!!!

Corky
Posts: 1466
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 553 times
Has Liked: 416 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Corky » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:30 pm

I haven't read all the messages that have popped up since I had my lunch. So apologies if this has been mentioned. As far as I can see this whole episode revolves around the BBC retaining its political impartiality. And how this is impacted by the actions of the people who work fully or part time for the Beeb. Obviously all these people have an opinion on the current hot topic of "stop the boats" even if it is ambivalence. But I find it strange and for some, quite disingenuous, how they have leapt upon the utterances of a former footballer just because he now hosts a sports programme once a week. I assume that his perceived high profile is a concern for them but for me his forthright words are quite refreshing and a basic exercise in free speech.

Ask yourselves this; how impartial is the Beeb when the Chairman and Director General are both card carrying members of the tory party. Just because they don't make their allegiances obvious does not mean they are not orchestrating things from the shadows. Such things as policy decisions will surely be impacted by their political views. Didn't the DG say as much on his joining the Beeb, something along the lines of there are too many lefty comedy programmes!!
These 8 users liked this post: Stockbrokerbelt Lancasterclaret Lord Beamish Steve-Harpers-perm Greenmile longsidepies jrgbfc IanMcL

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9817
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3230 times
Has Liked: 10711 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by evensteadiereddie » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:38 pm

Spot on, Corky, spot on.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:41 pm

bpgburn wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 12:45 pm
Isn't that something so trivial that you could and maybe should be big enough to just ignore?
Probably, but to me (and I fully appreciate that you won't have seen all the stuff he posted) it was verging on obsessive

martin_p
Posts: 11146
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4086 times
Has Liked: 753 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by martin_p » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:42 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:29 pm
It depends on their role. Some are there as commentators, some as hosts. The hosts should not comment. The commentators should. It's the hosts role to challenge, question and probe the people commenting but we should come away not having any inclination of the host's opinion.


See above. It depends on their role. A host should remain impartial.
Surely the whole point about the Linekar comments is that he was neither, he was commenting as an individual who happens to do some work for the BBC.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:44 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:01 pm
…or how about when you banged on and on about Corbyn’s links to Irish terrorism, and the you had to pretend you’d been away on a stag do to avoid answering the obvious questions when Theresa May climbed into bed with Arlene Foster’s DUP.
Lord Beamish wrote:
Hopefully this shout out to Lord Beamish works! I saw you "liked" the post so I thought I'd try and copy you in.

I miss Beamish and his posts from "Beamish Towers" from where he would benevolently betroth us with much lesser dwellings the benefit of his left wing wisdom. You should post more often, Lord Beamish.

I'd also like to throw a metaphorical party popper into the air for the idea that I've ever "pretended" to be on a stag do.

You understand the point I'm making though, don't you Greenmile? It's one thing to disagree with my opinions. That's all fine and dandy.

But when you can only attribute my opinions to some scurrilous imaginary motives that I somehow cunningly never mention or think that the best explanation for my opinions is "he clearly isn't on a stag do when he says he is!" then it strikes me that your worldview is somewhat skewed and off kilter.

So let me ask again, what would happen if you simply took my posts at face value?

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6510
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 984 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:45 pm

Presume from the fabricated uproar that Lineker is the first BBC employee who has expressed his personal opinion on Twitter?
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:46 pm

martin_p wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:42 pm
Surely the whole point about the Linekar comments is that he was neither, he was commenting as an individual who happens to do some work for the BBC.
Yes, well that's his defence.

As I've said a few times now martin, in the past it wouldn't have mattered. Social media has changed the world and I think the BBC needs to change it's guidance on impartiality in line with this.

Lineker isn't just an ordinary Joe Bloggs like you or me. He is one of the corporation's most high-profile faces.

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5026
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3455 times
Has Liked: 2958 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Lord Beamish » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:48 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:21 pm
I don't follow your logic at all. I find you difficult to engage with you. You're openly are not prepared to take what I say on face value, so let me instead share a little story with you.

I've got a friend, an Englisman, who lives in France. He's got dual nationality nowadays and lives there permanently. He's an academic and has the intelligence to match. He's also highly articulate and thoughtful. However despite his intelligence (here you go Rileybobs, a bit flippancy snook into a serious subject) he also what I like to call "a massive lefty".

He brought up the question of Corbyn's alleged anti-semitism to me one day. The question he asked me was, "I've seen this storm about anti-semitism in the Labour party and centred around Jeremy Corbyn. Tell me Rowls, do you think Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-semite?"

He's used to asking questions, because he's a lecturer. And, unlike most of the responses on here, he really can tear an argument apart if it's weak or unfounded or insincere. So I made sure I thought about my response, moreso than I often do here.

"Let me show you something," I said.

And I found a picture online of the infamous mural that Jeremy Corbyn had "liked". For reference, the picture can be found at the link below, and if you need to the context about this, then click the link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_for_Humanity

And then I told him that, no, I do not think that Jeremy Corbyn is, himself, an antisemite. However, Corbyn's politics had given him a massive blindspot when it came to antisemitism because it so often accompanied the kind of left wing politics that he was receptive to.

I think Jeremy Corbyn is a genuine and honest guy, a man of principle. But he certainly did (and still does) have a massive blindspot when it comes to anti-semitism.

My friend hadn't seen the mural before. He doesn't read British newspapers or obtain much that is contemporary from a British perspective. He'd only read a left-wing French article describing the debate, from a left leaning, pro-Corbyn bias so he hadn't seen the mural before. He was actually shocked that a high level politician could have been so stupid as to publicly endorse a mural like the one Jeremy Corbyn did.
He’s at the rambling prolixity stage now.
These 2 users liked this post: Greenmile Bordeauxclaret

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3763
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1481 times
Has Liked: 364 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Big Vinny K » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:48 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:29 pm
Inline answers for ease of response:


No.


No, saw it on the BBC website.


Deal! In fact, I'm prepared to forget about her for much longer. It's only via this thread that I've learned her name.


It depends on their role. Some are there as commentators, some as hosts. The hosts should not comment. The commentators should. It's the hosts role to challenge, question and probe the people commenting but we should come away not having any inclination of the host's opinion.


See above. It depends on their role. A host should remain impartial.



The Daily Express!!!

Yes, THE DAILY EXPRESS!!!

I think I understand the point you're making here - THE DAILY EXPRESS!!!
So to summarise your view is that Sally Nugent (or any other host) should not have been actively promoting Marcus Rashford in his successful campaign in persuading the government to change their policy on providing free school meals to children during COVID.
Even though it was abundantly clear that the u turn the government did was directly as a result of Sally Nugent and other BBC breakfast hosts bringing to the publics attention and indeed actively promoting Rashford’s campaign.

Maybe Gary Lineker, Sally Nugent and others in the BBC think that what they are hoping to achieve from expressing their political views is far more important than some Mr Cholmondley-Warner 1930s type view of how a BBC presenter should remain impartial and just get on with reading the auto cue that has been approved by the Tory Director General ?
This user liked this post: Greenmile

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1249 times
Has Liked: 213 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by AlargeClaret » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:48 pm

Corky wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:30 pm
I haven't read all the messages that have popped up since I had my lunch. So apologies if this has been mentioned. As far as I can see this whole episode revolves around the BBC retaining its political impartiality. And how this is impacted by the actions of the people who work fully or part time for the Beeb. Obviously all these people have an opinion on the current hot topic of "stop the boats" even if it is ambivalence. But I find it strange and for some, quite disingenuous, how they have leapt upon the utterances of a former footballer just because he now hosts a sports programme once a week. I assume that his perceived high profile is a concern for them but for me his forthright words are quite refreshing and a basic exercise in free speech.

Ask yourselves this; how impartial is the Beeb when the Chairman and Director General are both card carrying members of the tory party. Just because they don't make their allegiances obvious does not mean they are not orchestrating things from the shadows. Such things as policy decisions will surely be impacted by their political views. Didn't the DG say as much on his joining the Beeb, something along the lines of there are too many lefty comedy programmes!!
In case you weren’t aware Linekar( one of our greatest internationals and goal scorers ) “ who now hosts a sports program once a week “ has been presenting almost continuously for 25 yrs and is indeed extremely “high profile “
Anyone would have thought you were talking about Ray Deakin

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:49 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:48 pm
He’s at the rambling prolixity stage now.
Disappointing.

The old trick of referring to me in the third person is very dull and boring.

Go on, put a genuine opinion out there!

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Greenmile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:50 pm

Rowls wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:21 pm
I don't follow your logic at all…
Yes - that’s quite obvious from the rest of your post.

I’ll try to dumb it down for you a bit.

You are a massive hypocrite, because you regularly criticise those on the left for doing exactly what you would defend those on the right for doing.

Therefore, when you post something like “ If Lineker was speaking loudly about his support for conservative values and opinions I'd agree with him. But I'd still question whether a prominent BBC employee (or contracter, as he is claiming) should be campaigning so prominently for partisan political causes.”, anyone with a passing acquaintance with your posting history on here can tell that you are obviously lying - hence the numerous likes for fatboy’s post pointing this out.

Similarly, you went on a mad crusade about Corbyn’s antisemitism, not because you hate antisemitism per se, but because you couldn’t pass up the opportunity to have a dig at “the left”. This is demonstrated by your total failure to call out antisemitism or racism when committed by anyone on the right.

Do you follow my logic now?
These 2 users liked this post: Lord Beamish Bordeauxclaret

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5897 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Gary Lineker

Post by Rowls » Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:51 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:48 pm
So to summarise your view is that Sally Nugent (or any other host) should not have been actively promoting Marcus Rashford in his successful campaign in persuading the government to change their policy on providing free school meals to children during COVID.
Even though it was abundantly clear that the u turn the government did was directly as a result of Sally Nugent and other BBC breakfast hosts bringing to the publics attention and indeed actively promoting Rashford’s campaign.

Maybe Gary Lineker, Sally Nugent and others in the BBC think that what they are hoping to achieve from expressing their political views is far more important than some Mr Cholmondley-Warner 1930s type view of how a BBC presenter should remain impartial and just get on with reading the auto cue that has been approved by the Tory Director General ?
No, your "summary" of my view is actually a lot longer than what I posted and extrapolates far more than I actually said.

My view is that BBC presenters and hosts should abide by the impartiality guidelines.

Locked