Post match interviews v WBA
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 8831
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3016 times
- Has Liked: 1860 times
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
Scott knows he did his bit, the team were worthy of three points, sadly the officiating was from Aldi on a slow day.
horrific refereeing , a massive blow to us, and a game we deserved to win.
horrific refereeing , a massive blow to us, and a game we deserved to win.
-
- Posts: 8518
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2259 times
- Has Liked: 1241 times
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
The Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDEWile E Coyote wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 12:18 amScott knows he did his bit, the team were worthy of three points, sadly the officiating was from Aldi on a slow day.
horrific refereeing , a massive blow to us, and a game we deserved to win.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
But we also had a penalty turned down. Anyway even if jot we would still be at least a point better off. It was a truly awful decision. Baffling
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 150 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
- Location: Bournemouth
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
VAR would have made no difference last night. They would not have overturned the referee's decision, because he did touch the defender and they would have said it was down to the ref's interpretation of the so called 'foul'.
-
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 775 times
- Has Liked: 126 times
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
Don't forget Preston had a perfectly good goal disallowed against us too so it's swings and roundabouts regarding the goal, you win some you lose some.warksclaret wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 amThe Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDE
The clear home team biass on any 50/50 decisions was what was inexcusable for me from the officials.
-
- Posts: 6711
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
Did Bastards have a goal disallowed? I genuinely can’t remember.warksclaret wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 amThe Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDE
I do remember Preston having a good goal ruled out.
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
Sorry but the ref was in no position to see of there was a push. The lino would have been though. Did he speak to the ref via audio. If he did he needs to resign.Paulclaret wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:09 amVAR would have made no difference last night. They would not have overturned the referee's decision, because he did touch the defender and they would have said it was down to the ref's interpretation of the so called 'foul'.
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 150 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
- Location: Bournemouth
Re: Post match interviews v WBA
The fact that, in our opinion, the ref was in no position to see is totally irrelevant. VAR would only interfere if there was a clear and obvious error. The fact that there was a touch in the defender's back would mean that it was solely down to the referee's opinion whether or not in hindered him and VAR would stick with his decision.summitclaret wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:25 amSorry but the ref was in no position to see of there was a push. The lino would have been though. Did he speak to the ref via audio. If he did he needs to resign.
The fact that the ref was a wrong and a complete tosser is not in question.
